Skip to main content


MAGA acolyte Marjorie Taylor Greene votes alongside Tlaib and Omar to cut US funding for Israel


in reply to Peter Link

The House of Representatives, however, rejected in a 422-6 vote on Thursday,


Why is the only thing both sides enthusiastically agree on is giving billions to Israel?

ETA:

"It's becoming like, wait a minute, what about our own country? What about our own people?"


You're this close Marjorie. "Our own country?" No, They own the country. "Our own people?" They own the people.

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to defunct_punk

Every one of my reps has AIPAC high on their donor list. I am unsure what to say any longer when I call. It feels like my "voice" is too cheap.
in reply to PancakesCantKillMe

Correct. Your tax dollars going to fund candidacies you neither want nor approve, so your voice can not matter.
in reply to PancakesCantKillMe

They are God's chosen people, after all. And you, my fellow American, are God's chosen people's piggy bank. That'll be $500,000,000 to keep killing brown people, even AOC says you gotta pay up.
This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to PancakesCantKillMe

4th box. When even your money holds no meaning to them, your mettle will still will
in reply to defunct_punk

Why is it bipartisan? Israel is our only ally in the middle east. We lose Israel, we lose our foothold into the countries with oil.
in reply to Shirasho

Government sources indicate that the US really only imports from two Middle Eastern countries: Iraq and Saudi Arabia. I don't see how either of those countries would be particularly displeased if the US cuts off Israel.

Israel is a useless ally. They just hold their hands out for American money and don't seem to provide anything in return other than bad press. Maybe you could make an argument that Israel's position is beneficial for regional stability, but I don't see why other countries couldn't fill that role. There is no shortage of strongmen in the Middle East. Yeah, they're the "oNlY deMocRaCy iN tHe MiddLe EasT" but that means nothing if their electorate always just votes for politicians who want to massacre their neighbours.

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to NateNate60

Israel isn't just a useless ally. They're a fucking liability as an ally. America is like the 7ft tall 300lb quite guy in the hoodie standing in the corner, and Israel is his 5'2 'friend' who gets constant handouts, but acts like a complete dick hole to everyone and provokes fights that they can't win on their own.

Israel is a fucking mistake made possible by the compromises and lack of foresight post WW2.

This is not at all a critique on the Jewish faith, just on the nation of Israel

in reply to NateNate60

I think you missed the point with my post, which is fair since the way I said it doesn't look like criticism.

Israel itself is useless. We only support it as a foothold into the middle east. As you said, anybody else could theoretically fill that role, but the reality of it is that much of the middle east hates the United States. If we lose Israel, America would have to spend a lot more to regain that foothold.

To make it perfectly clear, I am in agreement that the United States should drop them as an ally and leave the middle east alone altogether.

in reply to Shirasho

Israel is NOT our only ally in the Middle East. We have good relationships with every country there except Iran. Frankly we’d have even more friends if we didn’t unconditionally back Israel and their wars on every one of their neighbors.
in reply to defunct_punk

So, when AIPAC donates to candidates, it's US tax payers being surreptitiously forced to donate to those candidates.
in reply to Peter Link

Imagine what 3.3bn would do for education in the United States? Fuck Iseral's "security", they can take care of themselves.
in reply to Lucky_777

I agree Israel should not be subsidized by the states but 3.3 billion is about ten dollars per American.
in reply to SatansMaggotyCumFart

If that money were all distributed to our education system, it would only really go to the children of the US, so it makes less sense to evaluate that money on a per-american basis.

That money would also be going to institutions as opposed to the students, so a more practical evaluation would be to see what amounts would go to each school.

At the end of the day, though, we know that $3.3bn isn't going to education - not even a bit.

in reply to JayDee

Even if it’s say twenty percent of Americans being school aged so it actually being fifty dollars per student I don’t see how’s that’s going to change the education system.
in reply to SatansMaggotyCumFart

Again, it's 50 dollars per student - given to the school as a subsidy. The average middle school has something around 500-600 students, so that's between $25,000 to $30,000 per school. That's not huge but it's not negligible either.
in reply to SatansMaggotyCumFart

Because you don't understand how far a dollar can go when you invest it in productive programs.
in reply to SatansMaggotyCumFart

Someone else already mentioned that it’s more than half the current budget for feeding students so that could be expanded by a lot, but it’s easily enough for schools to hire a part time therapist or nurse or to get new textbooks for a subject or two.
in reply to SatansMaggotyCumFart

Of which, roughly speaking about 23% are under 18 and school-aged if census.gov is to be trusted

Around $40 per student could still do an incredible amount of good across our national school system. A given school's graduating class might range anywhere from 50-2,000 students and you'll have 3-4 of those per school. That's potentially $320,000 for a single large school by this napkin math assuming those funds are distributed perfectly evenly according to student population. If put to more strategic use this could be an incredible boon to lower income schools in many, many areas.

in reply to SatansMaggotyCumFart

At the same time, we spend $5.2 billion a year to provide 2.4 billion breakfasts in over 90,000 schools and residential child care institutions. $3.3 million more could feed a lot of hungry kids.
in reply to SatansMaggotyCumFart

That’s just for a single military program. We also give $18 Billion a year to Israel and have given something like $200 Billion over the last 70 years to Israel.
in reply to Lucky_777

Not even getting into how Israels have all the "socialism" stuff we say we can't afford for ourselves.

If universal healthcare and free college isn't worth it for Americans, why are we giving Israel billions annually? Shouldn't Israel stop that "frivolous" spending to lower the amount they need from foreign countries?

But like, when they House votes 422-6 for something like this, it's pointless to think logic will change the mind of any of the 422.

It's a hard thing to admit, but we need to be able to say a foreign government has clearly bought off both parties of our government.

And nothing will convince the compromised politicians to stop, we have to vote them out. D or R every one of those 422 needs to go. MTG still needs to go too, there's plenty of other reasons

in reply to Maeve

The US has a handful of what one might reasonably call adversaries militarily. If not only China at this point, considering the Russian military has been exposed as being quite a joke over the last several years.

Iran isnt remotely a military adversary of the US, or any of the other groups/countries Israel beefs with. Saying we pay them to fight proxy wars is a bit more than a stretch

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Maeve

Israel has never fought a conflict that was not in their own interest. Israeli troops have never died to help the US.
in reply to givesomefucks

Seriously. We subsidize them to the point where they have universal healthcare, social safety nets, robust education, and in return they turned Palestine into a prison state, and now a literal genocide.

We need to realize that Israel gets free passes because their Epstein honey pot ensnared generations of western political leaders, and that's why in America, we need to purge our political leadership of anyone over 65 for registered parties. The world they grew up in is gone, and they were the ones that destroyed it. They can hand over the reigns, or be removed from them forcefully

in reply to Lucky_777

That's the problem you see. If they can take care of themselves they might figure out how to take care of us in the future should they need to
in reply to Lucky_777

Israel is currently secure enough to be able to commit a genocide while also starting conflicts with neighboring countries. They're acting like they can take care of things on their own, so let them.
in reply to JohnnyFlapHoleSeed

Budgeting around mom's credit card is a nad idea unless you are Israel.
in reply to altkey (he\him)

My husband's theory is that Epstein was a mossad asset so it's more like don't spend moms credit card unless you found her cp stash.
in reply to Lucky_777

It would do something the GOP doesn’t like. Create people who understand science and reasoning, which is bad for the base.
in reply to Jesus

Ambitious! It would actually go to military industrial contracts more directly (maybe in R&D for new weapons) so as "not to disrupt the economy".

And they'd be mostly fine with it.

in reply to Peter Link

Aren't all the MAGAts screaming "America first?"

Seems awful not "us first"

The hypocrisy is astounding

in reply to PattyMcB

They literally spent 2 billion of OUR money SPECIFICALLY on immigrants, legal or otherwise. Nearly all of which were working, paying taxes, and contributing to the economy.

MAGAt pedos would rather spend 2 billion destroying lives and families, than feeding, educating, and giving healthcare to Americans. The entire party is built on bad faith and treason.

in reply to Peter Link

This was a performative act to drive the narrative. She looks a fool cause she didn't realize the party only follows along to orders from the top (i.e. not her).

And y'all are still playing into it. So it's working anyways. WTF

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

in reply to forrgott

IIRC it was to cut defensive weapon funding ie. Iron Dome. Offensive weapons weren't being touched.
in reply to Dultas

Doesn't matter. If they know the iron dome is funded they will act more violent knowing they won't face retaliation.
in reply to Peter Link

Marjorie Karen Green actually did something moral for once, and I have mixed feelings.
in reply to Etterra

Nah. It's still sending money to Israel, just a tiny bit less. It's still sending money for weapons to continue the genocide. Just because it's a little less makes zero effect on the morality, it's still furthering the genocide. It's just phrased to make you think it's doing something to cause less harm. It's not.
in reply to Peter Link

I hate to say it, but couldn’t someone turn around and pass a bill making any action against Israel as antisemitism?
in reply to hopesdead

Antisemitism is not illegal in the US, just frowned on (by most). Hate crimes are illegal, but if you nonviolently hate Jewish people, that’s allowed.
in reply to crystalmerchant

What if they go so far politically right... they come out the other side?

Nah....

in reply to crystalmerchant

Confluence of isolationism and being an actual Nazi type, if you forgot about the Jewish Space Lasers.
in reply to Peter Link

You go girl! I mean, fuck you, but also you go girl!
in reply to ExLisper

She's MAGA (AKA a Nazi-fetishist), so the motivations are most definitely Jewish-hatred.

There I elaborated your feelings

in reply to ZeroOne

Yes, it's wild that the only politicians criticizing Israel are doing it for the wrong reason.

Except for Spain. I think Spain is the only country doing the right thing here for the right reason. Go Spain! And South Africa. Shame on everyone else.

in reply to Peter Link

aoc voted against it, and her crashout over the criticism she's getting is not looking good. she's throwing the squad under the bus trying to double down on her inane decision.
in reply to pyre

Can you explain in detail what you mean? I see her bluesky and she clearly shared the roll call with her voting against the funding.

Edit: nvm i found out by reading the comments on her post. She didnt support an amendment to the defense bill and epsitne didnt kill himself.

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Peter Link

Remember folks, Ms. She-wolf of The SS wants to cut funding to Israel because of her raging hatred of Jewish people and not for the plight of the Palestinian people at the hands of the Israeli state. Also, something something Rothschild Space Lasers, something something George Soros.
in reply to SpiceDealer

Yeah this bill cuts funding for the iron dome, putting Israeli civilians in danger without cutting funding for the bombs being used to kill Palestinians, and Iranians, and ... Every other neighboring country. Ask this does is ensure even more people in the middle east will die.
This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Bronzebeard

counterpoint: weakening the iron dome will increase pressure on Israel to stop its aggressive behavior.
in reply to i_ben_fine

Not as much as not giving them the weapons at all
in reply to Peter Link

Doesn't cut any offensive weapons shipments. US is still supporting Israel's genocide.