Speaking about #decentralization and Mastodon, does Mastodon official client onboarding flow still promote the "mastodon.social" or other single server as default option instead of rotating/randomizing across the list of known servers with option to type server manually? Without this #Mastodon will have to "block Missisipi" too eventually.
Yes, I referring to that decision of #Bluesky to block access to bluesky web UI from IP addresses in Missisipi US state due age-check laws adopted there.
Yes, I referring to that decision of #Bluesky to block access to bluesky web UI from IP addresses in Missisipi US state due age-check laws adopted there.
sam
in reply to Magical Cat • • •Fedi.Tips π
in reply to sam • • •@sam
The Github issues to vote in about this are:
- github.com/mastodon/mastodon-aβ¦
- github.com/mastodon/mastodon-iβ¦
- github.com/mastodon/joinmastodβ¦
Replace "Join mastodon.social" button on front page with button promoting rotating third party server from pool of reliable servers
FediVideos (GitHub)Magical Cat
in reply to Fedi.Tips π • • •@FediTips
Thanks! I already voted to these issues.
The most difficult thing is to form and maintain a high-quality list of these instances to select/rotate from.
Criteria I think about:
1. Signed same moderation covenant, to be sure these recommended servers have compatible moderation policies
2. Operate e. g. at least 3 months
3. Accept new members (for this flow - without pre-moderation?!)
4. Operator gave consent to be added to this list.
Rotation can be as "instance of the week"?
@sam