California’s Gavin Newsom signs law banning all plastic bags at grocery stores

“Paper or plastic” will no longer be a choice at grocery store checkout lines in California under a new law signed on Sunday by the governor, Gavin Newsom, that bans all plastic shopping bags.

California had already banned thin plastic shopping bags at supermarkets and other stores, but shoppers could purchase bags made with a thicker plastic that purportedly made them reusable and recyclable.

The new measure, approved by state legislators last month, bans all plastic shopping bags starting in 2026. Consumers who don’t bring their own bags will now simply be asked if they want a paper bag.

State senator Catherine Blakespear, one of the bill’s supporters, said people were not reusing or recycling any plastic bags. She pointed to a state study that found that the amount of plastic shopping bags trashed a person grew from 8lb (3.6kg) a year in 2004 to 11lb a year in 2021.

Blakespear, a Democrat from Encinitas, said the previous bag ban passed a decade ago didn’t reduce the overall use of plastic.

“We are literally choking our planet with plastic waste,” she said in February.

The environmental non-profit Oceana applauded Newsom for signing the bill and “safeguarding California’s coastline, marine life, and communities from single-use plastic grocery bags”.

Christy Leavitt, Oceana’s plastics campaign director, said on Sunday that the new ban on single-use plastic bags at grocery store checkouts “solidifies California as a leader in tackling the global plastic pollution crisis”.

Twelve states, including California, already have some type of statewide plastic bag ban in place, according to the environmental advocacy group Environment America Research & Policy Center. Hundreds of cities across 28 states also have their own plastic bag bans in place.

The California legislature passed its statewide ban on plastic bags in 2014. The law was later affirmed by voters in a 2016 referendum.

The California Public Interest Research Group said on Sunday that the new law finally meets the intent of the original bag ban.

Via Fix the News

Marvel, DC Lose ‘Superhero’ Trademarks After Failing To Respond To Cancellation Petition

We have a hero in our midst, one that is responsible for freeing up the term “superhero” from its previous trademark imprisonment. If you don’t recall, Scott Richold is a British comic artist who produces the Superbabies line of comic books. Richold applied for a trademark for his comic only to find it opposed by both DC and Marvel. The two companies jointly held 4 trademarks to the term “superhero” and variations of that term. And if that strikes you as plainly absurd, given that the “superhero” is the name of an entire genre of fiction across many mediums, you’re certainly not alone.

As a result, Richold petitioned the USPTO to cancel those four trademarks, arguing that the terms have become generic. As detailed in a follow up post, I figured there were several ways that DC and Marvel might respond to the petition. They could have fought it, deploying a hefty legal war chest to try to simply bully Richold out of his attempt. Or they could have amicably released their marks, generating some amount of goodwill within the public. But I didn’t expect the companies to simply fail to respond to the petition entirely, which is exactly what happened.

As a result of the failure to respond, Richold moved for a default judgement, which would free the “superhero” term from trademark status and move it into the public domain. And, admittedly, to my surprise, the TTAB granted the default judgment.

A U.S. Trademark Office tribunal has canceled a set of “Super Hero” trademarks jointly owned by comic giants Marvel and DC at the request of a London-based comic book artist, according to a Thursday order.

The USPTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled for S.J. Richold’s Superbabies Ltd after Disney’s Marvel and Warner Bros’ DC did not file an answer to Superbabies’ request to invalidate the marks.