Skip to main content


Greatest irony of the AI age: Humans being increasingly hired to clean AI slop


reshared this

in reply to solrize

in reply to rozodru

This is super interesting! I don’t know if you have a platform for this but you should write an article about this. Maybe talk to the likes of 404media and see if they have interest in the story.
in reply to Apollo98

There are a few people who have posted on Hacker News about it but I figured the pay probably sucked. It sounded like it would be treated as a menial job.
in reply to solrize

Yes, it'll usually be treated like a menial job, because so many of the folks who fell for AI code wholesale are assholes. Non-assholes often have a friend who tells them when they're fucking up that badly.

But the pay tends to be very good, anyway, because assholes are usually desperate for any help they can still get.

in reply to solrize

it's very menial/easy. BUT you charge a premium for the service because as /u/pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip put it these places are very desperate to fix their fuck ups and fix them quickly. Like I'm talking builds or projects that could be months along and suddenly...nothing works. or something breaks. or nothing can be added. or more common than anything the AI claimed it had added something when it reality it either didn't or simply made a #todo comment and vibe coders continued on.

But yes the pay is good. I essentially get paid to tell a company how much they fucked up and what it will take to fix. There is always the very slim possibility of refactoring but i'd say 8 times out of 10 the only clear path forward is to start from scratch and that generally means hiring devs again.

#todo
in reply to rozodru

FINALLY someone wrote something about my job. This is EXACTLY what I’ve been doing for the past year and I make more money doing it than I did as a regular freelance/consultant dev.


Are you serious? I'm good at code review but figured that this slop fixup stuff was a fiverr type of job that paid crap. If there's better money in it, maybe I should look into it.

Machine translations (natural language) used to be way worse than they are now, and I've spent some time cleaning those up for my own personal use. It's not that annoying to do. Maybe it would get annoying after a while though.

Very interesting!

in reply to solrize

in reply to rozodru

in reply to rozodru

I wonder what the balance is for the company...

I mean, it wouldn't be impossible that they still save money even while paying you more if they have fired more people. If they fire 3 people and hire 1 code-reviewer for double the salary they are still having to pay 1 less wage.

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to solrize

This was exactly the concern of the TV and movie writers who went on strike. Instead of being paid writers' wages they'll be paid much less as editors to clean up AI slop, while effectively doing the same job because what it writes is so bad.
in reply to floofloof

Except all the actual creative part of the job is gone, you know, the reason they got into it in the first place.
This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to Obi

These AI systems are brought to you by execs who don't know the joy of creating anything but lines that go up.

CEO of AI music generation firm Suno claims majority of people don’t “enjoy” making music