Skip to main content



Billionaire Pavel Durov accuses France of ''disrespecting Romanian Democracy'' by asking Telegram to remove right-wing content linked to Presidential election.


Response from French Foreign Ministry:

The recent statements from Mr. Pavel Durov are completely false. France is not involved in the Romanian Presidential election. The first round of the Presidential election was canceled in december by the Romanian authorities due to evidence of financial and tech interference from Russia. New investigations by the European Commission confirmed the scale of interference, including by the use of social media”

“These false accusations against France are nothing but a trick. He is attempting to create a deflection to distract people from a very real issue. We urge all Romanian political actors to be responsible and defend democracy"

“As a friend of Romania, we supported Romania’s reforms. We supported Romania joining the European Union and joining the Shengen area. A few days after the start of the Russian invasion of Ukrainian, we sent french troops to help Romania's security”

xcancel.com/francediplo/status…

This entry was edited (7 months ago)

in reply to jeffw

For a ship that the authorities said had lost power it was rather lighted up like a christmas tree...
in reply to Treczoks

It lost steering power, not electrical power. Kinda like all the warning lights in your car turning on at once and the engine shutting down, even though the headlights are still on.


Texas House votes to formally repeal gay sex ban in historic, unlikely vote


12 republicans joined all 60 democrats in the Texas house to vote to formally repeal the gay sex ban that was ruled unconstitutional in 2003

First time the Texas house has passed any repeal attempts. It still faces steep odds in the Texas senate



Liberal mayor and conservative historian headed to presidential runoff in Poland, exit poll shows


WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Liberal Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski and a conservative historian, Karol Nawrocki, emerged as the front-runners in Poland’s presidential election Sunday, according to an exit poll, putting them on track to face off in a second round in two weeks.

A late exit poll by the Ipsos institute released three hours after polls closed showed Trzaskowski with an estimated 31.1 percent of the votes and Nawrocki with 29.1 percent. That suggested that the runoff on June 1 could be very tight. Official results are expected on Monday or Tuesday.

in reply to TheTimeKnife

for more context, the boring liberal mayor got just north of 30%; the fuckass nobody pulled from depths of conservative party apparatus couple of months ago got just south of 30%; there's 21% split between two far right fuckers, one conspiracy friendly, catholic extremist (6%) and one that pretends to not be (15%); 10% split between three socdems; 5% for former "got talent" host targeting the mythical swing voter; and 2% split between some random weirdos, 1.2% of which goes to a streamer


Portugal’s center-right alliance headed for another minority government after election


LISBON, Portugal (AP) — The incumbent center-right Democratic Alliance won a general election in Portugal on Sunday, but it failed to secure a majority in Parliament and was set to take office as a minority government for the second time in a year.

Portugal’s third general election in three years dashed hopes that the ballot could end the worst spell of political instability for decades in the European Union country of 10.6 million people.

in reply to TheTimeKnife

Any Portuguese here who can shed some more nuanced light on the political situation? Are the left-wing parties there really that out of touch/ineffectual, or is there something else going on?
in reply to gravitas_deficiency

We come from many years of Socialist Party rule, and the pendulum has now swang to the other side.

After 50 years of democracy young people no longer have any idea what it was like to live under the fascist dictatorship, they don't have any idea of the huge leap in quality of life that these last 50 years brought us, and they have been made to think by propaganda that the whole system is rotten and that we've never been worse. That revolt vote that in my youth went to far left parties that talked about decriminalizing drugs and abortion, now goes to far right parties that blame gipsies and immigrants for all perceived problems (many of them not even factually existing).

In one or two more years the far right will inevitably reach government, and we'll be a little Hungary by the sea.

in reply to justgohomealready

Societal tendency to just forget bad shit after the generation the bad shit happened to mostly dies off is… a consistently problematic and frustrating trend through modern history
in reply to justgohomealready

Same as it ever was :'(

Also, "swang" is an excellent verb for the political pendulum's movement.



Trump’s acceptance of Qatar jet gift is ‘definition of corruption’, senator says


Chris Murphy says Trump strategically visited Gulf states ‘willing to pay him off’ as backlash rises against luxury offer

Donald Trump’s acceptance of a $400m Boeing jet from Qatar is the “definition of corruption”, a leading Democrat said on Sunday, as several senior Republicans joined in a bipartisan fusillade of criticism and concern over the luxury gift.

Chris Murphy, a Democratic senator for Connecticut, condemned the “flying grift” on NBC’s Meet the Press as he assailed the president’s trip to several Gulf states this week that included a stop in Qatar.

“Why did he choose these three countries for his first major foreign trip? It’s not because these are our most important allies or the most important countries in the world,” he said of Trump’s visit to the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

in reply to MicroWave

I love stuff like this because it shows the cognitive dissonance on the right really, really well. They hate foreigners and imported stuff EXCEPT just for times like this, when it makes a lot of sense for the USA to get this "gift" from a foreign nation that doesn't seem to line up with what MAGA says a country should be like.

It's exhausting to keep up with. Are Islamic countries "based" now?

Trump said this in 2017: “The nation of Qatar, unfortunately, has historically been a funder of terrorism at a very high level.” Does he no longer feel that way? Are we supposed to like them now?




Lemmy needs AI. [SATIRE]


This entry was edited (7 months ago)


FDA approves new COVID vaccine only for those 65 and older or immunocompromised


The Food and Drug Administration has issued a long-awaited approval of Novavax’s COVID-19 vaccine but with unusual restrictions.

Novavax makes the nation’s only traditional protein-based coronavirus vaccine – and until now it had emergency authorization from FDA for use in anyone 12 and older.

But late Friday, the FDA granted the company full approval for its vaccine for use only in adults 65 and older – or those 12 to 64 who have at least one health problem that puts them at increased risk from COVID-19.

Vaccines made by Novavax’s competitors Pfizer and Moderna already are fully licensed for use in anyone 12 and older, and also are authorized for use in children as young as 6 months.

in reply to robocall

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to xyzzy

I've had Covid twice. The second one wasn't bad because of the vaccine, but my lungs are still damaged five years later from my first bout with it—which wasn't even particularly serious (never hospitalized or anything). I lost a bit of lung capacity and ever since I have had an awful barky cough and any chest congestion takes me weeks to clear.

It's a massive spectrum of severity.



Israel says it will allow ‘basic’ aid into Gaza after nearly 3 months of blockade


cross-posted from: lemmy.ml/post/30319380

from #AssociatedPress #AP #APNews
Updated 5:30 PM EDT, May 18, 2025

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — Israel announced Sunday it will allow a limited amount of humanitarian aid into Gaza after a nearly three-month blockade, days after global experts on food security warned of famine.
...
It was not immediately clear when aid would enter Gaza, or how. The Israeli military body in charge of overseeing aid did not comment. Israel has been trying to impose a new aid system, despite objections by aid workers. Netanyahu said Israel would work to ensure that aid does not reach militants.

https://apnews.com/article/mideast-wars-israel-gaza-hamas-hostages-18-05-2025-f325044576f1ac31e6083622242c9990

in reply to Peter Link

It was not immediately clear when aid would enter Gaza, or how. The Israeli military body in charge of overseeing aid did not comment


So yeah.. I'll believe it when it actually happens rather than trust the word of the government that has been blatantly lying about it and related topics since its inception nearly 80 years ago.

in reply to Viking_Hippie

Allow limited aid in for a week... then target and kill the aid workers (as they've been doing) and go back to intentionally bombing civilians (as they've been doing) with the end goal of eliminating the Palestinian people and completing the seizure of their land (which was their goal all along).

A lot of asterisks on anything they claim to do. Genocide is always the ultimate intent.


in reply to 60d

LMAO good one. For a second there I almost thought you were serious.
in reply to Psythik

Since I didn't put a /s I got downvoted pretty hard, but it's k because I was going for that divisiveness award.


Trump administration working on plan to move 1 million Palestinians to Libya


In exchange for the resettling of Palestinians, the administration would potentially release to Libya billions of dollars of funds that the U.S. froze more than a decade ago, those three people said.
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to Longpork3

Nazis wanted to kill them all, not move them further away. It's of course a shitty thing to do, but I'm getting kinda annoyed by how often people use nazis as an example for something when they were far more evil than anything that exists today, essentially downplaying or borderline normalizing nazis because of how commonly it's now used for real life examples.
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to REDACTED

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to acargitz

..dude, I literally talked about what happened, not what was theoretized. Do you have any idea how brutally evil things have US or other countries theoretized? Thinking and doing are two very, VERY different things. Didn't know this needs explaining.
in reply to REDACTED

I responded to what you actually wrote:

Nazis wanted to kill them all, not move them further away. [...]


You described intent, i.e., "thinking".

🙄

PS. Genocide is not a single event in time, it's a process. An easy way to educate yourself on the matter is by searching YouTube for interviews of Omer Bartov, world renowned Israeli scholar on Genocide and the Holocaust, prof at Brown.

in reply to acargitz

I mean, they were doing it and would have finished doing it if it wasn't for a world war, so definitely not just thinking
in reply to REDACTED

This is also false. The mass killings started in the middle of 1941 after the invasion of the Soviet Union. The systematic policy of extermination was decided in January 1942 in the Wannsee Conference.

There was quite a lot of thinking before doing. And there was quite a lot of doing smaller steps before doing bigger steps. Just like there was quite a lot of thinking smaller steps before thinking bigger steps.

Give it a rest buddy, you don't know what you're talking about.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to acargitz

Says I'm false

Proceeds to tell me I'm true.

Look buddy who knows it all, when Israel actually decides to kill those million Palestinians instead of moving them, get back to me abd I'll apologize for my ignorant statements, but as of things stand now, I cannot take you seriously when you push for extreme comparisons while nit-picking how it all started.

Your argument somewhat reminded me of the "weed is a getaway drug to stronger drugs" argument. No, that's not always the case.

in reply to REDACTED

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to acargitz

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to REDACTED

I am not making prophecies. I am not predicting the future. I am specifically writing:

When people defend or downplay proposals to forcibly remove an entire population [...] the comparison isn’t extreme. It’s cautionary.


Do you understand what that phrase means? Do you understand what the word "cautionary" means?

in reply to acargitz

I understand, but what I'm saying from my perspective is that I do not see that happening in any way possible, even if the beginning phase looks like startup nazi ideology. One can be cautious about new nuclear reactor in France exploding because one exploded in Chornobyl, while others, like me, will try to assure you it's quite impossible under new designs (new world order).

Like I said before, if Israel actually goes ahead and kills those millions Palestinians instead of displacing them, get back to me and I will write an apology letter for my ignorance and short-sightness, but as of things stand now, I simply don't see how is it possible for Israel to do this without causing their own destruction.

in reply to REDACTED

If you look at our discussion you might notice that at no point have I singled out Israel as the only possible perpetrator. We are literally discussing this in the thread below an article about the American government making genocidal plans. Between Trumpist USA and the far right current Israeli government, an escalation is not inconceivable. It is true however that thankfully there are multiple actors, from the Europeans to the Egyptians and Jordanians for example, who would not easily allow something like this to happen. But then again, if the world order is blown up in WW3, anything is possible and these kinds of plans would become much less unworkable... Which is why calling them out and not letting them be normalized now is very important.
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to REDACTED

No, the orginal plan was to ship them all to Madagascar. It is well documented
in reply to Longpork3

And the original plan for country X was to do Y but since it never happened, it's irrelevant and people almost never speak of it, except when it suddenly fits their narrative, no matter how stupid/disconnected it is

In other news, USSR and Gulag is exactly the comparison you were actually looking for, but no, gotta always use "nazis" because of how catchy it is to you guys

This entry was edited (7 months ago)


in reply to inclementimmigrant

Surprising to see the NYT reporting on this, since they've usually been on board with such crushing.
in reply to floofloof

There are a lot of good rank and file journalists at NYT, and they have resisted attempts by the higher-ups to censor them. So there has been both bad and good coverage on this topic as a result.
in reply to LibertyLizard

The NYT isn't an ethical organization anymore

This article helps the rich by making Neoliberal genociders and leftists fight.

in reply to SoftestSapphic

The owners don’t control every decision made by every writer or editor, but it’s true that they do have excessive influence and power to kill some stories or promote others.

But I meant how does this article in particular make liberals and leftists fight?

I see this article as a growing shift in tone from liberals towards a greater skepticism and criticism of Israeli actions. This would mean they’d align better with leftists, not worse.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to LibertyLizard

There are articles that effect their narratives, they have agreements with the managers that they publish things that forward those narratives.
in reply to LibertyLizard

The NYT has issues going back 7 generations, it’s not like it started to go downhill recently
in reply to limer

Every organization has issues. That doesn’t mean there hasn’t been good journalism done under its banner.
in reply to LibertyLizard

Plenty of good journalists have worked there, often with high ideals. But that is not the whole picture. The NYT is soaked with blood and poverty for all the other things it has done. Almost everything we read as bad in history has had its proponents or motivators or mitigators working in the same hallways

in reply to fne8w2ah

Better safe than sorry. Especially if it wasn’t expected to be there in the first place.
in reply to bean

I'm not sure who I would trust enough to believe that an old grenade is safe
in reply to whyNotSquirrel

Grandpa had one. But it was welded shut at the handle and the bottom had a big hole in it so you could see inside!
in reply to bean

My dad had a few. They were training ones though. Hollowed out and the pins were lost long ago. Still fairly heavy though and very real looking at a distance.
in reply to fne8w2ah

Nah, it's just a heap of junk!

This entry was edited (7 months ago)

in reply to toy_boat_toy_boat

fun fact, he is not aware when he shits own pants after he flies intoa rage. the producers in his relaity show later claimed he becomes a deer in head lights when it happens, and often they have a guy on the set to wipe him down like a baby.
in reply to Ledericas

i don't understand what you're trying to say. if he's not aware when his shits himself, why would he 'become a deer in head lights' when it happens?

(someone should go back thru old footage to find moments where he randomly just sits up and looks around - but i can't imagine he could pass one without anyone around noticing.. that would be like the actual smell of hell venting out)




in reply to Redditsux

I wonder if the chief justice will keep hanging his flag upside down and blaming his wife.....
Unknown parent

Is this in Spanish? This means she has a big cock. Seems correct but just checking.


Melania Trump statue sawn off at the feet sparks police investigation


The life-size sculpture near Sevnica in central Slovenia, where Melanija Knavs was born in 1970, was unveiled in 2020 during US President Donald Trump's first term in office.

It replaced a wooden statue that had been set on fire earlier that year.

in reply to Redditsux

When was it ever appropriate to honor plagiarizing gold diggers who ~~spread their legs~~ married a fascist with statues? If anything that really says something negative about the place it's erected. If that's the biggest thing they have to be proud of.
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to Eldritch

Gross slut shaming vibes. You can criticize someone without moralizing, you know?
in reply to MnemonicBump

Any kind of shaming is welcome for Nazis. They don't get the same respect as actual real people.

She's a gold-digging whore, who has earned our disrespect.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to barneypiccolo

Nazis are actual real people. It doesn't do anybody any good to deny that human beings are capable of great evil. It only seeks to further distance ourselves from our shared history of violence and doom us to repeat it. Talk like that is exactly what leads to Nazis in the first place
in reply to MnemonicBump

Nazis are actual real people.


I could make an actual educated argument on how that's literally not true, but it'd go into sophistry. Still, I definitely could.

Talk like that is exactly what leads to Nazis in the first place


No, it isn't. It's exaggerated rhetoric and a very appropriate response to legitimate Nazism.

What YOU are doing is what lead to the Nazis in the first place. Thinking you can reason with Nazis. 20th century Germany had people who basically were forced to be a Nazi, no matter their personal ideologies. It's understandable, but it's not acceptable. And it's very different having been in the party when the Nazis were in rule and voluntarily choosing to be one in modern times. Choosing to become a Nazi is so much worse than being somewhat afraid in Germany in 1942, and joining out of fear for your life.

We know we're purposefully exaggerating when we say Nazis aren't people, and we know it. Nazis do not exaggerate with their calls to white supremacy.

So the appropriate reply to Nazism is to utterly dehumanise and shame them, as much as humanly possible.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to Dasus

I have no desire to reason with Nazis, I believe the only kind of good Nazi is a dead Nazi, and I genuinely believe it is my moral duty to punch a Nazi on site. But I don't have to pretend their not human to do that. Evil is a human thing. No other animal does that. You have to recognize it for what it is and root it out. Calling them not human doesn't help anything.
in reply to MnemonicBump

in reply to Dasus

Ugh 🙄 internet "philosophers". I'll see you in the front lines, dude. We'll have a good laugh about how unnecessary this argument was once we're there
in reply to MnemonicBump

No, you won't.

My war time posting is not in the front lines. It's about ~30km behind them. In a leadership position.

(Yes, that's the backside of my dogtags. I'm hardly going to dox myself by filming the front.)

Edit also, most communication is online nowadays, even academic. Everyone is constantly online. You can just call me a philosopher, no need for the "internet" or the quotations.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to Dasus

An "Internet philosopher" is a particular type of person. If you're serious about ending fascism, then our petty little back and forth will not matter when it really comes down to it, then right?

Because, historically, dehumanization comes in handy when it comes to elimination, but not so helpful when it comes to the part that comes next. It seems like an excuse to not feel guilty for killing, and that seems like a dark path to go down.

in reply to MnemonicBump

You know, trying to explain your already bad joke isn't making it any funnier.

then our petty little back and forth will not matter when it really comes down to it, then right?


Ofc it will have. Everything matters. Some things more than others.

It seems like an excuse to not feel guilty for killing, and that seems like a dark path to go down.


"Oh please, won't someone think of the Nazis?"

I don't think you've actually read anything I've written. That too, is an exaggeration, I don't literally mean that. I mean to say that you've not understood it for some reason. I'd like to point out that in my experience, the people who think calling someone an "internet philosopher" or "a fucking SJW" or "a keyboard warrior" (harder to call me a "keyboard warrior" when I'm actually part of the Finnish Defence Forces?) are usually slightly cognitively lazy and/or poorly educated people who just don't have the attention-span nor the skills to actually engage in such discussion. So you mock it as being too fancy, meaning it's too fancy... for you.

I can promise you not everyone share's your view.

in reply to Dasus

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to MnemonicBump

in reply to Redditsux

I wrote a thing and then thought, you know what? It's not worth it. We're strangers that know literally nothing about each other, so what's the point? I'm an anti fascist and I know that. If that's the side that you're also on, then we are on the same side. I don't know what else to say