City Council meets today! It's the last and final meeting of 2025. They'll go out with a bang (?) with debates on speeding up the Finch LRT, a luxury home tax hike, climate change, bike lanes and more.
It'll stream live here. I'll post the major happenings. youtube.com/watch?v=iOh5tftX62โฆ
City Council - December 16, 2025
City Council, meeting 35, December 16, 2025Agenda and background materials:https://secure.toronto.ca/council/#/committees/2462/25769The National Anthem playe...YouTube
May is Seasonally Seasoned reshared this.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Council gets ready for festive debate about a faster Finch
Matt Elliott (City Hall Watcher)Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Perruzza says there are some questions about the Finch West LRT technology. "Is the fact that you glued the tracks to the concrete โ you don't bolt them or fasten them or weld them โ is that going to have some longevity to it?"
But he says he's been on the old Finch West bus and the LRT is better.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Councillor Brad Bradford asks if city hall's "Vision Zero policy" is to blame for slow Finch West LRT speeds through intersections.
Staff say the speed through intersections and approaching stops is an "operational requirement that's been defined by the TTC."
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Bradford asks Chow how she'll be ensuring more accountability at the TTC for faster service on routes like Finch West.
Chow says while Metrolinx had control of the line, the TTC couldn't do much. Now that it's in the TTC's hands, she says promising moves are happening.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Holyday wants to know what it would mean if signal priority gave LRTs priority over left-turning vehicles. "Have you ever played Uno?" Holyday asks. "You ever get a miss-your-turn card? Is that what this is?"
Staff say left-turning cars would still get a turn, after the transit has cleared.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Mayor Olivia Chow describes her experience riding the Finch West LRT twice on opening day.
"It was smooth. It was comfortable. It was quite quiet. And the riders that were packed on the first ride were just very excited. Yes, it is a bit too slow. That is why we are here working to speed it up."
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Holyday asks Chow what she'll do if "tinkering with the lights" to offer transit signal priority creates "public backlash"?
"I wouldn't call giving public transit that holds hundreds of people 'tinkering'," says Chow. "There's no reason that 3-4 cars making left-turns should have priority."
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •"No more left-hand turns, is that the message? When you travel, make right-hand-turn circles? Because that's what this implicates. It will stack up cars trying to make a left," Holyday wonders.
Chow says she heard those arguments when Spadina got its right-of-way in the 90s. Drivers will adapt.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Councillor Jon Burnside asks if Chow would consider congestion pricing like other cities worldwide.
"It's not up to us," says Chow."Why go down that road because the premier and the provincial government have said many times, 'Don't even think about it!'"
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Burnside presses Chow on the congestion pricing question, noting if she gets re-elected she might "outlive" the current provincial government.
"I don't speculate," Chow says of a congestion price. She's focused instead on things like dealing with illegal construction closures.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •With that, Council takes lunch. They'll return at 2 p.m.
Rough schedule for the rest of today:
1) Faster Finch
2) Max indoor temperature bylaw
Tomorrow:
1) Luxury land transfer tax hike
2) TransformTO climate change plan
3) Rooming house bylaw update
There are 80 items left on the agenda.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Back to the Faster Finch debate. Councillor Holyday says Council shouldn't rush into changes with a transit line that just opened.
"The one thing in this world that you cannot manufacture is time," he says, worrying that giving the LRT priority will slow down other traffic and create backlash.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Councillor Gord Perks rails against public-private partnerships. "It is not 3 Ps. It's 6 Ps: Public Partner Pays, Private Partner Profits."
He says the private partner on Finch LRT is "laughing all the way to the bank" as council tries to fix the issues with the line.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Nobody moves any amendments to Mayor Olivia Chow's motion to speed up the Finch West LRT, streetcars and other transit routes with better signal priority.
The motion CARRIES 22-1.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •May is Seasonally Seasoned reshared this.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •May is Seasonally Seasoned reshared this.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •May is Seasonally Seasoned reshared this.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Council votes to go into private session to discuss this Kingston Road development in Councillor Bradford's ward, proposed atop the Glen Stewart Ravine.
Darkness descends on council's proceedings. To be continued. secure.toronto.ca/council/agenโฆ
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •And that'll do it for today. Councillors head outside for a menorah-lighting ceremony in the square.
Back tomorrow at 9:30 a.m. to deal with 60 items left on the agenda. Up first: a land transfer tax increase on homes sold for more than $3 million.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •It's the dawn of the second day. Councillors are ever so slowly making their way back to the chamber.
Up first this morning: should people who buy $3 million homes pay more land transfer tax? The mayor says yes. Will council agree?
The meeting will stream live here: youtube.com/watch?v=9_MrcMXq6bโฆ
- YouTube
www.youtube.comMatt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Chow says her "key question" for the 2026 budget is "how do I make life more affordable for ordinary folks?"
She points to her investments in school food programs, another TTC fare freeze, and extra library hours. "Who's paying for it? I'm asking that top wealthiest 2% of homebuyers."
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •"What does a $20 million home have? I looked it up!" says Mayor Olivia Chow. "It has 23 parking spaces. It has ten bathrooms! It is laced with marble and crystal, with an indoor pool!"
"I'm asking those who can afford it to pay a bit more."
diana ๐ณ๏ธโง๏ธ๐ฆ๐ฑ reshared this.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Chow cites figures offered by the CFO saying the luxury home market in the city is holding up pretty well, even with higher land transfer taxes.
"Am I worried someone that can afford to pay $22 million or $30 million will go somewhere else? I'm not worried about that," says the mayor.
May is Seasonally Seasoned reshared this.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Bradford asks Chow why she wants to look at increasing the first-time buyer rebate for the land transfer tax now, when she voted against a motion he brought to do the same thing in 2023.
Chow says she inherited big budget deficit from Tory era. Needed to secure New Deal and fix finances first.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •"There was some scoffing about somebody who might have a $20 million house and 23 parking spots and marble and so on. You know what, though? They earned it! What's wrong with that?" wonders Holyday.
He doesn't think the "government should come and take it away and give it to someone else."
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Perks asks Bradford where he'd get the $90 million needed to cover the revenue lost from increasing the first-time buyer rebate for the land transfer tax.
"That is something that [Chow] needs to work through in her budget process ... that's a question of prioritization," says Bradford, vaguely.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •With that, council breaks for lunch. They'll be back at 2 p.m. to finish the luxury land transfer tax item, the climate change item and deal with 33 member motions.
See you back here soon.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Back to the luxury land transfer tax hike debate.
Councillor Bradford's motion to amend Chow's motion so that it specifically requests an increase to the threshold for the first-time home buyer rebate FAILS 4-19.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Council just voted to APPROVE an update on their rooming houses regulations without any debate at all.
Councillor Gord Perks, the planning & housing chair, was so excited about this that he did a little dance.
May is Seasonally Seasoned reshared this.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Councillor Holyday moves to refer the laneway closure item to Etobicoke York Community Council, saying it'll be give more opportunity for public deputations.
Perks urges colleagues to vote against it. "Councillor Holyday is tossing us a load of red herrings. A whole barrel full of them!"
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •May is Seasonally Seasoned reshared this.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •That killer line takes council to dinner. They'll be back at 6:30. Ish. Probably more like 6:45. You know how it goes.
There are 14 items left on the agenda.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •- YouTube
www.youtube.comMatt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Cheng says she wants to be "visionary" and transform Yonge between the 401 and Steeles to be "the magnificent mile of Toronto" with lanes for bikes and cars, and wide sidewalks.
Council likes the idea. The motion CARRIES 20-3.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •May is Seasonally Seasoned reshared this.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott: A money-back TTC guarantee? Why this councillorโs mayoral campaign stunt is on the right track
The Toronto StarMay is Seasonally Seasoned reshared this.
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •After Fletcher says Bradford is being "disrespectful", Nunziata says, "You can't expect anything more from Councillor Bradford."
Bradford does NOT like that. He demands an apology from Nunziata. "That was NOT objective and impartial in your role as the speaker!"
Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Matt Elliott
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Joy to the world. Council's December meeting is officially OVER.
If you enjoyed this thread and want to be festive and say "thank you", consider buying a subscription to my newsletter, City Hall Watcher. Your support keeps me going. toronto.cityhallwatcher.com/suโฆ
Subscribe to City Hall Watcher
toronto.cityhallwatcher.comStewart Russell
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Tuolla
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Not everything I buy turns out to be perfectly satisfactory and I don't expect to be refunded for it.
The value of this type of guarantee is to incentivize the service provider to meet the standards. I have a bit of a hard time envisioning how this would work for people who have monthly passes or in the future when some people have hit the fare cap for the month.
Reay
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •@mayintoronto It was a small section of the roof that wasn’t even in the public space. Their claim was further suspicious because it was allegedly about concern over snow buildup collapsing the damaged part of the roof, but the Centre was closed months before typical snowfall.
The same company that executed the original building’s design offered to investigate the damage and plan for the repair, all pro bono, and the materials and work to do the repair was offered to be covered by an anonymous philanthropist. Meaning it all could’ve been dealt with properly and wouldn’t have cost the government (*AHEMtaxpayersAHEM*) a dime.
It was followed up by Ford and his lot saying that the Science Centre was closed because a new Metrolinx station would be right in the Centre’s main parking lot. So wait… they’re putting a station right there, bringing more people than ever before to the Science Centre’s doorstep, and yet THAT is w
... show more@mayintoronto It was a small section of the roof that wasnโt even in the public space. Their claim was further suspicious because it was allegedly about concern over snow buildup collapsing the damaged part of the roof, but the Centre was closed months before typical snowfall.
The same company that executed the original buildingโs design offered to investigate the damage and plan for the repair, all pro bono, and the materials and work to do the repair was offered to be covered by an anonymous philanthropist. Meaning it all couldโve been dealt with properly and wouldnโt have cost the government (*AHEMtaxpayersAHEM*) a dime.
It was followed up by Ford and his lot saying that the Science Centre was closed because a new Metrolinx station would be right in the Centreโs main parking lot. So waitโฆ theyโre putting a station right there, bringing more people than ever before to the Science Centreโs doorstep, and yet THAT is when they close the Centre and move it downtown?
How about make that new Metrolinx station underground โ it would nicely connect with the new โScience Centreโ subway station โ and keep the parking lot intact?
But no, theyโd rather push ahead with their plan to make the new Science Centre at the waterfront as a small fraction of the size of the original and in a place it was never meant to be โ next to a highly unpopular and ill-informed spa, which has all been its own total shitshow โ and will be less accessible for people travelling from out of town, which was A LOT of people.
The whole thing is ridiculous.
May is Seasonally Seasoned reshared this.
๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Bri ๐ฌ๏ธ๐ดโ๏ธโจ
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Hanno Rein
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Eric Goodwin
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Bri ๐ฌ๏ธ๐ดโ๏ธโจ
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Third spruce tree on the left
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Lyle Solla-Yates
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •pxplowsound ๐ต๐ธ
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Mary Margaret ๐จ๐ฆ๐๐บ๐ฆ โฎ๏ธโ ๐ธโ
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Stewart Russell
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Jรฉrรดme
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Dan Neuman ๐จ๐ฆ
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •Tricia Wood
in reply to Matt Elliott • • •No question we need to speed up that Finch LRT, but OMG those streetcar and bus speeds are appalling.
@GraphicMatt
files.mastodon.social/media_atโฆ