If you are creating your own server on here, don't use a domain name with the word "mastodon".
The word "mastodon" in relation to social networks is a registered trademark owned by Eugen Rochko's Mastodon gGmbH organisation.
If you use a domain name which includes the word "mastodon", this obliges you to obey these terms laid down by Eugen's organisation:
https://joinmastodon.org/trademark
For example, this would potentially make it illegal to switch to software unapproved by Mastodon gGmbH.
The word "mastodon" in relation to social networks is a registered trademark owned by Eugen Rochko's Mastodon gGmbH organisation.
If you use a domain name which includes the word "mastodon", this obliges you to obey these terms laid down by Eugen's organisation:
https://joinmastodon.org/trademark
For example, this would potentially make it illegal to switch to software unapproved by Mastodon gGmbH.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
FediTips has moved! reshared this.
Michal Špondr
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Grow Your Own Services 🌱
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •Safest option is just to avoid any trademarks.
If you're using a subdomain for a Fedi server, use generic subdomains like "social.example.com".
If you're talking about the network, call it the Fediverse, no one owns that AFAIK.
Grow Your Own Services 🌱
Unknown parent • • •Yes, you can run Mastodon on a subdomain.
If you use a generic non-trademarked subdomain like "social.example.com" then you will be free to use whatever software you want.
It's best to avoid subdomains like "mastodon.example.com" as this may possibly restrict what software you can use in the future.
Hirad
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •deilann (owo)
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •#FreeJohnMastodon
Grow Your Own Services 🌱
Unknown parent • • •The document says they do automatically allow you to use the word "mastodon" in a domain name if you comply with their terms.
So, you don't need to actively ask permission, but by using the word "mastodon" in a domain name you are agreeing to obey the terms of that document.
Eddy Almuiña
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Fabio Manganiello
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Sometimes I can see the argument for brand recognition, unless the brand name is a word in the English vocabulary. If you want brand name protection, then you should pick a name that isn't on the vocabulary. You can't own a vocabulary word and prevent people from using it.
Grow Your Own Services 🌱
in reply to Fabio Manganiello • • •I am not a lawyer, so I have no idea how those scenarios would play out in court! 😁
But as a non-lawyer it seems easier just to avoid using the word in the domain name?
You would still be unrestricted in using the word "mastodon" in discussions online, for example about the extinct animal or about the band. These legal terms only apply to branding of social networks, including domain names.
Fabio Manganiello
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •I know that such a litigation may go on forever in courts (see Apple Records vs. Apple Computers, which has been going on for more than three decades), but IMHO it could be completely avoided if the dominant doctrine was "you can ask trademark protection only if the name of your business didn't exist before your business was created".
Under such a doctrine, for example, Twitter may ask for trademark protection, because "Twitter" wasn't a word in the vocabulary before the company invented it, so if you use "Twitter" as part of your domain/subdomain you are clearly ripping off a word that uniquely references a certain company/product.
I'm just not sure if this can/should apply to Mastodon, or any words with multiple non-overlapping meanings.
Fabio Manganiello
in reply to Fabio Manganiello • • •In fact, the case was reignited when Apple released a MIDI interface for its computers, and again when it released the iPod, and again when it released Apple Music.
So I guess that an instance dedicated to Mastodon (the band) may legally be allowed to use the name in the domain, as long as there's no confusion about scopes? After all, Eugen himself admitted that he's a fan of the band, and their name influenced the decision for the name of the social network, and I haven't seen the band suing him for trademark violation...
Grow Your Own Services 🌱
in reply to Fabio Manganiello • • •I don't know, but I am guessing most server owners (who won't be dedicated to the band or 🐘 ) will simply want to avoid such complications and uncertainties?
The Beatles Apple thing is a very interesting case though. Would it have happened if it had been a struggling unknown band without any money?
aardvark
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Grow Your Own Services 🌱
Unknown parent • • •It makes sense from his point of view legally, but at an emotional level it conflicts with the open decentralised ethos of the Fediverse, where no one owns the network.
This is just a guess, but I don't think most people realise that the work "mastodon" is a trademark owned by a central legal entity?
The good news is you can avoid all this by choosing a domain name that doesn't mention that word.
DoCh_Dev
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Grow Your Own Services 🌱
in reply to DoCh_Dev • • •But it's their decision on giving permission, and on what those terms are, as they own the trademark.
Just to make clear, the terms do automatically grant permission as long as you aren't breaking the terms.
DoCh_Dev
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Grow Your Own Services 🌱
in reply to DoCh_Dev • • •Ah, yeah, that's true.
MrClon
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Grow Your Own Services 🌱
in reply to MrClon • • •Indeed, great point!
This is another reason to talk about the Fediverse rather than Mastodon, no one has trademarked Fediverse.
Kingsley Yung
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •https://mastodon.kawaiyume.net/users/ixo
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Grow Your Own Services 🌱
in reply to • • •I am not sure, to be honest!
It's complicated as other servers will be referring to your server by its current domain name. I cannot find a procedure in the official documentation?
One workaround might be to create a new server and migrate your accounts from the existing server to the new server?
To keep this in perspective, it's unlikely to affect you in the short term, but if you're creating a new server in the future this is something to bear in mind.
https://mastodon.kawaiyume.net/users/ixo
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •https://mastodon.i3x.cx/users/i3xCx
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Grow Your Own Services 🌱
in reply to • • •No, as long as you comply with the terms laid out in this document:
https://joinmastodon.org/trademark
Trademark Policy of Mastodon
joinmastodon.orgGrow Your Own Services 🌱
Unknown parent • • •I guess it's best to just avoid mentioning software in domains, as you never know whether you'll be running the same software in the future?
Alan Bell
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Grow Your Own Services 🌱
in reply to Alan Bell • • •It's permanently tethering your server to whatever the current and future terms of the trademark are.
Alan Bell
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Michael Downey 🇺🇳
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Ming Chan
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •David Amador
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Grow Your Own Services 🌱
in reply to David Amador • • •I am not a lawyer, I don't know how this applies to subdomains.
ryedai
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Sören
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •Grow Your Own Services 🌱
Unknown parent • • •As far as I know there is no way of changing the domain name of a Masto server.
The only workaround I know of is to create a new server and transfer your accounts there?
I've heard Calckey software also accepts Mastodon account transfers. If you're comfortable installing that it might be worth a try?
sc :agorism_heart:
in reply to Grow Your Own Services 🌱 • • •