Skip to main content



Tuya soil sensor integration


I'm attempting to add a no-name chinese solar wifi soil sensor to my HA server and have a couple questions. I was able to pair the device to the Smart Life app, add the Tuya integration to HA, link my Smart Life account to the HA integration, and recognize the device from that integration.

The device in the Smart Life app shows sensor readings for temperature, moisture, and nutrient levels, but the only sensor reading available in HA is temperature.
So I guess I have 2 questions:
1. How to get HA to recognize the other sensors from this device?
2. Is there any way directly connect a device like this to HA without linking to a Smart Life account?



this always cheers me up


take a bike ride around the city, maybe do some errands you've been planning, get that sense of accomplishment and feel the breeze on your concealed face, that's what I call a chill vibe alright
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to culprit

*allegedly. He was with me at the time of the murder.




SLIC Superpixels




What's the deal with Reddit and Zelensky?


Just that. Someone uploaded this photo of Zelensky allegedly taking a selfie in Kupiansk, which is supposed to be a city already taken by Russian forces. I am not really informed of the situation in Kupiansk, but this is not the issue for me.

In the Politics subreddit, where this was published, the comments are overwhelmingly pro Ukraine, which, well, checks out. But what I find kind of trollish, are the comments surrounding Zelenksy. It's like reading the five-star comments of the Google Play Services app in the Play Store, or something. They repeatedly talk about how big and glorious are Zelensky's balls? Praising his balls, even though, he is a smaller guy? They praise the bold actions of Zelensky calling him a European hero, imagining his heroic dialogues as in some cheap hollywood movie, etc. To me, it just feels utterly fake? I mean, AI fake.

What do you make of this, guys? Please, remember, it's not about the conflict itself.



What is the AI vibe at work like for you?


I have a boss who tells us weekly that everything we do should start with AI. Researching? Ask ChatGPT first. Writing an email or a document? Get ChatGPT to do it.

They send me documents they "put together" that are clearly ChatGPT generated, with no shame. They tell us that if we aren't doing these things, our careers will be dead. And their boss is bought in to AI just as much, and so on.

I feel like I am living in a nightmare.

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

While this sounds like a good idea, leaving individual decisions to people, longterm it is quite dumb.

  • if you let an LLM solve your software dev problems, you learn nothing. You don't get better at handling this problem, you don't get faster, you don't get experience in spotting the same problem and having a solution ready.
  • you don't train junior devs this way, and in 20 years there will be (or would be without the bubble popping) a massive need for skilled software developers. (and other specialists in other fields. Better pray that medical doctors handle their profession differently..)
  • you really enjoy tweaking a prompt, dealing with "lying" LLMs and the occasional deleted harddrive? Is this really what you want to do as a job?
  • (bonus point) Would your company be ok with someone paying a remote worker to do his tasks for a fraction of the salary, and then do nothing? I doubt that. so, apparently it does matter how the work gets done.
in reply to mavu

Old enough to remember how people made these same arguments about writing in anything but assembly, using garbage collection, and so on. Technology moves on, and every time there's a new way to do things people who invested time into doing things the old way end up being upset. You're just doing moral panic here.

It's also very clear that you haven't used these tools yourself, and you're just making up a straw man workflow that is divorced from reality.

Meanwhile, your bonus point has nothing to do with technology itself. You're complaining about how capitalism works.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

All the technologies you listed behave deterministically, or at least predictably enough that we generally don't have to worry about surprises from that abstraction layer. Technology does not just move on, practitioners need to actually find it practical beyond their next project that satisfies the shareholders.
in reply to zbyte64

Again, you're discussing tools you haven't actually used and you clearly have no clue how they work. If you had, then you would realize that agents can work against tests, which act as a contract they fill. I use these tools on daily basis and I have no idea what these surprises you're talking about are. As a practitioner, I find these things plenty practical.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

I've literally integrated LLMs into a materials optimizations routine at Apple. It's dangerous to assume what strangers do and do not know.
in reply to zbyte64

I'm not assuming anything. Either you have not used these tools seriously, or you're intentionally lying here. Your description of how these tools work and their capabilities is at odds with reality. It's dangerous to make shit up when talking to people who are well versed in a subject.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Your description of the tools was to make an inaccurate comparison. But sure, I am the "dangerous" one for showing how those examples are deterministic while gAI is not. Your responses with personal attacks makes it harder to address your claims and makes me think you are here to convince yourself and not others.
This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to zbyte64

I didn't make any inaccurate comparisons. The whole deterministic LLM argument was just the straw man you were making. I'm merely pointing out your dishonesty here, if you choose to perceive it as a personal attack that's on you.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Honestly not sure what I expected in terms of a response but this is certainly an interesting reaction. "Calling someone dishonest is not a personal attack" is certainly a take. It's also interesting that dishonesty is your automatic conclusion when there are other alternatives when someone approached you with a different professional experience; absent is the tendency of expert practitioners to be curious about contextual clues that can lead to different outcomes. I'm going to take your criticism in good faith and recognize this is probably the standard you hold yourself to: that any part of yourself that does not comport to the current ideal is to be treated with suspicion.
in reply to zbyte64

I gave you the benefit of the doubt initially assuming you simply haven't used these tools. Now, you've come back and emphatically stated that you have. Given that what you describe is not how these tools work, it's very clear that you are being dishonest by your own admission. Now you're just using sophistry to paper over that.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Just as you questioned my intention with accusations of dishonesty I am wondering what your intention is when disparaging a random person's professional pedigrees (with no effort to make the person known to yourself first). I made my perspective on this known to you and I am trying to understand what your intention was as it does not aide in the debate you so vigilantly protect.
in reply to zbyte64

I can only go by what you say here which is frankly nonsense. I've explained to you that any serious software project relies on practices like tests and code reviews to ensure quality of the code being produced. Whether the code is written by a tool or a human is entirely beside the point. It should be treated the same way. Anybody who's actually written code knows that humans are fallible and make plenty of mistakes, so your argument about hallucinations applies to human written code exactly the same way. The way to deal with it in both cases is by having contracts that the code fulfills. My intention is to correct misinformation that people such as yourself are spreading.
This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Yeah, I wasn't asking for your professional opinion on gAI but why you feel the need to attack people's professional reputation when it can only detract from your argument. I have no intention of debating someone who levels such insults but I am happy to talk about the emotional needs around such actions.
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to zbyte64

Stop playing a victim. If you don't want people to call out your bullshit then don't post nonsense. It's that simple. The only one being emotional here is you. Feel free to actually address what I said instead of whinging.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Interesting, I didn't accuse you of being emotional just that you have emotional needs. Everyone has emotional needs. Nonviolent Communication is a great tool for disentangling judgements from needs; for example, calling me dishonest speaks to a need for integrity.
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to zbyte64

What you're doing here is called sophistry. You're intentionally trying to derail the discussion from the actual substantive points. It's rather artless and transparent.
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

If it is as transparent as you say then you wouldn't have the need to comment any further. So why did you?
in reply to zbyte64

For the benefit of other people who might be reading this thread. You're the subject here, not a conversation partner.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Old enough to remember how people made these same arguments about writing in anything but assembly, using garbage collection, and so on. Technology moves on, and every time there’s a new way to do things people who invested time into doing things the old way end up being upset. You’re just doing moral panic here.


If this is an example of your level of reading comprehension, then i guess it's no surprise that you find LLMs work well for you.
Your answer addresses none of the points i made, and just tries to do the Jedi-mind-trick-handwave, which unfortunately doesn't work in real life.

in reply to mavu

Correct, my answer does not address obvious straw man points of scenarios that don't exist in the real world.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

that don’t exist in the real world.


A bit like your ability to reason and provide arguments. But i guess that happens when you have used LLMs for too long.

in reply to mavu

I guess using personal attacks like a child is all you can do when you don't have any actual point to make.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

I'm sorry?

You have the gall to tell that to me, after the first thing you do is falsely accusing me of using straw man arguments and making things up.

And then come here, after providing zero actual counterpoints and tell me I am acting like a child?

Incredible.

in reply to mavu

You haven't made any arguments that warrant counterpoints. Go do your trolling somewhere else.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Of course, the end point of everyone who doesn't really have any facts and just vibes on the internet.

Very predictable.

in reply to mavu

Even a chatbot could come up with a better comeback. 🤣


At least 11 die in storm-hit Gaza from cold and collapsing buildings




At least 11 die in storm-hit Gaza from cold and collapsing buildings




At least 11 die in storm-hit Gaza from cold and collapsing buildings


By Mera Aladam
12 December 2025 10:20 GMT

Overall, at least 13 buildings - already partly damaged from Israeli bombing - collapsed due to heavy rain and strong winds, according to the Gaza-based Government Media Office. Some people remain trapped under the rubble, with others wounded.

Meanwhile, over 27,000 tents of displaced families have been destroyed or swept away by floods and strong winds. More than 250,000 displaced people have been affected by rain, floods, and collapsing shelters.

Over 4,300 distress calls have been made across the Gaza Strip since the storm began earlier this week, the Ministry of Interior and National Security said.

Despite limited resources, the ministry said search-and-rescue civil defence teams, along with police, are doing their best to help people.



Israel’s expanding ‘Yellow Line’ swallows Gaza districts and uproots families




Israel’s expanding ‘Yellow Line’ swallows Gaza districts and uproots families




Israel’s expanding ‘Yellow Line’ swallows Gaza districts and uproots families


By Maha Hussaini in Gaza City, occupied Palestine
13 December 2025 09:44 GMT

“From the first day we came back, we heard bombardment, demolitions and gunfire,” Hamed said.

“It would start at sunset and continue until dawn.”

At first, they assumed the explosions were far away, believing the Yellow Line was still distant.

But now, Hamed can see the yellow concrete blocks placed by Israeli forces from his window – a sight that wasn’t there just weeks ago.

Across Gaza, the temporary demarcation line has been shifting, creeping ever closer to densely populated areas and fuelling fears of renewed displacement and violence by Israel.




Are canadians friendly to people from other countries?


I plan on traveling to Canada, but I do have this worry.

To be more specific, I'm not kinda black, my skin's somehow white, but I have black relatives, which means I got wavy hair and some other things.

in reply to fancy-straw-simple

Alright, off Qebec, off Alberta, off islands and off rural zones. This post's getting helpful.



Home Assistant and VLANs/Other Networks





in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

I heard about that! Heat from data centers is harder, unfortunately, because the amount of waste heat generated by a nuclear reactor is far higher than the amount generated by a data center. With smaller quantities of heat come greater costs to recuperate it, at least until they link all the waste-heat sources up into a single network that can collect from multiple data centers.

China is moving fast, though. I bet we'll see some kind of project like this before the bubble pops in the US.