Skip to main content


having succeeded in purchasing positions of influence inside the White House, the billionaires and tech VCs have now set their sights back on Wikipedia
in reply to Molly White

"[Wikipedia] deserves 0$ until they rebalance." - a sentence that shows complete absence on understanding how wikipedia works.

"They" includes everyone, as wikipedia is the encyclopedia everyone can edit.

And the donations go to the WM foundation, that has no control about the content.

The content is made by volunteers that have nothing to do with the donations.

While the USA can force authors and admins with a residence in the US to anything, these authors and admins will be overruled by english language authors and admins in Canada, australia, britain, ireland and many other locations.

It seems that both groups (the billionaires and MAGApoliticians on the one side and the employees of the WMF on the other side) are completely unaware that it is unavoidable, that trumpmusk destroys Wikipedia, as Wikipedia cannot be forced into submission with any less severe action.

in reply to Molly White

this is a pivotal moment. They really want to destroy information and truth. With that gone, they can convince anyone of anything. The world would be theirs.
They are also idiots. Defund Wikipedia? It's not publicly funded you awkward gesturing car maker
in reply to Molly White

Silo (the show) is becoming more and more relevant. Scary.
This entry was edited (11 months ago)
in reply to Molly White

I assume Wiki has backups of its database ... we really need a locked copy of the whole thing stored in another country.
This entry was edited (11 months ago)
in reply to Molly White

I can't work out if this is a sinister attempt to rewrite reality in a way that suits them. Or if they are so deluded they actually believe what they're saying.
in reply to Molly White

Yep. Fascism doesn’t elevate great “thinkers” It elevates followers & then throws them off a balcony if they dare to think. They share tRumps dreams of power, shame at being excluded & anger at the world but past that the majority are voids. #USPol @rhm
in reply to Molly White

@catsalad Thankfully, the wikimedia foundation is funded for years to come. The edit wars I just saw flashing before my eyes are a whole other beast, though.

Coincidentally, I was just listening to a report about a sock puppet zoo revising history on German Wikipedia. Chilling stuff, but also a boost to respect towards serious Wikipedia editors. ardaudiothek.de/episode/socken… (in German)

in reply to Molly White

Wasn't there some effort a few years ago to launch a "conservative wikipedia" alternative? Didn't it fail spectacularly? I'm hoping that I didn't imagine that.
in reply to keet

@keet Conservapedia. Infighting and logical fallacies have essentially destroyed it, tho.
@keet
in reply to thepoliticalcat

@thepoliticalcat @keet it’s a shame their project to rewrite the bible without all the woke parts never really took off
in reply to Molly White

Europe or somebody needs to offer a home to these institutions, they are not safe in the US.

#Wikipedia

in reply to Molly White

There should be a federated Wikipedia alternative (to combat censorship if the US Gov tries to ban Wikipedia), it should be called Fedipedia
in reply to Molly White

whatever happened to "businesses have a right".

oh right, they don't actually care at all.

I think they don't even suggest a "balanced" new 'pedia because they don't want Wikipedia to exist at all.

in reply to Molly White

Elon has already convinced me to sign up for a recurring Wikimedia donation.
in reply to Molly White

entertaining that rich fuckers like Musk think government funds Wikipedia. I'm sure he's never donated a goddamn penny to the Wiki world
in reply to Molly White

Everyone must send massive donations, as much as they can afford to Wikipedia.
in reply to Molly White

Weird when it's the biggest "Community Notes" site, or not weird because it's the biggest "independent" one.
in reply to Molly White

Wiki is good in some cases, not others. Their historicity of Jesus is mostly biased....
in reply to Molly White

Saw your post, then donated to Wikipedia. Thanks for the reminder.
in reply to Molly White

Wow, Chamath is all in .. .
First he programed you so he could become a billionaire and get a seat at the table, now he's doing what ever he can so they don't kick his PoC body out of the country.

.. nice try ..

in reply to Molly White

I would think they intend to inflitrate it vs. take it down! We can all help stop that, by starting again to work as wikipedians!
in reply to Molly White

I find it funny that the term "God given gift to think for yourself," is uttered. You can only think for yourself because an imaginative force gave you permission to do so.
in reply to Molly White

"Foundation AI models are being trained on this data..." Well, then don't. I'm sure he can get some great content from "X - The Everything App" instead to train their models.
in reply to Molly White

for that reason I started donating to Wikipedia. I hope many more people will.
in reply to Molly White

But Wikipedia is mostly politics nowadays and no neutral source. At least when you want to inform yourself about some history, countries or public people.
In tech stuff I didn't found issues yet (but I use Wikipedia very rarely)
in reply to Molly White

Yet another attempt to replace Freedom of Speech with Freedom to Deceive
in reply to Molly White

Do these people not realize that Fox News is part of the legacy media and Wikipedia is independent media?
in reply to Molly White

They should channels their efforts and attack this. bls.go

The amount of utter bullshit published monthly by the US Department of Labor has more utility than the sum of any other bullshit alive. It has ALL the trappings of weaponized bullshit including providing the Fed with reason to rob 90% of you blind while you engage in needless discourse.

in reply to Molly White

this prompted me to set up a monthly donation.
This entry was edited (11 months ago)
in reply to Molly White

Is it possible to be among the richest & at the same time dumbest persons on Earth?

Elon Musk for sure feels compelled to prove it by personal example, to attract some more attention.

They're feeling the unpostponable urge to ban books & information so the masses wouldn't be able to claim superior knowledge compared to natural-born billionaire goofballs.

[Btw, it's still not officially confirmed if the Liar-In-Chief will spend less than one whole year playing with taxpayers' dollars on one of his notorious, laundered-money-funded goof courses this time. 🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑]

in reply to Molly White

气得我立刻开始捐钱!I'm donating to Wikipedia right now!
in reply to Molly White

When people like that set out to suppress "ideology", with no reasonable argument as to why its only ideology, what they're saying is that their wealth and power are the only things that should matter and they are tired or dealing with inconvenient facts.

They represent "the natural order" and anything that would elicit disapproval of them is unnatural "ideology".
#SocialDarwinism #nazi #oligarchy

This entry was edited (11 months ago)
in reply to Molly White

Since Elon Musk works for the Trump administration, he naturally simply becomes an extension of Trump administration propaganda!
in reply to Molly White

Wikipedia shouldn’t be seen as an arbiter of truth. That’s why teachers try to hammer it in to students that you can’t just cite Wikipedia as a source. However I would take the vetted words of the community over whatever Elon Musk says any day.
in reply to Molly White

Have they considered, I dunno, just not using it, if they really don't like it? Or is that "cancel culture"? Asking for a friend.
in reply to Molly White

I was just doing some research on Wikipedia.
It is an invaluable resource for fighting disinformation and getting expert knowledge.

Specifically on when sexual dimorphism occurs during prenatal development.
(Hint: it isn’t at the time of conception)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline…

in reply to Molly White

Wikipedia's bullshit to bulltruth ratio is superb. Wikipedia does "lie" but its way, way worse at it than anyone else.

I'd put wikipedia on lists that include the great wall and the Apollo missions.

in reply to Molly White

What happened to Wikipedia's co-founder Larry Sanger that he made it his mission in life to destroy Wikipedia?
in reply to Molly White

you know what's truly mind boggling - it's the American ignorance of the ENTIRE REST OF THE WORLD.
Even if Wikipedia was bias towards some side of American clown politics the value it adds to the rest of the world just blows all of these meme issues to complete and utter irrelevance.
in reply to Molly White

“Foundation AI models are being trained on this biased data as if it's ground truth”

There’s an easy solution to that.

in reply to Molly White

Never understood why these people think Wikipedia is heavily biased when I would argue it's one of the most neutral sites on the Internet, never once bending in favor of one political ideology. Wikipedia is not and never was perfect, but in an era where most people will easily fall for blatant lies and half-truths, the site and related platforms are kind of a necessity.
in reply to Molly White

"wikipedia lies" ok link us to the lie and your attempt to correct it. Oh wait its just something you dont like and you have no evidence against.
in reply to Molly White

Wikipedia should become a UNESCO world heritage
@briankrebs
This entry was edited (11 months ago)
in reply to Molly White

Can someone be bought/bribed to sell Wikipedia? Having supported it from time to time, I will feel cheated then.
in reply to Molly White

What a #Bullshit they post about a decentralized #Information #Network, that is run by millions and #millions of #People #worldwide. Not a #Second in it's #Lifespan until today there was an ideological #Influence of any kind on #Wikipedia. Let's give it a #Lie to these #malvolent #Billionaires and their #Supporters. Keep #Wikipedia #free.
in reply to Molly White

I guess it's important to not have your lies fact-checked.

Technical question: Does anyone know how and were wikipedia is hosted ? Ie: does it replicate its data to alternative jurisdictions (ie: outside of the US) in case the oligarchs manage to get it blocked / brought down ?

in reply to Molly White

if the sources aren't credible enough for them, their energy should be on making the sources more credible.

The apparent rage might be as simple as site visit ranking and popular kids are falling, so have to pick on the nerdy one that is below them (for now). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o…

in reply to Molly White

just in case, you can download Wikipedia. Literally.

I used @kiwix for this, so now I have it locally on my computer. It’s amazing software.

kiwix.org/

#Wikipedia #Information #Data

in reply to Mark Wyner Won’t Comply

@markwyner @kiwix I have it locally on my computer and a trimmed version on my phone

Other wikis (like travel wiki or educational materials of various sorts) can also be put on Kiwix. There are also ways to convert websites in general (most/some)

in reply to HowToPhil

@howtophil

Mos def. I downloaded some important docs on medicine, field guides, machinery fixing, etc. Kiwix is amazing.

@molly0xfff @kiwix

in reply to Molly White

"Idealogically captured" They don't even bother changing their scripted talking points. #Amirika