Skip to main content



Rifts growing in the Taliban over the ban on girls' schooling


Summary

Divisions are deepening within the Taliban over the ban on girls’ secondary education, with some senior officials opposing the policy.

Acting Deputy Foreign Minister Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai publicly condemned the ban as unjust and left Afghanistan for the UAE in protest.

Despite internal dissent, Supreme Leader Haibatullah Akhundzada and his loyalists continue to enforce strict restrictions. Around 2.2 million girls remain out of school.

Families risk fleeing the country, while new laws further limit women’s freedoms, solidifying Taliban control and making policy reversal unlikely.


in reply to qnfo

This entry was edited (2 minutes ago)



Aid cuts could have ‘pandemic-like effects’ on maternal deaths, WHO warns


Summary

UN agencies warn that global aid cuts, particularly from wealthy countries like the U.S., could cause a surge in maternal deaths, with effects comparable to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Maternal mortality fell 40% from 2000 to 2023 but progress has stalled, with 260,000 deaths last year. Cuts have led to clinic closures, job losses, and medicine shortages.

Conflict zones remain most at risk. Poor countries face maternal death rates 35 times higher than rich nations.

WHO calls for urgent investment in midwives, healthcare workers, and sustained global funding to prevent further setbacks.



'Your question is so stupid' Trump snaps when asked how much economic pain he'd tolerate


Summary

Trump snapped at a reporter who asked how much economic pain he was willing to inflict amid plunging markets triggered by his new tariffs.

Speaking after a weekend at his Florida resort, Trump dismissed speculation he was trying to crash the market, claiming tariffs would bring in "$1 trillion" and spur U.S. manufacturing.

When asked about a pain threshold for Americans, he called the question "so stupid," arguing economic “medicine” was necessary to reverse decades of "stupid leadership."

He insisted the strategy would make the U.S. "solid and strong again."

in reply to MicroWave

I think the answer is none, hence why he never paid contractors, and sold himself to Russia when he went under
in reply to MicroWave

His motives may be unclear, but his actions are crystal clear. He’s tried to enact tariffs already and been stopped before they were implemented because everyone knows the level of damage they cause. He’s moving forward this time. He’s deliberately crashing the global economy.

Why? Who knows? His Silicon Valley overlords demand it? I doubt it’s Putin, because Russia’s economy is hanging on by a thread, and the last thing they need is a global downturn, especially when it craters oil prices. Is it just that Trump is stupid, maybe senile, and ultimately in charge?

Regardless, the leader of the biggest economy in the world has decided that it’s time for a global recession/depression, so unless that course is changed, that’s probably what’s going to happen.





VOTE


Nearly 90 million people didn’t vote in the 2024 USA election. If you don’t want to become an American, don’t act like one.

🇨🇦 ✊ 🇨🇦 GET OUT AND VOTE 🇨🇦 ✊ 🇨🇦

no excuses: (elections.ca/home.aspx/)

in reply to BlackSheep

Here I thought it was my boomer parents canceling out my vote, when it was really people too lazy to stand up against Nazis.
in reply to PineRune

I’m a boomer. I have NEVER voted conservative! Please don’t blame/shame generations. It’s a “divide and conquer” tactic. (A MAGA tactic)


Notes on Civil Society’s Quasi-War with A Renegade President


My biggest takeaway, with new examples just over this weekend is this: most people outside that world, indeed, most people even in that world outside of NIH, don’t grasp what’s happening to the world of disease research and cure-finding. And the biggest barrier to is not just speed of what’s happened and lack of good information. It’s that people have a very difficult time believing it. We know that some people don’t want to fund Medicaid that goes to poor people. You may not think that way but it probably doesn’t surprise you that many people do. It’s very hard to people to believe that anyone is trying to end research into finding cures for diseases that affect everyone. The richest people get cancer and Alzheimers and Parkinson’s. Just yesterday I heard second hand from a power player in our society saying, ‘That makes no sense. Who would go after cancer research?’ And yet it is happening.
in reply to silence7

"Notes on A Renegade President's War Against Civil Soviety"


Bernie Sanders says U.S. under Trump is facing "unprecedented level of danger"



in reply to julian

Only 5 communities called 'Fediverse'? That's child's play, here on feddit.uk we have 14 communities called that.
in reply to julian

Might be our first post on here from NodeBB. I look forward to seeing more content from over there.



in reply to Nadia786

This looks like a blog post. Do you have a news source for it?
in reply to fubo

Check Dear:
cbsnews.com/news/central-park-…
This entry was edited (4 hours ago)
in reply to fubo

Yah cbsnews.com/news/central-park-…




Macron to EU colleagues: Stop buying American, buy European


in reply to Sine_Fine_Belli

This entry was edited (2 hours ago)
in reply to Sine_Fine_Belli

France has a sneaker brand called Le Coq. Why would anyone buy Nike when they can show off their Le Coq is beyond me.

in reply to cm0002

Genuinely never thought I'd join the war on China on the side of China.
in reply to cm0002

It’s not a big deal. Rare earth minerals aren’t that rare.

It’s the refining of rare earth minerals which is energy intensive and causes a great deal of pollution.

It was nice that China was destroying their own environment and spending the capital to build power plants. Now we will have to invest the capital to do it ourselves.


in reply to technocrit

They haven't encouraged this, they've been pretty critical of trump.

They're openly capitalist and liberal.

in reply to wise_pancake

Liberal in the British 19th-century sense: in favor of free trade abroad and rule of law at home-- the kind of political philosophy that would suit a Manchester factory owner.

The Guardian had similar origins, but has drifted slightly leftward since its founding. It's still more sympathetic to the LibDems than towards Labour, and its discomfort with socialism could be seen in their vitriolic hatred of Corbyn.