Skip to main content


in reply to Lovstuhagen

I'm sure she'll be back in jail after the holidays /s

On a serious note, is this a normal thing? Not sure if judges allow this for citizens as well or not.


in reply to misk

Good on them. The places where this is most prominent wouldn't dare to take such action.







in reply to ursakhiin

I mean he shot that woman and killed her as far as I know, are there more details I'm not aware of?
in reply to realcaseyrollins

Ah. Ok. I mean, I'm of the opinion that he has every reason to believe he wasn't going to shoot her when he pulled the trigger.

But I just wasn't sure if you were misunderstanding the headline or if you were in the camp of punish everybody all the time.

in reply to ursakhiin

That's true, it sort of seems like negligent homicide to me.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manslaug…

I always thought that killing someone, even on accident, is against the law.

in reply to realcaseyrollins

Personally, I just don't think Baldwin is the one who deserves the charge. There were people on set responsible for ensuring his gun wasn't loaded. Those people failed in their job.
in reply to ursakhiin

But wasn't Baldwin not even supposed to be shooting at the person he killed? If he had shot someone he was supposed to fire a blank at, I understand. Aren't you supposed to practice gun safety even with replicas? Don't point at anything you're not willing to shoot?
in reply to realcaseyrollins

He was following the directions of the director and everybody involved, including the woman who died, agreed to do the scene. She wasn't just some random person on set, she was behind the camera because she was the director of photography.

If she didn't feel the scene was safe to film, she had the right to say no to using a realistic prop. This is an obviously sad incident. But Manny people were found or pleaded guilty to the events. Baldwin just isn't I've of them. Actors can't be expected to be experts and have to defer to experts on set all the time.

in reply to ursakhiin

Ah I see. That makes sense then. I didn't know she was behind the camera when she got shot.
in reply to realcaseyrollins

It was on a movie set where it is to be reasonably expected that the armorer will clear weapons to be safe on set and that actors aren’t expected to be firearms experts so that they are able to perform with them.

It should also be expected that said armorers do their job as expected and NOT shoot real ammo out of prop guns. And if they do, they’re expected to properly clear them; even though they never should in the first place.

But yeah, this was totally about Alec Baldwin the elite bourgeois flexing his real ultimate power of wealth and crushing the matter-nothing proletariat, the people have lost once again because he was not held accountable for someone else’s actions.

I’m all for eating the rich but let’s not just make shit up, that makes us look ridiculous.

in reply to 4am

A really cheesy way to put it but I generally agree. However I don't think that Alec Baldwin pressured the prosecutor to back off, I think the prosecutor didn't want the smoke from other entities like Baldwin's managers or business partners, or Alec Baldwin's fans


Evgeny Poberezkin - SimpleX Chat: 1st Messaging Platform Bridging Between Privacy & Mass-market Apps


in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

I'd say the real first is Signal tbh, but not taking anything away from SimpleX
in reply to QuazarOmega

He specifically articulates the problem with Signal in the talk which is collection of metadata (phone numbers).

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

"The voluntary recall last month was of 10,8000 cartons of Handsome Brook Farms eggs sold under the Kirkland Signature Organic Pasture Raised label."


The AI that wrote this "article": Commas are hard! Numbers are hard!




YouTube is cracking down on clickbait


cross-posted from: feddit.nl/post/25854447



Esploriamo Lemmy, la piattaforma del fediverso adottata da diggita per il proprio sito di giornalismo partecipativo


This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)


Why is HDR in Plex such a chore while it is no problem on VLC?


VLC as always saves the day. Most recently for me when you want to watch HDR UHD ripped to 1080p. With plex, this becomes a problem you need to buy a plex pass for and more significantly, must have a '16 Intel CPU or newer to be able to remap it while VLC does so in the fly.

Details: In plex, the colors are so washed out it looks like a black and white movie. In VLC, the colors hit you like

Addition: I tried two remedies while packing with handbrake. BT.709 colorspace and a custom one from reddit. Both lead to the movie being so dark that you cant see most of the details.

Conclusion: VLC being open source, we should be able to see what they are doing and copy this behavior. if plex wont do it without payment, this could be huge for jellyfin for example.

Anyone with actual knowledge who can shed light on this?

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)


Υπάρχει περίπτωση να αποκτήσουμε και εμείς δική μας ελληνική οντότητα στο Lemmy; Και αν ναι, από τι εξαρτάται;


Πάντα αναρωτιομουν γιατί δεν υπάρχουν ελληνικοί διακομιστές όπως το feddit.de η αντίστοιχα για το mastodon
in reply to ByteMe

Είναι ελληνικό κοινωνικό δίκτυο από παλιά @panos@electricrequiem.com
in reply to db0

@panos περίεργο εμένα δουλέβει από phanpy
in reply to db0

in reply to Πάνος Δ.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to db0

Χα αν πας μεσα απο το fedia.io τα βλέπεις. fedia.io/m/Greece/t/1582701/Yp…. Ότιναν
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)


Jag har läst flera artiklar i Flamman om kristen tro som tycks utgå från att det finns en nykristlig trend i Sverige. Till och med inom vänstern. Det är helt enkelt dumheter. Vilket Petter Larsson mycket tydligt visar i en artikel i Aftonbladet

blog.zaramis.se/2024/12/24/pet…



'When you enter Gaza, you are God': Inside the minds of IDF soldiers who commit war crimes


https://archive.is/d5iWb