Skip to main content




in reply to cmnybo

love 2 come to the science comm and cast aspersions with absolutely no evidence

something something that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed similarly etc

weird racist loser

cmnybo doesn't like this.

in reply to cmnybo

Even if we ignore the blatant "chinaman bad", this doesn't make any sense. Why would they disappear people? This would still be a great outcome for them even with 80% success rate or something. The only difference between 80% and 100% is a tiny bit of nerd cred in recreational science communities. Even the logistical effort of "disappearing" people, while keeping everyone quiet about it, is clearly not worth the benefit here, let alone the potential international scandal.

cmnybo doesn't like this.

in reply to cmnybo

Ah yes, the sinister Chinese. Even when they're doing something good, they're secretly doing something bad
This entry was edited (4 days ago)



in reply to Spectre

Curse this ai slop. The fake crayon thing is really bugging me, like. Crack open a box and put a few hours in if you mean it, super accessible style
in reply to moonshadow

Thank you for mentioning this, I thought I was the only one.
in reply to moonshadow

There's absolutely no reason why this short, simplistic agitprop needs to be made in artisinal fashion from a Marxist perspective. Labor hours saved is valuable, and nobody is enjoying this agitprop from the perspective of artistic analysis. AI cannot replace art, but the insistence that every graphic regardless of use-case be made in artisinal fashion is reactionary.
in reply to Cowbee [he/they]

From a human perspective it's icky and you come across like 1950s propaganda to make commies look bad. When people express themselves they... you know what, I'm just gonna leave it at "ai sucks". Simulated human output, our entire selves slurped up and analyzed to be extruded by a corporation, if your self-defined "marxist perspective" has an excuse for that it can eat my ass
in reply to moonshadow

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Cowbee [he/they]

Your only point is:

  1. If it supports my ideology it's inherently good
This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to moonshadow

No.

My point is that technology that eliminates labor is useful, and correctly analyzing where it's useful and where it isn't is important. It is better to save time where we can, such is the purpose of technology that amplifies what labor creates.

Any leftist of any sort should be dedicated to improving technology and production so that we can fulfill the needs of as many people as possible with as little labor necessary. AI can't replace art, but it can certainly help in cases like this, small disposable agitprop memes for sparking discussion (like we are having now).

This is why it's important to have a dialectical materialist outlook and not an idealist one. Metaphysics isn't helpful.

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Cowbee [he/they]

The impactful thing here is your output, not that of the slop machine, and I don't think it's having the influence you'd hope for mr. downvote
in reply to moonshadow

What is the actual difference in output in the use-case here? What changes about the message if this meme was artisinally created, especially if you couldn't tell? This is why it's important to discard idealism and to embrace materialism, idealism adds confusing baggage that clouds our judgement.

Further, it is working. Every other top-level comment is a discussion of the content of the post, not the fact that it was generated.

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Cowbee [he/they]

The difference is whether we're engaging with one another collectively or being engaged by a machine in isolation. If we couldn't tell the difference we would be "cooked" and it would be "so over" as the kids say. This is why it's important to care about the human element, freebasing materialism has apparently caused you to dismiss your fellow man as confusing baggage

Further, this (thankfully) doesn't seem very well-recieved, I would say in large part because it is thoughtless, souless, trite, mechanized slop. It's making a room full of countercultural system-smashers who would otherwise agree with at least the general sentiment stop and think that you suck too

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to moonshadow

As I said, OP could have grabbed a stock image and wordart and made the exact same image. Is it still intrinsically bad? We interact with machines and use tools all the time to shortcut processes that used to be artisinal. Taking photos of people instead of drawing them by hand did not erase the desire for portraits, but it added the ability to shortcut photography for times where applicable.

As for where you're getting the idea that OP's image isn't well-recieved from, I have no idea. Your top comment is at time of writing 50% upvoted and 50% downvoted, and everyone else is talking about the content of the image. Saying we are "cooked and so over" without further elaboration isn't a point either.

I'm not dismissing my fellow man, especially because I am fighting for the right of tool usage that alleviates artisinal labor from areas it doesn't need to be.

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Cowbee [he/they]

People like expressing themselves, to know and be known is kinda what life is all about, and I have no idea how to meaningfully engage with someone who sees that opportunity as a burden to be alleviated. Hope you find both joy and peace today man
in reply to moonshadow

I explicitly said, over and over again, that AI can never take the place of art. OP clearly did not like the idea of hand-drawing agitprop, and so used a tool to shortcut to the final product. I don't see art as a burden to be alleviated, and made the case that AI can exist alongside art without replacing it, just as photography didn't replace hand-drawn portraits.

If you're going to deliberately ignore what others are saying to you and instead make up brand new strawmen to attack, do you actually care about human expression or is this just a trend of emotional reaction?

in reply to Spectre

See in my mind "real liberalism" is anti-capitalist, because capitalism is inherently a snowball-hierarchy. That's against liberty by definition.


Top Brazilian Official Warns Trump of 'Vietnam-Style' Regional Conflict If He Attacks Venezuela




Top Brazilian Official Warns Trump of 'Vietnam-Style' Regional Conflict If He Attacks Venezuela




Top Brazilian Official Warns Trump of 'Vietnam-Style' Regional Conflict If He Attacks Venezuela


in reply to Salamence

Don't confuse "top official" with military official. He's a civilian politician who was once minister of defense. He's from the right-wing of the governing Worker's Party and is currently an advisor for Lula.

The same Lula who did not recognise Maduro's election in 2024, blocked Venezuela's entry into BRICS, won't even name Venezula in official speeches, and is now cozying up to the USA in exchange for the end of the tariffs.

Brazil won't intervene. It might even help the US.

in reply to Conselheiro

on the other hand venezuela is actually prepared to fight back, unlike most the us attacks. i can only hope venezuelans kick usian ass like the vietnamese did before.

i've heard of MST saying they would help but yeah, i don't expect anything from lula except more neoliberal bullshit. really wish brazil had a better way out tbh, but i don't see it.

This entry was edited (6 days ago)
in reply to ☂️-

i also wouldn't expect much of any support from the rest of latin america; there's too much inertia from pro-capitalist/pro-american forces throughout the region to let it happen.
in reply to Conselheiro

I don't see how that affects his analysis, though. An American attempt to oust the Venezuelan government would likely lead to a wide scale guerilla war and South America would likely become more anti-American in the process.

That someone so high up in the administration is saying it likely means there are reasonable fears of this becoming a major issue.

in reply to Conselheiro

I don't think he is implying that Brazil will hop to the defense of Venezuela necessarily, I think he is more concerned that (parts of) Brazil will become a Laos or a Cambodia in the conflict and it will spiral out of control. In Laos almost 200k people were killed which was 10% of their population and another 750k were displaced. Unexploded shells harm up to 50k people every year into the 2020s from that conflict.
This entry was edited (5 days ago)


Diaries of Blood, The secret artists within Israeli detention facilities.




Diaries of Blood, The secret artists within Israeli detention facilities.



in reply to misk

Larian wouldn't fuck us with yet another card game bandwagoning I think? Given the shorter dev cycle...ARPG?

Divine Divinity is back, baby.

in reply to BurgerBaron

That would make me incredibly happy. I recently played Divine Divinity again, and it holds up so well. Sadly the tech is showing it's age. All it needs is a new engine and a bit of qol.


2025 set for second-hottest year on record


in reply to eldavi

Spoiler formatting looks like this:

::: spoiler Tap for spoiler
Spoilers go here
:::

The "Tap for spoiler" part is what shows up in the post, like this:

::: spoiler Tap for spoiler
Snape kills Dumbledore
:::

You can put whatever you like instead of "Tap for spoiler", such as emojis:

::: spoiler 😱😱😱😱
Mrs Flood is the Rani
:::

That's all :)

This entry was edited (6 days ago)



in reply to King

Geez Cloudflare really is just a massive MITM isn't it.