Skip to main content




Google granted request to pause order on Play store overhaul


Oct 18 (Reuters) - A federal judge in California has granted Google's request to temporarily pause his order directing the Alphabet (GOOGL.O) unit to overhaul its Android app store Play by Nov. 1 to give consumers more choice over how they download software.

San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge James Donato made the decision on Friday as part of an antitrust lawsuit against Google by "Fortnite" maker Epic Games. Google argued that Donato's Oct. 7 injunction would harm the company and introduce "serious safety, security and privacy risks into the Android ecosystem."

Donato delayed the injunction to allow the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to consider Google's separate request to pause the judge's order. Donato denied Google's separate request to pause the order for the duration of its broader appeal in the case.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-judge-grants-google-request-put-play-store-overhaul-temporary-hold-2024-10-18/

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to geneva_convenience

To be fair, giving a company that's been failing to get themed icons to work on Android for almost four years now less than a month to make a significant change to a core part of their software is... quite weird?

Like, the EU usually gives companies at least half a year to comply with smaller demands than this, because companies with such a huge bureaucracy load wouldn't even be able to change an app logo in such a short amount of time.



in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Human rights?

don't like this

in reply to JohnDClay

They’re winning social control
in reply to JohnDClay

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to freagle

but the police allowed the protests to rage for weeks and did not violently repress them.


The HK cops absolutely were violent, it was just unfathomably better controlled than American cops, because they didn't kill a single person despite the huge scale of the protests and reasonably long time period. Literally the only living being who I have heard about their actions killing was a cat that got caught in teargas (whose owner brought it to the protests like a moron). Meanwhile the HK protestors, in a deliberate and targeted manner, immolated a civilian for aiding the police (I think he opened a gate for them or something), along with abuses that were less serious, like beating up the odd pro-mainland HK civilian or less-targeted, like when they negligently bricked that old man and he died.

Edit: I hope that's not just an incomprehensible pile of anecdotes.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to freagle

this. the west is not all chrome and shiny (heh), it jsut oursources its violence to its poorer lackeys.
in reply to freagle

people always compare Chinas percent of people who speak their native tongue to genocidal states like amerikkka and canada but honestly it compares very favorably to european countries too where minorities sometimes massive ones like the occitanians in france have experience a slow cultural genocide and most people seem not to care.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to JohnDClay

That's not money so it's inconceivable to foreign relations pundits.
in reply to JohnDClay

Unlike wetreners, Chinese do have real human rights, like right to housing, education, food, and healthcare.
in reply to JohnDClay

European journalists are getting raided and arrested for covering the genocide in Gaza.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Do you know why it's on the news? Or why it is news?

don't like this

in reply to JohnDClay

So people like you can have the illusion of freedom. Speech that cannot be translated into tangible action is not freedom. The people in the west have the freedom to scream into the void, but not the freedom to change their conditions. Anybody who can't tell the difference between the two is so very lost.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Than that's a different freedom than freedom of expression.

Do you think Chinese media outlets are able to effectively criticize the government?

don't like this

in reply to JohnDClay

Yes I do, and the fact that Chinese system has shown itself to be flexible and adaptable is proof of that. A system can only evolve effectively when it can be criticized in a way that lead to action. That's how change happens. Western systems are the ones where effective free expression is forbidden, and that's why they've ossified and the ruling class no longer even pretends to care about public opinion.
in reply to JohnDClay

Literally yes read Chinese papers. Comradely criticism is like Marxism 101
in reply to OurToothbrush

All news media run by the Party must work to speak for the Party’s will and its propositions and protect the Party’s authority and unity

They should enhance their awareness to align their ideology, political thinking and deeds to those of the CPC Central Committee and help fashion the Party’s theories and policies into conscious action by the general public while providing spiritual enrichment to the people


Xi Jinping February 2016.

chinadigitaltimes.net/2016/02/…
nytimes.com/2016/02/23/world/a…

in reply to JohnDClay

Your two sources are a NED funded paper and the New York crimes
in reply to JohnDClay

Okay now use your words and brain to explain what you just quoted and why it's a problem
in reply to JohnDClay

Taking the quote completely at face value:

So it's now censorship of freedom of expression if the state is not actively sponsoring, advertising, and distributing criticism of itself? I should try writing to NPR about how we need a proletarian party controlling the government so I can say that they've "censored" me when they obviously don't invite me on to talk about it.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to JohnDClay

This content will be automatically deleted
This entry was edited (9 months ago)
in reply to pancake

And every time an actual leftist party succeeds, our media basically unite against it while pretending to accept them.


you're having it so good. here in the periphery of the capitalism we are just putsched whenever a marginally leftist party gets elected, with active help from the department of state.

in reply to JohnDClay

When fairly compared, yes absolutely.

What do you think of the human rights of the millions killed and deprived by the US and its allies on a near-constant basis?

Oh, that's right, that discourse doesn't even exist as the topic is framed exclusively in a racist and self-serving way. True Human Rights Violations only come from the nonwhite periphery region, everything else is just sparkling accidental collateral damage for Freedom and Democracy.

in reply to TheOubliette

Do you think China is more human rights focused and/or less racist than anywhere else in the world?

don't like this

in reply to JohnDClay

Certainly compared to the settler imperial core responsible for virtually every war and the racist status quo of systemic deprivation. It is not a serious discussion to imagine otherwise.

I kind of already said that.

in reply to TheOubliette

We are comparing the current state of countries, yes? Do you think Norway for example currently has an imperialist settler core?

What would you call China's ambitions regarding the nine dash line and Taiwan if not imperialist?

don't like this

in reply to JohnDClay

in reply to TheOubliette

No because what I described is part of a systemic process and is ongoing


So it is comparing the current state, yes? Taking into account how history shapes it sure, but the current state.

You'll need to do more to connect oil why pricing oil is racist. Because it competes with other countries like Venezuela?

in reply to JohnDClay

So it is comparing the current state, yes? Taking into account how history shapes it sure, but the current state.


I already answered, "No".

You'll need to do more to connect oil why pricing oil is racist.


I didn't say that pricing oil is racist.

Because it competes with other countries like Venezuela?


Pushing for sanctions from the superpowee is a funny thing to call competition.

Please do your best to engage in good faith by reading and addressing what I say. At least, if you're going to respond. This last response was mostly reading incomprehension, which normally, sure, no biggie, but the amount you didn't respond to in order to do that? No bueno.

in reply to JohnDClay

The nine dash line is open to negotiations as recent ones with Vietnam have shown. "Taiwan", actually called the Republic of China, is the rump state of the losing side of the chinese civil war. It only exists because the US interfered. It considers itself China, the PRC considers it China. Only you ignorant people don't. It is a wholy internal matter of the chinese people.

There is no state called "Taiwan", get it already.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to JohnDClay

What would you call China’s ambitions regarding the nine dash line and Taiwan if not imperialist?


holy shit crack a history book

like literally learn the first fucking thing about the situation

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to JohnDClay

::: spoiler Poverty rates in China
Image/photo
:::

::: spoiler Under every income group.
1

2.15

3.65

6.85

10

20
:::

Homeownership rates in China
Image/photo

Reached 90% in 2018

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Yes the West's well known quest for Net Zero. Anti-communist libs are something else




in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

I'll have you know that there are several states that no longer practice slavery, thank you very much! XD


Question: Better Alternative than CC BY SA


I'm interested in copyright licenses, especially open source/creative commons. It's definitely a rabbit hole to sink into. Right now I'm reading up on a case wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/… It basically said, a CC-BY-SA will not be applied to a "collective work", where your art/asset are used in a "compilation" of some sort. Like a photograph in an album, the photograph can't be considered "derivative work" as long as it's not being modified.

One question arises, is there a CC-BY-SA with better coverage which also includes collective works?

This entry was edited (1 year ago)

reshared this

in reply to tengkuizdihar

What does "better coverage" mean? A compilation or collective work is not a modification and is exactly what the license allows. Do you want hinder that? Can it be called Open Source, if you don't even allow the distribution of your work? First it would be good to know what your goal is.
in reply to thingsiplay

How about a license which will also make the collective work into the same license as the work itself? Coverage as in it could reach more in terms of copyleft-ness.
in reply to tengkuizdihar

I struggle with the goal here. If you don't want hinder anyone from using your work in collective work, then its basically already covered in the sense that it is allowed. I see only a reason to cover that, if you actively want to hinder your project from distribution in collective works. With CC-BY-SA the license allows the distribution of your work in any collective work.

Can you describe a specific situation as an example you want to solve?

in reply to thingsiplay

It's better for OP to explain, but from what I read they don't mind it being used in a collective work, but they want to make sure that collective work will also be CC-BY-SA. What from what they read it is no guarantee.
in reply to Sarcasmo220

So you mean like GPL to enforce same license when reused? I don't think anyone using works licensed as CC-BY-SA is allowed to relicense it under a different license: creativecommons.org/licenses/b…

ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

in reply to thingsiplay

CC BY-SA 4.0 is one way compatible with GPLv3.

It does mean that anything released under older CC SA licenses aren't, so they can't be used in GPL projects. And MIT isn't compatible at all.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to JohnEdwa

Put simply this means you now have permission to adapt another licensor’s work under CC BY-SA 4.0 and release your contributions to the adaptation under GPLv3 (while the adaptation relies on both licenses, a reuser of the combined and remixed work need only look to the conditions of GPLv3 to satisfy the attribution and ShareAlike conditions of BY-SA 4.0).


Wow I read that. And it means one can take the CC-BY-SA 4.0 work and relicense it as GPLv3. Its' not just about being compatible in a project, it literally means re-licensing is allowed. But that is only for the adapted work. Meaning if you change something from his work, you are able to release your work as both licenses. While the original untouched work is still CC-BY-SA 4.0 only. So a collection has no rights to make changes to its original license.

in reply to thingsiplay

It means a GPLv3 project can use something licensed as CC BY-SA 4.0 by converting it to GPLv3, as is required. E.g using a CC BY-SA photograph as a background or a splash image in a program.
And while you technically can't take the original, yeah, practically everything except "here is the image file alone in a folder" counts as modifying and a derivative work. Resize it, crop it, change a .png to a .jpg etc - all modify the original work.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to tengkuizdihar

Is your issue somebody profiting from including the work in a collection? If so non-commercial might achieve your aims. Just add a note that people can reach out to you directly for commercial use.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0


in reply to 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒

This is literally the one case in which that is the grammatically correct question.
in reply to 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Railison

Vampires need to ask permission to enter and physically can't without permission. Can the 'can' be read in both senses here?
in reply to Railison

I was thinking the Vampire could actually take this as permission. She told him to make the determination.


You're overcomplicating production


cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/21023181

Sharing some lessons I learned from 10 years/millions of users in production. I’ll be in the comments if anyone has any questions!


I hope some of the lessons in this series help people learn to adopt Linux directly into their stack as a simple tool that can be managed easily on a server.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to something_random_tho

I think Kubernetes has its value. It can be wildly complex but it also can be reasonable and clean. For my Homelab I like k3s as it is lightweight and gets the job done. I can setup automatic rollbacks and have all the features of Kubernetes without the complexity of the commercial providers.

I'm sure there are other Kubernetes distributions that do the same.

in reply to something_random_tho

There is very little content here.

Could have boiled it down to modern CI/CD is over complicated, I'm going to talk about it. Then why not start talking about it with point 1 rather than just saying you will.

I have no idea whether the content will be meaningful or not.

More killer, less filler next time.



GIMP - Development Update: Closing In on the 3.0 Release Candidate


GIMP 3.0 is over 96% complete!
The GIMP team got sick at the Libre Arts conference over the summer, hence the setback to the release schedule but they are now back making good progress.

Along with non-destructive editing and a colour overhaul we've all been waiting for, longstanding critics of the UI/UX will be pleased to hear that GIMP are setting up a UX repository and are looking to build a dedicated team of designers to develop this.

All of these things look set to make the GIMP project feel a lot more current and dynamic. I can't wait!

And if anyone wants to help out it looks like testing/reporting, donations and updating the help manual are all welcomed by the project at the moment.

reshared this

in reply to Churbleyimyam

Can someone tell me what the worst UI issues are in GIMP? I only ever used GIMP for casual, easy editing and idk, I don't really get the hate. I'm not saying there aren't UI issues, just that I don't use photo editing software enough to understand them.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to kadotux

I don't know how to specifically tell you that it's really fucking bad other than the fact that I can never figure things out without looking them up because it's really bad and it's not good and that's why I can't
in reply to kadotux

It used to be way worse. I first tried gimp 10ish years ago and instead of the program running from a single window it was like the canvas, the hierarchy tree, and every other toolbox had its own separate window. I think they updated that a while ago now.
in reply to DrSteveBrule

I too used it back in the separate-windows days, and thought it was pretty terrible. As soon as it got updated (which took quite a while) I didn't have problems with the UI. People saying "you have to look up guides to learn how to use it" is to me... Well, doesn't every professional tool/program require some getting used to? It's not like you just open up Photoshop and know how to use it.
in reply to kadotux

I agree with you there. I've personally found it very interesting to try new programs and figure out each one's layout and work flow, but I've found many people absolutely hate doing that. I get it, if you want to just use the product for what it's intended for maybe you don't want to waste time learning the differences. All of that in consideration, I don't think gimp is that bad
in reply to kadotux

For me, the biggest thing was the program not running from a single window. IIRC there was actually a separate fork of GIMP that made it run in a single window called GIMPshop or something, and that made it into a single window. I'm not sure when GIMP itself got single window functionality.

It's a lot more usable these days.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to kadotux

For minor things it works alright. For slightly advanced things, like making making curved text, it's not intuitive compared to Photoshop. Though personally, even for minor things I found Krita more pleasant.

A UI designer made this little short about Gimp, which I think captures the sorta things that can be frustrating.

I'm extremely pleased to hear they will be taking UI seriously.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to kadotux

I find the UI completely fine. But I think a lot of people expect it to be a perfect and direct clone of photoshop that you don't have to pay for, rather than its own piece of software and are consequently upset when they have to learn how to use it. People forget that they had to learn how to use photoshop as well.

Like you, I've asked people to give a specific example of something that is clearly bad about GIMP and either don't get a proper answer, or they name something from an ancient version.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Churbleyimyam

No, it's still lacking a few features like CMYK color spaces. The UX issues are those of polish: the feature works if you know exactly how to use it, but a lot of times the workflows are neither intuitive for novices or efficient for proficient users. The team clearly has accepted this too.


Where to Find Statistics on Lemmy Communities and Post Activity?


Yeah because first of all, content had to be spread out across 562826 different communities for no reason other than that reddit had lots of communities, after growing for many many years. It started with just a few.

Then 99% of those were created on Lemmy.world, and every new user was directed to sign up at Lemmy.world.

I guess a lot of people here are younger than me and didn’t experience forums, but we had like 30 forum channels. That was enough to talk about anything at all. And I believe it’s the same here, it would have been enough. And then all channels would have easy to find content.

source


Hey everyone! I'm curious about the number of communities on Lemmy and the activity levels within them. Specifically, is there a reliable source where I can check the total number of communities and the average number of posts per month? It seems like the number of communities might be quite high, but I wonder how low the post activity is across most of them. Any insights or links to resources would be greatly appreciated!

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Blaze (he/him)

30k communities and 9M posts by day. I find the number of posts by day very hard to believe. Each community would have an average of 300 posts by day and most communities are abandoned, maybe its the bot communities that repost all the Reddit posts that gets the number so high.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to CoderSupreme

If your math is right then yeah, that's crazy. Too sweepy to verify.
in reply to CoderSupreme

Maybe it’s the bot communities that repost all the Reddit posts that inflate the number so high


That's probably it. lemmit.online should give you some more stats

in reply to CoderSupreme

I think it is total posts. There is a monthly active users of about 40k. If only 10% posts and the rest are lurkers that's 4k.
in reply to CoderSupreme

What is Sharkey? A fork of Misskey, which I also don't know. I imagine Sharkey does much the same things as Lemmy? It is almost as large, and seems to have grown rather quickly.

Is there someone who can provide background for these?

And why is Mastodon so huge? Are they including Threads as a part of it?

in reply to Melatonin

No Sharkey/Misskey is more like Mastodon, but with more playful features like emoji reactions and animated text.

Threads is not included, but Mastodon had a lot more Twitter refugees.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Melatonin

What is Sharkey? A fork of Misskey, which I also don’t know. I imagine Sharkey does much the same things as Lemmy? It is almost as large, and seems to have grown rather quickly.


Misskey and Sharkey are micro blogging platforms, more similar to Mastodon and Twitter rather than Lemmy.

Mastodon is much older than Lemmy. Not sure if they count Threads

in reply to Blaze (he/him)

Threads allegedly has 100's of millions of users, plus it's not even federated with Mastodon. There's no way that Threads users are counted in the Mastodon statistics


Hamas says Al-Sultan Brigade Commander was also killed alongside Sinwar in Gaza


The movement said in a statement that Hamdan was killed while actively engaging with the Israeli army, reportedly alongside Sinwar.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to geneva_convenience

Hey cool, so they can stop now right? They did what they destroyed families and killed 10s of thousands of Palestinians for? So they can leave? Help rebuild?

...or plan on doing more settling, that's the same thing I guess.

/s

in reply to brvslvrnst

Netanyahu's Likud Party Issues Invitation to Event Titled 'Preparing to Settle Gaza'
in reply to brvslvrnst

Settlers don't stop of their own volition, they just change their strategies of genocide and displacement. The protesting masses of the Zionist entity demanding blood and regional war.


This week in Plasma: hardware is hard


in reply to MyNameIsRichard

Awesome stuff. I'm still hoping to see more HDR related fixes since that still isn't working for me. This other stuff is still great to see, though.





Paris SUV driver charged with murder after cyclist run over


Ian Brossat, a former Paris councillor and now a senator representing the French Communist party, called for SUVs to be banned in Paris. “This is not the first incident of its kind, and the dangerous nature of SUVs has already been pointed out on several occasions. We owe it to this young man to realise the scale of the problem and draw all the consequences,” Brossat told the Nouvel Obs.
Unknown parent

lemmy - Link to source
phar
I've been to France a few times and what they consider an SUV over here in America we don't consider to really be an suv. They're like tiny crossovers. I wonder when they're trying to get rid of SUVs how many vehicles they're really trying to get rid of. The "SUV" we got when we rented one was not much different from a medium sized sedan. We could not fit five pieces of luggage.
Unknown parent

lemmy - Link to source
phar

You seem to have misunderstood what I was saying. I was saying the article just says SUV. But what does it mean by SUV? Full size SUVs? Because the little SUVs over there are really small and may notnbe what they are talking about. I was commenting on it being unclear, I wasn't supporting the use of SUVs. Maybe try to piece it together before you insult someone?

Edit: example- a 2022 BMW X1 is 300mm shorter in length than a 2022 BMW 330xi. So if you ban that SUV, do you ban cars too? What's the proportions they want to ban?

This entry was edited (1 year ago)


Cuba forced to ‘paralyse economy’ amid desperate energy crisis


Facing US sanctions, Cuba has long relied on subsidised Venezuelan oil, but that supply is increasingly precarious as Venezuela grapples with its own economic woes. And Venezuela's allies Russia and China, have failed to send enough aid to fill the gap, despite expressions of political solidarity.