Skip to main content


Oh hell no, years ago i would have signed up myself but nowdays blob.cat shouldnt be a big instance and i bet gargron wouldnt even suggest *oma even tho its compatible
RE: mastodon.social/@Mastodon/1159…


If you’re interested in participating in this experiment, please let us know by filling out this form.

(sorry it’s in Google docs)

forms.gle/7uRui5VnMPfEYAgq8

5/6


in reply to :blobcatverified2:

@Jain it's good as a default suggestion though. some dutch servers, some german ones. .. most casual users will want to see content generally related to their real life. we are the outsiders in this sense i think.

it's not a bad idea I think.

+ it's a lot better than everything on mastosoc!!!

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to 🔻 aetios 🇪🇺

@aetios @Jain aren’t most servers hosted on VPS located somewhere in either EU or US regardless of where the people on there are anyways?

like mstdn.jp and misskey.io are hosted in US for example

in reply to xrvs

@xarvos @aetios well yes, but i rather interpret it differently, like how instances represent themself geographically and not the location where the servers are


We are excited to share that we are beginning work on a new onboarding experiment for #Mastodon: Default Server Recommendations.

Our intent for this experiment is to recommend the closest server geographically that is in the correct language during the sign-up flow. We will be running this experiment on our iOS and Android apps only to start.

1/6

in reply to Mastodon

(The reason we’re starting with the apps and not the web is because the necessary data to run this experiment is already provided through the app store. It is more complicated to do this right for the web, and we want to think carefully about how to do this in a way that respects privacy.)

2/6

reshared this

in reply to Mastodon

The experiment will be designed to ensure that server admins remain in control: meaning they will have the power opt-in and opt-out as needed, or reduce the percentage of sign-ups flowing their way.

3/6

Tim Chambers reshared this.

in reply to Mastodon

Starting now, we’re recruiting general purpose servers with open sign-ups. To be eligible, servers must:

- Run default Mastodon (for now)
- Agree to the Server Covenant
- Have existed for 1+ year
- Have shut-down & disaster plans

4/6

reshared this

in reply to Mastodon

If you’re interested in participating in this experiment, please let us know by filling out this form.

(sorry it’s in Google docs)

forms.gle/7uRui5VnMPfEYAgq8

5/6

This entry was edited (4 days ago)

reshared this

in reply to Mastodon

The Default Server Recommendations experiment is a first step in reimagining how Mastodon onboarding & server discovery work.

Our team’s intent is to work with the community to build new onboarding pathways that support the entire network.

We can’t wait to get started 💜

6/6

Tim Chambers reshared this.

in reply to Mastodon

@ruud

Sounds like a really good idea. I am very excited to see the first results.

@Ruud
This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Mastodon

Interesting experiment!
Before I fill in the form:
Is there anything in particular that should be done or followed-up server/admin side for this?
in reply to Mastodon Belgium Admin

@admin hey! The only thing to do for now is make sure you’re meeting these eligibility requirements:

- Run default Mastodon (for now)
- Agree to the Server Covenant
- Have existed for 1+ year
- Have shut-down & disaster plans

Besides that, stay tuned!

reshared this

in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles @admin
This is awesome! I would be happy to host more folks on my server. I just need some guidance on how to reduce the cost a bit. I am not sure how to get images, videos, etc, to less expensive storage on Digital Ocean. Anyone out there that could point me in the right direction?
in reply to Mastodon

It's amazing seeing these sorts of things play out across the Fediverse. Making sure we make a better internet that is centered around Privacy and staying decentralized for all.

Keep up the good work and can't wait to see where we all are in several years to come.

in reply to Mastodon

It sounds really good, especially to avoid overcrowd Mastodon official servers and strengthen the Fediverse philosophy!
in reply to Mastodon

✅already answered, no more need for reposts

@Mastodon
How about also interest based?
There are some for special interests
Like punkstodon.de for punk music, metalhead.club for metal heads, infosec.exchange for tech security interested people and so on.
So just the region is maybe too less?
At least it's something to be considered after the first iteration

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Jörgi

@joergi hey! This experiment will be for general purpose servers only, but we'll be looking into running other onboarding experiments—including for special interest servers—soon.
in reply to Mastodon

I really enjoy this news wich will make the Fediverse healthier and more resilient in my opinion.
Thank you.
🥳 ♥️
in reply to Mastodon

I suggest a rule:

That the number of servers that defederate this specific server in her language is low.

To prevent toxic server.

in reply to Mastodon

I’d be interested if it didn’t require open reg. Reality is, opening up registration creates a massive headache. I’d like to see us get a trial signup mode where someone can join still use the service but be in a read only state until approved. Would solve the drop off problem registration reasons cause.
in reply to Mastodon

I presume by "default Mastodon", you mean that if a server has so much as changed the max characters per post from the default 500, they won't be eligible?

Otherwise, I think this is a fantastic idea!

in reply to Mastodon

Question: why go geographical? I personally would rather be funnelled into a server by theme.
in reply to Orion Ussner kidder

@OrionKidder
Language I guess. This is the default mechanism for those that don't know or care about picking a special interest server. But you probably want a server with people posting in your own language and local subjects.
in reply to Janne Moren

@jannem That doesn't quite make sense, though. Lots of places on Earth speak English or Spanish, for example, and there are non-geographical populations speaking, say, Cantonese. I mean, it's not an unreasonable guess, but I suspect it's something different.
in reply to Orion Ussner kidder

@OrionKidder @jannem
There's more to server than just understanding the language. Consider talk about politics, promotion of irl-events, or asking help with something.. these are all topics where a hobby is a secondary concern to location.

That isn't to say a hobby couldn't be a reason to pick a server, mostly that I wouldn't recommend a hobby server for a noob at fedi, even if I knew they lived for the suspect.

Of course, ymmv.

in reply to Juho Mäntysalo

@iju @OrionKidder @jannem well said, Juho! This matches our reasoning well.

This is just a first experiment in how we will evolve onboarding, but it will not be the only one. We are starting to look at how to evolve Server Directory too, including adding more kinds of server classifications and categories. We also want to move that to a PR-based backend so it’s more manageable to keep updated. We think this will be a good first step to help with interest-based server discovery, and we’ve got some other ideas too. More soon…

in reply to Mastodon

Cool that you crowdsource.
But no need to use g forms and then apologize for it.
I like to use framaforms.org/
in reply to Mastodon

google docs wtf?!... switch asap to Cryptpad comrades for stuff like this
in reply to Mastodon

we could deal with the form being on Google, but it requires a Google account to fill it, which our instance admin doesn't have. I'm pretty sure this is configurable
in reply to Mastodon

Since you say Sorry it's in google docs, why don't use other tools?
in reply to Mastodon

can we have something like a quota? Not to overflow a small instance?
in reply to henry

@Henry I expect we will! The exact parameters for the experiment are still being set, so please keep these ideas coming :)
in reply to Mastodon

please do not apologise for using a good free tool while it's free lol
in reply to Mastodon

buhuuu! today is #diday, use it to switch to something privacy-friendly instead!

be a good role model, not a bad one!

in reply to Mastodon

This is a link to the server covenant:

joinmastodon.org/covenant

One important question – and one we’ve discussed together – is which definition of antisemitism are you going with? I’d appreciate it if you could state the decision you’ve reached on this publicly. Crucially, is it one that conflates opposition to Zionism, Israel, and the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people with being bigoted against Jewish people or not? This is key in knowing whether only Zionist, pro-Israel, pro-genocide Mastodon servers will be featured in recommendations or not.

This entry was edited (4 days ago)

Aral Balkan reshared this.

in reply to Aral Balkan

@aral for us in Canada, we align with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and still are green in terms of the Covenant.

There's protected speech, and there's unprotected speech, and that is what we abide by.

Being a purely geographical instance, I know we enjoy being able to defer these decisions.

in reply to Aral Balkan

@aral

I feel like by asking this question you're — inadvertently — legitimizing zionism by implying that the conflation of antisemitism with antizionism is a credible definition of that word.

Personally, I assume that antisemitism means antisemitism unless I have reason to believe otherwise.

in reply to Kackfresh

It’s not a credible definition of the word but it is a *legally accepted* one in certain jurisdictions and it is essential that we know what is meant – in this specific context – by a term that is so widely and so willfully misunderstood so we understand what exactly the effects of this initiative will be and whether we should be in support of it or in opposition to it.
This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Aral Balkan

in reply to Mastodon

besides geographical location, are there going to be any filters for like, interests or core topics etc?

A gardening and plant instance is going to have a different vibe from the software/hardware developer instance, etc.

It would be neat to be a part of this, but only if relevant users/signups are being directed.

Edit: "General Purpose Servers" ah.. missed that keyword (figured that would've been mentioned again earlier?). /ht: tyrol.social/@nitrml/115989922…


@colinstu it says "general purpose servers". So no special interests servers or topical servers are gonna be able to participate in this feature (at the moment).

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Colin

@colinstu it says "general purpose servers". So no special interests servers or topical servers are gonna be able to participate in this feature (at the moment).
in reply to Niko Trimmel

@nitrml @colinstu

This experiment will be for general purpose servers only, but we'll be looking into running other onboarding experiments—including for special interest servers—soon.

in reply to Mastodon

do you mean entirely open sign-ups (i.e. prone to spam accounts) or accepting sign-ups that get manually approved by a human? :shiba_confused:
in reply to Octavia Con Amore Succubard's Library

@OctaviaConAmore
For this experiment, that is correct. We are looking to partner with servers that have open sign-ups. But we've heard the feedback that spam is going to be a big issue for many servers to participate, so our team is going to discuss what we can do about that next week.
in reply to hannah aubry

Thanks for clarifying.

As it stands any participating server would be paying a price for inclusion.

I'm not even sure how many reputable general purpose servers still have open sign-up after recent spam waves.

As a volunteer, eyeballing potential member applications while not attending to one's own business is the only way to do it.

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Davey

@davey_cakes @haubles @OctaviaConAmore yeah requiring open sign ups is a total deal breaker. There's no way we will stop screening for bots, it saves so much work.
in reply to Andrew

@piepants @mike @davey_cakes @OctaviaConAmore thanks for raising this. we hear you that open sign-ups/spam is going to be an issue for many servers to participate in this experiment, and we’re going to talk about how we might be able to help with that next week. And, this experiment is not the only thing we’re planning to improve onboarding and server discovery! We have more ideas we are discussing, we will be able to share more on them soon
in reply to Mastodon

Open sign-ups? Won't we just get spam from more servers? (Most of our reports are of mastodon.social accounts for this reason).
in reply to Matt Noyes

@Matt_Noyes
Yeah, if by open sign-ups they mean you can sign up without admin approval, then this requirement is either hilariously stupid or purposely crafted so that they can exclude most, if not all, other servers except mastodon.social and then just return to the current status quo.

I'd so much like to apply Hanlon's on this, but given how long it took them to start working on this...
@Mastodon

in reply to panu

@shadowdancer @Matt_Noyes
hachyderm.io/@haubles/11599538…


@piepants @mike @davey_cakes @OctaviaConAmore thanks for raising this. we hear you that open sign-ups/spam is going to be an issue for many servers to participate in this experiment, and we’re going to talk about how we might be able to help with that next week. And, this experiment is not the only thing we’re planning to improve onboarding and server discovery! We have more ideas we are discussing, we will be able to share more on them soon

in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles
Okay, thanks for taking this into consideration.

And, please accept my apology for my rather hostile take on the issue. I was under the impression Mastodon was well aware about the concerns around the open signups issue, but apparently I was mistaken.
@Matt_Noyes @Mastodon

in reply to Mastodon

Having open signups is so risky and makes moderation so much harder for the rest of the fediverse. This is a bad idea. You should require closed signups to prevent spam and harassment. Right now mastodon.social already creates so much extra work for moderators due to this policy. Having this policy says to bad actors: you're allowed to come here and hurt others for at least a little bit. It's such low hanging fruit...
in reply to Mastodon

does "open sign-up" include required approval for sign-ups as well?
in reply to Mastodon

Looks good. Only the open sign-up requirement will result in more overall spam. So hopefully you will take more action regarding this.
in reply to Mastodon

Good point! Just in case your team hasn't thought of this yet, I'd like to share an idea.

On the pricing page of my hobby project (link in my bio), I wanted to show the prices of the "correct" country. But I wanted to ensure that I don't get to know the result if someone is just visiting.

But sending the user's IP address to a third party geolocation service is not legally possible without first asking for consent.

Here's my solution: the web page contacts a tiny endpoint on my server that returns the IPv4 address it sees, but doesn't log it. Then the country lookup happens client-side via a geo-IP database file that the web page has loaded into the browser cache earlier. As the web server itself also doesn't log, I don't have any data on visitors (unless they become customers). 🎉

In the next step, you could list all languages of servers in that country, starting with the most common ones spoken there (e.g. for Switzerland: DE, FR, IT, RM) & let them choose.

#GDPR #SaaS

in reply to Mastodon

How to tell the Apple App Store and Google Play Store provide a lot of privacy information about a user without saying that the App Store and Play Store provide a lot of privacy information about a user.
in reply to Mastodon

good idea!
"Correct language": Does it mean the favourite language that people choose individually in their preferences (but for which they need an instance) or official language of a country/region? Asking for all the multi-language migrants, bilingual regions, and foreign-language prefering people.
in reply to Petra van Cronenburg

@NatureMC

Hey! We haven't built the logic for this yet, so thanks for mentioning situations like this so we can make sure to take them into account. Our idea is "correct language" = "the person's preferred language, as determined by their phone's preferences."

@Mastodon

in reply to Mastodon

@FediTips you should boost this to the admins of servers you have recommended on fedi.garden
in reply to George B

@gbargoud

I've posted about this on my other account @homegrown which is for people who run their own servers, and boosted it on here to get it a bit more visible. Hopefully that gets the word out to admins 🙂

in reply to Mastodon

Fabulous news. Any movement away from mastodon . social (risk of centralization, and plenty of other issues) is progress

HT @FediTips

social.growyourown.services/@F…


Mastodon.social has no advantages over any other Mastodon server. It has no special status or privileges, it uses exactly the same software as other Mastodon servers.

In fact I'd strongly advise people *NOT* to sign up on mastodon.social, here are the reasons why: fedi.tips/its-a-really-bad-ide…

TL:DR - It's far far too big, it's putting the entire decentralised nature of the Fediverse in danger.

If you want help choosing a good reliable server, have a look at fedi.garden

#FediTips


in reply to Mastodon

ideally combined with personal interests, right? (as long as there are enough servers to choose from) 😎🌈👩‍💻🌳
in reply to Sunny

@sunnythesheep for this experiment we are looking to partner with general-purpose servers. But this is just one experiment, not the only experiment! We’ll be looking at how we can help with special-interest server discovery soon.
in reply to Mastodon

"We will be running this experiment on our iOS and Android apps only to start."

And here is the core symptom of the core problem itself:

You're pointing the question and its solution right back at the Deathstar Mothership itself: @Mastodon dot Social

Sort of a recursive, self-fulfilling loop, no?

But not the least bit surprising

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Mastodon

Awesome! The other issue is “filling up the feed”, right? Bluesky’s feeds to follow are nice, but we got hashtags here. Maybe when people sign up, you also give them a nice (and attractively presented) list of hashtags to follow???

LEAN IN on that old school spirit and people feeds will fill up right away!!!

in reply to Mastodon

in reply to Mastodon

I hope international boundaries will be taken into consideration. Many mobile apps (such as dating apps) use geographical proximity, and it’s not helpful where I live, as preference is given to a rather hostile neighbouring country over the nearest cities in my own country.
in reply to Mastodon

#FOSDEM #Fediverse #Privacy

Would you please like to focus your attention on the issue of encryption, please. Currently you are building a network with servers that do not encrypt user data and do not offer e2ee for private messages. This will explode into a gigantic privacy catastrophe when Mastodon will get it´s endless November, so these heavy design issues must be solved before that.

in reply to Mastodon

What would be great is to be able to see more than one server in the app, merged into a single feed...
in reply to Mastodon

Very good. Sometimes one got the impression that Fediverse was finished, but it reads as if we have started something whose future is yet to come.
in reply to Mastodon

just remember that "the correct language" is just a guess and may be wrong. Plus, for many users there may be 2, 3, or more "correct languages".
in reply to Mastodon

Onboarding seems to be the barrier to Mastodon's growth and success. The whole Active ecosystem is a bit foreign to general users and needs more work.
in reply to Mastodon

Consider that many may prefer non-local servers. I sure wouldn’t want an American server.
in reply to Mastodon

this is great and will improve the user experience so much. Well done 👏
in reply to Mastodon

hype, this is a great idea! Looking forward to this- also it would be cool to see this with other apps too
in reply to Mastodon

this would be great for some of the smaller indigenous communities here that might be experimenting with creating their own servers. The people I’ve spoken to up here about the fediverse were most excited by the idea of easy ways for minority language groups to create their own social spaces online.
in reply to Mastodon

just make sure to check the servers *before* recommending, just because the language is the correct doesn't mean the server is properly run
in reply to Mastodon

This sounds like a really good way to get regionally organized.

It could add tremendously to civilians getting organized.

The Fediverse as Civil OS.

Way to go!

in reply to Mastodon

I want to continue access to German accounts to practice my German language skills.
in reply to Mastodon

interesting. but you have no time do deal with the islamophobia, toxic masculinity and targeted herrassment on your platform. i would really like to block you, but i really like @benroyce see the problem there?
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to kali

not to defense mastodon.social, there's plenty of shit accounts here, but i've also found plenty of shit accounts on other servers too

what you're complaining about, it doesn't even seem like a fediverse problem, but a social media problem. there's always successful entrenched assholes and trolls, everywhere

if there's specific accounts you have in mind, DM me. maybe we can find a way to nuke them

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce i told you i reported it and they said there is nothing they can do about it. they don't give a f anymore. another indicator their hordes of underage accounts. as i want to post adult stuff from time to time that is just another think i want 0 do to with.
in reply to kali

@benroyce i mean it is ok if people want a fediverse facebook, but i don't want it.
in reply to kali

a distributed network, unlike a centralized one, is a double edged sword. you have variety in moderation. good, and bad. if a server is enough off the mark, it can be suspended. those servers adhering enough to a good ethos remain in the network. what else can you ask for?
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce not to be caught with netanjahu's shit stained boot literally in your mouth why jerking off on your server size would be a good start.
in reply to kali

the post above is a direct attack on the server size of the flagship instance. so, you like it. as for the other thing you're implying, i don't think it's accurate. what i think is accurate is the server is running in germany, and inherits the position it must maintain from that legal jurisdiction. you have a problem with germany, not mastodon.social
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to kali

@kali
kali, *you* summoned me into your complaint here. i can't even begin to mansplain to you what i don't even fucking understand that you're complaining about. do you understand who i am? i'm just some fucking dude in western ny. i have no real power, i have no agenda save my posts about ukraine, and voting in the usa, and other issues that catch my interest. how do i figure in your complaints that you think it's important to mention me? why do you summon me?
@kali
in reply to kali

then just fucking block mastodon.social if you fucking summon me then attack me when i am just trying to fucking understand what the fuck is going on!

i'm just a rando dude in western ny kali

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to kali

i'm a fucking shitposter of random shit i'm interested in. i'm a fucking nobody. why do you imagine i have fucking import or influence here?

fucking huge intractable world problems, and fucking server politics on the fediverse. what the fuck do you think i can fucking do about that kali?

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce bc people value your opinion. in case you have not realized that. anyway, its ok i didn't want to attack you.
in reply to kali

@kali
kali there's accounts i like, and accounts i don't like. there's also plenty of accounts who think i'm peachy keen, and plenty of accounts that fucking hate me. this is all very normal and not remotely remarkable, the same applies to every other account, i'm not special

just please don't summon me into drama, so i try to understand what the fuck is going on, and i get rewarded for that by being accused of mansplaining. how can i mansplain what i don't even fucking understand!

@kali
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

what is there to understand? the people running the instance are spineless RE:palestine bc they want a big instance. basically what every single western media outlet has been doing. i tell you it has absolutely 0 to do wit german law.

so if i wanted that i could just read the NYT?

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to kali

@kali
kali: i'm a fucking rando hothead loudmouth in western ny. i can't solve the shit israel is doing, i can't influence politics on mastodon.social or any other server. i can't do shit kali. all i can do is engage on social media on topics that interest me, that's what social media is for

what the fuck do you want from me? why the fuck do you think "i'm going to summon ben royce here" and i'm going to do... what? what is this random asshole from western ny supposed to do?

@kali
in reply to kali

@benroyce i am not even palestinian and it disturbs me so much that i just don't want to see it. but i cannot without blocking you. that is a microcosm of why big servers are bad, my case is rested.
in reply to kali

@kali
block it! i can't help you!

why do you think i have any fucking power here!

and don't fucking attack people YOU summoned who are just trying to fucking understand what the fucking problem is!

jesus fucking christ!

@kali
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@kali
and frankly kali: fuck you

*you* summoned me. i'm trying to engage on why

and for that effort, i get accused of mansplaining?!

fuck you!

stop fucking summoning me in something i don't even fucking comprehend that you're complaining about. why me? what did i do that made you think "ben royce should be in on this"

in on what?

what is the point of summoning me, then attacking me when i try to understand? what is the fucking point of that?

@kali
in reply to kali

@kali
you want me to leave mastodon.social?

i have left one server before for mastodon.social when i was just getting starting out and knew nothing of the politics

i am in fact thinking of starting my own server, but not tomorrow, not even next month or 3 months. so you may see me elsewhere someday. until then, what the fuck do you want me to do? leave the server because you have problems with it i can't get a grasp on without being fucking attacked by you? what the fuck?

@kali
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce i said: if more people told you that. i am not the only one one here who sees things that way, u know.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce

There's a position that mastodon.social -users fall into three categories: the harassers etc / noobs who mostly lurk / and real posters™ like you (and mayhaps me).

The argument goes that real posters™ not moving to a smallish server, they make it impossible to block the harassers and the noobs.

( Personally I haven't moved due to fearing (among other things) that smaller servers' homogeneity may lead to regulating words and not intentions. De facto, if not de jure. )

in reply to Juho Mäntysalo

moderation is all over the fucking place on all servers. some servers are fucking great. some servers really fucking suck. i don't want connections severed because of the pique of some asshole who thinks they are looking out for me when they just have some fucking agenda, whatever it may be, whatever their intentions. and i'm a guy who hunts vatnik accounts to bait them, report them, and get them suspended. so i have no problem with moderation per se, i'm not some "free speech" bigot chud
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@iju

as for moderation on mastodon.social, i'm sure someone could write 10 books on how much it sucks, but the same could be said for any server. moderation is not a science, and there's always grey areas and complaints. it's simply large enough, it's standard enough. having said all of *that* i do intend to move, and start my own server. someday. next year. 3 months from now

in reply to Mastodon

it sounds like a good idea but more than geographic distance, keys server themes and rules are the determining factors for selecting a server IMO.
in reply to Mastodon

Great that the recommendation is no longer for a specialised topic server.
The fediverse is about avoiding the problems of centralisation. Having centralised topic servers has already resulted in much fedi-infighting.
I have several special interests. But its nonsensical to need multiple accounts. Resulting in topics most people are excluded from because they are not a member of that club. And those topics are watered down with other topic or non topic posts.
This is all because Mastodon doesn't yet have Federated groups, where 'anyone' can join. Where topic posts stay within those groups.