Discord now properly supports screensharing on linux
Wayland and audio is fixed, but only on the canary branch for the moment, this isnt lazy either, they changed the whole screenshare flow to suit linux's permission prompts
don't like this
reshared this
Blisterexe
in reply to Blisterexe • • •silly goose meekah
in reply to Blisterexe • • •t҉̠̙ǵ̣̞̄ͪ͜x̸̱͚̳ͫ͐̑̈ͯͣ̚n̒͌҉͉̦̜̝ͅ
in reply to Blisterexe • • •chingadera
in reply to t҉̠̙ǵ̣̞̄ͪ͜x̸̱͚̳ͫ͐̑̈ͯͣ̚n̒͌҉͉̦̜̝ͅ • • •Eyck_of_denesle
in reply to chingadera • • •chingadera
in reply to Eyck_of_denesle • • •Yttra
in reply to Eyck_of_denesle • • •Sips'
in reply to chingadera • • •Jeena
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Blisterexe
in reply to Jeena • • •you first click the "share screen" button, then it asks if you want to share a device, screen or window, then it shows you that screen, that summons a permission prompt tailored to what you selected recently.
I agree it's quite nice
ProdigalFrog
in reply to Blisterexe • • •simple
in reply to Blisterexe • • •simonced
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Quite nice feature indeed.
Blisterexe
in reply to simonced • • •The Ramen Dutchman
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Good to know it works on X, as well.
Blisterexe
in reply to The Ramen Dutchman • • •Mereo
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Blisterexe
in reply to Mereo • • •Mereo
in reply to Blisterexe • • •tiramichu
in reply to Mereo • • •t҉̠̙ǵ̣̞̄ͪ͜x̸̱͚̳ͫ͐̑̈ͯͣ̚n̒͌҉͉̦̜̝ͅ
in reply to Mereo • • •Still, this is a huge improvement over not working at all, and the "Entire Desktop" (3 screens) works, as well as "select region" sharing!
DacoTaco
in reply to t҉̠̙ǵ̣̞̄ͪ͜x̸̱͚̳ͫ͐̑̈ͯͣ̚n̒͌҉͉̦̜̝ͅ • • •ffhein
in reply to t҉̠̙ǵ̣̞̄ͪ͜x̸̱͚̳ͫ͐̑̈ͯͣ̚n̒͌҉͉̦̜̝ͅ • • •camr_on
in reply to Blisterexe • • •tiramichu
in reply to Blisterexe • • •I was almost convinced they were keeping this broken on purpose, it's been broken so long. Like, years long.
It was broken so long I honestly wouldn't have been surprised if news surfaced that Discord was taking back-handers from Microsoft under the table to keep it broken. With steam working so well on Linux now, broken discord streaming without actual working audio share was one of the last things that posed a hurdle for gamers ditching Windows.
(In the meantime, thank you Vesktop for your service ❤)
corsicanguppy
in reply to tiramichu • • •Heh. There's a ticket with Splunk. It's a simple request: do the 30 sec of work to let us install your software rpm from a proper yum repo.
They can't figure out how.
They won't ask.
It's 12 years old now.
The ticket for them to do a trivial exercise with tools twice as old, is now a tween. It can ride the bus on its own. I think it can get a Facebook account. Maybe.
We should get one for it.
tehfishman
in reply to corsicanguppy • • •dan
in reply to corsicanguppy • • •dino
in reply to dan • • •dan
in reply to dino • • •finder
in reply to dan • • •dan
in reply to finder • • •finder
in reply to dan • • •Blisterexe
in reply to tiramichu • • •I saw something from a discord dev (can't find it, so grain of salt) about how there was interest recently to do it, but they'd have to work on other stuff that affected everyone first, and they'd probably get it done by q4 2024, guess they were right.
I think before then the whole linux graphics and audio space hadn't really stabilized enough for them to be interested.
blobjim [he/him]
in reply to tiramichu • • •Zamundaaa
in reply to blobjim [he/him] • • •blobjim [he/him]
in reply to Zamundaaa • • •Zamundaaa
in reply to blobjim [he/him] • • •Chromium had it for qhite a while, but it isn't really relevant... Discord's implementation of screen sharing was custom on X11, if they had used the one that comes with Electron, this would've worked far earlier.
DEs that had a Wayland session (aka Gnome and Plasma) supported it very soon after the portal was made.
The real reason won't be anything external, but something in the company. Usually it's just that Linux isn't a priority for a given company, so even if there's a motivated engineer that wants to take care of it, it's hard justifying to their managers why they need to spend a lot of time on it.
This isn't exclusive to Discord, to use a very similar example, Zoom is kinda worse. In the past, Zoom misused a Gnome screenshot API to do screen casting very badly, and recently they ported to the desktop portal - not because they had a choice, but because Gnome locked down the API they were using. Screen casting still only works on Gnome though, because they stil
... show moreChromium had it for qhite a while, but it isn't really relevant... Discord's implementation of screen sharing was custom on X11, if they had used the one that comes with Electron, this would've worked far earlier.
DEs that had a Wayland session (aka Gnome and Plasma) supported it very soon after the portal was made.
The real reason won't be anything external, but something in the company. Usually it's just that Linux isn't a priority for a given company, so even if there's a motivated engineer that wants to take care of it, it's hard justifying to their managers why they need to spend a lot of time on it.
This isn't exclusive to Discord, to use a very similar example, Zoom is kinda worse. In the past, Zoom misused a Gnome screenshot API to do screen casting very badly, and recently they ported to the desktop portal - not because they had a choice, but because Gnome locked down the API they were using. Screen casting still only works on Gnome though, because they still check for the desktop name. If you set it to Gnome, it works perfectly fine everywhere else too!
All it would take to fix that problem is removing an if statement, yet, despite many complaints, it hasn't happened... because no big customer has complained, so it's just one of the unimportant Linux bugs.
blobjim [he/him]
in reply to Zamundaaa • • •DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]
in reply to tiramichu • • •deadcream
in reply to tiramichu • • •Tech companies are fully capable of being lazy for free. Fixing this takes dev time from other work that brings Discord money so doing this costs them, especially considering that Linux userbase must be rather tiny. 99% of software companies don't give a shit about making quality product and will always try their hardest to do as little work as possible while making as much money as possible. If fixing a bug will cost them more than potential profits from making it work then they won't fix it.
tiramichu
in reply to deadcream • • •kuneho
in reply to tiramichu • • •You give them too much credit. It's just shitty, that's it.
Discord is pretty much broken on all platform. It always was. There's just no real alternative unfortunately.
dino
in reply to kuneho • • •kuneho
in reply to dino • • •dino
in reply to kuneho • • •We would have to sit down and actually think what an opensource solution can achieve and how it gets traction. Also from the get go it should be clear that there will be no feature parity between it and discord. If it was me, I would cut out the whole chatroom functionality, leave private messaging in, use threaded conversations as a standard and but a decent videocall system on top. But this would be my version of it, other people have other needs.
For the video call system you would not have to reinvent the wheel, use something existing like Jitsi (?) or alternatives. Then you would
Maybe the best bet is to look at matrix and wrench out the chatroom focus and replace it with threads?
Blisterexe
in reply to dino • • •dino
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Not in my bubble, chats create insurmountable loads of noise. By focusing on threads you get the discussion much more focused and streamlined. Example:
Most of my discords are ttrpg related, where with the usage of bots games are scheduled. Or where discussion are happening around certain ttrpg systems.
I agree that a lot of discord servers focus on chat rooms. But you could retain that by simply having 1-2 chatrooms per server and structure/direct conversations to dedicated threads/voice chats instead.
Again this is just MY view. I am totally aware that other people, use it differently.
Blisterexe
in reply to dino • • •dino
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Blisterexe
in reply to dino • • •dino
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Blisterexe
in reply to dino • • •Blisterexe
in reply to dino • • •kuneho
in reply to dino • • •GregorGizeh
in reply to dino • • •dino
in reply to GregorGizeh • • •GregorGizeh
in reply to dino • • •Discord isnt open source either tho so how does that matter for the comparison?
And while yes it is a little outdated, I do recall the time before discord when people would have their own teamspeak server instead, which worked very similar to the fediverse.
You had the client and could connect to any server you had the credentials to, which each were owned and hosted by various people or groups each with their own rules and code of conduct.
treverflume
in reply to GregorGizeh • • •lorty
in reply to dino • • •dino
in reply to lorty • • •xavier666
in reply to kuneho • • •riquisimo
in reply to tiramichu • • •Flatfire
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Oh my fuck, finally. Good lord Discord, only took you eons to get that working with Wayland after you broke it.
I get that there's other things like Discord out there, but nothing works like Discord.
index
in reply to Flatfire • • •There's plenty of free alternatives that works much better than discord
matrix.org/ecosystem/clients/
Flatfire
in reply to index • • •index
in reply to Flatfire • • •Calls and video chats works just fine in matrix and client like element allow you to integrate other services if you don't like the default ones.
You sound a lot like someone who use windows. We are on a linux sub.
Flatfire
in reply to index • • •priapus
in reply to index • • •The Ramen Dutchman
in reply to Flatfire • • •devfuuu
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Finally. I had it working after a bunch of workarounds recently, but it was not really stable.
Always remember, this is what we all deserve for using closed source apps.
like this
metaStatic likes this.
pinguinu [any]
in reply to Blisterexe • • •TheDrink [he/him]
in reply to Blisterexe • • •I've been using the canary branch exclusively for about a year because of audio issues on the main one, I would genuinely be ecstatic if they finally ported over the fix because for some reason the canary branch refuses to auto upgrade and I have to do it manually every time.
Blisterexe
Unknown parent • • •Blisterexe
Unknown parent • • •tekato
Unknown parent • • •sanpo
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Russ
in reply to sanpo • • •Eyck_of_denesle
in reply to Russ • • •miss phant
in reply to Eyck_of_denesle • • •Haven't used it in a while but from what I remember it always puts you in idle if you do something else and only back to online if you do something in Discord itself, as expected from the Wayland limitation.
It could be implemented with the ext-idle-notify-v1 protocol.
sanpo
in reply to miss phant • • •sanpo
in reply to Russ • • •Russ
in reply to sanpo • • •Ah, I thought this was in regards to AFK tracking when discord isn't focused (which this plugin still won't fix due to the mentioned Wayland restrictions) - I didn't realize that it still didn't work even when discord was focused, which is strange.
I've been using Vesktop since screen share wasn't working on Wayland, and it already seems to do what this plugin does hence my confusion.
darklamer
in reply to tekato • • •metaStatic
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Eyck_of_denesle
in reply to metaStatic • • •unique_hemp
in reply to Eyck_of_denesle • • •flatpak.github.io/xdg-desktop-…
KDE has support for it, Gnome is in progress:
gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/xdg-des…
priapus
in reply to unique_hemp • • •unique_hemp
in reply to priapus • • •LucidBoi
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Lettuce eat lettuce
in reply to darklamer • • •secret300
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Derin
in reply to Blisterexe • • •dingleberrylover
in reply to Derin • • •Derin
in reply to dingleberrylover • • •It's not an official client, and non-official clients are against the ToS.
Discord's been nice about them so far, but at some point someone in or above that company is going to demand they start making a profit, and when that happens the amnesty custom clients are currently unofficially receiving will disappear.
Hopefully I can convince people to use Mumble with me 😂
Mandy
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Just use vencord or something that worked for ages.
Matt
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Tux Enthusiast
in reply to Blisterexe • • •foremanguy
in reply to Blisterexe • • •thingsiplay
in reply to foremanguy • • •Me too, yet we click and decided to reply.^^
I'm happy for others, plus it makes life easier for those who expect a working Discord like on Windows.
foremanguy
in reply to thingsiplay • • •flux
in reply to foremanguy • • •foremanguy
in reply to flux • • •index
in reply to flux • • •Blisterexe
in reply to index • • •flux
in reply to index • • •Well, except perhaps for the fact that Discord has a Linux version, while the Facebook App doesn't.
And—clearly!—it seems rather popular as well.
SkyeStarfall
in reply to foremanguy • • •index
in reply to SkyeStarfall • • •I encourage you to switch to better interests
spyware.neocities.org/articles…
SkyeStarfall
in reply to index • • •Okay, great, now convince 30+ other people I chat with on the service
Yes I know it sucks and will just keep on enshittifying, but it's not so much as it being a replaceable social media for me, as it is a primary way for me to keep in contact with partners, friends, finding out about and participating in arrangements, and meeting new people in my local area. Stopping using discord is effectively cutting myself off from the local communities
Everyone in my social circle uses it, and will keep on using it. Maybe once some breaking point is reached due to ever increasing enshittification people will start being interested in alternatives, but we're far from that point still
index
in reply to SkyeStarfall • • •Show them the link and encourage them to move to better platforms
matrix.org/ecosystem/clients/
index
in reply to SkyeStarfall • • •Show them the link and encourage them to move to better platforms
matrix.org/ecosystem/clients/
SkyeStarfall
in reply to index • • •Blisterexe
in reply to SkyeStarfall • • •index
in reply to SkyeStarfall • • •Lemmchen
in reply to foremanguy • • •Feathercrown
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Blisterexe
in reply to Feathercrown • • •/s
:::
Feathercrown
in reply to Blisterexe • • •jonesy
in reply to Blisterexe • • •boredsquirrel
in reply to jonesy • • •THIS prevented you from switching?
Afaik screenshare always worked when using Discord in a browser
jonesy
in reply to boredsquirrel • • •flubba86
in reply to jonesy • • •boredsquirrel
in reply to flubba86 • • •vintageballs
in reply to flubba86 • • •GregorGizeh
in reply to jonesy • • •Nilz
in reply to GregorGizeh • • •devfuuu
in reply to Nilz • • •Zetta
in reply to devfuuu • • •devfuuu
in reply to Zetta • • •Getting good enough noise cancelling and mic detection working is only almost decent on the official app.
I've never had a problem with low bitrate or anything related to that.
priapus
in reply to devfuuu • • •Zetta
in reply to devfuuu • • •vintageballs
in reply to Nilz • • •jonesy
in reply to GregorGizeh • • •Blisterexe
in reply to GregorGizeh • • •Tywèle [she|her]
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Matt
in reply to Blisterexe • • •SolarPunker
in reply to Blisterexe • • •branch
in reply to SolarPunker • • •onlooker
in reply to branch • • •index
in reply to branch • • •spyware.neocities.org/articles…
stallman.org/discord.html
.Donuts
in reply to index • • •These articles are very old and not super relevant any more. Sources of 2018 and 2019, while a lot has changed over the years.
I'm not here to "defend" Discord and pretend it's all gravy, but if you want to make a compelling argument, I think it's a good idea to stick to current, factual information.
index
in reply to .Donuts • • •Did you even read them? They changed for worst all the points remain.
.Donuts
in reply to index • • •Which got worse? Feel free to show me an example. I'll try to investigate and find out its merits.
It must be said that that site also considers browsers like Firefox and Vivaldi to be at a high level of being spyware. I think it's important to understand that Discord doesn't do things much differently than other platforms, other than not having any 3rd party ads.
index
in reply to .Donuts • • •You sound exactly like a bad actor. If you open and read the website you would know why Firefox it's listed
cadence.moe/blog/2020-06-06-wh…
.Donuts
in reply to index • • •(emphasis mine). Ah yes, another blog by a user that thinks everything revolves around their experience.
I would love to act in good faith, but you're not making it easy linking this drivel. Because I don't want to make you feel like I'm fishing for sources, let me expand some points in the original link to talk about:
... show more(emphasis mine). Ah yes, another blog by a user that thinks everything revolves around their experience.
I would love to act in good faith, but you're not making it easy linking this drivel. Because I don't want to make you feel like I'm fishing for sources, let me expand some points in the original link to talk about:
Ah yes, very scary. Connecting your account with other platforms to show your profile.
The "advertising" in question:
Usually this is a server (community) - side setting, but Discord also forces it when they think you are a spammer or malicious actor. Pretending it's to collect phone number is a bit out there. Also, 2FA has been a thing since forever.
Lastly, there's probably the argument of selling our personal data:
This is a legal document that they will get in trouble for if they were lying. They've already been fined hundreds of thousands of euros for GDPR violations but that curiously did not include a fine for "took people's personal information and then sold them without consent whilst explicitly saying they didn't do that"
Discord further has no third party advertisements which they can use to "sell" your data by allowing those advertisements to target you.
index
in reply to .Donuts • • •You are here on lemmy on a linux sub trying to defend a proprietary company who makes billions stealing kids data. Take a break and think about what you are doing with your life.
drewdevault.com/2021/12/28/Don…
meliaesc
in reply to index • • •Did you actually read anything or are you just set to rage mode?
And then your blogger proceeds to use it as a cited source, my goodness.
index
in reply to meliaesc • • •Yes, did you? They are trying to claim something as stupid as that discord doesn't sell your data.
meliaesc
in reply to index • • •Burden of proof is on you, to show an instance of Discord going against its ToS and selling data.
Only thing I could find: arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20… where are 3rd party bot might scrape data to then sell... which is an issue even for lemmy?
index
in reply to meliaesc • • •meliaesc
in reply to index • • •.Donuts
in reply to index • • •There are plenty of legit things to get upset about. Malicious bots, prolific scams, CSAM, customer support having an abysmal rep, and that's not even talking about how foundationally incompatible Discord is with FOSS.
So no, I'm not here to defend a proprietary company. I'm here to address the pointless fear mongering that distracts from the real issues.
GHiLA
in reply to branch • • •ILikeBoobies
in reply to GHiLA • • •It’s reach not centralization
You’d think Lemmy would’ve taught you that by now
g1ya777
in reply to SolarPunker • • •a Kendrick fan
in reply to g1ya777 • • •Blisterexe
in reply to a Kendrick fan • • •ILikeBoobies
in reply to Blisterexe • • •I wouldn’t say discord is either of those things
They need to limit server sizes, get rid of community searching, and add #XXXX to the end of usernames before we can pretend that
Tattorack
in reply to ILikeBoobies • • •Wouldn't limiting server sizes and getting rid of community searching be removing features? Why would anyone want that?
And Discord used to have #XXXX at the end of usernames.
ILikeBoobies
in reply to Tattorack • • •1 they aren’t pedos
2 they want an app to talk to their friends with
3 they don’t want to be victims of misinformation campaigns
Yeah it was better, it meant if you were being stalked you could just have the numbers changed. Now you need a completely different alias with the only purpose to be discouraging victims from getting help
Tattorack
in reply to ILikeBoobies • • •1- What does that have to do with anything?
2- Then make a private server for just your friends.
3- Then make a private server for just your friends.
And no, it wasn't better. Just... different.
ILikeBoobies
in reply to Tattorack • • •2/3 opposite of above: the people who would join public servers are too young to know not to
Tattorack
in reply to ILikeBoobies • • •It's rather odd you think discord is full of children... And that there aren't verification processes in place.
You're creating a problem with Discord that doesn't exist, or at least, not in any way that's unique to discord.
Mactan
in reply to a Kendrick fan • • •unexposedhazard
in reply to Mactan • • •How long has it been since you used element/matrix? Serious question because the new element call stack is now finally released in element stable, as of a few patches ago. (It still only shows up as the "video rooms" feature that u have to enable in the labs/beta settings)
Its much cleaner than before and properly supports screensharing, adjusting individual user volumes and more. The previous jitsi based voice rooms were somewhat lacking i admit but they have been functional for years.
That was the last thing that kind of kept me from fully endorsing matrix but now it does all that really important stuff. The new mobile ElementX client also supports the new call system but its overall lacking compared to the normal mobile client which does not support it.
But for desktop use i dont have any complains anymore about matrix really.
Mactan
in reply to unexposedhazard • • •matcha_addict
in reply to Mactan • • •flashgnash
in reply to g1ya777 • • •HATEFISH
in reply to flashgnash • • •ubergeek
in reply to g1ya777 • • •MonkderVierte
in reply to Blisterexe • • •DacoTaco
in reply to MonkderVierte • • •sntx
in reply to DacoTaco • • •Sent by me:
Their answer:
DacoTaco
in reply to sntx • • •Also, their response is terrible haha
Faresh
in reply to DacoTaco • • •DacoTaco
in reply to Faresh • • •index
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Read Bio
in reply to Blisterexe • • •EuCaue
in reply to Blisterexe • • •mariusafa
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Blisterexe
in reply to mariusafa • • •NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Blisterexe
in reply to NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ • • •AnAmericanPotato
in reply to Blisterexe • • •It doesn't really matter if they do or don't. What matters is that they can change their TOS at any time, they keep an archive of all historical data, and you will have pretty much no recourse no matter what they decide to do with it in the future.
Who knows what will happen to Discord in five or ten years?
They might get bought by a narcissistic billionaire.
They might sell all their data to Google for training AI.
They might go bankrupt and sell off their assets to the highest bidder.
They might have an IPO and begin the usual value extraction at the expense of their users.
I know, I know...crazy ideas, right? When has anything like that ever happened?!
Blisterexe
in reply to AnAmericanPotato • • •i think you're totally right, i just dont like people saying theyre doing it right now.
Frankly i think we should use matrix instead, but it just isnt good enough yet
AnAmericanPotato
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Yeah, Matrix is a very, very hard sell. I mean, "normal" people (for lack of a better term) are put off by Mastodon, and Matrix is a hundred times more complicated to join. I'm also not sure what it would look like to use Matrix the way I use Discord. Perhaps there is functionality in Element/Matrix I have never explored since I use it more for messaging and group chat, not for communities with multiple channels like IRC/Discord/Slack.
In any case, Discord is too entrenched to be replaced by something that is merely technically superior, or even more user-friendly. Realistically, you can't migrate entire communities if they're bigger than a tight-knit IRL friend group, and even that is hard. That seems to be the only reason X still exists.
refalo
in reply to AnAmericanPotato • • •AnAmericanPotato
in reply to refalo • • •Almost, yeah. Certainly the big corps.
This is why I strongly favor services that use end-to-end encryption or do not store history in the first place.
There are not many times when I've needed to search back through history on a Discord server, and every time I have I thought to myself "this would be much better on any platform besides Discord". Discord would, IMHO, be a better product if they did not retain history forever.
Ditto for Slack. Slack has the additional gall to limit access to that data unless you pay for a premium plan, despite the fact that they keep the data forever regardless (as evidenced by their occasional free trials which magically bring all history back, and some search tricks you can use to access old posts regardless).
Both Slack and Discord have lulled their user base into a false sense of privacy. Nothing you post there should be considered private.
Lemmchen
in reply to Blisterexe • • •John
in reply to mariusafa • • •flashgnash
in reply to John • • •John
in reply to flashgnash • • •setVeryLoud(true);
in reply to John • • •mariusafa
in reply to John • • •bonus_crab
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Tattorack
in reply to bonus_crab • • •flashgnash
in reply to bonus_crab • • •Third party discord clients keep letting me down, not updating their electron version and breaking my system updates cause it's marked insecure
Browser version with extensions is the way to go
lilpatchy2eyes
in reply to flashgnash • • •flashgnash
in reply to lilpatchy2eyes • • •Stylus for theming, vimium for navigation
It works a lot better than the discord app, more responsive for one. Ctrl k on the app takes a few seconds, takes half a second on web
Multiple instances at once without any hassle is nice, the ability to open links in the same window instead of having it open a browser somewhere (tiling wm with discord in a pop up layer)
Seems to be less resource intensive I assume because no electron wrapper running, just Firefox which I already have open anyway
Plus the main one is that because it's not using electron I don't have the constant drama with insecure electron versions, also if discord forces an update and your package manager doesn't update you just can't use discord for a few days until it catches up
secret300
in reply to bonus_crab • • •flashgnash
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Faresh
in reply to flashgnash • • •flashgnash
in reply to Faresh • • •I regularly share my whole screen
I have an issue with the dialog box popping up multiple times but that's it, still works
The only caveat is window specific sharing often doesn't work because of how Wayland works
Blisterexe
in reply to flashgnash • • •Jerkface (any/all)
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Saff
in reply to Blisterexe • • •JayDee
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Blisterexe
in reply to JayDee • • •LeFantome
in reply to Blisterexe • • •TychoQuad
in reply to Blisterexe • • •Blisterexe
in reply to TychoQuad • • •If you don't want to wait you can get the binary from discord.com/download.
or wait t'ill the most recent version here is 0.0.79 or higher
Install Discord on Linux | Flathub
Flathubsawyer
in reply to Blisterexe • • •