Skip to main content


The EU wants to stop feeding your DNS queries to Silicon Valley.

DNS4EU is the European Commission’s attempt to build a sovereign DNS resolver infrastructure that doesn’t route all your web lookups through the likes of Google, or Cloudflare.

DNS4EU aims to bring DNS resolution under EU oversight and privacy rules.

So, if you want 🇪🇺-backed ad-blocking and child protection, you may want to give it a try.

Check out DNS4EU here: joindns4.eu/for-public

reshared this

in reply to Graham Cluley

And yet still nobody explained why we need centralized resolvers for a decentralized distributed system that is designed for everyone to run their own resolvers.
in reply to Klaus Frank

@agowa338 Indeed, among the many things that are wrong in this ad: it implies that you have a use a public resolver and it never mentions the default choice, a local resolver.
in reply to Stéphane Bortzmeyer

@bortzmeyer @agowa338 I'd initially assumed the point was to replace the DNS roots, which are controlled by different branches of the US federal government.
in reply to FoolishOwl

@foolishowl @agowa338 No, DNS4EU is a resolver, not an authoritative name server.
(And, no, the root name servers are not controlled by the US government - except the three managed by the US military and the NASA - but it is another story.)
in reply to Stéphane Bortzmeyer

@bortzmeyer @foolishowl
well they have still a lot of influence through companies like verysign and such, so I'd add a "technically" to that 2nd part though.
in reply to FoolishOwl

@foolishowl @bortzmeyer
No, also they're technically not US controlled (anymore). They're part of some international agreement and considered inter-governmental organizations and so on...
in reply to Klaus Frank

@agowa338 @foolishowl No. There is no "international agreement" (each root name server is on a free ride) and no, nobody regards them as inter-governemental (which would require an international treaty).
in reply to Klaus Frank

@agowa338 @foolishowl Sorry, but I know and I don't need Wikipedia for that.
For instance, root name servers are *not* managed by ICANN (except one; L-root).
in reply to Stéphane Bortzmeyer

@bortzmeyer @foolishowl
well then you would have known what I meant with international agreements and such. So either you don't or you're posting nonsense...
in reply to Jeroen van Tol 🍋 🐸🔻

@TheDutchChief One more click and you find it (and it works) joindns4.eu/for-public#resolve…
in reply to Graham Cluley

There are so many things wrong in this ad, it is hard to start. Let's begin with the picture: the DNS query is not happy with both EU and Google and goes further away?

#DNS4EU

in reply to Stéphane Bortzmeyer

Then, the biggest problem: do you know anything about the #DNS? Are you aware that most users don't use a public resolver but rather a local resolver maintained by their access provider, their employer or university, or even themselves?
Why should they switch to a public resolver? (I know several reasons but you did not mention them.)

#DNS4EU

in reply to Stéphane Bortzmeyer

Then, *if* you want to use a public resolver *and* *if* you want it to be european, there are several european public resolvers, created years ago before the bureaucratic and slow European Commission project.

dns.sb/
dns4all.eu/
fdn.fr/actions/dns/

(and many others; no need to centralize, especially to the State)

#DNS4EU

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Stéphane Bortzmeyer
@lightning We manage authoritative name servers for several TLD and, while Google (and a few others) are indeed big clients, they are far from the majority of DNS requests.
Also, if your toothbrush or your vacuum cleaner talks directlty to 8.8.8.8 with DoH, I doubt they will allow you to change this setting, whatever resolver you prefer.
in reply to Graham Cluley

I was with you until you said "child protection", code for "censorship of information children need to survive an abusive world". 🤬
in reply to Cassandrich

@dalias
Do young children need the porn, violence and drugs sites made available to them?
@gcluley
in reply to Cassandrich

@dalias
This isn't a system for the EU to restrict information from older teens, but a way for parents to allow internet use for children without letting them be overwhelmed by all the adult shit that dominates the web. It you want your kids to see that shit, then feel free - no one will stop you.
@gcluley
in reply to Roche Limit

@rochelimit @dalias
this is your irregular reminder that conservatives will always categorise 2SLGBTQIA+ materials as 'adult material', claiming that we are 'groomers', 'sexual predators', and the like. they will also categorise sex education materials as such, too.

you cannot trust anyone who claims to be 'thinking of the children'.