Matt Gaetz ethics report says his drug use and sex with a minor violated state laws
What was life like for ordinary Victorians? Historian Ruth Goodman explains
- YouTube
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.www.youtube.com
What The West Misunderstands About Power In China
What The West Misunderstands About Power In China
Often overlooked in portrayals of China, provincial & local officials have the greatest impact on day-to-day governance, & their actions shape national politics.NOEMA
An Extraordinary Time-Lapse Captures the Microscopic Development of a Single Cell into a Newt
An Extraordinary Time-Lapse Captures the Microscopic Development of a Single Cell into a Newt — Colossal
In Becoming, a time-lapse film by Jan van IJken (previously), a single cell splits. Then it splits again, and again, and again, morphing and quivering as new quadrants continually appear and divide.Kate Sierzputowski (Colossal)
nano-queries - A universal and powerful database-agnostic query builder for Node and browser (works with SQLite, Postgres, GraphQL, Redis, PGlite, etc.)
GitHub - vitonsky/nano-queries: Simple and powerful query builder for any database (SQLite, Postgres, MySQL, etc).
Simple and powerful query builder for any database (SQLite, Postgres, MySQL, etc). - vitonsky/nano-queriesGitHub
The brain controls body weight and obesity by regulating intestinal fat absorption
The brain controls body weight and obesity by regulating intestinal fat absorption
A new study in the journal ‘Nature’ suggests the brain plays a key role in this processIgnacio Morgado Bernal (Ediciones EL PAÍS S.L.)
like this
Björn Tantau and HootinNHollerin like this.
How is a list of seven(!) different analyzed potential factors reduced by you with a "wtf" to one of those?
And then followed by an anecdote, a correlated studies off topic to the study described and a bit of conspiracy theory (note: one of the few I even support myself, but i's out of scope of this article!).
You're actively harming the points you want to make by jumping onto the wrong targets.
You should see my '89 year book. Almost no one was even slightly overweight except for the biggest jocks. I see people every day that would have shocked us in the 80s and 90s.
My friend across the street is grossly obese. His best friend just calls him "chubby", but really fat. Told him the guy would have been the fattest kid in my senior class (excepting the jocks).
My theory is this: People keep seeing people bigger than themselves and saying, "I might be fat, but at least I'm not that fat!" Rinse and repeat.
Dude, go talk to a bariatric specialist. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
You ever even look into the advances in bariatric medicine the last decade? Ever help treat a bariatric patient? 99% behaviorial is utter bullshit, and does not match currer best information.
Genetics didn't likely change, but epigenetics is how our systems respond to conditions in and around us. And that absolutely can and has changed in the last fifty years, and was changing before that.
How our food is process impacts the entire endocrine system, our microbiota in not only the gut, but the entire body. We've got massive increases in environmental contamination over the same kind of timeline, which can not only directly effect systemic function, it can change epigenetics in the womb, and the actual genes themselves.
99% behaviorial my hairy ass.
Even that part is influenced by how food is processed, since there's enough shit in anything you grow, even when you're growing it yourself to play a factor. Actual processed foods are literally designed to trigger our brains and kick off addictions to the added fats and sugars.
That kind of bullshit is the same kind of brainless thing that leads to people thinking vaccines cause autism. There's a metric buttload of data pointing to both weight gain and difficulty in weight loss being heavily influenced by external factors, but you're in here like "nuh-uh, my data set of two fat kids in school says no"
I think they’re just saying that they found another link to obesity causing things. On the flip side of this my family can eat literally anything we want and not a single one of us is more than 130 pounds(all somewhere between 5’7 and 6’). I mean I’ve watched my brother slam 4 eggs, two slices of cheesecake, and half a gallon of milk for breakfast. He also tried to gain weight for two months by upping his calorie intake to somewhere around 6K calories a day. He gained like a pound and dropped it cause it was expensive…
We can only gain weight by adding muscle. My other brother was in the military and heaviest he ever weighed was after training. It’s been a few decades since then and he’s right back to his earlier weight.
I’ve been told by many that oh as you age that metabolism is gonna slow and you’ll start putting on the pounds. There is some truth to that but not as extreme as others.
My 70+ year old mother is 103 pounds. She might gain a few pounds if she has 2-3 shakes in a week(this also means she’s just on a sweets binge in general). All that’s required to lose it? Not have shakes the next week. Mind you this is someone who had 4 children and left the hospital after pregnancy within a few pounds of their pre-pregnancy weight.
So genetics is absolutely a factor and I’m all for them uncovering what that link is and researching it. The more we understand things the better.
I’d like to put on some weight…even fat. Cause I’m literally low single digit fat percentage right now which isn’t healthy either. Mind you I have a desk job. Not like I’m the epitome of active people.
For a lot of people
What about that phrase made you interpret it as "everyone"?
In fact, I lost weight when I moved out and had very little money
This makes it sound like your young and still had the metabolism of a teenager... Losing that is what makes most people gain weight. While some people can be overweight with it, it's still literally the easiest time in your life to lose weight.
It would have been much harder if you were fully grown.
like this
superkret likes this.
don't like this
superkret doesn't like this.
Might explain why I can barely gain weight, once had a camp week where me and a friend had the exact same food intake and exercise but he gained 2kg while I lost 3kg.
Sofar doctors have thought I just had a fast metabolism but seems like there could be more at play.
For you, yeah.
For most people even, sure.
But not everyone, there's an absolute shit ton of natural human variation on top of conditions/diseases that effect that.
Like, some people react to a normal diet by their body drastically cutting energy expenditure to try and maintain fat reserves.
Billions of years of evolution says carrying around as much fat as possible is the optimal choice, and different people have different traits to maintain those energy reserves which used to be the most important part of physical fitness.
Like, of any possible addiction, an addiction to a high calorie diet should make the most sense to people.
like this
TachyonTele likes this.
Former fatty. It was 100% behavioral. CICO. Physics. Some people need help, no denying that. But rigorously limiting and counting my intake, and estimating my output from added activity with fitness trackers, while also altering my diet to include more volume, less caloric density to stop feeling so hungry, 100% worked. And I learned to be hungry and that the world wasn't going to end if I was hungry for a little while until it was meal time. I had plenty of caloric surplus and my body was being a little bitch.
Anyhow, anecdata of one that supports the control what goes in your facehole camp.
I know that while pregnant, the digestion slows down, to try to wring more nutrition from what you eat. I also know that I eat about the same as my ex and my husband and both managed to get fat. Also I drop weight when stressed and maintain a normal BMI when not so stressed, but others I know gain when stressed.
It all is very interesting to me, but so strange that it's broken for so many people, and most all in the direction of overweight.
Former porkchop here as well. It's all behavioral.
Yes there are external factors that can influence behavior, but at the end of the day it can't be reduced further than that.
I am exhausted by the collective delusion and endless disavowing of any form of personal responsibility for one's own dietary intake. Focus on the external factors, always, never look at choices because then it becomes a "they" problem not a "me" problem.
Dude, you don't get it at all.
You can scream until you're blue in the face, but it doesn't contradict massive amounts of data and research done by people that have actual training in human physiology.
You, as one person, are just one data point. And that's not how science works. It isn't, and never will be.
IDGAF what you believe, you can believe your farts are magic and grant wishes for all that. But it doesn't matter when it comes to reproducible data. And it is reproducible. The research on it all has been covered in multiple ways by multiple studies.
So, yay for you! You got fat by stuffing your giant mouth in an attempt to fill the hole in your brain, and lost the weight. Congratulations. It still has nothing to do with the current state of understanding of human metabolism.
My point is that all these factors are real, and they do tip the scale, but at the end of the day, how much you eat determines whether you gain or lose weight.
I'm not saying other factors can't make a significant difference. (genetics and epigenetics play a role.)
I'm also not saying that it's easy. (food, especially fast food can light up people's brains in a way that mirrors drug addiction.)
But if you eat less while burning the same number of calories, you WILL lose weight. That's not an opinion, it's a law of physics.
So, the real elephant in the room is that for the average worker, they are more productive (ie, working much harder) and under much, much more financial stress... which effects epigenetics
and... people are having children later in life, leading to children with more genetic defects (the average person has about 7 genetic defects, some people have more, some fewer)
in the 1950s, a man could work at a factory with a high school diploma, own a house, support a family, and have a wife as a full-time assistant at home
now both parents have to work, if there even are children, there may or may not be a house, and many are just single. people are under huge amounts of stress, and all of it effects epigenetics including via weaker bonds within families
bodies interpret stress as either "uh oh, i'm going to get kicked out of my tribe and will have to forage and hunt on my own and may die" or "there may be a famine soon"
the fact that the vitamin levels of food has gone down is a real thing, bodies remember things like that, and can be aware of the decrease, and start to prepare for famines
TLDR captialism without proper government regulation of externalities is making people fat along with higher populations and decreased vitamin levels in food due to over-farming
don't like this
superkret doesn't like this.
Only if they have German descent.
\s (it's scandinavien descent actually \s \s )
like this
sunzu2 likes this.
Do you know how many dicks I've sucked?
I'm asking because I don't know... because it's so many that I've lost count of how many.
It's a lot of dicks.
Yes, you could read what I wrote about genetic defects and think "He could be referring to a typical genetic defect as an enzyme having a slightly different shape due to a random base substitution error, slowing down the rate of a cellular reaction necessary for lysosomes to function well..." but instead you were like... "I bet it's because he's into Hitler."
And it's true. Not only have I sucked lots and lots of dicks, and am a dude, and would have been gassed many times over by my great savior, who is in fact strangely and paradoxically Hitler, but I am also clearly into Hitler based on the fact that I categorize some genetic mutations which result in a loss of function as genetic defects, instead of a beautiful cornucopia of changes which may one day prove to be adaptive.
You are a very clever sleuth!
TLDR: capitalism bad
superkret likes this.
superkret doesn't like this.
You are baiting the commenter, them making shit up to fit into you idiotic world views.
Pathetic behavior tbh
like this
secretlyaddictedtolinux and TachyonTele like this.
brutallyhonestcritic doesn't like this.
don't like this
superkret and TachyonTele don't like this.
One? lol, no way.... I stopped counting after it got into the double digits, but it's a lot. I used to say I had sucked fewer than 20 dicks, now I say it's less than an infinite number of dicks.
Also you are also misinterpreting my post as anger... but really my response was sexual arousal because I have a fetish for morons.
TachyonTele likes this.
TachyonTele doesn't like this.
riddle me this, ye illitirate one, how can i even be racist given the number of dicks I've sucked? it's impossible.
I'll prove to you how not racist and experienced I am with sucking dicks... if you'll let me...
TachyonTele likes this.
superkret likes this.
A comment on lemmy. Never need to read it, it will always have the same conclusion "capitalism bad". No matter the topic.
TL;DR of lemmy: capitalism bad, now you don't need to open the app at all.
don't like this
hardcoreufo, lungcookie, folkrav and don't like this.
like this
folkrav likes this.
like this
sunzu2 likes this.
archives.gov/founding-docs/dec…
...
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
...
The White Christian Nationals are about to ascend in a few weeks. And the first thing they are trying to do is deport a bunch of people who are predominantly non white, depending on how scientificly hispanics are regarded.
And they seem to be following that up with some facist policies to favor the oliigarchs.
So if things play out according to their published playbook....
And the first thing they are trying to do is deport a bunch of people who are predominantly non white, depending on how scientificly hispanics are regarded.
Why would they deport slave labour?
brutallyhonestcritic doesn't like this.
No one gives a fuck about "the points", when are you people going to figure that out? You are the ones harming people by trying to dismiss necessary behavioral changes and real advice because there are technically other factors that you can back up with OODLES OF PEER-REVIEWED STUDIES, HOW CAN YOU INSULT MY INTELLIGENCE LIKE THIS???? No one cares what you studied while knocking out gen ed requirements, get over yourself.
You're not in high school debate class anymore, you're among people seeking and sharing knowledge that can be of actual use to them. If you're gonna pretend you're in someone's corner and shield them from a false sense of blame, and then REFUSE to discuss actual, meaningful solutions, you are utterly worthless in spaces like this.
like this
LPS likes this.
I'm going to be mildly annoyed if the fat acceptance latches on to this as yet another study validating their belief that they can't lose weight.
Latches on to what exactly?
But the most novel and surprising thing that researchers have observed is that when a certain group of neurons in that same nucleus is deactivated, specifically those that project to the jejunum, a part of the small intestine, the length of the microvilli in the intestinal wall is shortened, which reduces its surface area and thus the place in whose blood capillaries fat absorption occurs. The brain thus regulates this absorption by controlling the length and surface area of the intestinal spaces in which it takes place.
Huh, so your intestines can stretch to control absorption rate, cool!
That's a lot of words to say "my beliefs trump basic science".
Peer review reproduction is a bit of a shambles tbh, so not the silver bullet people make it out to be in some fields, agreed.
So let's leave the science aside for now and focus on what you are proposing.
"Just eat less" is about as productive as "Just don't be sad" or "Just stop drinking alcohol", technically correct but woefully inadequate as a practical solution for most people.
edit: before you get even more angry i'm not saying that eating less and exercising more doesn't work, actually read the statement.
Aside from anecdotes and "trust me bro", what knowledge have you shared so far, what solutions ?
I'm legitimately willing to listen to something you can even halfway prove.
To be clear, i'm asking a very specific question about a very specific statement.
when you say :
So, yay for you! You got fat by stuffing your giant mouth in an attempt to fill the hole in your brain, and lost the weight. Congratulations. It still has nothing to do with the current state of understanding of human metabolism.
Are you claiming that basic CICO, which is peer reviewed science has "nothing to do with the current state of understanding of human metabolism."
or was that just poor phrasing ?
I hate to agree with southsamurai, they downvote nearly every post i make, but... they have some truth here.
hackertalks.com/post/4875937/5…
If you want to lose 1 lb in a month, or gain 1 lb, you need to consume or burn 3,500 calories. Or 116 calories a day. Or 38 calories per meal… Easy right? … In the US, calorie estimates are allowed to be off by as much as 25%, and that’s just packaged food, forget any restaurant or line cook being exactly precise with portions… So for 2,500 average daily diet, over three meals, the margin of error is 208 calories. Your target is 38 calories. You’re trying to do something within the margin of error of all of your estimates. Calorie counting is a very difficult game to do! The deck is stacked against you. This is why it’s important to allow the homeostasis machinery in your body to handle all of this through satiation. It’s going to do the right thing if you let it
Nah, I get it. Not screaming or whatever either. You are correct that human physiology is complicated. There are indeed many factors that go into nutrient absorbsion, etc. However, no one that has stopped eating for a significant amount of time stays fat. Not eating isn't comfortable. The constant dopamine hit of always putting something into your mouth and having your taste buds light up your brain is super addicting. Feeling hunger is uncomfortable. No one denies any of this. But ultimately, it is up to you, what you choose to put into your mouth and what level of activity to perform to expend energy. If you need psychological help and coaching (think life style changes, CBT, etc), I'm 100% in support. But the responsibility for being fat is on the person for the vast majority of the cases. Modern, car-focused society is not very supportive of fitness endeavors. Weaponized food science (high calorie, low nutrient shit designed to addict you) and weaponized psychology (I bet you can sing at least three jingles for some company if you live in the US) is not supportive of healthy diets.
The research and me are both correct. You can have metabolism issues and still be responsible for your fatness. Thermodynamics ultimately decides your fatness. Without a source of surplus calories, you will lose weight, period. If you don't, it is a measurement error or some adjustment in metabolic output estimation needs to be made. And if you've somehow magically measured, perfect, all of your input and output and are still not losing weight, get yourself a Nobel for perpetual motion. You just broke physics.
This is not in support at all. In fact, it further supports moonlight's and others' position. You cannot escape physics. That the numbers on the back of cereal box lie to you is not a get-out-responsibility card. You adjust your intake until you start losing. It is stupid simple. You body is a PID controller. And you need you learn how to operate it.
Does it make it more difficult to accomplish goal? Yep. Does it prevent you from actually doing it? Nah.
It's both a behavioural issue and a complex bodily disorder with many external factors...
Biologically, weight is pretty much an effect of calories in and calories out. If you lock someone up and give them too little food, they'll generally get thin. The body can't create fat if you don't feed it and it can't work without burning energy. Physics.
But losing weight when you're not locked in a cell with someone else controlling your food availability is really hard. Not eating when you're hungry is hard. The facility of getting healthy food that makes it easier is socio-economical. etc
It's like running a marathon is "just" about starting to run and not stopping until you reach the finish line. It's trivial on one level, really hard on another. It's simple physics AND a complex web of genetic factors, motivation, knowledge, upbringing, etc
So most people are technically and biologically capable of losing weight, but most people are also practically and statistically not very successful at it.
Most popular diets work under controlled conditions, for the people who adhere to them; but most popular diets also don't work in practice, as it's too hard for people to diet for the rest of their life.
Behavioural ≠ easy
Assessing Social Contagion in Body Mass Index, Overweight, and Obesity Using a Natural Experiment - PMC
Does exposure to communities with higher rates of obesity increase the body mass index (BMI) and risk of overweight/obesity of individual residents? Using data from military service members assigned to installations around the country, this study ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Poor reading comprehension spotted
The reference to "educated" is ohh so ironic dear
Everyone can lose weight though, and we all know what works to do it. You simply eat less food.
The hard part for everyone is manifesting the willpower to resist hunger. Often it takes a life-threatening health scare to manifest that willpower for people, and then they diet and lose weight to avoid dying.
don't like this
superkret doesn't like this.
Describe "real" rationality ?
I genuinely can't infer what you mean from that statement.
You probably want to keep to DM's if you don't want conversation on a public message board.
Though I suppose a demonstrated lack of understanding of how public message boards work gives me my answer so, thanks.
I guess the idea that some people are fat for reasons outside of their control? When it comes to fat people, people don't like to hear "excuses," regardless if it's "I don't have enough time to work out" or "my body is unable to do xyz effeciently and causes weight gain." Fat is seen as a character flaw. And because for a lot of people, it is a simple "calorie in vs calorie out," the idea of it not working for someone is seen as a failure of character. So this "belief" is making it easier for... Fat people to be fat I guess.
Weird that this didn't trigger concerns of anorexics latching onto this study validating their belief that they can't eat/eat certain foods because their body absorbs more than others. But, like they say, you can never be too rich or too thin. 👍🏾
Wait, seriously....no..that can't possibly be true...
You do understand that the word trump exists outside of the name.... Right?
Oh my, im glad you didn't read the rest of it, so many complicated words.
Good luck, you are absolutely going to need it
are you suggesting ¾ of the population is poor?
Completely unrelated to the weight loss issue, yeah absolutely. Depends on your definition of "poor" a bit, for example federal statistics list the official poverty cutoff at around $15k a year in income which is stupendously low, and even with that being so much lower than what's realistically survivable in most places they still report 11% of people being in that bracket. Less than half of Americans have more than $1000 in savings. Most of America is extremely broke as fuck.
Fair enough, i could probably also do with being a bit less sarcastic to things that might just be honest mistakes.
As a genuine question, what point are you maintaining, I've lost the thread and don't know which one you mean?
Squiddick17 likes this.
What Happened in Syria is Shocking & No One’s Allowed To Talk About It
- YouTube
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.www.youtube.com
Fängelsedomar för utpressning mot VD. Södertörns tingsrätt har dömt flera personer till fängelse i ett mål om bland annat försök till grov utpressning mot en företagsledare.
(BBC) A man's suicide leads to clamour around India's dowry law
Sensitive content
The law was introduced in 1983 after a spate of dowry deaths in Delhi and elsewhere in the country. There were daily reports of brides being burnt to death by their husbands and in-laws and the murders were often passed off as "kitchen accidents". Angry protests by female MPs and activists forced parliament to bring in the law.
Whatever adjustment needs to be made it clearly shouldn’t involve repealing these protections. Litigious bullying surely doesn’t surpass burning women because they didn’t give your family enough money when you married them.
‘Missing’ GOP Congresswoman Not Seen For Six Months Finally Found Living at Dementia Care Home
‘Missing’ GOP Congresswoman Not Seen For Six Months Finally Found Living at Dementia Care Home - WCBM TALKRADIO AM 680
In a startling revelation, Rep. Kay Granger, missing for six months, has been found living in a dementia care home. Discover the details behind her sudden disappearance and the implications for her political legacy.WCBM of Maryland inc.
Health insurers limit coverage of prosthetic limbs, questioning their medical necessity
Health insurers limit coverage of prosthetic limbs, questioning their medical necessity
Advocates say it is discrimination and are arguing for "insurance fairness" on the grounds that people who have joints surgically replaced typically don't face the same kinds of coverage challenges.CBS News
like this
Maeve and ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ like this.
‘Abysmal’ comic book film [Kraven] makes box office history – for a very bad reason
While Sony gave the film a promotional push in recent weeks, it seems the film’s dreadful reviews – including a one-star pan from The Independent, who called it “abysmal” – affected cinemagoers’ desire to watch it: Kraven the Hunter had the worst opening weekend of any Sony-produced Marvel film.The film pulled in just $11m (£8.7m) in the US and $15m (£11.8m) globally, earning it overall takings of $26m (£20.5m) – an even more meagre amount when considering it cost between $110-$150m (£86.9m-£118.5m). As of 22 December, the film had made just $30.2m (£24m).
These global takings sit behind the equally-as-maligned Morbius, starring Jared Leto, which took $39m. Madame Web was another Spider-Man spin-off released by Sony and, while despised by the critics, it amassed half of its budget back in the opening weekend alone, with takings of $49.1m.
Sony did enjoy big success with the Venom franchise, which became a sleeper hit when it launched in 2018.
The first Venom made $856.1m (£676.2m) with 2021 sequel Venom: Let There Be Carnage amassing $506.8m (£400.3m).
Meanwhile, the third and final entry in the series, Venom: The Last Dance, has made $475.5m (£375.6m) since being released earlier this year. At the time of writing, this makes it the ninth highest-grossing film of the year.
Kraven the Hunter sets unwanted movie record as Moana dominates Christmas box office
Sony’s Marvel spin-off has set an unwanted cinema recordJacob Stolworthy (The Independent)
like this
TVA likes this.
like this
TVA likes this.
like this
TVA likes this.
like this
TVA likes this.
Discord sued by users claiming Nitro subscription is too difficult to cancel
Discord sued by users claiming Nitro subscription is too difficult to cancel
Discord is being sued over Nitro, their subscription service, being too difficult to cancel. The suit claims their practice is anti-consumer.Carver Fisher (Dexerto)
Nice.
I thought about unsubscribing after a sibling gifted me Nitro, but then I actually started using it for one of my servers so I just kept the subscription.
Mer om sociala medier och klass. Jag skrev ett inlägg om sociala medier och klass med utgångspunkt från läsarna på min blogg och att Facebook och Instagram med stor sannaolikhet är de medium som har störst andel arbetarklassanvändare. Trea på listan är troligen Youtube.
blog.zaramis.se/2024/12/23/mer…
Monkeys paw curls:
Everyone now needs at least 2 jobs. Groceries are nominally cheaper through massive shrinkflation.
2024 was kind of a break. It wasn't that bad (comparatively), a few things happened that brought us hope, a lot of things happened that suggest things are going to get much worse
Might be the best year of the decade, honestly
Cool. Reminded me of a quote by Karl Marx that I saw referenced in lemmy. Searched for it:
Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past.
The tradition of all dead generations weighs like an nightmare on the brains of the living.
Awesome Fdroid Games
Here we'll simply share the names of some cool Libre/OpenSource Android games that are available (Or should be made available) on Fdroid
UPDATE-->
You can also talk about what Proprietary Android games Should we make a FOSS Clone of
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
Reposting this awsome lemmy thread by @MITM0 with hashtags for the benefit of people following me on Mastodon:
Here we’ll simply share the names of some cool Libre/OpenSource Android games that are available (Or should be made available) on Fdroid
#gaming #LinuxGaming #FLOSS #FOSS #FossGames #FDroid #Linux #Android
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
in reply to FlashMobOfOne • • •