Skip to main content


RE: mastodon.art/@posiputt/1158283…

To me a computer should turn on, look nice, let me perform task and then turn off.

I don't want to look under the hood or the terminal or all that. I don't want to have to browse reddit threads about linux partitions. I want to paint comic books and titties.


and being honest with myself I am absolutely one of those linux bros that has a hard time really understanding why almost noone would switch. on some level anyway. on other levels I'm very aware that most people do not want to have to understand how computers work beyond what they actually need or want to do with them. the way windows and mac do it is promising an easy experience and then making you depend on their stuff and so on.

Neil Brown reshared this.

in reply to JenJen

I think that's valid. You're not to blame for the fact that this means that you'll probably always need someone to be your IT support. as I said before: noone can know everything. nor should anyone have to.
in reply to JenJen

I have been preaching this for years now:

The computer is a tool, or a necessary evil, to the vast majority of users. Desktop Linux is... a hobby project. Just like veteran cars or wood-hulled boats. They work, but they require a level of knowledge 95% of the population neither has nor feel like they should need.

As much enshittification that MS has pushed into Windows lately, it literally just... works. Turn on, work / game, turn off.

JenJen reshared this.

in reply to JenJen

This is sure the goal.

It’s why I’ve used Macs for decades, and why it’s so hard to switch out: it’s not usually good design vs. bad. It’s usually design vs. no design.

in reply to JenJen

In other words, You want the convenience of technology without the responsibility of learning how it works, and you feel the need to criticize people's who suggest that you do learn. You're not alone. in fact, that is the norm, and it's why the tech bro sociopaths have more money and power than God. So thanks for that.

Please get a drafting table.

in reply to David Bramian

linux discussion

Sensitive content

in reply to Space-G

@spaceg I agree with this, but my take on that last bit is that tech companies have, in part by making software accessible to non-enthusiasts, inserted themselves (and computers) into almost every activity people want and have to do. Someone not interested in computers used to be able to choose not to use them, but that is not really practical now - so their choices are learning computers, or taking the "easy" option that gives the corporations even more power. It's the corpos we should "thank".
in reply to eishiya

@spaceg I like your car comparison because in many places, cars are similarly a practical necessity rather than a luxury or a hobby, because car manufacturers have made it so.

If I want to get into cars for fun, it's reasonable to expect me to learn a lot about them. But if the residential area I live in is miles away from the jobs and there's no public transit, I'm probably going to use a car whether I care to learn about it or not, and car enthusiasts shouldn't expect me to be on their level.

in reply to JenJen

You can have the "Just turn it on" computer with Linux, easy.

Unfortunately, you'd do it by purchasing a computer with Linux pre-installed. I am not saying this would be practical or desirable for you, just that your laptop almost certainly (99%+) came with Windows, so you also didn't have to learn how to install that.

If you bought, say, a Raspberry Pi, it would come with Linux and Just Work. They just don't fit your use case.

in reply to JenJen

> To me a computer should turn on, look nice, let me perform task and then turn off.

So like an electronic calculator?

Or more like a digital camera?

Or more like a game console?

> I don't want […] the terminal or all that.

I wonder: What kind of interface do you prefer for “I want to precisely express a non-trivial workflow that maybe no one has done exactly like this and/or that the devs did not anticipate”?

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Gabriel Viso Carrera
@neil that's 100% how it should be.
in reply to JenJen

Tintin, Billo, Chacha Choudhary, Swat Kats, Captain Planet & Scooby Doo.

Cannot forget Archie's and Raj Comics..
Indian ones included above.

in reply to JenJen

The promise of Free Software is that end users can modify the system however they like, to make it work better for them. If that ability is limited to a few percent of potential users who are comfortable diving into arcane poorly documented C codebases and then maintaining patches against a rapidly changing upstream, it has failed as a Free Software system. And that is not the users’ fault.
in reply to JenJen

I try and be disciplined and keep my laptop as a turn on and just work device, but I struggle as I want to get inside it. 🛠️
in reply to JenJen

💯

When I was in college (in the late 90s!) I only had a Linux computer. I loved tinkering with my Linux computer

My few years older housemate said, yeah, I used to care about all that, but these days, I just want the computer to work with out all of the fucking around

At the time I was horrified. That could never be me!

Now I get pissed when a new dialog box I’ve never seen pops up. I don’t want to have to even read that shit, let alone figure out if I should care or not