@EricChrSmit En ze zitten op Mastodon: @sprind_de

@EricChrSmit grote vrienden van me, en ze helpen nu met de oprichting van een Nederlandse equivalente club.

@bert_hubert Goed om te horen!

@janantos
If the point is to safeguard other installations around the place of the attack, EMP could possibly destroy more value than a kinetic interceptor. But it's of course less likely to harm humans directly. Don't use pacemakers 😉
@ErikJonker

@ammdias @notsoloud I was more pointing that those requirements are quite weird and I am not sure it will work in reality. 1) as we have seen in Ukrainian drones, they have AI on board and can continue even under electronic suppression by following visual checkpoints. 2) both sides are using also optically controlled drones, cutting the wire from my perspective is kinetic attack. So unless someone will invent how to open wormhole and transport drone to another dimension… but let us be surprised.

@janantos @notsoloud
Same opinion here 🙂

@ammdias @notsoloud we shall go with simplest way, intercept and physically damage beyond point it can fly. We need tech that is simple and cheap, so it can be deployed on every corner, in these types of warfare it is amount of assets thats count.