ITER’s timeline for fusion stretched out even further
Full fusion power won't happen until nearly 2040 on new timeline.
arstechnica.com/science/2024/0…
⇧
ITER’s timeline for fusion stretched out even further
Full fusion power won't happen until nearly 2040 on new timeline.
arstechnica.com/science/2024/0…
Preston MacDougall
in reply to Ars Technica • • •The #Fusion energy #boondoggle has been stringing along taxpayers for over 60 years, and it looks like they’re planning at least a century-long con job.
Still not on par with the millennia-long con jobs of organized #religion. 🤷🏻♂️
#NiceWorkIfYouCanGetIt
Mike Bartley
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Number6 :syncthing:
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Hugo Jonker
in reply to Ars Technica • • •John Chapman
in reply to Ars Technica • • •MegatronicThronBanks
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Fusion is not getting ANY funding. As soon as some spoiled tech heir throws $100b at it, it will be solved overnight.
I'd love to see Fusion work, but it will be irrelevant to power needs very soon. It's more I think going to be useful for future very high power load projects we haven't yet thought of, but undoubtedly will.
#fusion #billionairesarepsycopaths
Luna chan
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Bob 🇺🇲♒🐧
in reply to Ars Technica • • •D1g1talDrag0n
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Milos
in reply to Ars Technica • • •