Skip to main content



China surpasses Germany, Japan in industrial robotics adoption density: report


in reply to django

The new World Robotics report recorded 1,755,132 industrial robots working in China's factories - an increase of 17%. Annual installations reached 276,288 units in 2023. This was down 5% but still the second highest level ever recorded – representing 51% of global demand.


ifr.org/downloads/press2018/20…



Child safety org launches AI model trained on real child sex abuse images


Today, a prominent child safety organization, Thorn, in partnership with a leading cloud-based AI solutions provider, Hive, announced the release of an AI model designed to flag unknown CSAM at upload. It's the earliest AI technology striving to expose unreported CSAM at scale.
in reply to hendrik

I was going to say... Sure would be nice to have this feature in all the open source AI image generator tools but you're absolutely right 😩
in reply to Riskable

You never know. @alex@gleasonator.com / @npub1q3sle0kvfsehgsuexttt3ugjd8xdklxfwwkh559wxckmzddywnws6cd26p@momostr.pink tried getting Microsoft to provide their CSAM blocking filtering to the Fediverse in the past without success, but this is a different group.



2025 round the corner! What's your resolution??


New Year resolutions are being made everywhere right now. But to be honest, how many live to their word? This meme perfectly sums it up.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to ture

Do you know what? I did keep up my resolution this year. But it may have just been flakey timing for positive life changes. My little one was more image 3 supplements, got them by my desk and work and stayed on top of it. And the second was more movement. Which started as gym, then was long walks, then yoga, back to gym. It’s been good. I don’t think I have a ton for 2025. I hope I just keep it up.
in reply to ture

start them a month early, give yourself grace on sputtering starts.


Ukrainians Grow More Skeptical of West


in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

I'm sorry what because from where I have been sitting we've been against this from the beginning

Are y'all talking about liberals



Ukrainians Grow More Skeptical of West




Biden’s ATACMS Gambit on Ukraine Could Blow up in America’s Face


in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Giving more weapons and negotiating an end to the war are not mutually exclusive. Biden is Giving Ukraine their best hand possible before the US is likely to duck out.

don't like this

in reply to zbyte64

Once again, since you appear to have trouble grappling with this concept. More weapons are not going to change the terms because the winner of the war will be dictating them. Either NATO goes and fights Russia directly, which is highly unlikely, or Russia will dictate terms to Ukraine. All these weapons are achieving is to ensure more Ukrainians die in a pointless war, which seems to give a hard on to people like you.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Reactionaries can't resist injecting sexual innuendo, can they?
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

in reply to Chulk

RAND explained the key reason for the war here fairly honestly rand.org/pubs/research_reports…

I'd argue that Europe decoupling economically from the east and falling further into US orbit was a secondary objective that's now been achieved voronoiapp.com/trade/-US-Becom…

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

I like how they say their own research is Russian propaganda now.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Well since Russia wants to enslave people it seems better to die on your feet.
in reply to Sprocketfree

Enslave… where do people come up with this shit?
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to davel

Well they came and took the land, killed the people and stole the children. Putin can get fucked.

in reply to _stranger_

True, I should correct my statement: more people who voted did than didn't.
in reply to _stranger_

Yeah.

Notably there’s these promises from Trump:

  • mass deportations of illegal immigrants
  • tariffs
in reply to intensely_human

Neither of those things are laws that raise wages.

The first one will reduce supply of all sorts of things, which will raise prices. And it's back to hope again that the suppliers raise wages.

The second one is a tool to raise prices, with no direct way of raising wages so that's kinda the opposite actually.

Any Republicans out there putting forth laws that directly raise wages?

in reply to _stranger_

You're half right. Tariffs are likely to lower wages actually. But deporting illegal immigrants would probably raise the average wages of the people working in the fields that had those displaced jobs, either through supply and demand (few employees so there's more money to go around), or by citizens replacing non-citizens and getting paid full wages as a result.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to realcaseyrollins

All of that is in the realm of "hopefully" and none of it is in the realm of "will happen because a law says it must."

If citizenry is the magic spell that makes employees pay people more money, why not make all the undocumented citizens with jobs citizens?

Creating a sudden and violent work shortage across a large swath of industries sounds like blowing a hole in the country's foot when the requested results is just a few dollars higher wages. Why not make those industries pay higher wages by law? You could even mandate that those industries verify citizenship before hiring new people if you really wanted to, and provide a path to citizenship for the people who are already here and proving they can do a job and pay taxes.

Paying more wages is going to raise prices in either case, why choose to leave positive outcomes to chance when lawmakers can literally mandate the positive outcomes.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to _stranger_

See and you're wrong here too because minimum wages are higher than the wages illegal immigrants get paid. Hiring illegals is illegal, there's no incentive for the company to hire them over citizens unless it saves them money.
in reply to realcaseyrollins

Wouldn't it be in everyone's best interest to make those workers legal and pay them a fair wage? They're already doing the job, so if they're bad at it and not worth the wage increase to the business owner, wouldn't that mean other people could now out compete the immigrants for those same jobs?

Doing this would avoid a sudden labor market upset, extend amnesty to the businesses AND their underpaid employees (avoiding violence and suffering for everyone involved), guarantee a fair wage for all the workers involved (current and future), and make those positions competitive on the market.

The only downside is an increase in prices which is going to happen in every other case anyway.

in reply to _stranger_

Not enough of them do. It's hard to find pro-amnesty folks on the right.

To be clear, it's not that I oppose deporting illegals, I just think amnesty is better. And I'm not a single issue voter, so amnesty honestly wasn't a factor in my voting decisions this time around.

in reply to realcaseyrollins

Well, just to loop back around, this means all those "probably"'s up there are very likely "probably not"'s.
in reply to realcaseyrollins

That's a great question, and one for the people you voted for to answer.
in reply to _stranger_

You can't just say that something is probably not going to happen and then say it's other people's job to say why lolllll



in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Biden has circumvented his own Congress on numerous occasions throughout the past year to enable the Israeli genocide of Palestinians to the maximum degree possible - to the detriment of American citizens presently going without food, shelter or healthcare. Biden pushed for us to engage in the forever war in Afghanistan and Iraq and helped to ensure we stayed entrenched there for decades. Biden is an absolute war monger who will stop at nothing to further enrich American military contractors and arms dealers - he’s made his whole career about it. This move should not be considered shocking by anyone with half a clue.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Ukraine being forced to deploy even more mines in their country:


Looking for Mentor (for a PhD Candidate) that works with open source


in reply to thevoidzero

I'd just use the #rust IRC channel on libera.chat personally.

Edit: Maybe for the basics/boilerplate you could start with ChatGPT or another generative AI. Then if you have a specific question you could ask the enthusiasts on the IRC channel. IRC people are a lot more helpful than discord people in my experience.

Should also mention there is no substitute for a good textbook so maybe getting a PDF of an Intro to Rust type book would be a good idea as well.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to thevoidzero

In a similar spirit to the "why does it have to be in Rust" question, R already has a robust ecosystem of people doing research and writing packages for the physical sciences, even hydrology. What does writing a whole new system in a new language offer that can't be achieved with existing software?


How stdbuf works


reshared this

in reply to learnbyexample

almost fall off my chair at the end

is there collection of best comment in gnu? or kernel? or foss in general?



20241119_214136.jpg


" “Perma-circularity” is a concept I’ve coined with my colleague Dominique Bourg. He and I both do research at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. What does it mean? The expression is a composite of “permaculture” and “circular economy”. In a nutshell, I use it to designate a genuinely circular economy — one that not only...


DOJ calls for breakup of Google and sale of Chrome


in reply to تحريرها كلها ممكن

Indeed, and frankly Chrome should be operated as a non profit because browsers have become an essential service.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Absolutely.

The only reason Chrome has been slowing down the deprecation of 3rd party cookies is because it would make it harder to do privacy invading tracking, and thus, would make Google less money.

No browser benefits from tracking. Only ad companies do.

in reply to just another dev

Indeed, it's a huge conflict of interest for an ad company to operate the most popular browser. Google being the gatekeeper for the internet is a really terrible situation for the web as a whole.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Ferk

I agree, the way governance is set up is very important, and even non profits can susceptible to perverse incentives as we see with Mozilla. Ideally, it would be something close to the way Linux Foundation is set up.


Live Updates: I.C.C. Issues Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant


cross-posted from: lemmy.ml/post/22743061

[gift article - link can be shared. Expires in 30 days.]
[Bias alert - NYT usually favors Israel]




in reply to geneva_convenience

The audacity of playing victim when there's a warrant for your PM because he's responsible for war crimes, while at the same time your country is occupying and illegally settling on the land of the people he's committing war crimes against, is remarkable.
in reply to geneva_convenience

The US would nuke the Netherlands before Bibi sees the inside of a cell.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)