Pope Leo slams 'barbarity' of Gaza war as Israeli gunfire kills at least 93 at aid point
Pope Leo slams 'barbarity' of Gaza war as Israeli gunfire kills at least 93 at aid point
Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli forces opened fire Sunday on a crowd of Palestinians waiting to collect humanitarian aid, providing a toll of at least 93 people killed.FRANCE 24
like this
Oofnik, SolacefromSilence, notsure, EpicFailGuy, Lasslinthar and dandi8 like this.
Azerbaijan to file international lawsuits against Russia over Aktau plane crash, president says
Azerbaijan to file international lawsuits against Russia over Aktau plane crash, president says
President Aliyev stated that Azerbaijan had a clear understanding of what happened to the AZAL plane, and that Russian officials also possessed the same information.Euronews.com
like this
Oofnik, EpicFailGuy, Lasslinthar and dandi8 like this.
Some context ap link
Deaths of ethnic Azerbaijanis rounded up by police for decades-old murders in a Russian city. The crash of an Azerbaijan Airlines passenger jet that Baku blamed on Moscow. Growing ties between Azerbaijan and Turkey, along with waning Russian influence in the troubled South Caucasus region.
These are among the factors that have led to the escalating tensions between Russia and Azerbaijan, the oil-rich Caspian Sea country where President Ilhan Aliyev has been in power since 2003 -- almost as long as the 25-year rule of Vladimir Putin in Russia.
The Epstein Cover-Up at the FBI
> First, approximately 1,000 personnel in the Information Management Division (IMD) and the FBI New York Field Office were assigned to this task, confirming the whistleblower account made to Senator Durbin’s office. I can also confirm that a log exists tracking the mentions of Donald Trump in the files, and that there were approximately 100,000 files containing roughly 300,000 pages. Individual analysts were told to flag mentions of Trump by document and page number by logging them in an Excel spreadsheet, then they’d hand in their spreadsheet at the end of their (sometimes 24 or even 48-hour) shift. But it’s important to note that the agents were not told to flag Trump until later in a process that began mid-March.
But there is a log of instances Donald Trump is mentioned in the files, there are video and PDF trainings instructing analysts to flag Trump, there were multiple instances of Trump appearing in the files, Patel and Bondi wanted victim information and PII, and sloppiness means that more people than previously known had access to the Epstein and Maxwell files. And while there was no indication of a ready-made, A to Z client list beyond the little black book that’s already public, “to say there’s nothing or to say it’s a hoax? Bullshit.”
The Epstein Cover-Up at the FBI
Inside the chaotic review process of the Epstein and Maxwell files at the BureauAllison Gill (The Breakdown)
like this
aramis87, felixthecat, Oofnik, eierschaukeln, notsure, SuiXi3D, Dantpool and EpicFailGuy like this.
like this
felixthecat, notsure and slothbear like this.
Any person assisting in a coverup should be tried
for obstruction of justice and aiding a sex offender, sure.
treason is another thing. we save that for Tangerine Palpatine and his relationship with Darth Putin.
like this
notsure likes this.
Regarding the ever-changing nature of the instructions, which one source described as “full panic mode,” there were at least four different review instructions. Keeping in mind that the Record/Information Dissemination Section (RIDS) are trained in FOIA redactions but many in the IMD are not, there were multiple video training sessions that went out on an unclassified network on what to mark for redaction, what not to mark, and how to record things that needed to be flagged. That means that video exists of trainers explaining the process of flagging instances of Donald Trump appearing in the files, and those videos went out on unclassified networks within the bureau. It’s also of note that the trainers toward the end were folks from the Department of Justice, and not the FBI.
SOP for incompetent fascists
like this
notsure likes this.
like this
notsure and dcpDarkMatter like this.
like this
WadeTheWizard likes this.
oof, a list of times you called re: pedos in gov correlated with their voting record would make a fantastic campaign ad for anyone primarying these fucks.
"representative fuckhead, I called your office on 1,2,4,5,7,8, 10 july etc., hoping to speak to you about your misguided defence of sex offenders in our government. You refused to speak to me. So I'm gonna vote for (opposition) instead."
that'd be unffffff satisfying
~~19 3/8ths~~
I knew I wrote this down but assumed it was in my note taking app... oops
'Japanese First' party rocked by suspicions of Russian interference
'Japanese First' party rocked by suspicions of Russian interference
Party leader calls for resignations after candidate appears on state-owned mediaStaff Writer (Nikkei Asia)
Wow, will no one save us from Russian disinformation!?
Whoops, wrong administration to ask.
Trump signs order creating new federal worker classification for at-will, political appointees
Under the new classification, Schedule G, federal employees will be subject to hiring and firing by the president
Trump signed an executive order on Thursday creating a new classification of federal employees who would be subject to hiring and firing by the president, Schedule G, for employees working on policy, in the latest action by his administration to reshape the federal workforce.
The non-career classified employees will be expected to leave in changing presidential administrations, with the order claiming it will “improve operations, particularly in agencies like the Department of Veterans Affairs, by streamlining appointments for key policy roles”.
The order did not cite how many employees would fall under the new classification.
Trump's staff learned those lessons.
I'm sure the atrophied, lesioned Adderall riddled gray jello in his skull barely remembers breakfast.
Tennessee woman denied prenatal care for being unmarried
Pregnant Mother in Tennessee Denied Care for Being Unmarried
Denial of prenatal care to unmarried women in Tennessee raises concerns over the state's Medical Ethics Defense Act.Rachel Wells (Nashville Banner)
like this
originalucifer, FartsWithAnAccent, kubica, frustrated_phagocytosis, andyburke, FerretyFever0, Azathoth, wagesj45, SuiXi3D, Oofnik, aramis87, TVA, notsure, EpicFailGuy and Maeve like this.
like this
frustrated_phagocytosis, FerretyFever0, wagesj45, SuiXi3D and TVA like this.
A bunch of American men believe women should not have sex outside of marriage (except with them of course, where women are expected to be nymphomaniac whores).
Basically completely unrealistic and unreasonable shitty people
like this
Maeve likes this.
The 2025 Medical Ethics Defense Act allows physicians to deny care to patients whose lifestyles they disagree with“It’s absolutely not ‘pro-life’ — and not very Christian either,” said Rep. Gloria Johnson (D-Knoxville), as she shared the woman’s story after the town hall. “And who else are they not going to treat? I had a friend say: what about someone who’s addicted to drugs or alcohol, or who’s struggling with mental health? If you can just refuse treatment to anyone whose lifestyle you disagree with — that’s not medical ethics. That’s fascism.”
Its just like any other super henious piece of legislation that removes human rights. They give it some sweet helpful sounding name (eg. Patriot Act) so when anyone votes against it they can point fingers and say "THIS COMMUNIST HATES PATRIOTS!" or (eg. Kids Online Safety Act) "THIS EVIL BASTARD DOESNT WANT TO PROTECT KIDS!!!"
Its a fascist habit as old as time itself.
like this
Maeve likes this.
It's because the individual is more important than the community. I suppose you can call it the Harold Shipman clause of medical ethics.
You see, according to US doctrine, you are the only person that matters. Therefore, if you let other people die for fun, it's okay. They're part of the community, not you, the individual.
like this
SuiXi3D likes this.
Yikes
Patient Registration Questionnaire
Question 856. Patient's preferred computer operating system (OS): Ubuntu LTS
"Yeah, sorry buddy, we don't serve your kind in these offices."
Well America has always been the home of the free. Its in their national anthem and a huge part of their cultural identity.
For example, you're free to perform your own bodily functions such a procreation in any way you wish, provided that you're participating in a state sanctioned marriage, and that you belong to a demographic which is desirable to the state, and that your DNA does not contain any markers for undesirable traits, and that you express continued loyalty to the supreme leader eternal.
Its such an enlightened way of life.
like this
TVA and themadcodger like this.
She said she does have experience navigating the world of healthcare and Medicaid and explains she feels privileged in this way — a way most others wouldn’t be, especially being a white woman and employed.
Nope she’s a white woman. I mean I agree that I would have wagered she wasn’t white and hence the treatment. But fuck these religious bigots. I’m so sick of people not even following the teachings of the religion they so desperately use to define their lives.
When she reached staff at Sen. Bill Hagerty’s office, they told her, “he’s not obligated to listen to his constituents.”
I fucking hate this country's political system.
like this
TVA and themadcodger like this.
Just a Lemmy client with a webview setting to quickly open pages in app.
Been running an Amp blocker made by Apollo’s dev for over 4 years. Fuck Google’s amp wrappers.
How and when did Tennessee become worse than Texas and Florida? That’s the home of genuine living saint Dolly Parton, isn’t it? Every time I think I can’t become more disgusted by the U.S. I see a story like this. The ongoing gleeful predation and harm of vulnerable people, both domestic and foreign, is beyond the pale. Peaceful options have failed, and all that is left is descent to unimaginable levels of suffering and depravity and, eventually, violence. And all this at a time where the planet is literally dying and we should be doing everything in our power as a species to claw it back. It’s hard not to feel hopeless.
We’ve been considering moving back to B.C. but the way things are going I think that would only buy us a little time. This problem with fascism, capitalism, and general inhumanity is a global problem and there is no escape.
Sorry folks, I usually try to be more hopeful and solution-oriented, but this hit hard today.
How and when did Tennessee become worse than Texas and Florida?
When Haslam retired. Which he did because he saw the writing on the wall that there was no longer a place for him.
Haslam wasn't good, but as a corporate lackey, he just wanted to keep the machine running, he wasn't ideologically committed to all the christofascist culture war bullshit, and would push back on it when it would rock the boat too much. For a few years, he held back the rising tide of fascism and the state was less bad than most of its neighbors. But as soon as he left, there was a massive wave of legislation making up for lost time. The people running things now are fascist idiots, whether ideologues or opportunists, unrestrained by conscience or reason. If Fox News runs a story about something, there will be legislation about it within a week.
How did things get this bad? Because the corporate lackies created the material conditions for it. They were happy to work with and spur on the christofascists because it gets them voting Republican. And now they've created a beast they can no longer control or restrain.
like this
themadcodger likes this.
like this
TVA likes this.
like this
TVA likes this.
She wasn't even "promiscuous". That absolutely shouldn't Legally matter and doesn't morally matter at all, but the physician wasn't even going for low hanging fruit: she had been with the same man for 15 years and they had a 13yo together?? They were essentially married. Stfu dumb ass physician.
I hope it goes all the way to the Supreme Court (not that she should have to) and I like to think if I ever met said physician I would suddenly recieve divine intervention that, morally, no doctors should have Achilles tendons.
like this
TVA likes this.
like this
TVA likes this.
like this
TVA likes this.
They transport trash. Literally.
Their business model is collecting literal trash, in bulk, from various businesses, and evenly distributing it to every residence in the nation. From there, that trash is deposited directly into solid waste streams, recollected by sanitation engineers, and transported to landfills.
The only value the postal service brings is establishing a baseline price for low-speed package delivery that keeps UPS and FedEx from jacking their prices to the moon.
This is what they do now. Some counties and cities tax junk mail, this is very effective. When my city did this, it so affected the amount of paper being recycled that the city worried that people were no longer interested in the recycling program (they figured it out).
You can't blame the USPS for junk mail. They deliver, as fast as they can, and that's it.
One thing that should be brought back to the post, and my president, Elizabeth Warren, agrees, is payday check loans. That used to be a USPS service, and it was very popular.
The payday loans were always locked with interest no higher than inflation, so it wasn't a disaster if you got one. In the 1940s. the USP Savings System held billions in receipts, and was so trusted that even the rich invested in it.
When banks returned to full health, the "government monopoly" was taken from the USPS and ended up in the hands of a bunch of predatory check cashing companies that you now see littering every struggling neighborhood in the USA, except in the few places they're banned. Ironically, the 1980s destroyed the small town community bank (part of Reagan's legacy was the S&L scandal), which were supposed to be replacing the USPS, and the extortionists proliferated. Major banks are now in the game, offering payday/salary loans with 200-300% introductory rates.
Blame this guy.
It goes without saying, the business of payday loans hits the poor hard. Interest can reach 1000% if payments are missed, it's hell. In contrast, the USPSS helped establish credit for millions of working poor people in America. Even when it was judged "redundant" in the late 60s, over a million people still had an account with USPS. And nobody ever talks about it.
You can't blame the USPS for junk mail. They deliver, as fast as they can, and that's it.
They also establish postage rates. Those rates are specifically designed to maximize revenue from junk mail. So, yes, I can actually place a large part of the blame for junk mail directly on the postal service. They need the revenue from that junk mail to stay solvent. Without that junkmail, they would bankrupt themselves.
Which means their primary business is trash distribution. If uBlock functioned in the real world, the first thing it would block would be highway billboards, followed immediately by the USPS in its entirety.
One thing that should be brought back to the post, and my president, Elizabeth Warren, agrees, is payday check loans.
I fully agree with that. Basic banking services should be a core function of the post office.
Yes, I know, I meant that you can't blame the USPS for being required to function as a corporation.They are constantly targeted. If they were to not generate a profit, this would surely give more ammunition to the morons that think privatizing (more to the point, destroying their union) the USPS will make things better or more efficient. By necessity they have to make money where they can.
I brought up the old credit and savings service because it provided genuinely useful and helpful options for people, and it generated enough money for the post that they didn't have to lean on such cheap tactics as soliciting junk mail. I don't think the thousands of mail sorters are happy about it either; it's demoralizing to sift through and dump garbage onto people for a living.
China Used ChatGPT to Grade 203 Energy Policies. It Didn’t Go Well
China Used ChatGPT to Grade 203 Energy Policies. It Didn’t Go Well
Beijing’s audacious promise to reach carbon neutrality by 2060 just encountered an unexpected reality check.GazeOn Team (GazeOn)
like this
originalucifer and dandi8 like this.
like this
FaceDeer likes this.
Sure the only county that has the capability to separate itself from the global internet and possessing state of the art AI models will use fucking chatGPT....
Also the claim that LLMs have no politics shows that the author and the editor know nothing about how LLMs and politics work.
Edit: in my first paragraph I am wrongly assuming relation between the state and these researchers.
The AI models you have may not be on par with American AI models, but that doesn't mean the AI models are bad.
The bad thing is I can't find the research.
Pope condemns Gaza war’s ‘barbarity’ as 73 reported killed while waiting for food
Pontiff also speaks of anguish over Israeli strike on territory’s only Catholic church, which killed three people
Jennifer Rankin and agencies
Sun 20 Jul 2025 12.17 EDT
[these are the strongest words yet from Pope Leo]
Israel has expressed “deep sorrow” and opened an investigation into the strike on the church, which was sheltering about 600 displaced people, most of them children and many with special needs.“This act unfortunately adds to the ongoing military attacks against the civilian population and places of worship in Gaza,” the Pope said on Sunday.
“I appeal to the international community to observe humanitarian law and respect the obligation to protect civilians, as well as the prohibition of collective punishment, the indiscriminate use of force, and the forced displacement of populations.”
Pope condemns Gaza war’s ‘barbarity’ as 93 reported killed by Israeli fire while waiting for food
Israeli forces open fire on hungry Palestinians near Gaza City in one of bloodiest incidents involving aid seekersJennifer Rankin (The Guardian)
Pope condemns Gaza war’s ‘barbarity’ as 73 reported killed while waiting for food
cross-posted from: lemmy.ml/post/33430951
Pontiff also speaks of anguish over Israeli strike on territory’s only Catholic church, which killed three peopleJennifer Rankin and agencies
Sun 20 Jul 2025 12.17 EDT[these are the strongest words yet from Pope Leo]
Israel has expressed “deep sorrow” and opened an investigation into the strike on the church, which was sheltering about 600 displaced people, most of them children and many with special needs.“This act unfortunately adds to the ongoing military attacks against the civilian population and places of worship in Gaza,” the Pope said on Sunday.
“I appeal to the international community to observe humanitarian law and respect the obligation to protect civilians, as well as the prohibition of collective punishment, the indiscriminate use of force, and the forced displacement of populations.”
Pope condemns Gaza war’s ‘barbarity’ as 73 reported killed while waiting for food
Pontiff also speaks of anguish over Israeli strike on territory’s only Catholic church, which killed three peopleJennifer Rankin and agencies
Sun 20 Jul 2025 12.17 EDT[these are the strongest words yet from Pope Leo]
Israel has expressed “deep sorrow” and opened an investigation into the strike on the church, which was sheltering about 600 displaced people, most of them children and many with special needs.“This act unfortunately adds to the ongoing military attacks against the civilian population and places of worship in Gaza,” the Pope said on Sunday.
“I appeal to the international community to observe humanitarian law and respect the obligation to protect civilians, as well as the prohibition of collective punishment, the indiscriminate use of force, and the forced displacement of populations.”
Pope condemns Gaza war’s ‘barbarity’ as 93 reported killed by Israeli fire while waiting for food
Israeli forces open fire on hungry Palestinians near Gaza City in one of bloodiest incidents involving aid seekersJennifer Rankin (The Guardian)
like this
TVA, Endymion_Mallorn and Oofnik like this.
A steakhouse heir, Israeli spies and a cross-border abduction
A steakhouse heir, Israeli spies and a cross-border abduction: the custody battle gripping Germany
Christina Block is standing trial in Hamburg accused of kidnapping two of her own children from her ex-husbandKate Connolly (The Guardian)
Aid for Gaza’s starving children is right at the gates. Let it in
from +972’s Sunday Recap
from +972Magazine [published in Israel]
Other articles
- The suffocation of Sinjil
- Autel denies selling drones to Israel. So why are they roaming Gaza’s skies?
- ‘I haven’t been here in 40 years’: Emotional reunions as Druze cross Israel-Syria fence
- My journalist friend was arrested by Israel. He won’t be the last
Voting age to be lowered to 16 in UK by next general election
Voting age to be lowered to 16 across UK by next general election
Extension of franchise is among changes including easier voter registration and crackdown on foreign interferenceRowena Mason (The Guardian)
Controversial opinion: I don't see a justification for ANY voting age.
For adults we (rightfully) don't make voting dependent on mental or physical capacity, being dependent on other people, and there also is no upper age limit.
So i wouldn't be opposed to allowing anyone elegible for voting to do so when he/she expresses the wish to do so.
That is just a very stupid idea. The best thing for all of us everywhere is for the most rational and well-informed people to vote. The fact that everyone gets a vote is unfortunate for all of us because that includes voters who vote against the public interest, but it is necessary for a free democracy.
Seems like you are arguing for meritocracy here, which has it's own set of problems.
Even if you want to make the argument that some are informed enough, they are far, FAR fewer than in the adult populace. You do not want to broaden that window.
Honestly, this sounds exactly like an argument that could have been made in a debate about whether or not black people or woman should be allowed to vote.
I think you said it yourself, democray needs to endure that sometimes people just don't vote in the same way or for the same reasons as it suits ones own views.
Babies and toddlers don't know shit, plus parents have an extreme amount of coercion over their children until they're teenagers.
Like I said we don't make this a prequisite for adults. There are plenty of disabled or old people fully dependent on others.
Also allowing children to vote will result in more political propaganda targeted at children.
That is an interesting point definitely worth debating. Propaganda would definitely be an issue, but this is the case not just in children, but adults alike. On the other hand with children becoming a voting block it might shift the focus slightly on topics benefiting them.
They deserve to enjoy childhood without worrying about the clusterfuck.
True, although I think children pick up a lot regardless. And importantly obliviousness of issues doesn't change how it affects them. Climate change and unfair pension systems for example will affect them regardless, this way they'd at least have a voice.
I think "teenager" is probably as low as you want to go for the foreseeable future.
I can for sure see how opinions can differ on the topic and I'd totally be ok with compromises and accepting some degree of hypocrisy. But nonetheless it's imo worth looking at the issue from the extreme.
As far as compromises go I think another way to go about it would be to have staggered voting with lower limits in more local votes. I could see how it might be more acceptable there for some.
Edit: also regarding babies and toddlers i'd think that they would need to express a desire to vote in some form, which would probably make it so you don't have literal 1 year olds voting (unless they are like an extreme genius, at which point they might aswell and it would only be a single vote of millions). Maybe one compromise would be to require some more active component below a certain age threshold, like having to vote in person for the first time or at least having to register somewhere (which if not done prior would happen automatically at a certain age).
Propaganda would definitely be an issue, but this is the case not just in children, but adults alike. On the other hand with children becoming a voting block it might shift the focus slightly on topics benefiting them.
you can't ignore the fact that even more propaganda would directly target them, taking advantage of very effective data mining based profiling. they should be able to experience more of life before advertisers starts to dictate their agenda, otherwise they'll easily think that advertisers are speaking the truth.
Climate change and unfair pension systems for example will affect them regardless, this way they'd at least have a voice.
they have a voice. It's not like people can only vote if they are in their last decade. turning 18, just 2 years, anyone can vote, and I would say even 30 and 40 years olds are largely affected by these issues.
you can’t ignore the fact that even more propaganda would directly target them, taking advantage of very effective data mining based profiling. they should be able to experience more of life before advertisers starts to dictate their agenda, otherwise they’ll easily think that advertisers are speaking the truth.
Yes, this is indeed an argument that shouldn't just be ignored. And honestly this should simply never be the case, regardless of age.
I'd break it up into two parts. Official election material and just general advertisements/media. The first one typically is already quite regulated and arguably for the benefit of all should already follow standards that are not harmful to children. The second one seems like the problematic one. However I'd argue that even children are already to some degree getting confronted with what's going on in the world. Anecdotally i can say that even at elementary school age children seem to be (to varying degrees) at least rudimentally aware of many things. To give a recent example like when Israel bombed Iran.
We have things like cigarettes and alcohol where we impose age limits, but those are directly harmful things. Hard to argue that voting in a democracy is harmful. Sometimes there might be anti democratic parties (like the afd here in germany for example), but in those cases you'd think about banning those, not taking away the ability to vote. Maybe you or someone else could give me an example of something positive being banned based on age because the state/society can't provide protection from something secondary.
I would also add that advertisement to a young voting base wouldn't exclusively need to be a bad thing. Take free school lunches for example. If as a politician you run a campaign on that for example you are banking on gaining favor from a voter base that only indirectly is affected by it. The people directly benefiting from it can't vote for you.
they have a voice. It’s not like people can only vote if they are in their last decade. turning 18, just 2 years, anyone can vote, and I would say even 30 and 40 years olds are largely affected by these issues.
They have a voice, but no vote, which is what matters for the politicians in charge. Also "just 2 years" falls flat since my argument is not about the lowering to 16, but abolishing it in general. So for the sake of argument for example an 8 year old, which would make it a full decade. In practice even longer, since elections aren't every year and you aren't guaranteed to have one in the year you turn 18.
And you are right that even 30 and 40 year olds are affected by these issues, but i don't see how that would be an argument against it. If anything i'd see it as an argument that children should also have a say. We also don't have an upper limit after which you aren't allowed to vote anymore. And for obvious reasons it would e.g. be impossible to have a rule that says x years before you die you aren't allowed to vote anymore, since you won't suffer all the consequences.
Yes, this is indeed an argument that shouldn't just be ignored. And honestly this should simply never be the case, regardless of age.
when will we ban personalized advertising?
or any kinds of advertising that is more than just showing that your product/service is there.
but unfortunately, with deceptive videos all over the internet, that wouldn't help at all.
However I'd argue that even children are already to some degree getting confronted with what's going on in the world.
that's right, but I think because of a lack of substantial amount of experiences (before being exposed to media), they have much less of a chance at figuring out what's real and what isn't.
heck I only started using facebook near the end of elementary school. and then when I got to be voting age, I had almost no clue about the running political parties, how truthful they are and what is their past. I just slightly missed being able to vote the time before that, and I know that I would have voted for a liar with a corrupt past, because of facebook ads of their party I assume. "oh look, they are apologizing and they regret it! they look so honest!"
nowadays? they just post a tiktok video that they'll give money to all below 20 if they are elected, and they get a bunch of votes. and the election office will do nothing. or they promise to lower the graduation requirements. or to make it unlawul to ban smartphone usage at school lessons. or anything that sounds good to them but everybody else knows is a bad idea.
they could have even cooperated with another party to make sure this one doesn't get elected, but takes votes away from another one.
all because they promised something on tiktok, or really any platform that auto plays videos when scrolling by.
deceptive social (and traditional) media is exactly why we can't allow this. and if you allow them to vote, you just made it so that now we can't even keep them away legally from that social media, because if you do that they won't vote for you anymore, and the next party will just undo your laws.
And you are right that even 30 and 40 year olds are affected by these issues, but i don't see how that would be an argument against it.
I think those adults had decades of life experiences that could have helped them recognize that they are being deceived and used. childrens won't have any of that. They'll have no chance of recognizing that, unless someone they trust tells them and they want to believe it.
it would also be interesting to read a study that compares the effects of video effects, animations and vibrant nice colors in videos on different age groups.
I'm reading your post and it reads just the same as what applies to many adults.
I know that I would have voted for a liar with a corrupt past, because of facebook ads of their party I assume. “oh look, they are apologizing and they regret it! they look so honest!”
I can't even get started how many politicians have a corrupt past here in Germany and got plenty of votes.
nowadays? they just post a tiktok video that they’ll give money to all below 20 if they are elected
Here in Germany parties actively ran on the promise of raising and fixing the pension levels in an already unsustainable system. Alongside other gifts to certain voter bases. The one left out (I assume partially because they are not able to vote): The youth.
I also think you vastly overestimate the amount of influence underage voters would yield. Especially in our demographic structures and based on the fact that a significantly lower share of them would actually make use of it. They certainly wouldn't have the power to introduce sweeping changes against the better judgement of other voting blocks. But you are right that they might influence smaller changes.
To take one of your examples i could see that for something like the smartphone ban. But would that be so bad? It might be a good thing, but i don't think this is conclusively proven. In return it is probably something being pushed by a large majority that might not even use a smartphone on a daily basis or at the least is very far removed from the current level of technology. And it also wouldn't all need to be negative. Take for example the stop killing games petition that is quite popular on this site. That one might suddenly gain some more supporters, which are actually affected by it.
However i'd also see a need for more studies. And i probably wouldn't just make a major shift like that instantaneously, but rather in a gradual way and maybe lead with changes to smaller more local elections first. Which might give opportunities for such studies.
Here in Germany parties actively ran on the promise of raising and fixing the pension levels in an already unsustainable system. Alongside other gifts to certain voter bases. The one left out (I assume partially because they are not able to vote): The youth.
so they were lying, except to the youth, because to them they didn't have a message. that's a positive thing to me.
But you are right that they might influence smaller changes.
part of my worries is this, but rather how will this affect all of them, when sociopathic people will start targeting them with even more brainwashing/reeducation content.
To take one of your examples i could see that for something like the smartphone ban. But would that be so bad?
what do you mean? the banning the school-level banning of it? the problem is not smartphones themselves, but what they can do.
playing games and scrolling social media on lessons. taking pictures of your peers against their will, like when they get humiliated. using the infra blaster to fuck with classroom equipment. all of these were happening in my class, just a few years ago. unless your solution is mandating school-issued spyware on every phone, which I don't support, the only solution is to ban them in one way or another. possibly only on lessons. and then somehow solve the problem of stolen phones, when someone knowingly took away a different phone at the end of lesson.
so they were lying, except to the youth, because to them they didn’t have a message. that’s a positive thing to me.
No, i might have been a bit unclear with my wording, but the pensioners got their huge gifts. They are the largest group of the electorate (and growing) , so there are plenty of incentives to please them, unlike children, who have no vote.
I was more thinking about a blanked ban on school grounds, not just during lessons. In any case i am not necessarily against it, but i think this brings us off topic too much. My main point was mostly just that particularly in regards to technology there might be a large gap and the younger generations would bring some perspectives that might not be properly represented.
like this
Hermit_Lailoken, satansbartender, Heydo, Successful_Try543, assembly, SGGeorwell, Regna, TryingSomethingNew, toothbrush, mintiefresh, DarkSirrush, cymbal_king, Facelesbutcher, m3t00🌎 and doublebatterypack like this.
Arab-Israeli MK Ayman Odeh Spoke at Anti-gov't Protest After Being Attacked by Right-wing Rioters
cross-posted from: lemmy.ml/post/33426944
'I Won't Let the Fascists Win'from Haaretz.com (2025-07-19)
Arab-Israeli MK Ayman Odeh spoke at anti-gov't protest after being attacked by right-wing rioters
According to lawmaker Ayman Odeh, whose ousting from the Knesset was recently attempted, a few dozen protesters surrounded the car, cried 'death to Arabs,' spat in his direction and cracked the windshield.Bar Peleg (Haaretz)
like this
Maeve likes this.
US Government Gives Elon Musk Permission to Detonate Rockets Over a Sacred Hawaian Island
Government Gives Elon Musk Permission to Detonate Rockets Over a Sacred Hawaian Island
After polluting a sacred beach in Texas, Elon Musk's SpaceX is now seeking to wreak havoc on another holy site in Hawaii.Noor Al-Sibai (Futurism)
like this
Maeve, Lasslinthar, aramis87, FartsWithAnAccent, PokyDokie and Quantumantics like this.
a remote and uninhabited island located 400 miles from HonoluluMokumanamana sits at the boundary between "'pō,' the darkness, and 'au,' the light." When a Native Hawaiian dies, their soul travels up near Mokumanamana, and after meeting their ancestors there, they potentially get to advance into the great beyond with them in the dark waters west of the island.
okey-doke.
So, uninhabited (at this point means not viable for habitation) and it's a religious site that probably no one goes on a pilgrimage to? Fuckit.
edit: so the people using the downvote button as a disagree button:
What's the problem? If we are going to do this space shit we need places to drop the litter, what's wrong with this place? Is it just because it's Musk and Trump? I'm no fan of either but wouldn't it be better to have this SpaceX trash out in the Pacific instead of off the coast of South Texas where millions of US and Mexican citizens live?
like this
FaceDeer likes this.
Wait, what am I being ignorant about?
edit: alas, I must remain ignorant as my opp will not tell me what I don't know.
like this
FaceDeer likes this.
So, uninhabited (at this point means not viable for habitation) and it’s a religious site that probably no one goes on a pilgrimage to? Fuckit.
Doesn't sound like you did a great deal of research.
like this
PokyDokie likes this.
militant atheism
WTF? The guy is a dick for sure but leave atheists out of it. This term is just the go-to term for extremist religious asshats
it’s a religious site … fuckit
i believe this is what they’re referring to. it’s specifically an atheist take; it’s just not a very nice one
i generally have disdain for religious crap, but do agree that simply writing people beliefs off as open for dumping waste on is probably not in the spirit of live and let live
Maybe the down votes are because not even 2 paragraphs from the one you quoted, they continue saying that they also have permission to drop debris all around the inhabitated islands.
Along with allowing Musk to rain schrapnel down near Mokumanamana, the FAA also granted SpaceX the ability to do so around Hawaii's eight main islands — which are populated with American citizens who may end up having their houses or property hit by debris — and portions of the Papahānaumokuākea marine national monument, a UNESCO world heritage site that's home to thousands of diverse species of animal and plant life.
like this
FaceDeer likes this.
Are they Americans or not? I know that's a loaded question but we have to dump space trash somewhere if we are going to continue launching. We're not allowed to dump the trash in international waters AFAIK so we have to pick somewhere in our borders.
Gulf of Mexico or The Pacific. Pick one.
like this
FaceDeer likes this.
this attitude is the problem with religion though. it's not that the religion isn't guided by science, but the idea that one groups needs supercede another group's. the hawaiians are the native keepers of this ecosystem. for thousands of years they have been there maintaining it. now because another group wants it for something else we're just supposed to ignore them? fuck that. this is the same attitude that gave us the crusades, the rape of africa, the potato famine, and boarding schools for indigenous people in north america. it doesn't matter that those acts were done by people who claimed to have god on their side and you claim there is no god.
what matters is those acts were done by people claiming to be more advanced than the backwards people they were doing it to, which is exactly what you are advocating for here
What the fuck? They are literally dumping this shit in the Gulf of Mexico RIGHT NOW.
Why is this shitty little island out in the middle of nowhere a problem?!
Yeah, that's what I'm worried about.
WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH THIS SHITTY LITTLE ISLAND?
And then someone posts the article on here and someone types out a defense “yeah but it’s a garage, its uninhabitable” and then later “WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH THIS SHITTY LITTLE ISLAND?” …. You’re getting this right?
Cool. Who's garage do we shit in then?
Because if we're going to shit in a garage we need a garage to shit in. So is that garage in South Texas or out in The Pacific?
basically, no one has stated why this place is not a good place but the Gulf of Mexico is what we're using now so... just keep using it?
You are the first person to articulate WHY you don't want it there, no one else has bothered.
What's the deal with this patch of ocean? Is it special in some other way than NIMBY cloaked in religion?
The religious significance of an uninhabited island seems like a nothingburger compared to this:
Along with allowing Musk to rain schrapnel down near Mokumanamana, the FAA also granted SpaceX the ability to do so around Hawaii's eight main islands — which are populated with American citizens
like this
WadeTheWizard, PokyDokie and FaceDeer like this.
it's time to accept that America is a Christian nation. it shouldn't be, but we're already getting Christian sharia laws, like women should be forced to give birth even if they die, or if the fetus is non viable.
there will be more sharia coming soon.
we should call those laws like that.
wait who doesn't think that america is a Christian nation
Christianity is literally intertwined with like every visible level of the american government
Americans who read the constitution.
That was done in the 50's by Republicans. Democrats lack the guts to fight back against it.
He's a defiler.
That’s why you can’t let Zerg get to late game. Guessing he’s going defiler/hydra/lurker? Sounds like we need firebats so we can still do damage under dark swarm. He might counter with scourge/guardians so watch for a greater spire for a good attack timing.
The guy carrying tanks of napalm smoking a cigarette always gets to me 😁
‘It came from the sky’: Saskatchewan farmer finds hunk of space junk in field
Barry Sawchuk found a giant piece of suspected space debris, as shown in this handout image provided by Sawchuk, in the field of his farm located near Ituna, Sask.globalnewsdigital (Global News)
Yeah right?? It's so crazy how many satellites there are nowadays.
We used to play with my friends when we were younger to spot them. Now it's harder not to see one.
And the sad part is it's going to get much worse probably.
like this
tiredofsametab likes this.
Sacred Hawaian Island
Broooo, who cares lol
Two UK pro-Palestine organisations have bank accounts frozen
Two UK pro-Palestine organisations have bank accounts frozen
Groups say having access to funds cut off raises fears of wider attempt to silence voices speaking out about GazaHaroon Siddique (The Guardian)
like this
FerretyFever0, aramis87, NoneOfUrBusiness and Lippy like this.
like this
FerretyFever0, NoneOfUrBusiness and Lippy like this.
access to their funds cut off indefinitely by Virgin Money and Unit Trust bank respectively
Sue the shit out of them.
like this
FerretyFever0 and NoneOfUrBusiness like this.
like this
FerretyFever0 and NoneOfUrBusiness like this.
like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
I don't think it's entirely the banks' fault. In UK pro-Palestinians are "terrorists" and anti-terrorism procedures require the freezing of assets.
People would think twice before flying Palestinian flags when they won't be able to afford food anymore and face terrorism charges. We live in a dystopia and that's very sad.
Put on some traditional TV news and you'll basically be told that there are no civilians there.
The average boomer think the entire place is 100% terrorists. They're not told about the suffering of innocents. And this isn't me speaking about America, I'm talking about non-conservative European news. The amount of propaganda is mind boggling.
you changed your comment from
euro is a beacon of democracy, folks
to
europe is a beacon of democracy, folks
That's not the way to have a conversation
Having lived in multiple countries in Europe, including Britain, lets just say that the UK is especially bad in terms of Morals and Ethics.
After living there for almost a decade I concluded British society and politics was a mix of European-style and American-style values, only they had mostly picked the bad ones from both (for example, Cronyism, Dynastic Wealth and the idea of the inherent superiority of those born rich from Europe and "Greed as the greatest quality there is" from America) rather than the good ones.
Mind you, most of the rest of Europe, at least at the level of the Political and Money elites, is Morally and Ethically a shithole. It's just that the UK is extra, extra special in this.
Britain speed-running their way into Fascism.
They've been periodically reminding that leaving that country after the Brexit vote was one of the best decisions in my life (and after seeing first hand the discourse around Leave, back then I already thought Britain was one of the most likely European nations to turn Fascist), but the frequency of such reminders has steeply increased in the last couple of months.
"I Said Good Morning to the Dead": Inside the Al-Baqa Cafe Bombing
cross-posted from: lemmy.ml/post/33424549
Huda Skaik, Hamza Salha
July 17 2025, 6:00am
On the evening of June 30, an Israeli warplane dropped a 500-pound, U.S.-made MK-82 bomb on the seaside Al-Baqa Cafe in Gaza City. The explosion killed more than 30 people and injured dozens more.The weapon’s wide blast radius in the dense neighborhood caused indiscriminate damage, affecting unprotected civilians including men, women, children, and the elderly. Legal experts have said the attack likely violated international law under the Geneva Conventions and may constitute a war crime.
As the war grinds on, cafes like Al-Baqa aren’t just social spaces; for many, they are the only places to access electricity and the internet, which are often unavailable in people’s homes due to the ongoing blockade and widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure.
“I Said Good Morning to the Dead”: Inside the Al-Baqa Cafe Bombing
Survivors of the Al-Baqa Cafe bombing in Gaza, and the loved ones of the dead, share their stories of the Israeli attack.Huda Skaik (The Intercept)
like this
Maeve likes this.
like this
NoneOfUrBusiness and Lasslinthar like this.
like this
ElcaineVolta, dcpDarkMatter and NoneOfUrBusiness like this.
like this
falseprophet likes this.
like this
NoneOfUrBusiness and PokyDokie like this.
You mean killed.
Also Israel and the US upped their genocide game. They know gas people to death with CS gas.
truthout.org/articles/witnesse…
Witnesses Say American Military Contractors Shot Tear Gas at Gaza Aid Seekers
One humanitarian group has called for Trump to be held responsible for complicity with GHF-enabled violence.Sharon Zhang (Truthout)
like this
RandomStickman, Lasslinthar and PokyDokie like this.
like this
RandomStickman and Lasslinthar like this.
How do you let your chief of governemnt get food poisoning?
That must have been intentional, either by interior or exterior enemies.
Devmapall
in reply to kebab • • •I'm not Catholic and live in the US
How much power does the Catholic Church and Pope really have anymore? I can't remember the last time anyone has mentioned the Pope in my day to day life. Not that I'm around people that would talk about it much to begin with.
like this
notsure likes this.
kebab
in reply to Devmapall • • •like this
notsure likes this.
Devmapall
in reply to kebab • • •That makes sense.
I was imagining individual people listening to his words. Having church leaders disseminate it makes it more powerful.
I haven't gone to church in years and I freely admit I didn't think my question all the way through before I asked it. Of course people will listen to what their clergy say. It's kind of the point.
ggtdbz
in reply to kebab • • •I guess you can say that, but I think what’s more important is that when he says something that goes against their presumptions they are forced to deal with it.
Francis’s low-bar acceptance of queer people really made a big difference in how many of his followers actually interact with them. Very, very far from perfect, but a huge number of people were forced to challenge their prejudices. Where I live, most people regarded the Venn diagram of gay people and child molesters to be a circle, and now while you’d still still be treated like shit, the idea that you can be gay without being the scum of the earth is much more common. The pope said they’re not bad people, so millions have to find it within themselves to follow what he said.
The Catholic Church will never be a beacon of progressivism. But they’ve been okay at giving stragglers a trustworthy lifeline to slightly more open minded positions.
I don’t think this excuses the bad stuff they’ve done (si
... show moreI guess you can say that, but I think what’s more important is that when he says something that goes against their presumptions they are forced to deal with it.
Francis’s low-bar acceptance of queer people really made a big difference in how many of his followers actually interact with them. Very, very far from perfect, but a huge number of people were forced to challenge their prejudices. Where I live, most people regarded the Venn diagram of gay people and child molesters to be a circle, and now while you’d still still be treated like shit, the idea that you can be gay without being the scum of the earth is much more common. The pope said they’re not bad people, so millions have to find it within themselves to follow what he said.
The Catholic Church will never be a beacon of progressivism. But they’ve been okay at giving stragglers a trustworthy lifeline to slightly more open minded positions.
I don’t think this excuses the bad stuff they’ve done (since this is always brought up any time anyone says anything positive about the church) but I don’t see the church disappearing anytime soon. I’ll take the good where I can find it. (Also the church is very influential where I live, so it’s important that they keep challenging the regressive ideas a lot of powerful and enfranchised people are holding on to. You don’t want to be challenging the pope by denying the atrocities in Gaza do you?)
Edit: just saw that you were replying to someone asking about the US. My comment is about Christians in the Middle East, both (Greek and Latin) Catholics and Maronites which are in communion with Rome. There’s spillover in attitude among the other, non-Catholic sects of Christianity, of course. And further, fainter spillover among others folks.
notsure
in reply to Devmapall • • •Lucidlethargy
in reply to Devmapall • • •Religion is shrinking pretty steadily, though it's also being used as a weapon more and more.
For example, Trump tear gassed a huge protest in DC in his last term, including members of the church he visited the front steps of. He did this to hold a Bible up for a photo op (and he held it upside down).
So on one hand, they have less devout followers. On the other, the concept of these religions is being weaponized and politicized to the point they often perform acts like the one mentioned above, which spit in the face of the very scripture they claim to follow.
xc2215x
in reply to kebab • • •like this
notsure likes this.
notsure
in reply to kebab • • •GingaNinga
in reply to kebab • • •FauxLiving
in reply to GingaNinga • • •palordrolap
in reply to kebab • • •crumbguzzler5000
in reply to kebab • • •kebab
in reply to crumbguzzler5000 • • •crumbguzzler5000
in reply to kebab • • •jaybone
in reply to crumbguzzler5000 • • •Aceticon
in reply to kebab • • •There is an Israel - Hamas war, but that ain't this, that's the guerrila war fought in the ruins of Gaza.
This is is something else: as per the admition of actual IDF soldiers participating in these shootings of people trying to get food aid that they're been ordered to shoot at civilians, this is just state sanctioned mass murder.
Aceticon
in reply to kebab • • •The idea is to scare the rest of Palestinians into not going to get food aid, so that they can starve to death and be blamed for it.
The Zionists are ever so slightly white-washing their Holocaust to make it palatable to "Liberals" (especially the US, British and German kind), otherwise they would only have the support of Fascists, and it really doesn't take much because those "Liberals" are pretty close to the Fascists politically, morally and ethically, so even the flimsiest, most ragged, and obvious to anybody with more than a brain cell of excuses is good enough for them.