Skip to main content



House passes Trump's budget in razor-thin vote after dramatic all-night session


The House narrowly passed Trump's domestic policy bill Thursday following a dramatic all-night session and days of negotiations.

In a 215 to 214 vote, all but two House Republicans supported the massive budget package — the centerpiece legislation of Mr. Trump's second-term agenda — in a vote that came hours after unveiling an updated version of the legislation that GOP leaders hoped would satisfy enough holdouts.

The measure cleared a critical procedural hurdle in the wee hours of the morning, teeing up the vote on final passage after days of consternation among the House Republican conference.

The bill will now go to the Senate, where some Republicans have already voiced some opposition. Congressional leaders have said they want to get it to Mr. Trump's desk by July 4.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to MicroWave

That evening, a Roman watched the smoke in the distance grow larger, and an orange glow grew through the night.

in reply to UnpopularCrow

NYT, wtf is this shite infographic? Just use pie charts, they're so much simpler to parse.

don't like this

in reply to beeng

True, the bar chart is probably the best, but both pie and bar outperform, by a wide margin, whatever NYT's chart is. With this many categories, I feel a pie chart will handle this info better than a bar chart.
in reply to JayDee

From a pure functional perspective, probably. Maybe.

Personally, I look at this more as a piece of art, as the chart was most likely picked because the visuals replicate what its describing: Science funding was shattered and is now in pieces.

in reply to UnpopularCrow

Kind of embarrassing don't you think. For a country to fall so far :/


in reply to vegeta

I'm starting to wonder if I should try to make a quick buck on the US citizens. You all seem to be okay with it.

Maybe I should leave my banking info here and tell you depositing money to that account will own the libs.



Trump's crypto dinner cost over $1 million per seat, on average


In total, the 220 winners of the contest to attend the dinner spent $394 million on Trump’s official cryptocurrency.

More than 200 wealthy, mostly anonymous crypto buyers are coming to Washington on Thursday to have dinner with Donald Trump. The price of admission: $55,000 to $37.7 million.

That’s how much the 220 winners of a contest to meet Trump spent on his volatile cryptocurrency token, $TRUMP, according to an analysis by the blockchain analytics company Nansen.

The top $TRUMP coin holders at a specific time — determined by the dinner’s organizers — secured a seat.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to MicroWave

Nasty old thing thinks he gets to take it with him...? Tick tock, ass-clown, you ain't living forever.


North Korea warship reportedly damaged during launch


North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, who watched the failed launch, called it a "criminal act," that tarnished the country's dignity.

A new North Korean naval destroyer launch ended in failure, state media reported Thursday.

North Korea's state news agency, KCNA, said Kim Jong Un described the accident as a "criminal act caused by absolute carelessness."

The country's leader reportedly witnessed the failed launch, which left "some sections of the warship's bottom crushed."

Kim has ordered the ship to be repaired ahead of a major meeting of the ruling Workers' Party Central Committee in late June.



Canada in talks with US about joining 'Golden Dome' plan


Prime Minister Mark Carney said he has had talks with Donald Trump about it. The defense system is designed to detect, track and potentially intercept incoming missiles.

Canada is conducting "high level" talks with the United States over joining Donald Trump's proposed "Golden Dome" missile defense program, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Wednesday.

Trump announced his plans the previous day to develop the multilayered, $175 billion (€155 billion) system with ground- and space-based capabilities that can defend against a wide range of enemy weapons, like drones, hypersonic and cruise missiles, and intercontinental ballistic missiles.

The US President said he expected the missile shield to be ready by the end of his second term in 2029.

in reply to MicroWave

175 billion dollars to build a thing in just a few years that's meant to protect America from attacks...

What attacks? Terrorists hijacking planes? Russians capturing the presidency? Right wing extremism? School shootings?

There's nothing immediate. And some trumpy dome doesn't sound like we're future proofing anything but Lockheed Martin's bank accounts.



Hate Trump? According to a Proposed NIH Investigation, You Have a Mental-Health Disorder.


I like the part about no new spending is needed. Should we translate that to we will divert people looking into measles and covid to this?
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to scaredoftrumpwinning

You have a mental diseuse, you can´t own a firearm.

Only MAGA have the right to article 2.

Job done.

in reply to scaredoftrumpwinning

I do think hating Trump has diagnostic value. It's a strong indication of anit-sociopathic tendencies.

Unknown parent

lemmy - Link to source
Ben Hur Horse Race
oh do not underestimate my ability to complain about the deserved consequences of my bullshit


GOP Ends Clean Energy Credits Years Earlier in Revised Bill


in reply to silence7

I just want to add that nuclear energy is clean energy and that the GOP is right to push for it. They might be wrong on most things but not on this one.
in reply to Plebcouncilman

Yes, and in fact, nuclear energy is precisely what is needed to manufacture the infrastructure of a clean energy grid with the least amount of carbon output. Thorium reactors are de wei.
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to NeilBrü

Maybe. By all means it deserves investment, deserves the attempt, but it doesn’t seem much more practical than fusion

Cost?
- renewables are the cheapest power generation
- nuclear is most expensive, not economical
- thorium isn’t even developed for regular use

Time?
- renewables can be built asap, and brought into use incrementally
- nuclear takes decades to build, no one can afford that
- thorium isn’t even commercially offered

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to Plebcouncilman

Its not economical yet, especially with renewables being so cheap. With a continental grid filling each other's gaps, renewables are unbeatable.
in reply to tflyghtz

Renewals cannot sustain industrial energy demand on their own. By all means encourage people to use renewable energy in their houses but industry requires more juice so nuclear it is. And how come it isn’t economical? We used to have way more nuclear power plants and it wasn’t economical concerns that shut them down afaik.
in reply to Plebcouncilman

I think we just need to keep expanding battery farms. 3+ phase power definitely generates more heat, but that's an issue that's been solved many times in our traditional power supply systems.
in reply to TimmyDeanSausage

It is not clear to me that this solves any environmental issues given that mining the minerals and manufacturing batteries with current chemistry and technology is horrible for the environment.

We should find a way to make clean batteries first and then I would agree with that statement.!

in reply to Plebcouncilman

I want to make it clear that I don't really agree that nuclear is bad. In any shape or form fusion and fission are the two cleanest sources of energy that we have and are the sources of energy humankind will need to guarantee our survival as a species.

However, there are clean batteries. Battery is just a term for potential energy storage and things like gravity batteries and thermal batteries are feasible right now. Electrochemical batteries aren't the only type of battery that we have. Actually, they are less efficient and less reliable than the others at scale.

in reply to GiuseppeAndTheYeti

I know there are clean batteries but I thought they were inefficient/hard to scale? If that isn’t the case why are large scale battery farms made with lithium batteries?

I’m genuinely asking here as I thought those technologies were still in their early days.

in reply to Plebcouncilman

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to Plebcouncilman

We already have some very promising seeming sodium based batteries that are much more environmentally friendly. Afaik, the capital class hasn't been funding it as well as they should because it's unclear if the tech will ever reach the same level of energy density per dollar as the current stuff. In other words, I don't think the problem is the tech. The problem is the owners of the private sector energy companies are more interested in sustainable short term profit than what's best for society, long term.
in reply to TimmyDeanSausage

Yes I agree with what you posit at the end. It’s a huge problem at a systemic level in fact, and I don’t think it’s necessarily inherent to the capitalist system because it wasn’t always like this. And the most ruthless capitalists on earth, the Chinese, do not seem to have this myopic focus in short term gains and are very willing to eat a loss today to end up winning over the long term. I think this is the true downfall of our society.
in reply to Plebcouncilman

What specifically makes "industrial energy" different from any other energy? I keep seeing this lie about renewables everywhere and it doesn't even try to make sense. Electricity is electricity. Need "more juice?" Install more renewables for the cheapest juice in history.
in reply to oyo

There are some applications where "industrial energy" isnt electricity or motion but instead simply heat.

AFAIK synthetic fuels would be more dollar-effkcient for many usages than an equivalent electric heater, even if we ignore the tooling cost.

But if its not a blowtorch and instead just motion, electricity is electricity and the only thing really special about "industrial use" is the amount demanded.

in reply to oyo

Right, I bet no one thought of that.

Industry requires stable energy in very large amounts,so if the sun does not come out for 2 days then you have to stop production. Also at some point you’re gonna run out of space to put solar panels and the maintenance cost might make it prohibitive.

Here’s the bottom line: if at the current level of technology and price renewables were cheaper than fossil fuels, every Corp in the world would be running purely on renewables. This the one nice thing about capitalism, that it only needs one argument to be convinced: lower costs. But that is not the case,” and renewables, or rather the infrastructure needed to harness it, is not yet cheaper than fossil fuel.

The solution is to invest money in r&d that makes renewable infrastructure more efficient and cheaper.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to Plebcouncilman

Many of the largest corps are buying and adding renewables in ever increasing amounts. There are some cases where fossil fuel is still a little bit cheaper than renewables plus batteries, if you completely ignore externalities like harmful emissions. Running out of space and maintenance costs? You're grasping at straws. Nearly every industrial facility is on the grid, not requiring any nearby space. And you know what's always more expensive than solar maintenance costs? Fossil plant maintenance costs, not even mentioning a little on-going cost and cost-risk thing called fuel.

More new solar capacity is being installed than any other generation type. I guess heavy industry is gonna collapse due to it being weak girly power! We're doomed!

in reply to oyo

in reply to Plebcouncilman

Too expensive, takes too long to build, still risky.

And dumping radioactive sludge into a hollowed out mountain, not clean.

Unknown parent

Parts of what they are doing will.

in reply to MuskyMelon

Cyril should start posting what is going on underneath trump’s nose with images and videos and just reply “it’s somewhere in the US“ when Donald challenges where it is.
in reply to MuskyMelon

The rich have successfully marketed their class war into a ridiculously contrived race war against the oppressed, long suffering white people.

Its profoundly stupid and does not reflect reality at all, but we are doing it anyway.

This entry was edited (7 months ago)


New North Korea warship is damaged at its launch ceremony attended by Kim Jong Un


The ship slid off the ramp and became stuck after the flatcar failed to move alongside it, throwing off its balance and crushing parts of the ship’s bottom, according to the Korean Central News Agency.

The accident at Wednesday’s ceremony at the northeastern port of Chongjin was an embarrassing setback for Kim, who has emphasized naval advancement as key to his nuclear-armed military.

The damaged vessel was likely in the same class as the country’s first destroyer, unveiled on April 25, which experts assessed as the North’s largest and most advanced warship to date. Kim called it a significant asset for advancing his goal of expanding the military’s operational range and nuclear strike capabilities.

https://apnews.com/article/north-korea-kim-jong-un-destroyer-damaged-nuclear-9f66685ad8f34d5bef027750a0678370

in reply to brown567

I’ll can excuse North Korean dictatorships but draw the line at damaging ships.
in reply to HellsBelle

Oh yeah, NK still exists.

With all the bullshit going on in America, NK has to feel like they're in the corner a little, eh?


in reply to MuskyMelon

“We need to do some rewriting so this document is not used against the DNI or POTUS,” he wrote, with acronyms referring to Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, and the president.

The document in question was an intelligence assessment on the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, the target of the Trump administration’s most sweeping actions on immigration so far.

However, the Feb. 26 intelligence assessment that Kent wanted to alter directly contradicted the idea that the gang was affiliated with the Venezuelan government or the Maduro regime.

in reply to MuskyMelon

Directly making up, and lying to the people, for the glory of great leader ~Stalin~ Drumpf.

Well, we've hit the point where nothing at all from the government can be trusted as real.



Disney CEO Told Hosts of the View to Tone Down Trump-Bashing


Good thing hosts of The View doesn't have to worry about dick energy.




“F**k you”: Entire Trump team hated Elon Musk, damning report reveals | Elon Musk has left the White House an utter failure


Elon Musk’s shouting match with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent might have been the final nail in the coffin for the tech billionaire’s four-month stint in the White House, but it came after months of bubbling frustration at Musk’s “chain-saw” approach to dismantling the federal government.

Musk and Bessent exploded at each other in April when Musk attempted to force through his pick to lead the IRS—Gary Shapley—behind Bessent’s back. (Musk eventually lost this battle—Shapley lasted less than 72 hours before Bessent tapped Michael Faulkender to replace him.)

“Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you!” a typically mild-mannered Bessent was heard shouting after Musk as they charged down the halls of the West Wing.

in reply to MicroWave

He accomplished all he set out to do, with one caveat, because he stood in the bad limelight his image and monetary value took a serious nosedive.
This last part is why he now is standing in the back, yet leering around the room wherever the president is.

The one thing he was aspiring towards did receive a huge blow, he was racing to become the world's first trillionaire.
And it might just be a setback that he can catch up with, but for now he does need to focus to try and crank all his stocks back up...



JD Vance lashes out at ‘profoundly wrong’ Supreme Court Chief Justice


The chief justice had spoken out against MAGA’s attacks on the judiciary.

JD Vance ripped into Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts for saying the courts are an equal branch of government whose job is to “check the excesses” of the executive branch.

Earlier this month, Roberts responded to calls from MAGA to impeach judges who ruled against Donald Trump’s policies by saying, “In our Constitution, the judiciary is a coequal branch of government, separate from the others, with the authority to interpret the Constitution as law, and strike down acts of Congress or acts of the president.”

“That innovation doesn’t work if the judiciary is not independent,” he continued during a fireside chat in Buffalo, New York. “Its job is to, obviously, decide cases, but in the course of that, check the excesses of Congress or of the executive, and that does require a degree of independence.”

in reply to MicroWave

I don't respect his self identification of JD Vance. James Bowman is on his birth certificate, and that's what he must be called.
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
Unknown parent

Jail them. Literally send aeound your thunfs to.haul their ass to jail,.no due process needed.


Outrage after Israeli army fires ‘warning shots’ at French and other diplomats on West Bank visit


The delegation included diplomats from China, Japan, Mexico and several European, including France, Spain and Italy.