Their operations become somewhat declassified after X years (I don't remember the exact number, but there is law for it). You can see many of their documents on the CIA website. For example, the Aerodynamic operation.
I mean basically everything bad ever right? Coups and proxy wars all over the world, spying on everyone, torturing, human trafficking, drug experiments, assassinations, mass murder, etc.
Can you point to relevant documents? I have heard of involvement in coups but I have not heard anything about them being behind so-called color revolutions, which I believe is a dangerous made up word used to justify imperialist repression against dissidents and protesters.
Some on the right are now referring to the current events in Minnesota as a color revolution, and I believe this is a result of our lack of criticism of this very dubious term.
There's simply no evidence any nation has been able to engineer a popular uprising. Such a thing is not possible. People feel how they feel and they hate their government for a reason.
It's just selectively chosen and distorted facts and invectives against the enemies of authoritarian leftists. It's not a serious attempt to document reality.
As an example, I looked at the page on color revolutions the user above recommended. It's just a series of unsupported assertions with no supporting evidence. It literally doesn't contain a single reference.
I do find it useful for evaluating leftists though. I find when prolewiki criticizes them then it's usually because they actually care about facts and have consistent values. So it does have some use.
References Statista (2022). Catolicismo y evangelismo: las dos religiones más comunes en Latinoamérica – Statista UNDP Human Development Report (2021-22). Human Devlopment Report 2021/22 – UNDP "Chile: The Failed Socialist Revolution" (2019-09-14). Politsturm. Archived from the original on 2021-08-27. Retrieved 2022-06-12. Jeremy Kuzmarov (2022-09-21). "Murder on Embassy Row—46 Years On: Remembering the Assassination of Orlando Letelier and Ronni Moffitt" CovertAction Magazine. Archived from the original on 2024-07-23. Vijay Prashad (2008). The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World: 'La Paz' (pp. 147–8). [PDF] The New Press. ISBN 9781595583420 [LG] Notes Spanish: República de Chile
There are also people like Chris Hedges, Greg Palast and multiple others. But I already knew you weren't sincere and wouldn't accept any sources.
What I find fascinating, and I've certainly been guilty in years past, is the louder and more "confident" people are, the more uninformed,
... show more
References Statista (2022). Catolicismo y evangelismo: las dos religiones más comunes en Latinoamérica – Statista UNDP Human Development Report (2021-22). Human Devlopment Report 2021/22 – UNDP "Chile: The Failed Socialist Revolution" (2019-09-14). Politsturm. Archived from the original on 2021-08-27. Retrieved 2022-06-12. Jeremy Kuzmarov (2022-09-21). "Murder on Embassy Row—46 Years On: Remembering the Assassination of Orlando Letelier and Ronni Moffitt" CovertAction Magazine. Archived from the original on 2024-07-23. Vijay Prashad (2008). The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World: 'La Paz' (pp. 147–8). [PDF] The New Press. ISBN 9781595583420 [LG] Notes Spanish: República de Chile
There are also people like Chris Hedges, Greg Palast and multiple others. But I already knew you weren't sincere and wouldn't accept any sources.
What I find fascinating, and I've certainly been guilty in years past, is the louder and more "confident" people are, the more uninformed, misinformed, or guilty they turn out to be.
I reacted the way I did because you basically said "lol google it nerd" instead of providing useful information. You get what you give in online discourse.
Anyone can see what this guy is trying to do here. If mods are removing my comment about it for 'bad jacketing' that says a lot about them. I guess 'lefty' here is the embarrassing american Dem/lib "we're not Republicans" and not more.
Well I am using the term as distinct from a coup. A coup is when a small circle of power holders (usually but not always the military) seize power without the involvement of the masses.
When people talk about color revolutions in my experience, it's usually an attempt to smear popular uprisings as being artificially created by some hostile foreign power. To my knowledge, such a thing has never happened. This is because it's far more difficult to motivate the thousands or even millions of people needed to take such actions. You can't simply pay them off or order them the way you can with a handful of generals.
The Shah was put in power in one of many coups supported or orchestrated by the US. But I would not describe it as a color revolution because there was little involvement of the general public. It was a struggle between elite factions.
Roosevelt quickly seized control of the Iranian press by buying them off with bribes and circulating anti-Mossadegh propaganda. He recruited allies among the Islamic clergy
In August 2013, the U.S. government formally acknowledged the U.S. role in the coup by releasing a bulk of previously classified government documents that show it was in charge of both the planning and the execution of the coup. According to American journalist Stephen Kinzer, the operation included false flag attacks, paid protesters, provocations, the bribing of Iranian politicians and high-ranking security and army officials, as well as pro-coup propaganda.
Roosevelt quickly seized control of the Iranian press by buying them off with bribes and circulating anti-Mossadegh propaganda. He recruited allies among the Islamic clergy
In August 2013, the U.S. government formally acknowledged the U.S. role in the coup by releasing a bulk of previously classified government documents that show it was in charge of both the planning and the execution of the coup. According to American journalist Stephen Kinzer, the operation included false flag attacks, paid protesters, provocations, the bribing of Iranian politicians and high-ranking security and army officials, as well as pro-coup propaganda.
So I guess you're saying that a truly popular uprising, like a spontaneous movement of the people orchestrated by the an imperial power has never happened? How narrowly do you need to define your definition, like, what evidence would convince you? I think your "its never happened" is an over correction, out of annoyance with online ML default talking points. And that's understandable, they can be ridiculous. But where an online ML misapplies the label of a color revolution to a popular uprising, the opposite of that is not the truth. And practically, declaring the opposite of an untruth to be the truth is not the best way to combat misinformation.
Idk how practical it is to nitpick this in our current struggles. Like the tea party was kind of an inside job, right? The right wing funded, and continues to fund, a bunch of loonies to attack liberal democracy, directly connected to Koch money, which continues to fund the Heritage foundation and project 2025. Hell, it even appears that Epstein and collaborators had something to do with 4 Chan and Qanon, so the January 6th attack was heavily influenced by private capital with government connections in intelligence in the USA and Israel.
Also its not like Radio Free Asia was just some hobby amongst people interested in liberating their own countries, they are concerted efforts to sway public opinion toward outcomes favorable to the US. Why would they waste the resources if there wasnt a popular component needed to affect real change? Were we just wasting time and resources?
At what point does a corporation capable of affecting public policy, like an oil company (relevant in every example), when they fund protestors, or counter protesters, how do you slice that? Was it like 3 months ago when a bunch of old Mexican business people donned one piece shirts, and protested the social democratic policies of Mexico's president Sheinbaum, using Trumpian talking points like resistance to cartels? If those business leaders or organizers had any connection to US intelligence, how does that figure? Or with the numerous failed coups in Venezuela, where the US declared Juan Guaido president? The US verifiably had connections with Venezuelan businesses and right wing leaders in orchestrating capital strikes and various economic attacks against the people.
If we crush the economy of a country and that causes a popular uprising, how does that figure? Does that ever happen completely absent of mass propaganda? I dont think so.
Like its very messy and amorphous, constantly changing and shifting dynamics, I think you're being too hard and fast with how you want to categorize, or decategorize, a color revolution. And the reason is kinda silly. To me its like youre saying that because (almost) everything is an op, then absolutely nothing is. Not a single tankie gets owned by being a different stripe of wrong, and certainly no one is educated. Campism creates as many enemies of a cause as it creates allies, because truth isnt weighed according to facts but by opposition to the other.
If you want to defeat tankies, or any political sect, you have to out-organize them, not steelman or debate. So it's not even a very practical position.
You can literally read documents that have been declassified. Anyone can. Even if you are being pedantic, they released their own classified documents. If that doesn't count as admission i honestly don't know what would.
I'm not doing research to support your claims. That's your job. The CIA has declassified mountains of documents, most of which are irrelevant to this question. And I can't prove that something is not in there. You can prove it is. Or you can fail to do so.
I have yo. Yet you still disagree. If you won't look at it yourself, then don't act like you have any leg to stand on. You can't say the sky is falling then refuse to look up.
I'm just asking people to share information and substantiate their claims. If they won't do so then I assume they're full of shit. That's just how this works.
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
And people will still continue that 'Conspiracy theorists are nutjobs' rhetoric.
Yes, don't get me wrong, believing that there are lizard people or aliens pulling the strings is questionable. But when somebody points at something highly suspicious and says, "hey, look at this, isn't that weird?" if your first response is, "go get your tinfoil hat" then you're being closeminded. So much in the Epstein files was called years and years ago, and even today people are reluctant to believe it.
WHEN DOES A SEPARATIST movement become a threat to Canada’s national security?
This is a question hanging in the air in Alberta. People are asking how it can possibly be that the very same individuals who are leading the separatist movement can also be three meetings deep into a relationship with senior officials of the Donald Trump administration in Washington, with a fourth scheduled for this month.
It is, as we know, entirely legal in Canada to advocate and campaign in support of a province or territory leaving Confederation. This is covered by the Clarity Act but also by the Charter, which protects the rights of citizens to free expression, assembly, and association.
Any organic political movement that is based in a genuine desire to achieve an outcome of their design is free to pursue that through whatever lawful means are available to them. Foreign interference in such movements, however, is where the line between lawful advocacy and dissent crosses into territory that constitutes a threat to Canada’s national security.
The Canadian Securi
... show more
WHEN DOES A SEPARATIST movement become a threat to Canada’s national security?
This is a question hanging in the air in Alberta. People are asking how it can possibly be that the very same individuals who are leading the separatist movement can also be three meetings deep into a relationship with senior officials of the Donald Trump administration in Washington, with a fourth scheduled for this month.
It is, as we know, entirely legal in Canada to advocate and campaign in support of a province or territory leaving Confederation. This is covered by the Clarity Act but also by the Charter, which protects the rights of citizens to free expression, assembly, and association.
Any organic political movement that is based in a genuine desire to achieve an outcome of their design is free to pursue that through whatever lawful means are available to them. Foreign interference in such movements, however, is where the line between lawful advocacy and dissent crosses into territory that constitutes a threat to Canada’s national security.
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act is clear on this. CSIS itself does not have a mandate to investigate “lawful advocacy, protest or dissent” unless these forms of activity are carried on in conjunction with the range of activities which the act defines as threats to the security of Canada.
Those threats include espionage or sabotage harmful to Canada’s interests; covert or deceptive foreign-influenced activities that undermine Canada or threaten individuals; support for or direction of serious violence against people or property to achieve political, religious, or ideological goals; and covert, unlawful acts aimed at undermining, overthrowing, or destroying Canada’s constitutionally established system of government through violence. In short, the act draws a clear line between protected democratic activity and conduct that involves foreign interference, secrecy, violence, or efforts to subvert the state itself.
They seem to think they’ll get to give Alberta resources to the grifter. In a way I wish they’d do it so I could laugh in their faces when they get shafted by him as well as everyone else he’s conned.
I have a little trouble understanding people who are interested in joining Trump in anything. Do you honestly think you can come out on top in an alliance with Donald?
gotta think strategically. it's not the time to be leftist right now. we just gotta wait until elections and put kamala hamala in power.
then we rest assured fascism doesn't exist anymore as long as you keep voting for whoever you think is not fascist. but for now just give everything they want so they don't get angry.
"Oh no by moving left we mean we're going to very strongly condemn ice but then also condemn anyone principled enough to take a real stance" - Average shitlib
The 1930s famine in the USSR was not intentionally inflicted nor directed, and therefore was not a genocide. What happened was a combination of adverse weather conditions with kulaks, bourgeois farmers, burning their crops and killing their livestock to resist collectivization. Collectivization increased agricultural output and ended famine in regions where it was historically common.
As for the Falun Gong, they are a cult, not an ethnicity, and the PRC isn't killing them en masse, just repressing it as an anti-communist and western-funded cult. Same as the idea of Uyghur genocide, atrocity propaganda akin to claiming that there's "white genocide" in South Africa, Christian genocide in Nigeria, or that Hamas sexually assaulted babies in Operation Al-Aqsa Flood.
In the case of Xinjiang, the area is crucial in the Belt and Road Initiative, so the west backed sepratist groups in order to destabilize the region. China responded with vocational programs and de-radicalization efforts, which the west then twisted into claims of "genocide." Nevermind that the
... show more
The 1930s famine in the USSR was not intentionally inflicted nor directed, and therefore was not a genocide. What happened was a combination of adverse weather conditions with kulaks, bourgeois farmers, burning their crops and killing their livestock to resist collectivization. Collectivization increased agricultural output and ended famine in regions where it was historically common.
As for the Falun Gong, they are a cult, not an ethnicity, and the PRC isn't killing them en masse, just repressing it as an anti-communist and western-funded cult. Same as the idea of Uyghur genocide, atrocity propaganda akin to claiming that there's "white genocide" in South Africa, Christian genocide in Nigeria, or that Hamas sexually assaulted babies in Operation Al-Aqsa Flood.
In the case of Xinjiang, the area is crucial in the Belt and Road Initiative, so the west backed sepratist groups in order to destabilize the region. China responded with vocational programs and de-radicalization efforts, which the west then twisted into claims of "genocide." Nevermind that the west responds to seperatism with mass violence, and thus re-education programs focused on rehabilitation are far more humane, the tool was used both for outright violence by the west into a useful narrative to feed its own citizens.
The best and most comprehensive resource I have seen so far is Qiao Collective's Xinjiang: A Resource and Report Compilation. Qiao Collective is explicitly pro-PRC, but this is an extremely comprehensive write-up of the entire background of the events, the timeline of reports, and real and fake claims.
Tourists do go to Xinjiang all the time as well. You can watch , though it obviously isn't going to be a comprehensive view of a complex situation like this.
Western governments have levied false allegations of genocide and slavery in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. A closer look makes clear that the politicization of China’s anti-terrorism policies in Xinjiang is another front of the U.S.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomo… Holodomor was a genocide. Ukraine had grain quotas and Stalin exported them instead of feeding the Ukrainians. And collectivization of farmers was not an act against bourgeois but against farmers that are not member of the party. My village too they just give the land of nonparty members to party members creating new bourgeois.
Genocide against Falun gong and muslims is still genocide. Organs are harvested and they do slave labor torture. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecut…
The famine was not preventable, and there's absolutely no evidence that the soviets wanted to replace ethnic minorities, the opposite is true. The soviets tried to preserve Ukrainian culture while establishing a common "soviet identity," in line with being a multinational federation. The kulak system was a bourgeois system of farming, where wealthy farmers employed poor laboring workers to toil the land, and collectivization improved yields while equalizing distribution.
The Politburo was also kept in the dark about how bad the famine was getting:
From: Archive of the President of the Russian Federation. Fond 3, Record Series 40, File 80, Page 58.
Excerpt from the protocol number of the meeting of the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist party (Bolsheviks) “Regarding Measures to Prevent Failure to Sow in Ukraine, March 16th, 1932.
The Political Bureau believes that shortage of seed grain in Ukraine is many times worse than what was d
... show more
Incorrect on all counts.
The famine was not preventable, and there's absolutely no evidence that the soviets wanted to replace ethnic minorities, the opposite is true. The soviets tried to preserve Ukrainian culture while establishing a common "soviet identity," in line with being a multinational federation. The kulak system was a bourgeois system of farming, where wealthy farmers employed poor laboring workers to toil the land, and collectivization improved yields while equalizing distribution.
The Politburo was also kept in the dark about how bad the famine was getting:
From: Archive of the President of the Russian Federation. Fond 3, Record Series 40, File 80, Page 58.
Excerpt from the protocol number of the meeting of the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist party (Bolsheviks) “Regarding Measures to Prevent Failure to Sow in Ukraine, March 16th, 1932.
The Political Bureau believes that shortage of seed grain in Ukraine is many times worse than what was described in comrade Kosior’s telegram; therefore, the Political Bureau recommends the Central Committee of the Communist party of Ukraine to take all measures within its reach to prevent the threat of failing to sow [field crops] in Ukraine.
Signed: Secretary of the Central Committee – J. STALIN
Letter to Joseph Stalin from Stanislaw Kosior, 1st secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine regarding the course and the perspectives of the sowing campaign in Ukraine, April 26th, 1932.
There are also isolated cases of starvation, and even whole villages [starving]; however, this is only the result of bungling on the local level, deviations [from the party line], especially in regard of kolkhozes. All rumours about “famine” in Ukraine must be unconditionally rejected. The crucial help that was provided for Ukraine will give us the opportunity to eradicate all such outbreaks [of starvation].
Letter from Joseph Stalin to Stanislaw Kosior, 1st secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine, April 26th, 1932.
Comrade Kosior!
You must read attached summaries. Judging by this information, it looks like the Soviet authority has ceased to exist in some areas of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. Can this be true? Is the situation invillages in Ukraine this bad? Where are the operatives of the OGPU [Joint Main Political Directorate], what are they doing?
Could you verify this information and inform the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist party about taken measures.
Sincerely, J. Stalin
The origins of such a story of forced starvation came from the Nazi newspaper Völkischer Beobachter in 1933. Völkischer Beobachter reported on it as intentional, and then spread the story around further. All evidence post-opening of the soviet archives points to it not being intentional.
As for Falun Gong, they are persecuted as a subversive cult and terrorist agency. They are not an ethnicity. There is no organ harvesting or torture, these are baseless western allegations, just like "white genocide" in South Africa. Directing you back to my previous comment:
As for the Falun Gong, they are a cult, not an ethnicity, and the PRC isn't killing them en masse, just repressing it as an anti-communist and western-funded cult. Same as the idea of Uyghur genocide, atrocity propaganda akin to claiming that there's "white genocide" in South Africa, Christian genocide in Nigeria, or that Hamas sexually assaulted babies in Operation Al-Aqsa Flood.
In the case of Xinjiang, the area is crucial in the Belt and Road Initiative, so the west backed sepratist groups in order to destabilize the region. China responded with vocational programs and de-radicalization efforts, which the west then twisted into claims of "genocide." Nevermind that the west responds to seperatism with mass violence, and thus re-education programs focused on rehabilitation are far more humane, the tool was used both for outright violence by the west into a useful narrative to feed its own citizens.
The best and most comprehensive resource I have seen so far is Qiao Collective's Xinjiang: A Resource and Report Compilation. Qiao Collective is explicitly pro-PRC, but this is an extremely comprehensive write-up of the entire background of the events, the timeline of reports, and real and fake claims.
Tourists do go to Xinjiang all the time as well. You can watch , though it obviously isn't going to be a comprehensive view of a complex situation like this.
Repeating western atrocity propaganda entirely uncritically stems from a deep sense of chauvanism and orientalism. Despite lacking any and all credible evidence backing your claims, you repeat them dogmatically. The only credible explanation for such dogmatism on your part is a deliberate choice to ignore truth, so as to lay cover for racist views underneath, whether you realize it or not.
Western governments have levied false allegations of genocide and slavery in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. A closer look makes clear that the politicization of China’s anti-terrorism policies in Xinjiang is another front of the U.S.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populati… He seems to love local cultures so much he transfered ethnic minorities to Siberia and replaced them with Russians to bring Russian culture.
And how would you explain sudden increase of organ transplants in China after 1999 before china had even an organ transplant system. There are many evidence reports about it like 2007 and 2016 the slaughter and bloody harvest and there was 2020 UN tribunal to which China did not even bother attending to present it's evidence
Population transfer is the only actual mistake of the communists that you've brought up. Marxist-Leninists today agree that this was one of the biggest legitimate crimes of the USSR, though it was not done for "Russification." Instead, population transfer happened during a time of constant turmoil and subversion, out of a sense of paranoia. Culture was still protected, and Russian culture did not replace local ethnic cultures, there was a simultaneous push for a "soviet" internationalist culture with preservation of local ethnicities and culture, even with population transfer. Still a crime, but the only actual crime you've brought up thus far.
As for the Falun Gong, again, they are a cult akin to Scientology, not an ethnicity, and the PRC isn't killing them en masse, just repressing it as an anti-communist and western-funded cult. Same as the idea of Uyghur genocide, atrocity propaganda akin to claiming that there's "white genocide" in South Africa, Christian genocide in Nigeria, or that Hamas sexually assaulted babies in Operation
... show more
Population transfer is the only actual mistake of the communists that you've brought up. Marxist-Leninists today agree that this was one of the biggest legitimate crimes of the USSR, though it was not done for "Russification." Instead, population transfer happened during a time of constant turmoil and subversion, out of a sense of paranoia. Culture was still protected, and Russian culture did not replace local ethnic cultures, there was a simultaneous push for a "soviet" internationalist culture with preservation of local ethnicities and culture, even with population transfer. Still a crime, but the only actual crime you've brought up thus far.
As for the Falun Gong, again, they are a cult akin to Scientology, not an ethnicity, and the PRC isn't killing them en masse, just repressing it as an anti-communist and western-funded cult. Same as the idea of Uyghur genocide, atrocity propaganda akin to claiming that there's "white genocide" in South Africa, Christian genocide in Nigeria, or that Hamas sexually assaulted babies in Operation Al-Aqsa Flood.
You're uncritically believing the equivalent of 5g cell towers causing brainwashing, or Bill Gates trying to microchip everyone with vaccines. You do this not because you're incapable of seeing truth, but because you deliberately believe convenient lies.
well isn't it convenient to label every inconvenient truth as "western propaganda". Probably for you Stalins gulags are also Western propaganda? Priests from Germany were sent to Siberian prison for 10 years same as Nazi soldiers from here. Czech Germans sent on death marches.
Organ harvest happens on scale, you cannot explain the organ tourism in China and that hospitals have sometimes multiple floors of transplant surgery rooms in a culture where organ donation is not even popular.
I quite literally stated that population transfer was a clear mistake, though I corrected you on motive. The presence of soviet prisons isn't propaganda, but very often the worst conditions are exaggerated and further made to seem the norm. The soviet prison system was actually very progressive for the time. Mary Stevenson Callcott documented it quite well in Russian Justice.
When it comes to social progressivism in general, the soviet union was among the best out of their peers, so instead we must look at who was actually repressed outside of the norm. In the USSR, it was the capitalist class, the kulaks, the fascists who were repressed. This is out of necessity for any socialist state. When it comes to working class freedoms, however, the soviet union represented a dramatic expansion. Soviet progressivism was documented quite well in Albert Syzmanski's
... show more
I quite literally stated that population transfer was a clear mistake, though I corrected you on motive. The presence of soviet prisons isn't propaganda, but very often the worst conditions are exaggerated and further made to seem the norm. The soviet prison system was actually very progressive for the time. Mary Stevenson Callcott documented it quite well in Russian Justice.
When it comes to social progressivism in general, the soviet union was among the best out of their peers, so instead we must look at who was actually repressed outside of the norm. In the USSR, it was the capitalist class, the kulaks, the fascists who were repressed. This is out of necessity for any socialist state. When it comes to working class freedoms, however, the soviet union represented a dramatic expansion. Soviet progressivism was documented quite well in Albert Syzmanski's Human Rights in the Soviet Union.
There is no credible evidence of organ harvesting. You are doing the equivalent of looking at rising autism diagnoses and rising vaccine usage and claiming they are connected based on fabricated evidence. There's absolutely no evidence of your fantasies of an organ harvesting operation going on in China, and you justify your views with neo-Nazi conspiracy theories.
To the disappeared persons and thousands of others who have been killed in Latin America since the mid-1960’s for their advocacy of freedom; and for D.R.
there was a UN china tribunal about the organ harvesting in 2020. After many testimonies and china not showing up they concluded with certainty that there is systematic organ harvesting. For you UN is not a credible source anymore?
And what does Falun gong have to do with Neonazi conspiracies???????
The UN is heavily biased, yes, but the fabricated testemonies and lies all coming from the Falun Gong itself and from anti-communist, far-right propagandists means that there is in fact no certainty on "organ harvesting." The Falun Gong are a far-right cult, and dogmatically repeating their conspiracy theories is like claiming vaccines cause autism or 5g cell towers cause cancer. I've shown you multiple examples of how these are fabricated, and you keep pointing to already debunked claims.
Muslims in xinjiang doing "terrorist actions" like wearing head scarf and testifying in 2020 is far right too? And how do you explain only 2 week waiting time for organ tourists coming to China? Where are all these organs coming from if not from systematic harvesting?
May 22, 2014: Urumqi Attack, 39 killed, 94 injured as 2 attackers drove cars into crowds and threw explosives at buildings.
And many more. Since the de-radicalization efforts, these attacks have gone down to effectively 0.
As for why China has low wait times on organ transplants, they have an extremely effective medical system and a very high population, meaning it's far easier to match organs for compatability than in smaller countries with worse medical systems. Again, you're doing the thing where you look at increased vaccinations and increased autism diagnoses and assuming they are connected, a common far-right strategy.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecut… People are persecuted just for doing Muslim things. Or are you suggesting that there are 1 million potential killers locked up in Xinjiang and somehow Uyghurs are more criminal (which would be a racist implication I think).
Your medical system can be as efficient as it wants to be and still not produce compatible organ donars if no one takes part of the organ donation system. 2 week waiting time for organs is insane. Normally people die before getting an organ.
No, people are not persecuted "for doing Muslim things." There are not 1 million people locked up in Xinjiang either. These are common lies propogated by professional propagandist and christian nationalist Adrian Zenz. Linking Wikipedia over and over again is not a source, I have linked you direct sources over and over again debunking this. No, there are not 1 million "potential killers," the idea that 1 million people are locked up is fabricated. Per @yogthos@lemmy.ml effort post:
The whole conspiracy theory started with a claim of millions of Uyghurs being supposedly imprisoned story is based on two highly dubious “studies.”. However, this claim is completely absurd when you stop and think about it even for a minute. That figure 1 million is repeated again and again. Let's just look at how much space would you actually ne
... show more
No, people are not persecuted "for doing Muslim things." There are not 1 million people locked up in Xinjiang either. These are common lies propogated by professional propagandist and christian nationalist Adrian Zenz. Linking Wikipedia over and over again is not a source, I have linked you direct sources over and over again debunking this. No, there are not 1 million "potential killers," the idea that 1 million people are locked up is fabricated. Per @yogthos@lemmy.ml effort post:
The whole conspiracy theory started with a claim of millions of Uyghurs being supposedly imprisoned story is based on two highly dubious “studies.”. However, this claim is completely absurd when you stop and think about it even for a minute. That figure 1 million is repeated again and again. Let's just look at how much space would you actually need to intern one million people.
This is a photo of Rikers Island, New York City's biggest prison. The actual size of a facility interning ten thousand people.
According to Wikipedia, "The average daily inmate population on the island is about 10,000, although it can hold a maximum of 15,000." Let's assume this is a Xinjiang detention camp, holding ten to fifteen thousand people. How many of these would it take to hold one million people?
Let's do some math:
Rikers Size
Rikers Prisoners
One Million Uyghurs Size
413.2 acres (0.645 square miles)
10,000 to 15,000
43 to 64 square miles
In reality, one million people would probably take more space; all the supposed detention camps we see are much less dense than Rikers.
For comparison, San Francisco is 47 square miles. Amsterdam is 64 square miles. You'd literally need detention camps that total the size of San Francisco or Amsterdam to intern one million Uyghurs. It'd be like looking at a map of California. There's Los Angeles. There's San Diego. And look, there's San Francisco Concentration City with its one million Uyghurs.
Practically all the stories we see about China trace back to Adrian Zenz is a far right fundamentalist nutcase and not a reliable source for any sort of information. The fact that he's the primary source for practically every article in western media demonstrates precisely what I'm talking about when I say that coverage is divorced from reality.
Along with his “mission” against China, heavenly guidance has apparently prompted Zenz to denounce homosexuality, gender equality, and the banning of physical punishment against children as threats to Christianity.
The fact that this nutcase is being paraded as a credible researcher on the subject is absolutely surreal, and it's clear that the methodology of his "research" doesn't pass any kind of muster when examined closely.
It's also worth noting that there is a political angle around the narrative around Xinjiang. For example, here's George Bush's chief of staff openly saying that US wants to destabilize the region, and NED admitting to funding Uyghur separatism for the past 16 years on their own official Twitter page. An ex-CIA operative details US operations radicalizing and training terrorists in the region in this book. Here's an excerpt:
US has been stoking terrorism in the region while they've been running a propaganda campaign against China in the west. In fact, US even classified Uyghur separatists as a terrorist group at one point mintpressnews.com/us-was-at-wa…
Here's an account from a Pakistani journalist who has been all over Xinjiang (which borders Pakistan) claims that western media reports on "atrocities" are lies. dailytimes.com.pk/723317/expos…
It's also worth noting that the accusations originate entirely from the west while Muslim majority countries support China, and their leaders have visited Xinjiang many times.
Also notable that whenever western media actually deigns to visit Xinjiang, which is not often, they're unable to produce support for any of their claims of mass imprisonment and oppression, so they opt for insinuations instead apnews.com/article/coronavirus…
The whole thing is very clearly a propaganda blitz that US is cynically using to manipulate impressionable people in the west.
As for the medical system, again, your line of logic is akin to saying there's no way we can diagnose autism at better degrees of accuracy without artificially inflating it. This is absurd, and the fact that you lack any and all credible evidence further points to this blatant orientalism on your part.
the estimation of Uyghur prisoners was I remember made from satalite images and number of prison camps. Satalite images are Infos that are public and can be easily verified.
And you still have not come up with the source of organs for transplantation. You see organ tourists mostly from south korea coming to get organs in China with only 2 week waiting time despite organ donation not being popular. Organ transplant boom just conveniently started after 1999 and was low before.
As already explained to you, the satellite estimates are bullshit, based on comparison to Rikers. There's no actual evidence of infrastructure even capable of holding 1 million prisoners in Xinjiang, let alone evidence that these buildings are for imprisoning Uyghur peoples.
And I did give an explanation for organ transplants. The PRC has 1.4 billion people, many of which are organ donors and die or otherwise can donate organs. You're looking at a simple phenomenon and resorting to far-right conspiracy theory to explain it.
Thank you so much, comrade! I try to foster an environment where this kind of discussion is the norm for communists, so we can advance the general level of education and help each other learn more! 🫡
No? Communism is a movement towards abolishing class society, via collectivizing production and distribution. Fascism is a violent reaction to capitalist decay, employed to retain bourgeois property ownership and break up labor organizing. They are diametric opposites, which is why they have historically bitterly hated each other.
I also realized if OOP is a man, that sometimes women will judge men on their financial status because the traditional path assumes "the woman" will need to depend on "the man" financially as a stay-at-home mom, and so a desirable man to a traditional, straight woman is usually a wealthy man.
Since I'm a gay woman and I accidentally assumed OOP was also a gay woman, I found it really confusing why she was worried the girl she is going out on a date would judge her for her old but reliable car.
The whole meme makes more sense to me with OOP being a straight man 😅
My ex and I were joking about that. I asked her what kind of car would instantly cause her to nope out if someone came to pick her up... "PT Cruiser." No hesitation.
I am inclined to agree.
As for the "assumed OOP" thing - we all do that, I think. I know I do constantly and have to check myself, even though I think it's pretty minor in the grand scheme of things. That is, of course, as long as we can all agree about PT Cruisers. ;)
I think a Hummer would give me the ick faster; I feel like a PT Cruiser is ugly and poor taste, but I would at least find out if like they inherited the car or someone gifted them the car before nopeing out, whereas a Hummer wouldn't probably get that level of benefit of the doubt, I would be looking for the quickest opportunity to nope.
I think I would also feel that way about Corvettes and certain other luxury cars. BMW is also a red flag. Lexus is borderline.
But yeah, I'm also not a typical person who actually went on dates or participated in much courting. At some point it was my goal to never have a romantic partner, and I see it as a fluke (even a failure) that someone found me anyway.
Why its just a car? The only red flag with a car I could think of is like a super expensive or impractical choice. Why would you judge a pt cruiser? Very reasonable car.
Whats impractical? Like a giant pickup or '60 mg mga or similar era italian sports car you need to carry special order parts in the trunk in case it breaks down? 20 year old sports bike?
💬 31 🔁 10497 ❤️ 13181 · Tech Enthusiasts: Everything in my house is wired to the Internet of Things! I control it all from my smartphone! My smart-house is bluetooth enabled and I can give it voi…
My '10 Versa's having the same humidity problems from so many rear end collisions. The cabin smells so moldy and nothing seems to work. It's a shame really because that thing can drive for another 100k miles easily.
Get some of these and it should take care of the moisture issues. One should last at least 3-4 months. Replace as needed. Then just find some kind of fabric cleaner and air freshener and you should be good to go.
Never been in one but they definitely seem nice. driving any 90s/2000s sedan would definitely make me like a date better, especially given how many people I know drive horrible modern SUVs
Definitely. I miss driving sedans and small hatchbacks, up until a few years ago they’re all I’d ever driven.
I currently have a Kia Sportage only because I moved to a rural area and needed something that could deal with country roads and off-road. Otherwise I’d still be driving my old ‘07 Accent, that thing gave me zero problems in well over 100k miles.
Decades of propaganda by the auto industry, especially through cinema and TV, has programmed people to think that if you don't have a nice car you won't get laid.
Yes and it cuts both ways. Prior to transition when I was driving an Infiniti I got female attention but driving beat up Hyundais and Fords the only attention I got was from the police, like driving around with a sign that says, "pull me over".
Post transition my life circumstances are much better but the cars affect my dating prospects totally differently. Driving a brand new performance model EV in 2022 I had at least two dates where the guy would lose all interest in me once they saw I was driving a car that costed several times their annual income.
You could literally see all interest melt off their face, "my car is the white sedan, can you drop me off there?"
Immediate flip from being warm and engaged to this cold, "gtfo out of my Nissan" vibe
You can't have a shitty car as a man and you can't have a nicer car as a trans woman
Driving a brand new performance model EV in 2022 I had at least two dates where the guy would lose all interest in me once they saw I was driving a car that costed several times their annual income.
Sounds like you dodged at least 2 bullets.
Wait "performance model EV" wasn't a Tesla, was it? They may have been in fear for their lives.
It’s a class war thing more than anything. Cops will pick on you more if you drive certain models of cars or a car that’s a total clunker with a busted window that’s taped up. Most people here don’t really care what you drive in the dating world unless you come from a wealthier background and are a snooty dick about it.
MEXICO CITY -- Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum announced Sunday she plans to send humanitarian aid to Cuba this week, including food and other humanitarian aid.
Sheinbaum's comments came after U.S. President Donald Trump said he asked the Mexican leader to suspend oil shipments to the Caribbean island.
Sheinbaum said at a public event in the northern state of Sonora that she did not discuss Cuban affairs in a phone conversation with Trump on Thursday. She added that her government seeks to “ diplomatically solve everything related to the oil shipments (to Cuba) for humanitarian reasons.”
Earlier, Trump told reporters that he told the Mexican president not to send oil to Cuba.
I have a few old automations that are designed to unlock my front door, or open my garage door, depending on how I leave. If I ride my bike or car, it opens my garage, if I leave via front door, it opens the front door. Pretty simple. Except!!! I did this in pieces, so it's 2 separate automations. One detects my phone entering the "home zone", the other detects an event firing (iOS triggered the event via 'shortcuts')
There is now "zone based" automations, and there is also my "person entity". So the way I see it, I have 3 different ways to tell when I come home:
My phone's gps enters the 'home zone'
My HA 'person' state changes from 'away' to 'home'
My phone's shortcut app fires an event that is detected.
I feel like #1 and #2 are the same, no? I only have one device linked to my person entity, and it's my phone. Is there any difference in this case? Is there a preferred choice?
Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) advanced American farmers and equipment owners’ lawful right to repair their farm and other nonroad diesel equipment.
Dr. Michael Antil moved from North Carolina to Toronto in July 2023, seeking a more diverse and broad-minded environment for his family and a universal health-care system in which to practice. But three years later, despite Canada's well-documented doctor shortage and so many theoretical routes to citizenship for skilled workers like himself, he still doesn't have permanent residency.
Antil came to Canada with over two decades' experience in the States — and he is now adeptly managing an above-average load of over 2,000 patients at a Toronto clinic. Yet he and his wife (an ESL teacher) are still living by dint of temporary work permits, their children are facing international student fees for post-secondary education, and he had to cough up an additional 25 per cent foreign buyers' tax on his house.
Rifling through an inches-tall stack of paperwork, the 50-year-old told White Coat, Black Art host Dr. Brian Goldman about all the hoops, hurdles and red tape he’s come up against since first applying for permanent residency in 2023.
He has been rejected t
... show more
Dr. Michael Antil moved from North Carolina to Toronto in July 2023, seeking a more diverse and broad-minded environment for his family and a universal health-care system in which to practice. But three years later, despite Canada's well-documented doctor shortage and so many theoretical routes to citizenship for skilled workers like himself, he still doesn't have permanent residency.
Antil came to Canada with over two decades' experience in the States — and he is now adeptly managing an above-average load of over 2,000 patients at a Toronto clinic. Yet he and his wife (an ESL teacher) are still living by dint of temporary work permits, their children are facing international student fees for post-secondary education, and he had to cough up an additional 25 per cent foreign buyers' tax on his house.
Rifling through an inches-tall stack of paperwork, the 50-year-old told White Coat, Black Art host Dr. Brian Goldman about all the hoops, hurdles and red tape he’s come up against since first applying for permanent residency in 2023.
He has been rejected three times on various technicalities even though, he says with a rueful laugh, "Ontario needs doctors.”
Over 2.5 million Ontarians are without a family doctor, according to the Ontario Medical Association. Across Canada that number sits at around 5.9 million.
It's ALL in the article. You should read it because it's very good.
Antil’s immigration journey began in 2023, when, with a five-year contract at the Albany clinic in hand, he settled in Toronto with a licence from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) and an Ontario work permit.
Getting the former was a four-month back-and-forth process that Antil meticulously completed step by step, which he likens to building an intricate Lego set.
Getting the latter meant making a 13-hour drive from North Carolina to Buffalo, N.Y. — on the advice of an immigration lawyer after his application, filed that February, had still not been answered by June.
Things got harder after that. Antil also applied to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada’s (IRCC) express entry under the Federal Skilled Worker program — a competitive permanent residency stream that assigns applicants a points-based score, and then invites those with a high enough score to apply for the accelerated process; shorter than the usual six months.
... show more
It's ALL in the article. You should read it because it's very good.
Antil’s immigration journey began in 2023, when, with a five-year contract at the Albany clinic in hand, he settled in Toronto with a licence from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) and an Ontario work permit.
Getting the former was a four-month back-and-forth process that Antil meticulously completed step by step, which he likens to building an intricate Lego set.
Getting the latter meant making a 13-hour drive from North Carolina to Buffalo, N.Y. — on the advice of an immigration lawyer after his application, filed that February, had still not been answered by June.
Things got harder after that. Antil also applied to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada’s (IRCC) express entry under the Federal Skilled Worker program — a competitive permanent residency stream that assigns applicants a points-based score, and then invites those with a high enough score to apply for the accelerated process; shorter than the usual six months.
But upon arriving, Antil didn’t meet that points threshold — though fluent in Spanish, he didn’t speak French, and his age (then 47) was considered high.
So he applied through the Ontario Immigrant Nominee Program (OINP), which awards bonus IRCC points to people with valuable skills. But it also required more forms, including additional certification of his U.S. medical school diploma — odd, he says, since he already has a medical licence in Ontario.
A months-long comedy of errors ensued — including a two-month delay because his notary signed Antil’s photo over, not under, his seal. So Antil missed the OINP deadline and they closed his application. He got the certification two weeks later so he filed an appeal, but still hasn't heard back.
So Antil applied, again, through IRCC but made two errors — ticking the box that said "doctoral degree" instead of "professional degree" and submitting an educational transcript for his wife that didn't have the official IRCC approval stamp. Those errors proved fatal to his application.
Antil is now working with immigration lawyer Ilene Solomon, who wasn’t surprised to learn about those rejections on what some may see as technicalities.
It's a "rigid" system, she said, "and one mistake is fatal."
Interesting read but that's just another one in a myriad of cases. This is the norm.
100% of my acquaintances that did not get professional services to prepare the application forms and documents (because that help is very expensive) had at least one rejection due to a form mistake or weird edge case.
Even with professional help I had trouble getting my wife's fingerprints validated because her digitals are so dim that ink-on-paper fingerprinting just doesn't work, it's a black blob every time, and during our year-long process the government changed the rule so that digital submissions were no longer valid so it had to be ink-on-paper.
In response to user feedback on AI integration, Mozilla announced today that the next Firefox release will let users disable AI features entirely or manage them individually.
With the launch of optical media in game consoles such as the Sony PlayStation 1. The console could be hacked with a use of a simple modchip - an unauthorized hardware modification that was soldered directly onto the motherboard. This was done to circumvent security features. While the original goal was for piracy and backups, as modchips evolved, so did their use cases. Everything from Region Free, homebrew, emulators, makeshift development kits and more were soon possible. In today's video we look at the earliest modchips and how they shaped the video game landscape.
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
Hehe same, I powered on a stock system to play a few years ago and I'm like sitting there wondering if it's broken or if this really all there was to the stock system LMAO
Meet new people in your area, absolutely privately using open-source technologies. You're only a few clicks away to find new friends, dating and sexual partners.
I can only guess but I think it's a combination of a lack of effective anti-bot protections and it being a sort of dead platform (so the only users that remain are largely bots which never leave)
Then I guess isn't worthy trying to use it. It's sad cause sounded like an alternative for Tinder and the rest of meeting apps from the Play Store that have the Google infestation on them.
Unfortunately I think projects like this have extra challenges over even regular social media platforms. There's also retromeet which seems even more dead (it may have not even made it to a stable release).
The idea is great but for a dating app to work, it needs to quickly get past two network effects: the global network effect (there must be enough people globally, or in a larger region, to get other people interested in trying out the platform) and the local network effect (there must be enough people to match with in most users' local areas to keep enough people interested). With corporate backing that's easy enough to do with a dedicated team to market and develop, but FOSS rarely has that sort of manpower. Slow growth is hard too, since users tend to leave dating apps quite often.
There's also the funny problem if the dev gets a partner usually the partner doesn't appreciate them staying on dating apps. Developing a dating app could be even worse for the relationship... actually now that I think of it, maybe I should make start a similar project since I don't like dating...
needs to quickly get past two network effects: the global network effect [..] and the local network effect
Sounds like a job for Fedi-date! If you could somehow hook a dating app into the fediverse, then maybe it could survive long enough to get sufficient users. If it also offers more general IRL meet-ups (like meetup.com but without the corpo rent-seeking), then it could perhaps begin to get popular that way too.
Though I do agree that having a broader scope than just the hot-or-not swipe thing would really help to attract enough people to join. Retromeet doesn't seem to do that, though I haven't used it so I could be wrong.
Local network effect is enough, even when it’s restricted to a specific demographic or subculture. Once a dating platform grabs a hold in a location and demographic, it can extend from there.
Of course to keep a project like this running, you need a way to pay for hosting and development.
Maybe we can agree to disagree because I don't think a specific demographic is enough to overcome the negative network effect at the start. The problem, imo, is that the attrition rate of dating apps is really high and dating apps are only good if a lot of people are located geographically nearby. You either need broad appeal to avoid running out of people early on or a demographic that is unusually geographically concentrated and usurps the attrition rate (ENM comes to mind for the latter).
Of course, you could always make something for dating without the geo proximity, but I think most people won't want to use something like that at all.
The beauty of new FOSS projects is that they're quite often hosted and developed for free, so I don't think that's much of a limiting factor as long as the community is there. That's also why I think it's important to make it big quickly, because that's the way to get a big enough community before the creator loses interest.
I was specifically thinking about men who have sex with men. Grindr and similar platforms are very successful. Most of it is about casual sex between promiscuous men. They are also a great target group otherwise. Travel between gay metropolises is common as. Pride tourism is big.
The mainstream apps (at least the ones that have been around a while) have bot ratios which are much better. They also have active moderation teams which remove profiles that make it through the automated protections. I'd guess they have ratios closer to 20:1 than 1:20 (people:bots)
I think a lot of engineers underestimate the amount of non-technical effort that goes into running platforms with users.
It's a shame I think there are some really interesting problems that a less profit driven dating app but currently anything without a big marketing budget isn't going to have the userbase to support it.
This kinda app would need at least an attempt at a technical solution to the bot problem. An open source app can't just pay people to kick bots out. And even the paid apps that can are drowning in bots.
Something cryptographic maybe. Tor is kinda magical, makes anonymity possible while the each machine knows who they are talking to. Maybe something where you can show that you are "a verified user" without showing exactly which one.
Other apps do have some good anti-bot measures which could be adopted for a FOSS project. The problem with a lot of cryptographic solutions for this is that often cryptography is usually more about proving your identity more than proving something about your identity. Tor is also focused on privacy from middle-men, which doesn't really make sense for a dating app.
I think the challenge boils down to how to prove you're human without biometrics or other PII. And I think the sad reality is that you can't prove it. Though you may be able to prove you have unique PII with some sort of zero-knowledge proof...
Maybe it would need to draw on experiences of moderating chat rooms and forums - these are very often done by volunteers who put a lot of time and energy into it because they believe in it.
There is also the "Web Of Trust" concept, where, given that everyone can prove their identity, people can then vouch for each other.
no need. this kind of individualistic approach to solve this problem isn't being effective so far. we'd need to find a better solution to the network effect.
M with Arch and Long Socks looking for that special self hosted someone with BPM>0, let's meet at the abandoned factory and compare notes about brutalist architecture.
I used it to chat with people and someone suggested what ended up being one my favorite albums. You won't meet the love if your life, but IMO still worth to spend some time there, you can find very interesting stuff.
I checked it out for fun some time ago. I really appreciated how unmonetized and not emotionally manipulative it was. There's like no people on there though.
you know these cats? because the site is joke; like, check out the faq. and says "we" a lot, who's that? who's moderating spam and scams and abuse and such? how are they financing the infra? the name, dios mio...
Orion — a web browser designed from the ground-up. Native WebKit speed, full extension compatibility, and absolute privacy is finally together in one browser that respects you.
Speakers - Line OUT detected but can't test Left/Right audio channels, options missing. No AUDIO from speakers unless I select them as default in Pavucontrol or manually assign outputs via Helvum.
Fedora 43 GNOME
How do I get my GNOME audio settings to work again?
This is so random and funny at the same time... yet frustrating because it makes no god damn sense :D
Save yourself the time and boot into a live distro with gnome, like the latest Ubuntu or something. Sanity test. Make sure it works there before trying to fix your own install.
I'm currently learning about it, so I can't offer much expertise, but if all else fails, look into Wireplumber; it sounds like it's failing to make the proper node connections automatically.
Hmmm. Random guess: does your machine have another audio output, possibly via HDMI, that you're not using? This could be ALSA selecting the wrong device as a default, which would then propagate up through the stack.
I have a stupid question: Are you sure you're not confusing "line out" and "headphone out"? They're different, and pretty much every desktop supports both these days. But standard PC speakers usually connect to the "headphone" socket.
I am seeing the exact same issue on a PC I just put together and loaded Fedora 43 Workstation on. If I hook the 3.5mm jack for the speakers (older Creative Pebbles) to the green port on the back panel it shows up just like OP's when I try to test; however, if I plug the jack into the headphones port on the case (which is connected to the motherboard audio pins) it detects and works properly. I was also seeing some Dummy Output options with the line out connection in use, and not knowing what it meant, I selected one and this kicked me back to the login screen and gave me an unhelpful kernel alert.
In contrast, the speakers on my other PC, which is also running Fedora 43 Workstation, works fine off of the back panel. Both motherboards are using Realtek audio chips but it may not be the same version since one board is a B650 and one is a B550.
Curious to see what the solution ends up being but I also recently installed pavucontrol on the newer PC so I will try and set the speakers up using the line-out that way. If that doesn't work I will migrate to bluetooth spea
... show more
I am seeing the exact same issue on a PC I just put together and loaded Fedora 43 Workstation on. If I hook the 3.5mm jack for the speakers (older Creative Pebbles) to the green port on the back panel it shows up just like OP's when I try to test; however, if I plug the jack into the headphones port on the case (which is connected to the motherboard audio pins) it detects and works properly. I was also seeing some Dummy Output options with the line out connection in use, and not knowing what it meant, I selected one and this kicked me back to the login screen and gave me an unhelpful kernel alert.
In contrast, the speakers on my other PC, which is also running Fedora 43 Workstation, works fine off of the back panel. Both motherboards are using Realtek audio chips but it may not be the same version since one board is a B650 and one is a B550.
Curious to see what the solution ends up being but I also recently installed pavucontrol on the newer PC so I will try and set the speakers up using the line-out that way. If that doesn't work I will migrate to bluetooth speakers or just leave things as is.
Grocery prices shot up by more than 30% since 2020, says StatsCan
Obligatory - Loblaw is out of control
The PBO report estimates the one-time payment will cost more than $3 billion this year, while the annual increases will cost between $1.7 billion and $1.9 billion annually through to 2031.
Not that expensive. Still these moves without addressing the rent seeking (profit maximization) in the consoludated supply and retail chain is a band aid. Minimum wages are also woefully underadjusted but they'd only have positive effect if the grocers can't just jack up their prices to where they think the new market conditions would bear.
If we assume Loblaws gets 100% of this money and those 12M Canadians get no extra food as a result from it, then I would be 100% against this. However I bet that 12M people will get some more food, probably not the equivalent of 100% of the spend but not zero. Loblaws would get the rest. Hunger isn't lower priority than healthcare. Both are cut-to-the-bone issues and food very much affects health and healthcare. So I think this will provide needed relief in the near term. We all know what happens in the long run. It's very much not the type of policy I would do if I were PM.
Don't get me wrong, I'd prefer an Avi Lewis gov't setup a non-profit public grocer and distributor and have zero money go to Loblaws, which is why I'm getting people to vote in the NDP election. I'm just commenting on the current material reality.
A rebate sounds like a positively insane idea. It's just a corporate subsidy with extra steps.
If you want to lower prices, you can't give people money to give to the oligopolies. You have to break up the oligopolies, regulate the hell out of them, and send some people to prison for price fixing.
It's becoming quite necessary to have some help given the financial situation of many Canadians. This is clearly going to be a difficult time for many ordinary people.
I find everyone using different services, so unsure how to best manage (and balance) concurrent access in Ubuntu/Debian to: - Local network services - Tailscale services from userA - Tailscale services from userB - Wireguard (OpenVPN also option) from userC - Twingate from userD
Each user is wanting to share different services via VPN, and pressuring any to change their production setups to a different style of VPN is not going to happen. - Management via software - Possibly up a routing device along the lines of OpenWrt or OpnSense. - Could even distribute such devices between these friends.
Example setup: - Jellyfin user access from TailscaleA - Nextcloud user access from TailscaleB - Jellyfin user access from Wireguard - Jellyfin user access from Twingate - Jellyfin user access from local services
How would you manage this in a somewhat seamless manner?
What do you mean? Is it working now? To my understanding this stuff either works or it doesn’t, what is going wrong for you? What are some things you’d like to make more seamless?
Are you running your services directly on the host or via docker? All the VPN services listed provide docker images which I think should allow you to run multiple instances without them interfering with each other, although I've only played around with Tailscale myself. The setup would be slightly different depending on if your services are containers or not
If it's a bunch of users sharing a bunch of resources from behind a bunch of different VPNs, I guess the most simple way is to tell them to expose it to the internet
Personally, I would do this in docker. That way you can have clearer separation between services and networks. But it's not a hard requirement.
I would just do it, as you wrote. For example, on the account of jellyfin server, configure the tailscaleA client, then wireguard client, etc. Set those up as separate user services/processes/system services if root permissions needed and that's it. Then on other services set the needed connections separately. It might be handy to set up traefik, so things served via vpns can go through the same routes as local traffic, so you use the same path as your users do
When you have a service that serves something on a port, you are not limited to only one connection. It can be accessed through different clients, the only needed part is that those clients connect to their respective vpn networks and pass the traffic correctly
I don't see a need for a separate device for that routing
LibertyLizard
in reply to Salamence • • •Shatur
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
LibertyLizard
in reply to Shatur • • •I was more wondering if there was a specific thing this comic was referencing. Perhaps in relation to the black panther depicted or something.
I know they wrote nasty letters and falsely signed them as leaders of other factions, but in the grand scheme of things that's pretty mild stuff.
unexposedhazard
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Maeve
in reply to unexposedhazard • • •LibertyLizard
in reply to Maeve • • •Can you point to relevant documents? I have heard of involvement in coups but I have not heard anything about them being behind so-called color revolutions, which I believe is a dangerous made up word used to justify imperialist repression against dissidents and protesters.
Some on the right are now referring to the current events in Minnesota as a color revolution, and I believe this is a result of our lack of criticism of this very dubious term.
Maeve
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •LibertyLizard
in reply to Maeve • • •Prolewiki is a joke. So you have nothing.
There's simply no evidence any nation has been able to engineer a popular uprising. Such a thing is not possible. People feel how they feel and they hate their government for a reason.
Calfpupa [she/her]
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
LibertyLizard
in reply to Calfpupa [she/her] • • •It's just selectively chosen and distorted facts and invectives against the enemies of authoritarian leftists. It's not a serious attempt to document reality.
As an example, I looked at the page on color revolutions the user above recommended. It's just a series of unsupported assertions with no supporting evidence. It literally doesn't contain a single reference.
I do find it useful for evaluating leftists though. I find when prolewiki criticizes them then it's usually because they actually care about facts and have consistent values. So it does have some use.
Bloomcole
in reply to Calfpupa [she/her] • • •Maeve
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •Maeve
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •There are also people like Chris Hedges, Greg Palast and multiple others. But I already knew you weren't sincere and wouldn't accept any sources.
What I find fascinating, and I've certainly been guilty in years past, is the louder and more "confident" people are, the more uninformed,
... show moreThere are also people like Chris Hedges, Greg Palast and multiple others. But I already knew you weren't sincere and wouldn't accept any sources.
What I find fascinating, and I've certainly been guilty in years past, is the louder and more "confident" people are, the more uninformed, misinformed, or guilty they turn out to be.
LibertyLizard
in reply to Maeve • • •Are these supposed to be links or what?
I reacted the way I did because you basically said "lol google it nerd" instead of providing useful information. You get what you give in online discourse.
Bloomcole
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •Bloomcole
in reply to Bloomcole • • •If mods are removing my comment about it for 'bad jacketing' that says a lot about them.
I guess 'lefty' here is the embarrassing american Dem/lib "we're not Republicans" and not more.
Juice
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •Iran
Brief life of Harvard CIA agent who helped install the shah of Iran
Gwen Kinkead (Harvard Magazine)like this
Maeve likes this.
LibertyLizard
in reply to Juice • • •Well I am using the term as distinct from a coup. A coup is when a small circle of power holders (usually but not always the military) seize power without the involvement of the masses.
When people talk about color revolutions in my experience, it's usually an attempt to smear popular uprisings as being artificially created by some hostile foreign power. To my knowledge, such a thing has never happened. This is because it's far more difficult to motivate the thousands or even millions of people needed to take such actions. You can't simply pay them off or order them the way you can with a handful of generals.
The Shah was put in power in one of many coups supported or orchestrated by the US. But I would not describe it as a color revolution because there was little involvement of the general public. It was a struggle between elite factions.
Juice
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •No, it was exactly a color revolution.
And the Wikipedia for Operation Ajax:
... show moreSo I guess you're saying that a truly p
No, it was exactly a color revolution.
And the Wikipedia for Operation Ajax:
So I guess you're saying that a truly popular uprising, like a spontaneous movement of the people orchestrated by the an imperial power has never happened? How narrowly do you need to define your definition, like, what evidence would convince you? I think your "its never happened" is an over correction, out of annoyance with online ML default talking points. And that's understandable, they can be ridiculous. But where an online ML misapplies the label of a color revolution to a popular uprising, the opposite of that is not the truth. And practically, declaring the opposite of an untruth to be the truth is not the best way to combat misinformation.
Idk how practical it is to nitpick this in our current struggles. Like the tea party was kind of an inside job, right? The right wing funded, and continues to fund, a bunch of loonies to attack liberal democracy, directly connected to Koch money, which continues to fund the Heritage foundation and project 2025. Hell, it even appears that Epstein and collaborators had something to do with 4 Chan and Qanon, so the January 6th attack was heavily influenced by private capital with government connections in intelligence in the USA and Israel.
Also its not like Radio Free Asia was just some hobby amongst people interested in liberating their own countries, they are concerted efforts to sway public opinion toward outcomes favorable to the US. Why would they waste the resources if there wasnt a popular component needed to affect real change? Were we just wasting time and resources?
At what point does a corporation capable of affecting public policy, like an oil company (relevant in every example), when they fund protestors, or counter protesters, how do you slice that? Was it like 3 months ago when a bunch of old Mexican business people donned one piece shirts, and protested the social democratic policies of Mexico's president Sheinbaum, using Trumpian talking points like resistance to cartels? If those business leaders or organizers had any connection to US intelligence, how does that figure? Or with the numerous failed coups in Venezuela, where the US declared Juan Guaido president? The US verifiably had connections with Venezuelan businesses and right wing leaders in orchestrating capital strikes and various economic attacks against the people.
If we crush the economy of a country and that causes a popular uprising, how does that figure? Does that ever happen completely absent of mass propaganda? I dont think so.
Like its very messy and amorphous, constantly changing and shifting dynamics, I think you're being too hard and fast with how you want to categorize, or decategorize, a color revolution. And the reason is kinda silly. To me its like youre saying that because (almost) everything is an op, then absolutely nothing is. Not a single tankie gets owned by being a different stripe of wrong, and certainly no one is educated. Campism creates as many enemies of a cause as it creates allies, because truth isnt weighed according to facts but by opposition to the other.
If you want to defeat tankies, or any political sect, you have to out-organize them, not steelman or debate. So it's not even a very practical position.
overthrow of the democratically elected government of Iran
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)like this
Maeve likes this.
LibertyLizard
in reply to unexposedhazard • • •I was more wondering if there was something specifically relevant to the black panthers as implied by the comic.
Also I'm not totally sure they've actually admitted to all that, though I'm sure it happened.
Entertainmeonly
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
LibertyLizard
in reply to Entertainmeonly • • •Entertainmeonly
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
LibertyLizard
in reply to Entertainmeonly • • •What the fuck does any of that mean?
I'm just asking people to share information and substantiate their claims. If they won't do so then I assume they're full of shit. That's just how this works.
Entertainmeonly
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •Maeve likes this.
LibertyLizard
in reply to Entertainmeonly • • •Entertainmeonly
in reply to LibertyLizard • • •Maeve likes this.
Maeve
in reply to Entertainmeonly • • •jjjalljs
in reply to Salamence • • •__反いじめ戦隊
in reply to Salamence • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Digit
in reply to Salamence • • •Yup.
[Edit: PS, while seeing this post, I happen to be playing ]
- YouTube
www.youtube.comcanofcam
in reply to Salamence • • •And people will still continue that 'Conspiracy theorists are nutjobs' rhetoric.
Yes, don't get me wrong, believing that there are lizard people or aliens pulling the strings is questionable. But when somebody points at something highly suspicious and says, "hey, look at this, isn't that weird?" if your first response is, "go get your tinfoil hat" then you're being closeminded. So much in the Epstein files was called years and years ago, and even today people are reluctant to believe it.
like this
Maeve likes this.