TROM Social | Community

Xi’s RSVP is a snub to Trump, but the inauguration invite is still a big deal

https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/12/politics/trump-xi-inauguration-china-analysis/index.html

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

hackerwacker

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • 3 months ago • •

I've invited Trump to watch me take a shit.

CNN.com: Wow what a power move from lemmy user hackerwacker

U.S. military confirms drone sightings at air base in Germany

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/unidentified-drones-sighted-over-us-air-base-germany-spiegel-reports-2024-12-13/

I don’t want to argue about genocide. I just want to honor Mahmoud.

cross-posted from: lemmy.ml/post/23541504

An Israeli drone strike killed the remarkable man behind the Gaza Soup Kitchen
from #TheForward #Forward
[#Jewish publication from #USA]
By Rabbi Regina Sandler-Phillips
December 9, 2024

Mahmoud Almadhoun, one of the founders of Gaza Soup Kitchen, killed by an Israeli drone strike. – The Forward

Instead of arguing over genocide, remember Mahmoud Almadhoun, one of the founders and chefs behind the Gaza Soup Kitchen.

^{The Forward}

#Forward #theforward

like this

in reply to Peter Link

teamevil

in reply to Peter Link • 3 months ago • •

That guy sounded amazing, God all this needless suffering is pointless unless you're a monster.

in reply to Peter Link

TheOubliette

in reply to Peter Link • 3 months ago • •

It is a genocide, full stop, and this source is rife with liberal Zionist genocide deniers.

You cannot truly honor this martyr while denying what is happening to him and all Gazans. You cannot clean your conscience selectively.

Stackabrix, a simple terminal game

gitlab.com/christosangel/stack…

stackabrix is a simple terminal game, written in Bash, where the user, against the clock and with the least moves possible, must sort the blocks according to their color, and stack them in the respective stack.

During the game, the user can move left and right, pick blocks and drop them in other stacks.

The aim is to sort the blocks, and stack them in the respectively named stacks, fast as possible, and with the least moves possible.

The play's score is the sum of the time achieved in seconds and of the moves made.

If the score is among the 10 best scores achived, it makes it in the Top Ten Highscores.

Any feedback is welcome.

in reply to christos

Bad_Company_Daps

in reply to christos • 3 months ago • •

Looks pretty cool. I know this isn't the point but I feel like from a games perspective the scoring is a bit off. I don't think 1 extra second and 1 extra move should be the same value. For me to sit there and analyze what the optimal move set would be to move set would be to move a certain block may avoid 2-3 extra moves, but would take way longer than 3 seconds for me to calculate in my head. Maybe make a move add 5 points to the score?

I wonder if there's a game theory way to find the optimal amount that the moves and time should be weighed to make them equal value.

Either way, pretty awesome you got this working in bash.

in reply to Bad_Company_Daps

christos

in reply to Bad_Company_Daps • 3 months ago • •

Summing up seconds and moves seemed a fair way to mark one's score. The analogy of each in the sum is purely arbitrary, and quite possibly subjective: Some people play based more with their reflexes, muscle memory, than calculation. Not everyone functions the same. However this is a fair point.
Thanks for the feedback.

in reply to christos

Bad_Company_Daps

in reply to christos • 3 months ago • •

I do agree in the end it's arbitrary, and you're right there are 2 extremes in strategy, purely analytical and purely reflexive, plus everything in between.

Admittedly without having played this game specifically using both strategies this is purely speculation. But from my experience playing similar games, exactly to your point of the two strategies, if time and moves are weighed equally, I feel like a player using the analytics strategy would end up with a much higher score than a reflex based player at the "same" skill level (however "skill" levels would be pretty hard to quantify and compare by the two strategies).

Hope that makes sense :)

in reply to Bad_Company_Daps

christos

in reply to Bad_Company_Daps • 3 months ago • •

It does. And naturally, the more one practices, they become better at it.

And there is the element of chance: if the randomly generated grid is helpful (e.g. half solved), the easier and quicker it is solved.

Allonzee via Memes

3 months ago • •

Allonzee
3 months ago • •

Will you let them distract and divide you again? It's what they do...

And no, the 6.134258 shares of Apple in your 401K don't make you an owner, lol.

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

like this

in reply to Allonzee

Chemical Wonka

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

bourgeoisie vs proletariat

in reply to Chemical Wonka

Allonzee

in reply to Chemical Wonka • 3 months ago • •

Yes, those are some of the words the owners convinced the masses are SCAWY and EVIL, and only spoken by people that want to take your money when you're a millionaire/billionaire one day.

Because clearly if you succeed, you would never want to have some of your success taxed to repair/improve the commons like roads, schools, and HEALTHCARE of the society that provided the conditions for your astronomical success in the first place.

That would be ridiculous. How can you expect to buy a pet mega yacht to keep your first mega yacht company, while buying an island, while buying up smalltime entrepreneurs that would compete with you, while space touristing, while building your luxury climate change bunker compound if you can't suck entire nations dry?!

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to Chemical Wonka

Voroxpete

in reply to Chemical Wonka • 3 months ago • •

I think the framing in the meme is actually more helpful. Marxists would do well to update their language instead of constantly speaking in terms that sound utterly archaic to modern ears.

I would in fact prefer "Owners vs Workers" because "Laborers" still implies specifically forms of physical labour in a way that makes a lot of people feel excluded from the movement we're trying to build.

in reply to Voroxpete

Allonzee

in reply to Voroxpete • 3 months ago • •

Absolutely agree.

Framing/Marketing is essential.

It's how they've sold this exploitative hellscape.

"This isn't hell, this is freedom! Freedom from responsibility to one another. Free to win big or lose bigger!"

It's sad that it does work, but it does. Hell, marketing has convinced us that a blatant antisocial vice like greed is virtuous rational self-interest. Marketing 👐

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to Voroxpete

Count Regal Inkwell

in reply to Voroxpete • 3 months ago • •

(also Boureoisie is hard as fuck to spell)

in reply to Count Regal Inkwell

PeeOnYou [he/him]

in reply to Count Regal Inkwell • 3 months ago • •

spell it to the Mickey mouse song.. Bou rge oisie

in reply to Voroxpete

Cowbee [he/they]

in reply to Voroxpete • 3 months ago • •

I disagree, actually. Labelling them by their Marxian terms ties them to Marxism. This continues to tie Marxism to modern day analysis. Using general terms erases Marxism, and therefore erases critical theory.

like this

in reply to Cowbee [he/they]

Voroxpete

in reply to Cowbee [he/they] • 3 months ago • •

You can still teach people theory. Theory is important. But it makes no sense to open with it. That's like being asked to teach someone how to use a computer and opening with an explanation of how a CPU works.

No one is going to pay attention to all your theory if they can't understand how it meaningfully relates to their circumstances.

And, frankly, the term Marxism comes with so much cultural baggage at this point that you're far better off focusing on what it actually means rather than what it says. You need to get people out of their preconceptions and help people understand what Marx really meant.

in reply to Voroxpete

Cowbee [he/they]

in reply to Voroxpete • 3 months ago • •

You insult the average person, people are far smarter than you give them credit for. Moreover, you can't avoid discussing the "baggage" that comes from Marxism anyways, so acting scared and secretive is more damaging than anything else. Maintaining a correct line is more important than trying to be sneaky and having it backfire by having them either not read theory, which would be disastrous, or having them retain anti-socialist views because you were sneaky.

in reply to Allonzee

Olgratin_Magmatoe

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

We cannot accept capitalism’s conception of economic relations as “free and private,” because contracts are not made among economic equals and because they give rise to social structures which undemocratically confer power upon some over others. Such relationships are undemocratic in that the citizens involved have not freely deliberated upon the structure of those institutions and how social roles should be distributed within them (e.g., the relationship between capital and labor in the workplace or men and women in child rearing). We do not imagine that all institutional relations would wither away under socialism, but we do believe that the basic contours of society must be democratically constructed by the free deliberation of its members.

in reply to Olgratin_Magmatoe

Allonzee

in reply to Olgratin_Magmatoe • 3 months ago • •

Exactly.

Freedom without responsibility or equity is a rampage.

Our people are only free in the sense that our most successful sociopaths are free to take everything their fellow citizens labor for without giving back anything, and everyone else is free to die in the gutter.

Societies have social contracts backed by law, we forgot and deregulated ours half a century ago, and even then it was lacking.

What society would want an economy that makes it untenable for most humans to raise a family on a single earner's income so a partner can raise kids? That was stolen for the owners profit. Such a society plainly does not prioritize having any future.

The shape of any society's economy tells you everything you need to know about that society's priorities. Ours says "everyone for themselves. You're either in the boat made of bodies, or feel free to drown, loser." Gotta love how enthusiastic our economists are about the system needing to have legions of "losers" as if their very lives are a fucking game.

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to Allonzee

Olgratin_Magmatoe

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

Here's the full article if you're interested:

dsausa.org/strategy/toward_fre…

in reply to Allonzee

CluckN

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

The 400m beats the 800m any day of the week. The 800m is too long to sprint and should be abolished.

in reply to CluckN

Allonzee

in reply to CluckN • 3 months ago • •

You.

Take.

That.

Back.

in reply to Allonzee

PeeOnYou [he/him]

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

Race war!

in reply to CluckN

anton

in reply to CluckN • 3 months ago • •

The 400m is the worst distance because it's the longest, that can be done anaerobic.
This results in the maximum lactic acid and pain for such a short event.
It's the uncanny valley between proper sprint and endurance.

in reply to Allonzee

theywilleatthestars

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

So left. That's what leftism is.

in reply to theywilleatthestars

Allonzee

in reply to theywilleatthestars • 3 months ago • •

While globally true, it isn't what the United States heavy handed Democrat party is at all. They work with Republicans to deny class struggle exists while they bicker on social issue symptoms. A for profit media amplified left/right freak show designed to keep us distracted and hating each other over relatively petty social issues so the owners can bleed us dry in peace. They've made us so divided on so many lines we can barely see straight, all to facilitate profit/growth/metastasis at all other expense.

The handful of spoiler candidates the DNC despises and undermines more than Republicans notwithstanding, the owner's succeeded in legalizing political bribery in the US, and thus we have an economically right-wing neoliberal party and a "put undesirables in concentration camps" party to the right of them.

A leftist movement either needs to steal the DNC infrastructure out from under them and force the neoliberals out as Trump did with the GOP by out-hating them, or we need to somehow make a third party work.

Because the DNC and the RNC are high on Corporate brib

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to Allonzee

theywilleatthestars

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

"Democrat" is not synonymous with Left. Most Democrats aren't leftists

in reply to theywilleatthestars

Iron Lynx

in reply to theywilleatthestars • 3 months ago • •

This. Comparing them to my national parties (NL), my rough estimate is that the Dems are more right wing than D66, and they're pretty much centre-right.

Come back to me when your left is on par with GL-PvdA

in reply to Allonzee

ParetoOptimalDev

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

Most social justice aware leftists don't deny class issues, lol wut

Dessalines likes this.

in reply to Allonzee

PolandIsAStateOfMind

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

While globally true, it isn’t what the United States heavy handed Democrat party is at all.

??? Democrat party was traditionally center-right and now is far-right

in reply to Allonzee

Dessalines

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

The US democrats are a far right party. The US doesn't allow any left-wing party to reach the public sphere, because its far right country.

in reply to Allonzee

UnderpantsWeevil

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

The top brackets are manifestations of the bottom bracket. Its a divide-and-conquer strategy, and foolish to ignore on its face.

For centuries women couldn't own property, couldn't hold professional jobs, and couldn't participate in politics. Same with ethnic minorities. Queer sexual preference was outright prohibited by law and used to disqualify candidates from office, to break up organizations with police action, and to deny people access to private careers and public services.

You can come at this from a vulgar Marxist perspective and only see the Owners v Workers. But you're missing why owners have power if you neglect the layer upon layer of privileged class surrounding them.

If it really does just boil down to Workers v Owners, why don't the cops simply seize the means of production themselves? What keeps them loyal to the bourgeois if they themselves are not invited to the Epstein Island Bunga-Bunga parties? What keeps suburban professionals loyal? What keeps religious radicals loyal?

There's more at play than mere title to real es

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to UnderpantsWeevil

Allonzee

in reply to UnderpantsWeevil • 3 months ago • •

If it really does just boil down to Workers v Owners, why don't the cops simply seize the means of production themselves?

theconversation.com/why-police…

in reply to Allonzee

UnderpantsWeevil

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

A good article for understanding the relationship between the police and other unions. But it doesn't answer the question

Why don’t the cops simply seize the means of production themselves? What keeps them loyal to the bourgeois?

in reply to UnderpantsWeevil

Allonzee

in reply to UnderpantsWeevil • 3 months ago • •

Police unions do not see themselves as part of this movement. With one exception – the International Union of Police Associations, which represents just 2.7% of American police – law enforcement unions are not affiliated with the AFL-CIO, the U.S. labor body that unites all unions.

Because as outlined culturally the police see themselves as the system itself, by nature of the job, as evidenced by their hostility towards the larger labor movement they're often tasked with breaking, something the vast majority of other union heavy vocations don't do, and are often given special carve outs when the labor movement and unionization are targeted legislatively precisely because it's their job to enforce those rules.

American police are more a capital defense force, and unlike the larger labor movement, have their priorities of being unaccountable to those they police backed by the state. They're the owner's special little boys/girls, they attract and recruit conservative minded power seekers who conflate legality with morality, and they like

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to UnderpantsWeevil

FrowingFostek

in reply to UnderpantsWeevil • 3 months ago • •

Imma just take a stab in the dark and say conservative/classical liberal ideology keeps them licking the toe jam of the owning class.

They love them some hierarchy.

in reply to Allonzee

ryedaft

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

cough cishets

in reply to ryedaft

Allonzee

in reply to ryedaft • 3 months ago • •

I will call any human nearly anything (not master, daddy, mommy, etc) they want to be called with any pronouns they want to be used out of basic kindness and courtesy. It doesn't cost anything to be nice.

People who belligerently don't want to are assholes who want to hurt people's feelings.

That said, I will gladly join hands with the assholes to dethrone the profiteers legally murdering people including children in droves out of ice cold, reptilian, calculating, sociopathic greed, because priorities.

For profit insurers don't care what your pronouns are when they murder you. You don't get a disrespectful wrong pronoun, because they murdered you and don't address you at all.

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to Allonzee

riodoro1

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

Being distracted and divided is what we do.

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to Allonzee

Elgenzay

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

Thought it said labradors and thought this post was written by a dog criticizing human politics compared to their dog politics between themselves and their owners

in reply to Elgenzay

chiliedogg

in reply to Elgenzay • 3 months ago • •

"Humans have limitless bacon, but force us to perform tricks and go outside to pee in view of the whole world before they'll give it away as a treat."

in reply to Allonzee

swab148

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

No war but class war.

in reply to Allonzee

recreationalcatheter

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

I love how you left out east vs west in the top panel.

What a weird thing to forget 😅

in reply to recreationalcatheter

JasonDJ

in reply to recreationalcatheter • 3 months ago • •

I think Tupac and Biggie would be friends today. Probably even do a collab album. And then beat the shit out of puff daddy.

in reply to JasonDJ

recreationalcatheter

in reply to JasonDJ • 3 months ago • •

I was referring to the century old propaganda in this meme. It's okay to not be for progress and growth, just don't pretend to be for it 🤷

Guess everyone was right about tankies not being able to honestly discuss anything.

in reply to Allonzee

Cowbee [he/they]

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

It's still very important to recognize the impacts of racism, sexism, homophobia, and more. White supremacy, cishet supremacy, and patriarchy are additional axes by which the overall contradiction of bourgeois vs proletarian is waged. You can't erase that. You have to acknowledge it within the broader class war. Historically, class war has been waged the fiercest by those most marginalized by it, uniting and making significant social progress is necessary for Socialism.

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

like this

in reply to Allonzee

UltraGiGaGigantic

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

While I appreciate you covered up drakes face with Luigi, please consider using the laforge version of this meme in the future. Here is a copy for you. Thanks.

in reply to UltraGiGaGigantic

Allonzee

in reply to UltraGiGaGigantic • 3 months ago • •

I will do so!

in reply to Allonzee

Mac

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to Mac

chetradley

in reply to Mac • 3 months ago • •

in reply to chetradley

UltraGiGaGigantic

in reply to chetradley • 2 months ago • •

Nice

in reply to Mac

UltraGiGaGigantic

in reply to Mac • 2 months ago • •

Damn dude, you win. Way to inspire me to aspire to your level of greatness.

in reply to UltraGiGaGigantic

JackbyDev

in reply to UltraGiGaGigantic • 3 months ago • •

I love the pic you posted, wonderin' if I share it, would you mind? I know a couple people online who would love it please reply.

in reply to UltraGiGaGigantic

dQw4w9WgXcQ

in reply to UltraGiGaGigantic • 3 months ago • •

I'm out-of-the-loop. Did Drake do something bad?

in reply to Allonzee

umbrella

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

i love how this guy is putting class consciousness into people.

the race, gender and politics discussion is important, but to get anything done we need class consciousness first.

in reply to umbrella

Cowbee [he/they]

in reply to umbrella • 3 months ago • •

Less "first," more "alongside" imo. Class division is the primary contradiction, but you can't untangle it without making progress on the secondary contradictions.

in reply to Cowbee [he/they]

umbrella

in reply to Cowbee [he/they] • 3 months ago • •

thats a good point. its part of how they divide us.

in reply to Allonzee

JackbyDev

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

And no, the 6.134258 shares of Apple in your 401K don't make you an owner, lol.

Thank you for saying this. It's very frustrating when people act like having retirement savings makes you like billionaires.

in reply to JackbyDev

explodicle

in reply to JackbyDev • 3 months ago • •

This is 100% by design. The only way to retire in this economy is to invest in an exploitative business. So over time, people find themselves supporting ideas that make retirements in general farther away, but their own retirement nicer.

in reply to Allonzee

PolandIsAStateOfMind

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

Right is in the first place because they support capitalism, therefore owners

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to Allonzee

Oka

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

Right vs Left Race vs. Race Men vs. Women Cis vs. LGBT

What did the left Race, or the women cis, or the Race Men do to deserve this?

in reply to Allonzee

sunbytes

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

We need a Luigi (the human) Wojak asap.

Nintendo will step in and spoil the fun (hard) if this gets momentum.

Also for human Luigi: Mugshot Vs Twitter pic for drake meme also?

in reply to sunbytes

RadiantLuminous

in reply to sunbytes • 3 months ago • •

in reply to sunbytes

PeeOnYou [he/him]

in reply to sunbytes • 3 months ago • •

fuck Nintendo, i don't think they'll want to push their luck

in reply to Allonzee

NutWrench

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

Yup. It's not about the "gays vs the straights" or the "left vs the right" or the Romulans vs The Federation. It's about the rich vs everybody else. It's a class war. It always has been and the rich use the media they own to make you think it's a culture war. To keep you fighting with other so you won't figure out where the REAL source of your pain comes from.

in reply to Allonzee

agent_nycto

in reply to Allonzee • 3 months ago • •

I kinda disagree with this a little. These things are interconnected. While we shouldn't let stuff like race and sexuality divide us, we shouldn't ignore that some groups have been fucked over more than others and part of dismantling the system is seeing what parts are rotten. Red lining n shit.

in reply to agent_nycto

Allonzee

in reply to agent_nycto • 3 months ago • •

I'm not saying to ignore them, I'm saying we have a common enemy using those differences to exploit and murder us by amplifying every division except owners vs workers using for profit media and captured government, encouraging us to fight one another over them so they can do so.

Note the absolutely confused and terrified tone the for profit media is going through right now when they're perfectly fine when 10 kids get gunned down. That's just another wedge for division, gun control, for them to stoke as no one that mattered, to them, died.

Im saying that until we pause and dethrone the owners, they will see to it those secondary divisions remain entrenched and heated to keep us weak, and therefore they are the primary threat that must be the priority to solve literally any of our great national blights.

We cannot begin to heal... Any division... Until the instigators that keep stoking them for private profit are defeated and made subject to society, government, and regulation again instead of controlling them.

Reigning in our sociopathic, murderous late sta

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to Allonzee

agent_nycto

in reply to Allonzee • 2 months ago • •

I've seen some pretty compelling arguments from minority groups that step 0 can't be done without simultaneously addressing the divisions you're talking about. I don't see why we can't do both. I agree that these things are used and usually ultimately come from capitalism, but I think that recognizing and fixing those divisions is an integral part of dismantling capitalism.

in reply to agent_nycto

Allonzee

in reply to agent_nycto • 2 months ago • •

Again, capitalism amplifies these divisions with the bully pulpits ONLY THE CAPITALISTS CONTROL through government and profit media.

You can't have any movement they don't inform and can't kill entirely if they wish, because they own the signal, and a few techies on distributed social media doesn't change that.

But nothing will change, because there are too many people that refuse to acknowledge that, that think their cause is more important and must take priority when the class war either created or exacerbates their oppression, effects more people, almost everyone, and while identify affirmation is a nice and in a decent society important thing, material needs, food, water, shelter for ALL are objectively a higher priority than telling 10% of the population for any subgroup "I see you, your identity is valid." I'm all for that. But this is a literal war where people are being murdered, and a cause parade for any cause other than stop murdering/exploiting our very lives for profit us has no place in a war for the vast majority of the population's survival.

And i

This entry was edited (2 months ago)

nutomic via Announcements

3 months ago • •

nutomic
3 months ago • •

Lemmy v0.19.8 Release

What is Lemmy?

Lemmy is a self-hosted social link aggregation and discussion platform. It is completely free and open, and not controlled by any company. This means that there is no advertising, tracking, or secret algorithms. Content is organized into communities, so it is easy to subscribe to topics that you are interested in, and ignore others. Voting is used to bring the most interesting items to the top.

Changes

This release includes a few minor fixes and improvements. Merry Christmas Everyone!

Lemmy

Fix post thumbnails by properly determining file type
Provide health endpoint for pictrs at /pictrs/healthz
Allow bypassing image proxy for specific domains (can be configured via config va

2024-12-12 - Lemmy Release v0.19.8

^{join-lemmy.org}

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

Lemmy reshared this.

in reply to nutomic

Avieshek

in reply to nutomic • 3 months ago • •

Make >!spoilers!< sane again 🔔

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to Avieshek

Dessalines

in reply to Avieshek • 3 months ago • •

Issue for context: github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/i…

TCB13 via Linux

3 months ago • •

TCB13
3 months ago • •

Paranoia Level: Virtualization vs Isolated Machines for Self-Hosting?

cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/23071801

Considering a lot of people here are self-hosting both private stuff, like a NAS and also some other is public like websites and whatnot, how do you approach segmentation in the context of virtual machines versus dedicated machines?
This is generally how I see the community action on this:

Scenario 1: Fully Isolated Machine for Public Stuff

Two servers one for the internal stuff (NAS) and another for the public stuff totally isolated from your LAN (websites, email etc). Preferably with a public IP that is not the same as your LAN and the traffic to that machines doesn't go through your main router. Eg. a switch between the ISP ONT and your router that also has a cable connected for the isolated machine. This way the machine is completely isolated from your network and not dependent on it.

Scenario 2: Single server with VM exposed

A single server hosting two VMs, one to host a NAS al

cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/23071801

Considering a lot of people here are self-hosting both private stuff, like a NAS and also some other is public like websites and whatnot, how do you approach segmentation in the context of virtual machines versus dedicated machines?
This is generally how I see the community action on this:

Scenario 1: Fully Isolated Machine for Public Stuff

Two servers one for the internal stuff (NAS) and another for the public stuff totally isolated from your LAN (websites, email etc). Preferably with a public IP that is not the same as your LAN and the traffic to that machines doesn't go through your main router. Eg. a switch between the ISP ONT and your router that also has a cable connected for the isolated machine. This way the machine is completely isolated from your network and not dependent on it.

Scenario 2: Single server with VM exposed

A single server hosting two VMs, one to host a NAS along with a few internal services running in containers, and another to host publicly exposed websites. Each website could have its own container inside the VM for added isolation, with a reverse proxy container managing traffic.
For networking, I typically see two main options:
Option A: Completely isolate the "public-facing" VM from the internal network by using a dedicated NIC in passthrough mode for the VM;
Option B: Use a switch to deliver two VLANs to the host—one for the internal network and one for public internet access. In this scenario, the host would have two VLAN-tagged interfaces (e.g., eth0.X) and bridge one of them with the "public" VM’s network interface. Here’s a diagram for reference: ibb.co/PTkQVBF
In the second option, a firewall would run inside the "public" VM to drop all inbound except for http traffic. The host would simply act as a bridge and would not participate in the network in any way.

Scenario 3: Exposed VM on a Windows/Linux Desktop Host

Windows/Linux desktop machine that runs KVM/VirtualBox/VMware to host a VM that is directly exposed to the internet with its own public IP assigned by the ISP. In this setup, a dedicated NIC would be passed through to the VM for isolation.
The host OS would be used as a personal desktop and contain sensitive information.

Scenario 4: Dual-Boot Between Desktop and Server

A dual-boot setup where the user switches between a OS for daily usage and another for hosting stuff when needed (with a public IP assigned by the ISP). The machine would have a single Ethernet interface and the user would manually switch network cables between: a) the router (NAT/internal network) when running the "personal" OS and b) a direct connection to the switch (and ISP) when running the "public/hosting" OS.
For increased security, each OS would be installed on a separate NVMe drive, and the "personal" one would use TPM with full disk encryption to protect sensitive data. If the "public/hosting" system were compromised.
The theory here is that, if properly done, the TPM doesn't release the keys to decrypt the "personal" disk OS when the user is booted into the "public/hosting" OS.
People also seem to combine both scenarios with Cloudflare tunnels or reverse proxies on cheap VPS.
What's your approach / paranoia level :D
Do you think using separate physical machines is really the only sensible way to go? How likely do you think VM escape attacks and VLAN hopping or other networking-based attacks are?
Let's discuss how secure these setups are, what pitfalls one should watch out for on each one, and what considerations need to be addressed.

in reply to TCB13

ffhein

in reply to TCB13 • 3 months ago • •

My paranoia level: Even though I'm pretty good with computers in general, I would not trust myself to set up a safe public facing service, which is the reason that I don't have any of those on my home server. If I needed something like that I wouldn't self host it.

in reply to TCB13

subtext

in reply to TCB13 • 3 months ago • •

Scenario 5: put it all in one big long docker-compose.yml and cross your fingers that docker isolation does its job.

E: definitely not what I do, no siree

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to subtext

N0x0n

in reply to subtext • 3 months ago • •

😱😱😱

in reply to subtext

Auli

in reply to subtext • 3 months ago • •

Nope don't do that either.

in reply to TCB13

SayCyberOnceMore

in reply to TCB13 • 3 months ago • •

Kinda Scenario 1 is the standard way: firewall at the perimeter with separately isolated networks for DMZ, LAN & Wifi

The Firewall provides a proxy for anything in the DMZ, so all the filtering is done there and not on the DMZ device(s).

GeoIP on the firewall, so anything that's opened to the interweb - inc. inbound VPNs can only come from selected regions.

Fail2Ban on DMZ device(s), to prevent repeated login attacks.

Wifi has multiple SSIDs to block / permit outbound access to the internet (IoT stuff), LAN (Guests), etc.

Then regular updates / patching / backups....

in reply to SayCyberOnceMore

TCB13

in reply to SayCyberOnceMore • 3 months ago • •

Kinda Scenario 1 is the standard way: firewall at the perimeter with separately isolated networks for DMZ, LAN & Wifi

What you're describing is close to scenario 1, but not purely scenario 1. It is a mix between public and private traffic on a single IP address and single firewall that a lot of people use because they can't have two separate public IP addresses running side by side on their connection.

The advantage of that setup is that it greatly reduces the attack surface by NOT exposing your home network public IP to whatever you're hosting and by not relying on the same firewall for both. Even if your entire hosting stack gets hacked there's no way the hacker can get in your home network because they're two separate networks.

The scenario one describes having 2 public IPs, a switch after the ISP ONT and one cable goes to the home firewall/router and another to the server (or another router / firewall). Much more isolated. It isn't a simple DMZ, it's literally the same as two different internet connections for each thing.

in reply to TCB13

SayCyberOnceMore

in reply to TCB13 • 3 months ago • •

Fair point, I neglected to mention that I have >1 Public IP
The firewall directs traffic as required.

in reply to SayCyberOnceMore

TCB13

in reply to SayCyberOnceMore • 3 months ago • •

That's a good setup with multiple IP, but still you've a single firewall that might be compromised somehow if someone get's access to the "public" machine. :)

in reply to TCB13

SayCyberOnceMore

in reply to TCB13 • 3 months ago • •

I have a single connection to the 'net, hence a single firewall.

I've port scanned my firewall (externally) when travelling for work, so I've verified what's exposed and verified that GeoIP works (forgot to enable a region before travelling there), so I've reached the point where I'm happy with this setup

in reply to TCB13

Rogue

in reply to TCB13 • 3 months ago • •

Don't expose anything publicly, instead setup wireguard for every VM. Connect your phone, PC etc to the VPN so you have full access without publicly exposing anything.

You may have touched on this but your post was way too long so I only read the headings

in reply to Rogue

TCB13

in reply to Rogue • 3 months ago • •

If you did you would know I wasn't looking for advice. You also knew that exposing stuff publicly was a prerequisite.

in reply to TCB13

Rogue

in reply to TCB13 • 3 months ago • •

Fair, but you were asking how people approach security for self hosted solutions and I guess I'm challenging why anything needs to be public. Self hosting is typically for your own services which can usually be hidden behind a VPN.

The exception I guess is email, but I never understand why people attempt self hosted mail servers

in reply to Rogue

TCB13

in reply to Rogue • 3 months ago • •

Why only email? Why not also a website? :)

"self-hosting both private stuff, like a NAS and also some other is public like websites and whatnot"

Some people do it and to be fair a website is way simpler and less prone to issues than mail.

in reply to TCB13

Rogue

in reply to TCB13 • 3 months ago • •

Do websites come under the remit of self hosting?

Personally I host static websites with GitHub, cloudfront, netlify, onrender etc. Trivial to setup, more reliable and better cdn distribution. Anything dynamic lives in a data center rather than a self host setup.

in reply to Rogue

TCB13

in reply to Rogue • 3 months ago • •

You may not want to depend on those cloud services and if you need something not static, doesn't cut it.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via canada

3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

Fuckface Labour Minister Steven MacKinnon is ordering Canada Post employees back to work.

Canada Post strike: Minister seeks order to get workers back on the job

Labour Minister Steven MacKinnon announced Friday that he is asking the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) to order workers back on the job.

^{Katie Dangerfield (Global News)}

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via Canada

3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

Fuckface Labour Minister Steven MacKinnon is ordering Canada Post employees back to work.

Canada Post strike: Minister seeks order to get workers back on the job

Labour Minister Steven MacKinnon announced Friday that he is asking the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) to order workers back on the job.

^{Katie Dangerfield (Global News)}

Dessalines likes this.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via Socialism

3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

Is Marx still relevant today?

Is Marx still relevant today? - Friends of Socialist China

The following article by Zhang Wan, a Current Affairs Commentator at CGTN, has been translated by the Academy of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and we are publishing it at their request.

^{Friends of Socialist China}

Dessalines likes this.

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

eldavi

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ • 3 months ago • •

americans don't like to read unless oprah is telling them to.

in reply to eldavi

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

in reply to eldavi • 3 months ago • •

Sadly very true. I've also notice how a lot of people just dismiss this stuff as being historical and no longer relevant without actually reading it.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via Socialism

3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

China’s bridges to a socialist future

PAWEL WARGAN examines how the nation’s infrastructure projects reflect its journey from poverty to lightning-fast development by combining ancient civilisation with modern socialist construction

^{Morning Star}

Dessalines likes this.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via World News

3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

10th Asia-Pacific Regional Conference of Solidarity with Cuba held in Beijing

schizoidman via World News

3 months ago • •

schizoidman
3 months ago • •

Macron names centrist ally François Bayrou as France's new prime minister

cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/23094586

Summary
French President Emmanuel Macron appointed centrist François Bayrou as the new prime minister after a no-confidence vote ousted Michel Barnier's government.
Bayrou, founder of the Democratic Movement party, faces the challenge of uniting a fractured parliament to pass an unpopular 2025 cost-cutting budget, which led to Barnier's downfall.
Barnier, ousted after just three months, was criticized for bypassing parliament.
Bayrou must form a cabinet and navigate political tensions to avoid another government collapse, which could endanger Macron's presidency amid calls for new elections.

President Macron names centrist ally François Bayrou as France's new prime minister

French President Emmanuel Macron named centrist ally François Bayrou as France's new prime minister on Friday as he sought to steer the country out of political chaos.

^{Chantal Da Silva (NBC News)}

in reply to schizoidman

Infamousblt [any]

in reply to schizoidman • 3 months ago • •

What ever happened to the person that actually won the election why hasn't that person been appointed prime minister yet. Some great democracy you got over there France

like this

in reply to Infamousblt [any]

MrPozor

in reply to Infamousblt [any] • 3 months ago • •

We voted for parliament groups, not a person. The prime minister is chosen by the president.

in reply to MrPozor

Sauerkraut

in reply to MrPozor • 3 months ago • •

Sounds super democratic. Why not copy the German system where the majority party in the majority coalition becomes PM / Chancellor?

like this

in reply to Sauerkraut

HobbitFoot

in reply to Sauerkraut • 3 months ago • •

Because de Gaulle wanted a system that combined the worst of the Presidential and Parliamentary systems.

like this

in reply to schizoidman

dkr567 [comrade/them, he/him]

in reply to schizoidman • 3 months ago • •

So how long until the centrist gets ousted?

in reply to dkr567 [comrade/them, he/him]

geneva_convenience

in reply to dkr567 [comrade/them, he/him] • 3 months ago • •

Macron will keep retrying until. Le Penn gets a shot.

in reply to dkr567 [comrade/them, he/him]

catloaf

in reply to dkr567 [comrade/them, he/him] • 3 months ago • •

I give it less than a week.

banazir via Linux

3 months ago • •

banazir
3 months ago • •

openSUSE: Choosing Better Alternatives Amid Confusing Policies

The case for Linux and openSUSE is clear. Linux provides viable, cost-effective and sustainable alternatives. Users can enjoy a free, open-source operating system that doesn’t require costly upgrades or restrictive hardware requirements with installing openSUSE. Here are a few things users that want to transition can consider:
Complete Transparency: Linux distributions like openSUSE are governed by open-source principles, ensuring clear and consistent development.
No Forced Obsolescence: openSUSE supports a wide range of hardware like modern machines to older PCs that allow users to extend the life of their devices.
Cost Savings: openSUSE is free to use, with no licensing fees or hidden subscription costs for extended support.
By switching to Linux, users can help combat e-waste as every PC saved from a landfill is a win for the environment.

Choosing Better Alternatives Amid Confusing Policies

A recent back-and-forth on Windows 11’s hardware requirements and the end-of-life timeline for Windows 10 leaves millions of users frustrated and uncertain a...

^{openSUSE News}

reshared this

in reply to banazir

propter_hog [none/use name]

in reply to banazir • 3 months ago • •

openSUSE is the GOAT for several reasons, but by far my favorite reason is Zypper.

in reply to propter_hog [none/use name]

kurcatovium

in reply to propter_hog [none/use name] • 3 months ago • •

I'm daily driving it for ~3 years and I only started yast once to see why everyone praises it so much and second time when I actually needed something (don't even know if I suceeded or failed).

Snapper on the other hand... That is a bit I praise the most! I still don't get it why it's not default for more distros...

in reply to banazir

rodbiren

in reply to banazir • 3 months ago • •

I continue to have a hard time with it. I desperately want to like it but feel like it doesn't handle laptop Nvidia right. I keep getting boot to black screen on KDE and have to rfkill unblock on install and just a host of issues I can't seem to ever nail down. Might have to try again since switcherooctl, but there are some rough edges for me.

Love MicroOS for server though. Rock solid.

like this

in reply to rodbiren

not_amm

in reply to rodbiren • 3 months ago • •

Hey, may I ask how has it been MicroOS for you?
I'm interested in using it for my small server and self-hosting, but I mostly use containers with Docker and I've seen that MicroOS comes with Podman by default.

in reply to not_amm

NanoooK

in reply to not_amm • 3 months ago • •

Podman is good, you should try it.

Most docker's commands can be replaced by podman's.

in reply to NanoooK

not_amm

in reply to NanoooK • 3 months ago • •

Will do, thanks!. Have you used something like Docker Compose? I didn't have a lot of time before, but I'm still researching and I don't get what is the "standardized" way of dealing with composed containers

in reply to not_amm

NanoooK

in reply to not_amm • 3 months ago • •

I have never used Podman Compose but it exists. I guess it's really similar to docker compose.

With podman you can use "Quadlets", which are systemd files allowing the services to integrate very well with the system (you can use journalctl to see the logs of a container).

   Podman  supports  building,  and starting containers (and creating vol‐
  umes) via systemd by using a systemd generator.  These files  are  read
  during boot (and when systemctl daemon-reload is run) and generate cor‐
  responding  regular  systemd  service  unit files. Both system and user
  systemd units are supported.  All options and tables available in stan‐
  dard systemd unit files are supported. For example, options defined  in
  the  [Service]  table and [Install] tables pass directly to systemd and
  are handled by it.  See systemd.unit(5) man page for more information.

  The Podman generator reads the search paths above and reads files  with
  the  extensions  .container  .volume, .network, .build, .pod and .kube,
  and for e

in reply to NanoooK

not_amm

in reply to NanoooK • 3 months ago • •

I've been reading about them, thank you! I'll test them in a VM soon, I find it weird to use systemd, but I guess if it works... I hope I get a new PC this month so I can transition distros and storage easily.

in reply to not_amm

rodbiren

in reply to not_amm • 3 months ago • •

I ended up installing docker. Didn't want to make a bunch of systemd files. It automatically updates each day and has required almost no maintenance at all. It's a little strange, but can work great.

in reply to rodbiren

not_amm

in reply to rodbiren • 3 months ago • •

I already use Docker, but in rootless mode, which works kind of weird. I wouldn't say I'm obsessed, but I like to go by example and implement all the best practices and zero trust in my own devices, since I'm studying cybersecurity:)

in reply to rodbiren

N.E.P.T.R

in reply to rodbiren • 3 months ago • •

For nvidia hardware, use nvidia images of Aurora/Bluefin (or Bazzite if you want gaming out of the box). All the OSes I mentioned are based on Fedora Atomic and offer image options for nvidia proprietary drivers. They even signing the kernel drivers, so you can use Secure Boot.

in reply to N.E.P.T.R

rodbiren

in reply to N.E.P.T.R • 3 months ago • •

I have distro hopped my dang brains out with everything under the sun. I'm back to Mint. It works without being an absolute pain and is boring as watching paint dry, which is the point of an OS. I just use it to compute, work, code, and game. it boots and updates eventually.

in reply to rodbiren

ProtonBadger

in reply to rodbiren • 3 months ago • •

Yes I encountered that when I used Tumbleweed on my laptop, the solution was to run "sudo prime-select boot offload". It set up my laptop to use iGPU for desktop environment and NV offload for gaming. I made it part of my update script. No idea why that wasn't handled better.

But generally I'm done with rolling distros, I now use an Ubuntu derivative that still keeps kernel and mesa quite up to date, I enjoy a stable environment.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via news

3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

One of the people who got their sentenced commuted by Biden was one of the Kids-for-Cash judges.

full story citizensvoice.com/2024/12/12/b…

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via United States | News & Politics

3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

One of the people who got their sentenced commuted by Biden was one of the Kids-for-Cash judges.

full story citizensvoice.com/2024/12/12/b…

Dessalines likes this.

geneva_convenience via World News

3 months ago • •

geneva_convenience
3 months ago • •

'Did you participate in genocide?': Australia stonewalls Israeli siblings' visa application over IDF service

Israeli siblings Omer Berger, 24, and Ella Berger, 22, faced delays in obtaining Australian visas after being asked to complete to complete a 13-page document typically required for military personnel involved in war. The siblings had planned to visit their 100-year-old great-grandmother, a Holocaust survivor.

According to Berger, six family members applied for Australian visas two months ago. While all were promptly approved, Omer and Ella were told to submit the extended form. The questions included whether they had participated in physical or psychological abuse, served as guards or officials in detention facilities or engaged in war crimes or genocide.

Ella, who had received a week’s leave from her military service to attend the celebration, gave up waiting and returned to Israel. Omer, a reservist, remains in Thailand, hoping for a resolution. Berger expressed the family’s heartbreak, fearing they may never see their great-grandmother again. “We just want a clear answer, yes or no,” he said.

'Did you participate in genocide?': Australia stonewalls Israeli siblings' visa appli

Omer and Ella Berger planned to visit their 100-year-old great-grandmother in Australia but were denied entry and asked to complete a 13-page form due to their IDF service; 'Decision reflects government’s increasingly hostile stance against Isra…

^{Itamar Eichner (ynet news)}

like this

in reply to geneva_convenience

keepcarrot [she/her]

in reply to geneva_convenience • 3 months ago • •

I'm pretty sure centrelink forms are routinely longer than 13 pages.

in reply to geneva_convenience

ZoDoneRightNow

in reply to geneva_convenience • 3 months ago • •

The bare fucking minimum so that the Australian government can argue that they aren’t complicit

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via Space, the final frontier

3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

Perseverance rover will uncover mysterious Martian history after a monthslong challenging trek

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/12/12/science/perseverance-rover-crater-rim

🏴 hamid the villain [he/him] 🏴 via Memes

3 months ago • •

🏴 hamid the villain [he/him] 🏴
3 months ago • •

American graduation

like this

in reply to 🏴 hamid the villain [he/him] 🏴

Sam_Bass

in reply to 🏴 hamid the villain [he/him] 🏴 • 3 months ago • •

Symbolicly throwing away years of trivial information that may or may not be dredged up later in life

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to 🏴 hamid the villain [he/him] 🏴

Assian_Candor [comrade/them]

in reply to 🏴 hamid the villain [he/him] 🏴 • 3 months ago • •

🔥

no_nothing via Memes

3 months ago • •

no_nothing
3 months ago • •

The Leftorium

like this

in reply to no_nothing

ThatWeirdGuy1001

in reply to no_nothing • 3 months ago • •

I'm gonna rant for a second here if that's alright.

FUCK being mixed handed. I'm not right or left handed but I'm not ambidextrous either. I'm what's called cross dominant and it's a huge pain in the ass all the time.

Cross dominance is when you don't use one hand for everything but can't use both hands for everything. I write with my left hand but throw with my right. I eat with my left hand but punch with my right. That's not the main issue though. The main issue is I cannot use both my hands at the same time without them running into each other because they both have different instincts. If I were to try to use both hands to put something together I'm likely to end up yeeting whatever it is across the room because my hands got confused and one did the right thing while the other had a fuckin stroke and thought that the necessary thing to do is just fully extend and smack whatever I'm working on.

It's a small thing that I generally don't bring up because it's not that big of a deal and I've adapted to only using one hand at a time but it's still infuriating.

Rant over.

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to ThatWeirdGuy1001

TheEEEdiot

in reply to ThatWeirdGuy1001 • 3 months ago • •

I don't know. Sounds kind of cool to be able to eat and punch someone at the same time.

in reply to TheEEEdiot

ThatWeirdGuy1001

in reply to TheEEEdiot • 3 months ago • •

I'd end up hitting them with the food and punching myself in the face.

in reply to ThatWeirdGuy1001

Albbi

in reply to ThatWeirdGuy1001 • 3 months ago • •

Well, picturing that all I can say is: relevant username.

in reply to Albbi

ThatWeirdGuy1001

in reply to Albbi • 3 months ago • •

That's just one thing on the list of many that make me one of the weirdest guys in the room at all times.

in reply to ThatWeirdGuy1001

Bumblefumble

in reply to ThatWeirdGuy1001 • 3 months ago • •

Maybe I'm showing my Europeannes, but don't most people eat with their left hand?

in reply to Bumblefumble

garretble

in reply to Bumblefumble • 3 months ago • •

What in the world? Is that European thing?

in reply to garretble

Bumblefumble

in reply to garretble • 3 months ago • •

Fork in your left hand, knife in your right. Yes, that is common European etiquette.

in reply to Bumblefumble

Venator

in reply to Bumblefumble • 3 months ago • •

Spoon in right hand though...

in reply to Bumblefumble

Ignotum

in reply to Bumblefumble • 3 months ago • •

Donk know what you mean, I'm from Europe and everyone here eats with their mouth

in reply to ThatWeirdGuy1001

Psythik

in reply to ThatWeirdGuy1001 • 3 months ago • •

That's not "cross-dominant", you are simply a lefty who has adapted to living in a right-handed world, just like me. I can't use a computer mouse or fire a gun left-handed, but only because they rarely made these things for left-handed people when I was growing up, so Ive only ever used then with my right hand and struggle to switch sides.

That said, my aim with a mouse and a gun are awful because I'm not right-handed. I have a feeling that I would do a lot better with these devices if I was more accommodated in my childhood.

in reply to Psythik

ThatWeirdGuy1001

in reply to Psythik • 3 months ago • •

Everyone thought I was left handed until I started playing baseball. I couldn't swing the bat right or throw the ball at all. It just felt and looked completely unnatural. Then a coach suggested throwing with my right hand and it was clearly obvious my body was fuckin weird

This entry was edited (3 months ago)

in reply to ThatWeirdGuy1001

Trainguyrom

in reply to ThatWeirdGuy1001 • 3 months ago • •

It was always a challenge for me in gym class because they'd detail "here's how to swing if you're left handed. Here's how to swing if you're right handed. Now remember no practice swings!" And I'd just have to try it both ways to see which way I do slightly less badly with while classmates jeer about "weren't you paying attention, you only swing that way if you're left handed! Why are you switching hands?!"

in reply to no_nothing

lightnsfw

in reply to no_nothing • 3 months ago • •

I never had an issue using right handed desks as a lefty. Or most other right handed things now that I think about it.

⇧

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via World News

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ 3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via World News

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ 3 months ago • •

Peter Link via World News

Peter Link 3 months ago • •

christos via Open Source

christos 3 months ago • •

Allonzee via Memes

Allonzee 3 months ago • •

nutomic via Announcements

nutomic 3 months ago • •

What is Lemmy?

Changes

Lemmy

Lemmy-UI

Upgrade instructions

Thanks to everyone

Support development

TCB13 via Linux

TCB13 3 months ago • •

Scenario 1: Fully Isolated Machine for Public Stuff

Scenario 2: Single server with VM exposed

Scenario 3: Exposed VM on a Windows/Linux Desktop Host

Scenario 4: Dual-Boot Between Desktop and Server

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via canada

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ 3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via Canada

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ 3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via Socialism

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ 3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ via Socialism

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ 3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

Peter Link
3 months ago • •

christos
3 months ago • •

Allonzee
3 months ago • •

nutomic
3 months ago • •

TCB13
3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
3 months ago • •