Skip to main content



Bypass paywall clean calling home


Bypass Paywall Clean -call home

Having looked at various browsers and what calls they make, I noticed on Firefox and other android browsers that when Bypass Paywall Clean is installed from main source:
gitflic.ru/project/magnolia123…

It makes calls to gitflic.ru quite often wether using a bypass website or not.

Anyone know on what the calls are about and if they are legitimate and or what telemetry is being shared?

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to anamethatisnt

Yep, looks like this has the data for each site and what part to remove to bypass, so it would need frequent updates.
in reply to MangoPenguin

Looks quite possible. It does connect every time you visit a site on the bypass list but not viewing other sites.


Selfhosting -- temat zbiorczy


This entry was edited (6 months ago)


Officials from over 30 nations meet in Colombia to demand end to Gaza genocide


News Desk - JUL 16, 2025

Ministerial delegates from over 30 nations gathered in Bogotá, Colombia, for a two-day summit to discuss measures for the international community to stop Israel’s ongoing genocide of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

“Each state must immediately review and suspend all ties with the State of Israel … and ensure its private sector does the same,” UN special rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territory, Francesca Albanese, said on Tuesday. “The Israeli economy is structured to sustain the occupation that has now turned genocidal.”


in reply to QueenHawlSera

There needs to be a lawsuit against Visa because PayPal stoped authorizing payments to steam in certain regions?
in reply to QueenHawlSera

For unrelated reasons, yes, but I'm considering the possibility that payment processors know they'll be asked to prove they aren't facilitating illegal transactions, and may have asked Valve to make purchase details available to them for that purpose. If Valve agreed to remove content from the store instead of blowing up user privacy, that would be a win.

But it might just be the PPs being dickheads.



in reply to misk

But expecting neurodiverse people to thrive in an environment designed for neurotypical people is destined to fail, she thinks. "It's like handing someone the wrong game controller and then judging them for not being able to play the game."


I'm not sure that this is a good attitude to have. Therapy and individual treatment can help those who are neurodivergent to become adjusted and successful members of society. And learning can actually be good for you and expose you to stuff that might help in situations down the line in future.

I'm not against the idea of tools to assist those who are neurodivergent, but there's something to be said for overcoming diversity through work and practice and learning new skills.

i don't think its fair to expect failure because someone isn't "thriving" in an environment they're currently in.



About to crack


#adhd



in reply to Sunshine (she/her)

Now calculate the donations per active user and the difference becomes very small.
in reply to Nutomic

41425 MAU/$4250.39 = 9.74.../$1

1629 MAU/$60.86 = 26,76.../$1

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Kierunkowy74

But....
That is the exact opposite of what the comment asked for

assuming your numbers are correct:

4250,39 $ ÷ 41425 MAU = 0,1026 $/MAU

60,86 $ ÷ 1629 MAU = 0,0374 $/MAU

edit: formating

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Stitch0815

Both of those things demonstrate the same point:

Lemmy has more funding per user (or, similarly, fewer users per dollar) by a large margin

in reply to Sunshine (she/her)

can we say that it is insanely cheap?

for an online platform competing with the big social media companies a total of less than 500 per month is nothing.

want to know the cost per active user per month and compare when Reddit and Facebook overhead.

in reply to 🍉 Albert 🍉

That's specifically development funding. The hosting cost/funding is separate on an instance by instance basis, most likely the majority of funding comes from whoever owns/operates the instance.
in reply to 🍉 Albert 🍉

you're forgetting about hosting, administration, and moderation! Don't forget to donate to your instance folks


Den 4 juni 2024 sköts rapparen C. Gambino till döds i ett parkeringsgarage på Selma Lagerlöfs torg i Backa, Göteborg. Göteborgs tingsrätt har dömt tre personer för medhjälp till mord på den 26-årige mannen.

blog.zaramis.se/2025/07/16/tre…

This entry was edited (6 months ago)

in reply to misk

great..... csam movie trilogies and action figures..... child trafficking versions of kpop demon hunters.....

just what society needed 😮‍💨

homo sapiens is so not worth the trouble. mother nature should just incinerate us now and cut her losses.

in reply to misk

I don't see a need. Roblox is FULL of unlicensed IP copies. Apparently labooboo (so?) is the thing now. They cram whatever the cool IP is into every game.

Sonic the hedgehog movie comes out - all of a sudden there are sonic obstacle courses. Sonic idle games. Sonic PVP. Sonic tower defense.



Lucio Russo: un argine all’irrazionalismo


Il 12 luglio è mancato Lucio Russo, figura singolare di scienziato e umanista, proprio perché nel suo percorso culturale i due termini erano indissolubilmente intrecciati. Nato a Venezia nel 1944, laureato in fisica a Napoli e professore ordinario di calcolo delle probabilità a Roma Tor Vergata, ci ha lasciato contributi e riflessioni che vanno molto al di là di un circoscritto settore scientifico. I suoi studi di storia della scienza mostrano una coerenza del tutto particolare anche con gli interventi pubblici sulla politica dell’istruzione.

segue sul blog di ROARS



Media ljuger om Greta Thunberg. Många medier ljuger om Greta Thunberg och ett diplom hon fick. Diplomet var från en organsiation som av altl att döma står nära Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP).

blog.zaramis.se/2025/07/16/med…

This entry was edited (6 months ago)


I början av mars stoppade tulltjänstemännen vid Öresundsbron en norskregistrerad bil som kördes av en litauisk medborgare i 60-årsåldern. Han är också ägare av bilen. Bredvid honom satt hans jämnåriga ryska fru. De berättade att de varit på en längre semester i Litauen och är på väg hem till Norge där de bor.

blog.zaramis.se/2025/07/16/omb…



Efterlyst i Sverige och gripen i Irak. En 27-årig man som använder aliaset Dybdala har gripots av irakisk polis, Han greps enligt media för några veckor sedan i Erbil. Det ligger i den kurdiska delen av Irak av den lokala säkerhetspolisen, enligt uppgifter till SVT.

blog.zaramis.se/2025/07/16/eft…

This entry was edited (6 months ago)


Ross Scott Gets A Second Chance For His ‘Stop Killing Games’ Crusade


in reply to schnurrito

Setting aside piratesoftware's concerns (that it's economically untenable to require devs to develop a form of their game's source that would be publicly releasable), I'm not clear on why games should have this requirement and no other media, particularly when games are so much more complicated.

If we can't even require physical releases of any show or movie or album, because the company still owns the copyright and might choose to profit from it in the future, how can we expect active investment in the unwinding of their copyright from devs? Seems a double standard.

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to known_unknown

Any successful first step is a first step. Hopefully this should lead to more sensible things.
in reply to Telex

Like, I don't want to be misconstrued; I want to live in a world where this stuff is possible. I guess I just feel like Stop Killing Games is shortsighted in its current form, and will get caught on some technicality like this, that will ultimately sink it.

My hope is that if it comes to failure, it will be as you say, a first step towards driving this media preservation objective, and advance the conversation.

If it passed in its current form, my fear is that it would effectively be an extra tax and burden just for choosing to make games instead of some other type of media, and I'm concerned investors would see it that way too, and move their financial support to these surer bets, ultimately harming individual game developers and lessening game releases.

in reply to known_unknown

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to known_unknown

If it passed in its current form


It doesn't really have a "current" form.

An EU citizens initiative can really only outline what the goal is, and if passed, force the EU comission to investigate the problem to determine what an actual law could look like.

It would mostly harm always online live service models. This stuff only gets complicated if a game has micro-transactions, and therefore has to have a bunch of systems to handle payment and accounts.

If your game just does server-client/peer-to-peer multiplayer, like older games (and a lot of modern ones), there's barely any complexity to handle. Even less so if your game isn't online at all.

Basically every title on GOG would already comply with any law this might lead to. It's really not that demanding. The big publishers who nickle and dime their players are the only ones who would have a hard time. And that's a good thing.

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to known_unknown

Other media should. But getting it to happen on games is a good first step considering games are the MOST profitable form of media.
in reply to RightHandOfIkaros

They're also the most complicated, and the production budgets, the resources available for archival, are often higher on blockbuster movies, as well as the barrier to entry being lower, for them to participate in archival, there's no such thing as spaghetti code in a movie

Like, why games first, unless you're specifically trying to tamp down their profitability as compared to other forms of media? I'm suspicious that this is the kind of shit the MPAA would pull because they're getting outcompeted.

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to known_unknown

Because movies and series don't need it as much. Because piracy is a thing. You can watch any series that was pulled from air even if there's no DVD because you can download it. Even if you download some games, you can't play them because they're online only. See the crew as a prime example, as others have said.
in reply to known_unknown

So, I have no idea how purchasing a show or movie (to own) digitally works, but I would think that at least you wouldn't have to worry about a server being taken down and not being able to access the movie, and I'm 100% certain that it's not a problem when you have a physical disk. The thing is, most media isn't being watched this way. It's watched on Netflix or any other streaming service where you aren't actually paying for a movie itself, which is why it's okay for them to delist it and you not be able to watch it anymore.

The reason that Stop Killing Games is happening is because people own a disk of The Crew and are physically unable to play the game now

in reply to known_unknown

This campaign is not asking to take away IP from devs or publishers, they would still retain it.

Legally speaking, a game sold for a single payment and without clear stipulation of an end of service would be considered a Good under EU law. Tjis means you're purchasing a perpetual license to your specific copy of the game, but not to the IP or copyright.

Ross, the creator of the SKG campaign, goes into extreme detail on this very topic of goods vs services, and how the game industry is committing fraud by destroying a customer's ability to access the content their perpetual license allows.

in reply to ProdigalFrog

The equivalent for other media would be that if I buy a digital copy of a film or something, I should always be able to access it in the same resolution and whatnot that I purchased it. That's outside the scope of this campaign, but this campaign would certainly pave the way for it.
in reply to known_unknown

It sounds like you're asking genuinely. Ross' interest is in games, hence that's the area he started it in. He's already stretched to his limit co-ordinating this limited campaign. He also advised to keep the scope limited so that the opposition to it will be mostly from games companies (Nintendo, Sony, Ubisoft, EA etc.) Than from movie companies (Paramount, Disney, Warner Bros. etc.) who will be also pushing as hard, using a lot of lobby money and a whole web of arguments from different fronts, that will be more difficult to deconstruct and rebut.

For other audio and visual content, there are often "analog loopholes" that can preserve media even if in a slightly degraded form no matter how many layers of DRM you put. Games do not have a standard method to do that, so access is unilaterally and permanently taken away without a way for it to have been preserved.

in reply to known_unknown

Nothing about the initiative says anything about “requiring devs to develop a form of their game’s source that would be publicly available”. Where did you see that?
in reply to Arcane2077

Seeing multiple people pushing source code to misrepresent the movement makes me start to think they are bad faith actors.
in reply to known_unknown

in reply to known_unknown

in reply to Lfrith

By the way, situation with Hitman is interesting, because petition as it stands, will not address the issue with it specifically. Hitman technically has offline mode, and it's even playable as a game. The fact that it doesn't have that part that makes it so interesting isn't actually addressed.
in reply to known_unknown

require devs to develop a form of their game’s source that would be publicly releasable


That's not a requirement or even expectation. The petition just requests that the game be reasonably playable after support ends, and only for people who bought it. That's it. That could mean:

  • release the server binaries so they can be self hosted
  • bake server logic into client and allow P2P play
  • for some games, merely remove the server requirement and allow single player

Or whatever other option the studio prefers. The only expectation is that the game is still playable in some meaningful fashion after support ends. How they achieve that is up to them.

For all of these options, they don't need to:

  • release source code
  • give up any IP rights
  • allow anyone who hasn't bought the game to play

The petition is intentionally vague on solutions to give publishers and studios as much choice in how they comply as possible.



It might be too late for the Threadiverse...


This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to cm0002

There's a lot of bumpiness involved with setting up the fediverse and not every instance, frontend, project and app will work out in the end. The fediverse is relatively young compared to Facebook. Though as we venture further into our journey the sharper we become.
in reply to Proudly Green

This entry was edited (6 months ago)

in reply to Sunshine (she/her)

They were definitely the most active Lemmy vegan instance, filling a much needed niche that counts their weight in gold. I hope they may return one day. Lemmy 1.0 will definitely makes the future experience much smoother for every admin.
This entry was edited (6 months ago)