Skip to main content


in reply to foggenbooty

This is worse than you think. These firefighters are locked up, but if they "volunteer" for high risk duties that pay them jack shit, they can get out a little earlier.

Do we have to explain the perverse incentives this system encourages? It's so dirty.

in reply to fodor

I just had a convo with someone about how the most dangerous job at their factory, which involves repeatedly getting near a 1700 degree furnace, was always mandated to be the highest hourly rate, even if other jobs were skilled labor, and no one thought this was unfair in the slightest due to the dangers involved.

in reply to jackeroni

Lmao looked at this guy's post history and the tankie vibes are strong, literally only Russian propaganda in there.
in reply to itstoowet

HA! Yes "propaganda" that's what western media likes to portray it as, but i'm sure they have no ulterior motives or goals to further by discrediting the truth 😁

in reply to jackeroni

Not sure if it's just the Tass being Tass - but somehow her statements are totally missing the debt crisis.

Total corporate debt has reached RUB 86.2 trillion (about US$1.1 trillion), up 65% compared to the start of the full-scale war. Nearly half of this debt is owed by Russia’s 78 largest companies. One in six of them spends over a third of profits on interest payments, while 8% of the total debt is owed by companies that cannot even cover their loan servicing costs.


msn, bloomberg archived, themoscowtimes

Even though she claims inflation is falling (to 3-4% nonetheless) The Bank of Russia interest rate is still breathtaking 20% tradingeconomics

This entry was edited (7 months ago)


Kiev loses over 1,235 troops in all frontline areas in past day — Russia’s top brass


😁 💪

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Man I thought they meant mine as in extract mineral resources and was more upset than I needed to be


Key Ukrainian Allies Are Shifting Focus to Other Priorities


archive.ph/aRT5S

in reply to jackeroni

Just vote blue no matter who1.


  1. Some, restrictions, . ↩︎
This entry was edited (7 months ago)


Ukrainian UAV Bombs Filled With Banned Agent Chloropicrin Found in DPR - Russia's FSB


Of course, completely expected that the Nazis would resort to chemical warfare when the chips are down

in reply to KiwiTB



in reply to Zerush

I love how these people think “we told it not to break the rules” and think somehow the stochastic parrot has understood them and will obey.
in reply to Zerush

Really looks like a slightly abstract goatse reference.


NATO has picked a new ‘threat’ to bully


Of course they did, damn imperialism knows no bounds 🙄


Three Years of Nix and NixOS: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly


in reply to ikidd

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to ikidd

I have not used Nix, so I may not know what I am talking about.

That said, I have been using Chimera Linux which uses the APK package manager. It works by maintaining a single file in /etc/apk/world that specifies all the packages the user wants on the system. This is used to calculate dependencies and install packages. When you “add” and “del” packages, all it is really doing is adding and removing from this list. If you remove a package, it will remove all the dependencies too unless they appear in the “world” file.

If you do not specify a version number for a package, you get the latest. But you can pin versions of you want.

If you copy the world file from one system to another, you get the same set of installed packages.

So, if I use git to backup my world file, maybe a couple of other entries in /etc, and the dot files in my home directory, I have pretty much everything I need to completely recreate my system.

Is it really worth all the extra complexity of Nix?





Brazil's Victory for Digital Sovereignty


in reply to Avatar of Vengeance

Will he keep this dumb position when hes the one veing censored? Ill be waiting to see
in reply to FreudianCafe

Did you read the article? Be honest with me. Because nobody who attentively read the article would think this is a new censorship regime, rather than foreign tech monopolies being asked to follow the law. You're siding with Elon Musk now?
in reply to Avatar of Vengeance

You seem to confuse how things work on paper and how reality is. Platforms will take down any content that may get them sued. If you dont like what someone is doing, sue the platform for whatever hatespeech and they take the content down. But theres no need to argue, just wait and see
in reply to FreudianCafe

Telesur is not going to get censored by Brazilian law lmao, if platforms did that it would be a reprisal for being made to follow Brazilian law.

There is no good argument for the US oligarchy to get final say over the govts of the countries using their services, but this is even crazier to say when US platforms are littered with mysteriously unmoderated Nazi content. Get real?

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to Avatar of Vengeance

This fairytale seems real cool. But when you wake up check what pro israel agencies made out of hate speech worldwide, including Brasil, and try to guess what will happen
in reply to FreudianCafe

I'm the one spinning fairy tales?? You're telling me that these companies aren't already blocking people in accordance with their own policies shaped by those very organizations? I just think there is a misunderstanding here, because Bolsonaro would never do anything like this but you're reframing it as a win for him.

I sure hope nobody thinks of Brazil as a magic kingdom where only good things happening. For the govt there to actually grow a backbone and limit the influence of the orgs that are encouraging their petit boug to be little pro-US Evangelical nightmare beings would ve fantastic. The dominance of US tech & media is very very bad and other countries need actual sovereignty (like enforcing their laws on multinational companies and not legalizing their activities - at a bare minimum, as relying on them at all is a result of being deliberately underdeveloped)

These companies are very entwined with US state power it's imperialism and the privatization of the state that is an issue not third world sovereignty itself

in reply to FreudianCafe

No it's not! I hope you can see that uninhibited unlawful access by multinational media & telecom companies is exactly what leads to the establishment of comprador figures like Bolsonaro, who dislike Telesur's politics.

I'm actually glad you've raised this, as it helps me develop my thoughts on social libertarian left tech activism & its limitations. One of its dubious accomplishments is watering down the wrongs done by the US & allied governments with pop social science into generic anti-authoritarian rhetoric, and opposing actions by neo-colonized countries which limit foreign soft power + capital

in reply to Avatar of Vengeance

Thanks for teaching us that people like bolsonaro didnt get to power before the internet. Like FHC or Collor
in reply to FreudianCafe

Oh fuck off. It's the PCO person again with the bullshit muh freeze peach. Stop being a reactionary for 5 minutes, will you?
in reply to Kras Mazov

People who dont have anything meaningfull to say dont have to worry about that. You are free to block me, and i strongly encourage you to
in reply to Avatar of Vengeance

In 2014, after years of debate, Brazil's Congress ratified Law 12.965/2014, the Internet Civil Framework. This law required social media companies to delete posts and deplatform users who broke Brazilian laws. However, it placed the burden on Brazilian courts to identify the posts and accounts.


Is this meant to apply to all "users" of the platform or only Brazilian Citizens?

If it applies to Brazilian Citizens, that's all fine and good. But if I break brazilian law by criticizing their government, is lemmy.ml expected to "deplatform" and "censor" me?

in reply to PowerCrazy

all users persecutable by brazilian law. its not about internet access or the platforms themselves, its about what you say and do publicly. the internet is just an extension of it, its pretty much like you commited that crime IRL.

said criminal or racist shit on twitter, and courts caught wind of it? believe it or not straight to court. most people get away with it, but its harder if you are famous but not rich enough to dismiss the accusations. or if someone sues you for it of course.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to ☂️-

So you are telling me that when Israel makes their definition of "anti-semitism" illegal that everyone in the entire world that uses the internet has to abide by it? That doesn't seem desirable or sane at all.
in reply to PowerCrazy

everyone in the entire world, israel


where did you get that from? i didn't say any of this.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to ☂️-

That is the natural extension of your line of thinking is it not? Which users are "persecutable" by brazilian/Israeli law? If it's not just the citizens of Brazil (which i'm ok with, obviously a nation should be able to pass laws that apply to their citizens) but everyone "persecutable," doesn't that mean that a country that is sufficiently able to persecute anyone in the world is now justified to enforce their laws upon the entire world?
in reply to PowerCrazy

its really not.

brazil is not israel. brazil can't meddle anywhere else without serious consequences.

and yes, it would suck if it was a nazi country, but its not.

in reply to PowerCrazy

Yes, the person hosting a website has to abide by the laws of countries they want to avoid being blocked in. This is common sense unless you're Mark Zuckerberg. No human rights for zillionaires, sorry chuddy
in reply to Avatar of Vengeance

So is lemmy.ml breaking the law in brazil right now? And rather then laughing at the notion, you think it's a good thing? Yea you should probably change your name to Avatar of Fascism.
in reply to PowerCrazy

No it's not, also there is at least one Brazilian Lemmy instance, stop crying in my mentions because someone made Facebook and Twitter follow laws which ALREADY APPLIED TO EVERYONE ELSE. Replying to me will not bring your wife back or whatever this is.
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to Avatar of Vengeance

Which countries laws "ALREADY APPL[Y] TO EVERYONE ELSE?" Cause I'm pretty sure that isn't how laws of other countries work. I understand that you want countries to pass laws making it illegal for people to make fun of you on the Internet, but that's a laughable notion.
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to PowerCrazy

Quit pulling stuff out of your ass, I've been trying to explain this to you because I find the subject engaging. Unc I spoke to you for the same reason I speak to hobos, we're all human beings, but you were already testing my patience, this is ridiculous. I'm still not convinced you read the article. I'm saying other websites in Brazil have to follow the law, US social media companies have been ignoring it, while enforcing their own code of conduct modeled after US definition of "disinformation" and internet laws. The supreme court of Brazil is enforcing the preexisting laws on them. It seems like you are not grasping the basic details to me or you're just a lunatic
in reply to Avatar of Vengeance

I read the article. In-fact I started this thread asking for clarification to whom these laws apply. Then you went off on a tangent about Zuckerberg and implied i'm a "chud." So let me state how I think these laws apply, tell me if this is correct.

The Nation of Brazil passes a law that says the users of a website have to abide by Brazil's laws. I don't know what they meant by that, I assume lemmy.ml that is not hosted in Brazil isn't expected to know nor care about what Brazil's laws say. But if that were the case, then Facebook also wouldn't be expected to know nor care about what Brazil's laws say. The citizens of brazil that use facebook? Sure, they should be subject to those laws. But why should any other entity that exists outside of Brazil be obligated to know nor care about Brazilian law?

Those details seem pretty important, and the article doesn't address them at all, it merely says that Brazil's supreme court says that website are required to "deplatform" and "delete posts" of users who broke the law. But why should lemmy.ml abide by brazilian laws?

in reply to PowerCrazy

Lemmy.ml should abide by Brazilian laws because otherwise they'll get blocked in that country. I'm not much of a free speech fanatic. Ideally if people post a bunch of Nazi shit then Brazilian ISPs will be legally obliged to block it. The socdems in Brazil are rather lame so I have little faith in all of the "dark humor" Fb and Telegram groups getting nuked.

I'm not a lawyer, but, if you understand this isn't even a new law and it's just the end of impunity for US companies I don't see why you would frame this as an imminent threat to free speech. That's why I doubted you read.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)

in reply to Avatar of Vengeance

taiwan should simulate unification
This entry was edited (7 months ago)


Russia Base Metals Sales to China Surge, Signaling Deep Reliance


archive.ph/I8wrK


Peoples and Regimes: Anti-Imperialism and the Islamic Republic of Iran