[SOLVED: BAD LOGIN] Can't connect to WPA2-EAP on Fedora Kinoite
cross-posted from: lemmy.zip/post/22209812
EDIT: Turns out my login information was slightly wrong, and had nothing to do with security.My school uses EAP for its student WiFi, but there's no option for "EAP" security (PEAP, LEAP and every other option in KDE's WiFi security settings wouldn't connect). I'm pretty sure there was an option for EAP on Linux Lite (my previous OS before kinoite) which connected successfully. Is it possible to use EAP in Kinoite, and how do I enable/use it?
reshared this
Tech Cyborg reshared this.
EAP is a wrapper for a bunch of different protocols. EAP-MSCHAPv2, EAP-TLS, etc. If you have access to the network settings on a Windows machine you may be able to get more information there.
Also, try stack exchange: askubuntu.com/questions/279762…
You probably want Peap. I don't belieave you can't do EAP by itself. Go to your schools help page for the correct information.
Also since you are on Lemmy.zip, I do run a Linux question community !Linuxquestions@lemmy.zip
The Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrong
The Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrong
The influential idea that in the past men were hunters and women were not isn’t supported by the available evidenceCara Ocobock (Scientific American)
like this
zeezee likes this.
I can’t believe so many people upvoted this comment. Do they just assume because there are lots of words and you referenced the original paper that this is a good critique? But I guess a lot of people just turn off their brain when they feel cognitive dissonance.
Do you know what a survey is? It’s not meant to be comprehensive, it’s supposed to be representative. Furthermore, it is based on existing ethnographic data, so it’s obviously not going to include data on tribes that are currently uncontacted, because there is little or none. The reasons why are obvious but since you don’t seem to understand, we can spell it out.
Conducting anthropological research on these tribes typically involves going to the tribe and living with, observing, and interviewing them for an extended period to fully understand their culture and way of life. This is not advisable with uncontacted tribes because it is dangerous for researchers and dangerous for the tribe which may lack exposure to endemic diseases in the rest of the world. It’s simply not done and I guarantee no ethics board would approve such research today.
Furthermore, it’s hilarious to suggest that the authors deliberately omitted cultures we know little about to reinforce their own agenda. How would they even know which tribes the exclude? And, as others have pointed out, even if all of these uncontacted tribes had only male hunting (a fact which would be highly surprising), it would barely change the conclusion here that in most forager societies, women engage in hunting.
Overall, this seems a very bad-faith critique. It’s good to delve into the science and examine whether a given paper was conducted in a sound way, but you need to approach it with an open mind, not just seek to undermine it with the simplest and most superficial criticism you can conceive of that supports your pre-existing position.
i thought the same thing, but these people persistence hunt today for over 8 hours. no mention of total distance but 8 hours is no joke.
The top of this comment thread is a person claiming that men do all the hunting in every primitive society, not just hunting based on long distance running.
You came into the thread to criticise a paper that showed that women hunt in 50 different societies around the world. Even your estimate of 50% is plenty enough examples to debunk the "all the hunting" claim.
Women are perfectly capable of drawing a bow that is suitable to hunt monkeys, rabbits, squirrels, small birds, etc. Accuracy is more important than power.
If your strategy for hunting mammoths involves your physical strength, you're gonna have a bad time.
Better doesn't always equal faster.
Better can equal going further.
Better can equal being more efficient.
Efficient means using less calories to do the same thing.
Persistence hunters today do track their prey, and often have to guess where the prey may have gone when the tracks are lost.
I wouldn’t consider 9% to be that large in this context. Certainly a difference that would be overshadowed by individual variation.
Even if we assume women are physiologically 9% slower at persistence hunting (which that statistic is far from proving) it still suggests they could and likely were successful at it, albeit maybe not the very best.
The fastest marathon time for men is 2 hours 1 minute and for women it is 2 hours 14 minutes.
"Fastest" does not mean the best endurance. You would be looking at the "longest".
Naked and Afraid and Women Who Hunt
Sounds like a very ...interesting show.
Meh...call me when a woman holds the world record for a marathon. It might happen in the next 100 years, but I strongly doubt it.
What bugs the shit out of me about all this...of course women hunted in times of need. They also hunted small game to help the tribe as needed.
I don't think that disrupts the overarching narrative of the male hunter and female gatherer. It's a general rule rather than a law.
So your theory is that women were the hunters, because they're faster after 200 miles? These people walked like 10-20 miles a day, and had to carry the food back home so that everyone else could eat. You imagine them going on month-long expeditions, carrying dead animals for 2 weeks back home? Are they also carrying mini fridges to keep the meat from spoiling?
I'm trying to even, but I can't.
That's not my theory. That's the data.
One interpretation could be that women were constantly engaged in strenuous endurance activities and so through evolution built up tolerances against exhaustion that at least rivals if not exceeds that of men. And one historical activity that used a lot of stamina and took a lot of tolerance against fatigue was the way in which ancient humans hunted.
That's not what a theory is, it's a hypothesis at best, hope that helped.
Yeah long term endurance hunting sounds like "bad hunting". You use up more calories, the prey expends more calories, you waste a whole day walking around in dangerous terrain and then you have to carry back the meat all the way back.
So even if their claims of greater female stamina bears out this would presumably only show that women can hunt better in certain worst case disciplines.
How does this make sense or am I missing something?
the world record
Nobody needed to be a world class athlete in order to sustain themselves through hunting, that's what the spears were for. Human sexual dimorphism is a lot more minor than what most people assume.
Human sexual dimorphism is a lot more minor than what most people assume.
This makes sense, but do you have any readings or evidence on the matter?
I just don’t think the evidence that supports this idea is very strong at all. Like maybe men on average did more hunting than women, but I haven’t seen any evidence to support this framing that women only hunted in times of need.
Unfortunately, it’s very difficult to know much for certain about the culture of prehistoric humans. But there is strong circumstantial evidence, like women buried with hunting implements, etc. which suggests that female hunters were prominent in at least some cultures.
This has nothing to do with toxic masculinity, i'd rather sit in a village and collect berries and cook than go hunting.
There will certainly be areas where the trail disappears, but tracking isn’t necessarily about locating every individual footfall.
With an understanding of movement and behavior, one can make inferences about where the animal went to find and follow the next sign.
Even moving over rock or packed soil, sign is left. You may not be able to perceive it yourself, but to someone who spends hours a day reading and studying the ground over the span of years, those subtle differences are perceptible.
An animal will eventually reach a place to stop and rest, but with repeated interruption that rest won’t count for much.
Women were first allowed to compete in marathons in 1972. In 1972 the men's record was 2:10:30. The current record is 2:00:35 which is about an 8% difference. Pretty close to the difference between men and women currently.
The first women's record was 3:40:22 and the current women's record is 2:11:53.11 which is 40% faster.
Once funding for women's athletics reaches parity and once girls are encouraged into athletics as much as boys, then we will see if the ladies catch up. So far they're doing a pretty good job catching up, and you can't look at one current window in time and say you have the answer, you need to look at trends.
The fastest marathon time for men is 2 hours 1 minute and for women it is 2 hours 14 minutes.
It's an unacceptable leap in logic to infer (from that statement) anything about populations of men and women. You've picked only a single sample from each population and chosen that highly biased representative.
Maybe women hunted, probably they did, maybe they didn't. Being able to run 100+ miles is freaking cool and great.
You DONT ENDURANCE HUNT into the next state. This is shit "evidence" of anything. It does not matter if you can lift 25% of not very much 2000% more than someone else can lift 25% of a lot, or if you can walk until 8 days from now and be less tired than someone else.
The premise is probably true that men and women both hunted, but endurance++ isn't a cut and dry argument for being a good huntress.
I've just come to notice that most men don't do a little squeal when startled, but women do. I just notice these things and I'm curious why there's a difference.
Startled by something happening around them. My example was a car accident happening somewhere in the same street, like one car hitting the other at slow speed.
You maliciously assuming there is a different motivation behind my comments is what's the actual problem here. I see people acting like this all the time, thinking in extremes like everything is either black or white, no gray areas. Not giving others the benefit of the doubt. I can tell you this is what's wrong with the world. All this tribalism and taking everything as an insult or an act of malice.
People like you can go fuck right off.
Not true, the fight or flight response is an automatic response of the nervous system.
The fight-or-flight or the fight-flight-freeze-or-fawn[1] (also called hyperarousal or the acute stress response) is a physiological reaction that occurs in response to a perceived harmful event, attack, or threat to survival.
I've heard the female screech pretty much all over western societies. I hardly ever hear men do that. So I was just wondering.
As an autistic person, noises trigger me, and that's why I noticed females doing it more than males.
If it is conditioning, it's something particular to western society, I suppose.
Or have you never heard women do a little squal when startled? Most women seem to do that, while most men seem not to.
I'm just curious why there is a difference.
I'm a man and I scream when something scary and surprising or unstoppable happens.
I remember a couple of years ago, I was getting breakfast, half asleep, and out of the corner of my eye, a mouse climbed down the kitchen cabinet and ran under the stove and I had no idea what it was at first, just some moving blob, and it scared the shit out of me and I screamed like a child.
No shit it's wrong. Has anyone ever gone hiking with a bitch? They have no sense of direction, only way I'd send one out to ~~gather~~ do literally anything is if I didn't mind ~~her~~ him not finding ~~her~~ his way back.
FTFY
Well.. many of the younger women would be constantly pregnant back then, and engaged in communal child rearing. So they are going to be spending less time on mammoth hunts.
Ancient people's also worked way less than we do now.
It seems obvious that some of the women would be better hunters than some of the men. But that only suggests that too much specialization was bad, not that there wasn't any specialization at all. So headline seems wrong.
Also persistent hunting seems like the most inefficient type of hunting. You exhaust yourself and the prey and loose calories, the time it takes, traveling far over unknown terrain and then having to carry it all the way back and beware other predators. Is the argument that women are best at "shitty hunting"?
I imagine you'd track an animal, get close, throw spear, miss, keep tracking the animal. And if they haven't invented the spear yet, can they even be called human?
Can you please show us what connects your data to being a success as an endurance hunter? Because "men hold more records running a specific distance faster than women do" is not in any way an indication of hunting success.
Do you think Olympic target shooters make the best hunters when it comes to guns and bows?
How many marathons are run in a weaving path on uneven ground full of underbrush while trying to keep up with an animal that could potentially go in any direction at any time in the hopes that it will get tired before you do?
Because otherwise this marathon measurement is silly.
We have these things called binoculars, telescopes, cameras and drones. All of which are able to observe subjects from a safe distance.
Binoculars, telescopes and cameras will tell you little about what islanders are doing inside the forest where they hunt if you are using them from the ocean. Drones flying over Sentinel Island would violate Indian law and whoever did it would be in huge trouble. Their data would likely be disregarded due to the ethical issues.
On top of that, if they heard a drone coming, they might just change what they normally do.
Like these people. Hunting becomes less of an issue suddenly when there's a flying threat.
A marathon is not a speed race. It is a 42 km endurance race, similar to endurance hunters would have done on, say, the plains of Africa.
The vast majority of people today would be unable to finish even a half marathon without collapsing due to utter and complete exhaustion.
Another factor is, with endurance hunting, you will need to carry the carcass back to home base. So let's take am antelope, which weighs 125 kg. You need the hunters to bring that all back to base, AFTER the multi kilometer hunt is over.
However, as far as portaging, women are very adept at that:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head-c…
Olympic shooters would make the absolute worst hunters, have you actually seen them shoot? It's a test of hand eye coordination to hit a paper target.
The theory proposes that hunting was a major driver of human evolution and that men carried this activity out to the exclusion of women. It holds that human ancestors had a division of labor, rooted in biological differences between males and females, in which males evolved to hunt and provide and females tended to children and domestic duties. It assumes that males are physically superior to females and that pregnancy and child-rearing reduce or eliminate a female's ability to hunt.
Oh boy, what a load of bullshit to start an article that may very well have a solid point. I lost all interest in reading at this paragraph.
"It holds" - as if there was only one theory - and everyone who believes that men were mostly hunters and women mostly gatherers would be guilty of the assumptions mentioned thereafter.
I, for one, only ever heard that due to men mostly hunting (because women were busy with children), men evolved to have a better perception of moving images e.g. small movements of prey in hiding, and women evolved to have a better perception of details of inanimate objects (e.g. finding things to forage). And that explanation - while not necessarily correct - made sense, and is in no way the sexist bullshit that the article insinuates.
The author of that article is not doing feminism a favor by basically alleging "all who believe men evolved to hunt and women to gather are chauvinists".
it is just an example how gender stuff infitrates siences like archeology and anthropology.
"It assumes that males are physically superior to females"
I hate how this is presented. I have vitamin deficency and i am really weak and lost a lot of weight, but i am still able to lift objects most women would not get of the ground. I weigh 64 kilos. that is not that much for a man.
this does not make me superior. it is just like it is.
I want to know how women like it to hunt while pregnant, having a baby on their hip, or small whiny children in tow.
give me a break. men evolved to hunters because the women told them to hunt.
they did not want to have them sit around and chew the fat with the children.
show me ONE women who says the she is worse than her husband in child rearing.
right, that will never ever happen. maybe if we have a drug addict or a severely cancer ridden person, but no.
women will die to have their children around. they will not go hunting if there is someone else that wants to do it.
but this is what I complain about. but yeah, i went over the rails, you are right. you have a point.
in that other thread, i mean, where the crosspost is, they talked a lot about patriarchy and stuff.
and i wondered: if women in the past were hunting and thus using their skill like men do and yada yada, not gender roles like today and stuff, does that mean that there was no patriarchy back then?
and i wondered: if women in the past were hunting and thus using their skill like men do and yada yada, not gender roles like today and stuff, does that mean that there was no patriarchy back then?
But you asked exactly that - and I gave you examples of women that "were hunting and thus using their skill" and there was no patriarchy in some of those systems - even into the present.
Also - let's be real - most men nowadays who talk about "men hunting" are fat slobs who couldn't hunt a chicken with a limp ;)
No, i asked for the past. ancient times.
most men nowadays who talk about “men hunting” are fat slobs who couldn’t hunt a chicken with a limp ;)
thats sounds like anectdotal evidence 
What's the best way to mount hard drives so that all users can access them at all times? Mint 22
Update: I managed to get it working with the answers from @Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me and this link:
zdnet.com/article/how-to-perma…
I've just installed Mint 22 on my laptop, and I've got two storage drives alongside my main drive. I want these drives to be available to all users on boot, and to be readable and writable. At the moment they're treated as removable drives, and are mounted under the individual user. As a result, any permissions that I'm setting as the owner are not sticking when they're mounted by another user.
The first drive is synced with my main PC through Syncthing, and is synced to Onedrive from there. The second drive is my music, podcasts, and audiobooks, which are all synced through Syncthing only. I'm the only person using the laptop and accessing any of these files, so I'm not bothered about the wrong user accidentally opening them.
I've read some posts about editing fstab to mount them at startup, but they don't cover whether the drives will be available to other users or not. Can I just add them to fstab and mount them somewhere that's available to all users, then sort out the permissions? If so, where's the best place to put them?
Thanks in advance :)
reshared this
Tech Cyborg reshared this.
I've read some posts about editing fstab to mount them at startup, but they don't cover whether the drives will be available to other users or not. Can I just add them to fstab and mount them somewhere that's available to all users, then sort out the permissions? If so, where's the best place to put them?
Yes pretty much. It just explicitly tells the system where to mount it, and for some filesystems you can even force the UID/GID and modes.
Usually /mnt/whatever for static mounts and /media/whatever for removable mounts (those appear as drives in file managers, whereas /mnt doesn't). You can set the users option in fstab and it'll let users mount and unmount it without sudo as well, or auto to always mount it on boot.
From there usually you can make a shared group, chown the mount to root:thatgroup, then chmod g+s to make sure the group is inherited. And you should mostly be good to go.
That's brilliant, thank you :)
Usually/mnt/whateverfor static mounts and/media/whateverfor removable mounts (those appear as drives in file managers, whereas /mnt doesn't).
Just to check, if I mount the drives under /media, will that still treat them as removable, or will they appear as permanent drives?
users in the option it shouldn't be unmountable.
Thanks for replying :)
I managed to get it working with the answers from @Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me and this link:
zdnet.com/article/how-to-perma…
I must have been testing it when you answered :)
i'm pretty excited for fedify since i'm unsure if there has been any other activitypub abstraction that feels as comprehensive as it seems right now (from a brief skim, anyway).
one thing i had in mind ever since i first skimmed the docs some time ago is this:
federation.setActorDispatcher("/users/{handle}", async (ctx, handle) => {i would really recommend you to NOT tell people to use handles here. i assume this is just naming and the framework doesn't actually require a handle there, but documentation matters and if you follow on the footsteps of mastodon, pleroma, lemmy, and friends everyone who follows your docs will lose the ability to change usernames down the line without more pain than it's worth (and yes, there are software out there that allow it right now! please do not build fedi software assuming usernames are immutable jsut because mastodon doesn't let people do it)
just like how you wouldn't use a natural key in a database, you should tell people to use a surrogate key like an autoincrement id or a uuid on the actor IDs, as they're effectively permanent. while it may be probably fine for a quickstart thing like this to omit that, a lot of permanent codebases do start up by following these kinds of guides, and nudging people to do the correct thing when it's not that hard is always a good idea IMO
In the next version of #Fedify, it will allow you to decouple actor URIs from WebFinger usernames with the mapHandle() method. For example, you can use UUIDs for actor URIs but let users use their own username of choice for their fediverse handle.
Linutil is a distro-agnostic toolbox designed to simplify everyday Linux tasks.
GitHub - ChrisTitusTech/linutil: Chris Titus Tech's Linux Toolbox - Linutil is a distro-agnostic toolbox designed to simplify everyday Linux tasks.
Chris Titus Tech's Linux Toolbox - Linutil is a distro-agnostic toolbox designed to simplify everyday Linux tasks. - ChrisTitusTech/linutilGitHub
reshared this
Tech Cyborg reshared this.
Lets go through the summary and see if anything is wrong or misleading:
Linutil is a distro-agnostic toolbox designed to simplify everyday Linux tasks. It helps you set up applications and optimize your system for specific use cases. The utility is actively developed in Rust 🦀, providing performance and reliability.
- It is not distro agnostic. There is Arch and Fedora specific code, which are not separated into modules, but part of other scripts. Outside of the package manager, it also relies heavily on systemd.
- Installing "Diablo II Resurrected loot filters" is not an "everyday task". A lot of other scripts are similar, very specific, "one time use" things, not "everyday tasks".
- helps you set up applications, maybe, but only if you count running
sudo pacman -S networkmanageras "helping", even when it ignores existing network configuration. - "optimize your system for specific use cases", it does nothing of the sort. There's no kernel parameter tweaking, no other cpu scheduler, no IO options being changed, or anything remotely similar.
- "The utility is actively developed in Rust" except for the ~70% that is shell scripts. (according to GitHub)
- "Providing performance and reliability", which is not something that's determined by the programming language.
So lets revise the short description, to exclude any incorrect/misleading statements:
Linutil is a toolbox. The utility is actively developed.
Alongside all that, the "installation instructions" include the biggest sin of all:
curl -fsSL https://christitus.com/linux | sh
TL;DR Never trust Chris Titus, or any "Linux YouTuber", with your Linux machine. They do not know what the hell they're doing.
Titus is fairly trustable (he's made a few videos on the dangers of custom Windows ISOs like AtlasOS) but the thing is written in good chunks with AI assisted development and it's also the dude's Rust learning experience as well, so the code is not great. Parts of it are meant to run under ArchISO to install Arch (another sin, an automatic Arch installer) so it makes sense to want to just one-liner download and run the prebuilt binary.
I wouldn't use it personally but his audience is for it. It targets quick and easy, not proper and secure. It's mostly meant to easily install and clone his setup, it's too early in development to really be that useful for everyone.
On the winutil side he also does the | iex PowerShell sin, but the toolbox do be really useful to debloat a Windows install.
Titus is fairly trustable
Like winutil, which installs from one day to another Chocolatey without asking? No, thanks no.
Decentralized P2P Webapp
live app: chat.positive-intentions.com
im aiming to make it as secure as theoretically possible. for transparency, its an open source unminified webapp. id like the experience to be as close to possible to a regular chat app. there are known limitations with what is possible with p2p and webapps. my priority is privacy and security.
to keep this post brief, please take a look at this article. it has all the information and links. im not much of a writer, so feel free to reach out for clarity. i go into some details about the privacy and security aspects of the app in this lemmy post.
i dont think its ready to replace any app or service, but id love to get feedback on what you think would make it so you would use it more than once.
- github: positive-intentions/chat
- subreddit: r/positive_intentions
GitHub - positive-intentions/chat: Decentralized chat
Decentralized chat. Contribute to positive-intentions/chat development by creating an account on GitHub.GitHub
reshared this
Tech Cyborg reshared this.
blockchain warning.
also requires a TURN server (not provided, no good free ones exist, no easy interface to configure your own) if you are behind CG or symmetric NAT like many people in the world.
Porting systemd to musl libc-powered Linux
I have completed an initial new port of systemd to musl. This patch set does not share much in common with the existing OpenEmbedded patchset. I wanted to make a fully updated patch series targeting more current releases of systemd and musl, taking advantage of the latest features and updates in both. I also took a focus on writing patches that could be sent for consideration of inclusion upstream.The final result is a system that appears to be surprisingly reliable considering the newness of the port, and very fast to boot.
...
And that is how I became the first person alive to see systemd passing its entire test suite on a big-endian 64-bit PowerPC musl libc system.
...
While the system works really well, and boots in 1/3rd the time of OpenRC on the same system, it isn’t ready for prime time just yet.
...
There aren’t any service unit files written or packaged yet, other than OpenSSH and utmps. We are working with our sponsor on an effort to add -systemd split packages to any of the packages with -openrc splits. We should be able to rely on upstream units where present, and lean on Gentoo and Fedora’s systemd experts to have good base files to reference when needed. I’ve already landed support for this in abuild.
This work is part of Adélie Linux
Porting systemd to musl libc-powered Linux
I have completed an initial new port of systemd to musl. This patch set does not share much in common with the existing OpenEmbedded patchset. I wanted to make a fully updated patch series targetin…The Cat Fox Life
like this
Badabinski and luana like this.
For all the cases where musk might have advantages.
reddit.com/r/voidlinux/comment…
I like that musl helps build smaller containers. And sometimes I need systemd in a container.
Sickday likes this.
like this
Virkkunen likes this.
If I need systemd for a specific use, like testing systemd services
So you're hoping to test systemd in this theoretical test environment, but your prod isn't built like this? Tell us why you're ignoring the first rule of testing and deploying internal software?
My understanding is that it boots faster.
I tested this with EL6 and EL7. There was no discernible difference. It was all theories and brochureware.
Systemd is here to stay and if anything it will only spread into more and more places as can be seen with projects like this.
I would say "finally", but I've given up already.
I don't see systems booting with systemd in any near future of any dimension. Instead I now run "terribly slow" OpenRC on my systems. Poor me.
Instead I now run “terribly slow” OpenRC on my systems.
I suspect you're entirely free of init problems where you raise your fists to the heavens and ask WHAT ARE YOU DOING as if it'll tell you why systemd is on holiday now.
Ghost Writers UK | MyAssignmentHelp
Looking to ace your assignments? MyAssignmentHelp is here to provide you with top-tier writing support, featuring our talented team of ghost writers UK. At MyAssignmentHelp, we understand that academic success hinges on high-quality, well-researched assignments. That’s why our ghost writers UK are dedicated to crafting compelling and original content tailored to your specific needs.
Our assignment writing service is designed to cover a wide range of academic requirements. From in-depth research papers to persuasive essays and comprehensive dissertations, our ghost writers UK bring a wealth of experience and expertise to every project. We ensure that each assignment is thoroughly researched, impeccably written, and delivered on time, helping you stay on track with your academic goals.
With MyAssignmentHelp, you benefit from the skills of our professional ghost writers UK who are committed to producing work that meets the highest standards of quality. We prioritize your academic success and offer personalized support to address your unique needs. Whether you’re facing tight deadlines or complex topics, our team is here to help you achieve the results you’re looking for.
Elevate your academic performance and relieve the stress of assignment deadlines with MyAssignmentHelp. Our ghost writers UK are ready to assist you with expert writing services that will make a difference in your grades and overall academic experience.
reshared this
Tech Cyborg reshared this.
Vänstermedier deltar i oseriös hets. Borgarmedia, högertroll, högerpolitiker, nazister, högerextremister, borgerliga ledarskribenter med flera hetsar på bred front mot vänstern. Vänsterpartiet och många vänsterpartister.
happy 10th birthday, ActivityPub! 🎉🎉
cross-posted from: hexbear.net/post/3384817
link that was attached to original post (1st ever ActivityPub), original post is linked in this post
The obvious choice for ActivityPub’s birthday would be the 23rd of January 2018 - the day it was annointed as a W3C recommendation. That doesn’t seem quite right though - its not as if the spec came into existence in any sense upon that date. In fact, Mastodon implemented it before thne.There are several possible dates you might pick, but for me it will always be September 5th 2014 - when I committed the first sketch of a specification I called ActivityPump [github.com] and pushed it to Github
It wouldn’t be until November that I actually submitted (a revised and enhanced version of) that draft to the working group, but even then I had the very nucleus of the specification written down.
Happy 10th birthday, ActivityPub. 🍰
like this
melroy likes this.
?
tal för grov utpressning och grova bokföringsbrott. ?
klagare vid ?
klagarmyndigheten och Ekobrottsmyndigheten har väckt åtal i ett ärende som handlar om försök till grov utpressning, grov mordbrand, grovt ocker, osant intygande, olaga tvång, grov utpressning, övergrepp i rättssak, folkbokföringsbrott och grova bokföringsbrott.
Fediversum i Sverige - Svenssons Nyheter
GE-Proton9-13 Released
Hotfix:
- Update vkd3d-proton to latest git to include World of Warcraft MSAA fix
proton:
- wine updated to latest bleeding edge
- dxvk updated to latest git
-proton upstream fixes added
Additional:
- protonfixes updated to latest git
NASA discovers Earth's electrical field at last after 60-year search
A long-sought invisible force wrapped around Earth has been detected more than half a century after it was first hypothesized.
The field, dubbed the "polar wind," explains how Earth's atmosphere escapes easily and rapidly above the north and south poles, and may have played a role in shaping our planet's thin upper atmosphere.
Edit: ELECTRICAL field sorry
A long-sought invisible force wrapped around Earth has been detected more than half a century after it was first hypothesized.
99% chance I'm being an idiot here, but, compass?
"The discussion continued for quite a while without making much headway."
I think Debian is interesting, being such a large project of collaboration. I want this democratic, volunteer, non-corporate backed, free project to show that 10000 eyes make bugs shallow. I wish this model produced new ways of doing things, bringing people together in the spirit of creativity and playful productivity.
I've used Debian in different ways for around 15 years now, and I really want it to succeed.
Having said that, there is a "but..." looming in the back of my mind. But... it's difficult to ignore that other distributions are the ones pushing Linux forward. The innovation from Fedora and the distributions still called OpenSuse explore new areas which become the standards.
This is not criticism of Debian, I just wonder if we humans are capable of collaborating freely at that level without some top-down force directing work forward, or if we are bound to being one step behind, always trying to catch up to what others have already done?
I'm glad to see were rediscovering what we lost in 2002 when we laid off all our mentors and experts after y2k.
Reproducible builds require complete and consistent validation. The deb format lacks this ability.
BrowserPub: A browser for debugging ActivityPub and the ⁂fediverse
👀 BrowserPub: A browser for exploring #ActivityPub and the ⁂fediverseBrowserPub · A browser for debugging ActivityPub and the fediverse
Explore the open social web through the lens of ActivityPub and the fediverse.browser.pub
Help a noob with jellyfin on Ubuntu server
I'm have some trouble on how to get Jellyfin running on Ubuntu server. I'm Very new to using Linux with the command line so please be patient with me.
i have tried to Duck(duckgo) a solution but i cant find anything that works for me.
If you need some kind of logs please tell me how to get them!
// A very lost linux noob
like this
Oofnik likes this.
How did you install jellyfin?
It should not core-dump (read: hard crash, something has gone terribly wrong), at best you should get a configuration error and errors like that.
You can see the logs of any systemd service/unit with this: journalctl -u <name of sevice> so in this case journalctl -u jellyfin (Tip: add -f to follow the output of a running service - useful for monitoring).
Note that some programs log to their own files (and not to stdout) so if the above command comes out empty you should look into /var/log/ directory.
I'm guessing you installed from Flatpak and it doesn't have the permissions to touch what it needs to outside of the sandbox.
Install plainly, or run a container with the proper permissions.
I haven't run Jellyfin outside of docker in ages, but looks like you have at least one set of conflicting tags in your exec section of that service file you posted (web something or other I can't see on mobile once starting this reply - you have a flat setting it and a flag disabling it).
Edit - also do you actually have something set for that list of variables in your exec?
I see other commenters saying you should use docker. And I agree. If you are set on doing this without learning docker, feel free to ignore this comment.
Otherwise, I would argue that learning docker and docker compose is a good investment for your linux learning. The TL;DR of docker is that it is a way to run software like jellyfin, which is prone to issues like you are currently seeing when running on "bare metal" (here defined as simply: not running in docker), in an environment created specifically for that software.
Docker makes it so other (usually really knowledgeable) people can set up a server that runs some software properly. It has all the files in the right place, any recurring jobs happening, all the permissions set up, etc. And then, they create a snapshot of that server and put it in a docker image. That image is publicly distributed and others (like you and me) can take that image to start a container. The terms are not super intuitive. But an image can be thought of as a "snapshot" of a specific computer at a specific time; it is usually set up to run a specific task. And a container is an actually running instance built off one of those snapshots.
To tie this into your use case, the idea is that you use docker to take a popular and robust jellyfin image and use docker to create a container that's running jellyfin smooth as silk for you to use. Docker is popular amongst the self-hosting community because containers don't tend to run into issues like you see above. Docker and/or the image itself control what environment variables they receive, what other software might be running with them, and a whole host of other headaches that come with running the service "bare metal."
Some comments mention Docker Compose. This can be thought of as an extension to docker functionality. To run a container in docker, you'll run a command like docker run -d <a whole goddamn host of arguments> lscr.io/linuxserver/jellyfin:latest where lscr.io/linuxserver/jellyfin is the image you want to use and latest is the tag (which is essentially the image's version except that some tags, like latest, change what they point to). This is totally fine and will work. But it's hard to make updates. The "whole goddamn host of arguments" will have important information about how your host server interacts with the container. It'll specify things like what ports from your host are forwarded to the container, what files from within the container persist after it has been stopped, and what environment variables the container runs with. With "base" docker, you need to run a command like this to bring up a container, which can get hugely cumbersome if you'rr maintaining a lot of services in containers or are trying to experiment with different container arguments. Docker Compose is a way to specify containers you want to bring up in a YAML file so that you don't need to type out or remember each service's command every time. I would strongly recommend using Docker Compose as well.
So, I'd recommend taking the time to install Docker and Docker Compose. And then the little extra learning curve to use them to run jellyfin in a container. It will take more time now, but save you time in the long run. You will know you have installed docker and docker compose correctly if you can run the command docker --version and see your version information and docker compose version and similarly see version information.
Appendix:
- Install Docker - I believe this installation comes with compose too, but it's been a while.
- LSCR Jellyfin Image - I would recommend this image over the official jellyfin one; it's easier to set up. It's the one I use.
My last note: we all started as noobs. I give this advice because it is the advice I would give my earlier self. I believe that the time investment in this now will save you a lot of pain both in avoiding the debugging now and in avoiding this debugging in future. Please feel free to reach out if you have questions.
For possibly more information on why the core is dumping (lol) try running jellyfin from the cli (probably just typing the path to the jellyfin executable and pressing enter)
If nothing interesting is printed, try adding strace before the jellyfin executable (Google strace, it intercepts all system calls and logs them) if that doesn't work tell strace to follow forks.
Other than that you could start using binary debugging tools to see what shared libraries jellyfin is looking for? Maybe run it in gdb...
What the fuck is up with all these docker comments?
Check your binaries, might not be the right ones for your platform/ubuntu version
I need to see the logs in order to help you.
I personally moved to containers as they are easier to maintain and update
We're going to need to know as a minimum:
- Linux distribution and version
- Jellyfin install method and version
- what you have already tried- not sure where all those flags are coming from
I would also support the comments here recommending that you use docker. There's only a small number of Linux distributions and versions where a distribution package installation of jellyfin is fully supported, but even then what you need to do varies across each one. All Linux distributions and versions support docker and the process is essentially the same for all of them.
Dave
in reply to Wilshire • • •like this
PokyDokie likes this.
Markaos
in reply to Dave • • •Dave
in reply to Markaos • • •ALQ
in reply to Markaos • • •osaerisxero
in reply to ALQ • • •The Pantser
in reply to osaerisxero • • •variants
in reply to osaerisxero • • •EldritchFemininity
in reply to variants • • •It's Doritos all the way down?
Always has been.
synae[he/him]
in reply to osaerisxero • • •NegativeInf
in reply to ALQ • • •like this
osaerisxero likes this.
Whitebrow
in reply to NegativeInf • • •like this
osaerisxero likes this.
P00ptart
in reply to NegativeInf • • •Artyom
in reply to Markaos • • •jordanlund
in reply to Artyom • • •You won't attract the worm
Tippon
in reply to Markaos • • •Sabata
in reply to Markaos • • •Sabre363
in reply to Wilshire • • •like this
PokyDokie likes this.
Dark Arc
in reply to Sabre363 • • •like this
PokyDokie and Zier like this.
Feathercrown
in reply to Dark Arc • • •Erm technically that's the air pushing not the vacuum sucking 🤓
like this
ignirtoq likes this.
atomicorange
in reply to Feathercrown • • •RogueBanana
in reply to Feathercrown • • •fluxion
in reply to Sabre363 • • •NocturnalMorning
in reply to Sabre363 • • •somethingsnappy
in reply to NocturnalMorning • • •Hamartiogonic
in reply to NocturnalMorning • • •NocturnalMorning
in reply to Hamartiogonic • • •Durandal
in reply to Wilshire • • •NOT_RICK
in reply to Durandal • • •PostiveNoise
in reply to Wilshire • • •quixotic120
in reply to Wilshire • • •“massaging tartrazine solution into hairless mouse skin over the course of a few minutes or using microneedling achieves “complete optical transparency in the red region of the visible spectrum”
I know it didn’t happen this way but I like to believe it was someone having their unwashed dorito fingers after lunch, decided to massage a mouse for several minutes, and figuring this out
like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
catloaf
in reply to quixotic120 • • •like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
sudo
in reply to quixotic120 • • •holycrap
in reply to sudo • • •potoooooooo ✅️
in reply to holycrap • • •holycrap
in reply to potoooooooo ✅️ • • •datavoid
in reply to quixotic120 • • •nilloc
in reply to datavoid • • •Chozo
in reply to Wilshire • • •I feel like it's only a matter of time before this becomes a TikTok trend.
like this
PokyDokie and NoneOfUrBusiness like this.
Tinidril
in reply to Chozo • • •like this
PokyDokie, Zier and NoneOfUrBusiness like this.
jordanlund
in reply to Chozo • • •like this
Chozo likes this.
Dharma Curious (he/him)
in reply to jordanlund • • •jordanlund
in reply to Dharma Curious (he/him) • • •I'd think a fracture big enough to be a problem would be immediately apparent, but if it's just a hairline, this probably isn't clear enough to show it...
OTOH, if you're around Portland, I know a super good podiatrist.
Dharma Curious (he/him)
in reply to jordanlund • • •jordanlund
in reply to Dharma Curious (he/him) • • •realtor.com/apartments/Portlan…
It can be done! Keep in mind too, I bet our wages are higher than TN too + no sales tax.
potoooooooo ✅️
in reply to jordanlund • • •Dharma Curious (he/him)
in reply to jordanlund • • •Wtaf, how are the prices in Portland better than in my little hick town in Tennessee? Jeeze
Just looked it up, and I'll make almost exactly 3 more dollars an hour, too. Honestly, this is worth genuinely considering
Dharma Curious (he/him)
in reply to jordanlund • • •jordanlund
in reply to Dharma Curious (he/him) • • •Ocean is about an hour away to the west, OTOH there's a giant volcano an hour to the east.
Bonus, Portland has a dormant volcano inside city limits:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_…
Dharma Curious (he/him)
in reply to jordanlund • • •Maybe not falling into the ocean, but does the idea of earth quakes, like "the big one" ever freak you out? I'd imagine I'd get used to little ones pretty quick, but the society-collapsing earthquake built up in my brain is very scary! Lol
Also, contacted my work and asked about transferring out there. We might actually be doing this!
jordanlund
in reply to Dharma Curious (he/him) • • •PM me if you come out! I know a great podiatrist! We actually just saw him today!
Earthquakes are infrequent. I've felt a couple. More of a deal if you're at the coast because they have tsunami alarms. Feels like a big truck driving behind you.
Oh, and it's always "the coast", not "the beach". People don't really "go to the beach" like in California, LOL:
youtu.be/JU-_Sn2cDwI
Dharma Curious (he/him)
in reply to jordanlund • • •jordanlund
in reply to Dharma Curious (he/him) • • •It's way, way too cold most of the year.
There are also dangers like sneaker logs. I love the coast and visit it when I can, but when you're a kid growing up here they always teach you "Don't turn your back to the ocean" because it has no pity and can and will straight up kill you.
weather.gov/safety/ripcurrent-…
"The coastline of Northern California, Oregon and Washington State are steep, tree lined, and have cold to frigid water temperatures. These beaches are quite unlike the flat, broad beaches of Southern California with their inviting warm water temperatures. The steep slopes of the Northwest’s coastlines are much more likely to cause sneaker waves; the trees that line the cliffs can wind up in the swift ocean currents running along the shoreline; while the cold to frigid temperatures, depending on the season, can induce cold water paralysis for anyone caught in these northwestern ocean waters.
While in Southern California people at the
... show moreIt's way, way too cold most of the year.
There are also dangers like sneaker logs. I love the coast and visit it when I can, but when you're a kid growing up here they always teach you "Don't turn your back to the ocean" because it has no pity and can and will straight up kill you.
weather.gov/safety/ripcurrent-…
"The coastline of Northern California, Oregon and Washington State are steep, tree lined, and have cold to frigid water temperatures. These beaches are quite unlike the flat, broad beaches of Southern California with their inviting warm water temperatures. The steep slopes of the Northwest’s coastlines are much more likely to cause sneaker waves; the trees that line the cliffs can wind up in the swift ocean currents running along the shoreline; while the cold to frigid temperatures, depending on the season, can induce cold water paralysis for anyone caught in these northwestern ocean waters.
While in Southern California people at the beach are in bathing suits or light summer clothes wading and swimming in warm waters with open beaches, in contrast in the North they wear heavier clothes, coats, shoes, and boots due to the cooler temperatures and in autumn and winter those waters are frigid. Encounters with the waves in Southern California, with its warm water temperatures and broad beaches, might simply knock a person over on the beach, but in the North the cold water temperatures could induce cold water paralysis rendering the individual helpless to escape the pull of the receding wave returning to the ocean.
Always respect the ocean on the beaches of the North Coast of California, Oregon, Washington with their steep, rugged tree lined coasts, and frigid ocean temperatures."
Dharma Curious (he/him)
in reply to jordanlund • • •jordanlund
in reply to Dharma Curious (he/him) • • •Tons of rivers and lakes, but you still have to be careful. Generally folks are out on the first hot day of the year and forget the water is still 50°. LOL.
There's this place called "High Rocks" and every year people are like "Well, start the clock until the first drowning..."
oregonlive.com/clackamascounty…
Dharma Curious (he/him)
in reply to jordanlund • • •Smoogs
in reply to Dharma Curious (he/him) • • •Dharma Curious (he/him)
in reply to Smoogs • • •Smoogs
in reply to Dharma Curious (he/him) • • •Dharma Curious (he/him)
in reply to Smoogs • • •grue
in reply to Chozo • • •Chozo
in reply to grue • • •Things absorbed through the skin may be in a different state when they reach your bloodstream than things that are ingested. The process of digestion can break down a lot of things that would otherwise be harmful, but aren't similarly filtered when absorbed through the skin.
It's also why some medicines are taken by swallowing a pill, and some are taken by dissolving a tablet under your tongue.
like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
trolololol
in reply to Chozo • • •EldritchFemininity
in reply to trolololol • • •trolololol
in reply to EldritchFemininity • • •DempstersBox
in reply to trolololol • • •Ænima
in reply to EldritchFemininity • • •SturgiesYrFase
in reply to Ænima • • •Fondots
in reply to Ænima • • •Some glow in the dark chemicals are called phosphors, and while they're named after phosphorus, they usually do not contain any phosphorus, zinc sulfide for example. These are the kinds of things you might find on a watch face or stickers or whatever that need to absorb light from some other source first.
To make it even more confusing, phosphorus isn't actually phosphorescent, its glow is from chemiluminescence, the result of a chemical reaction.
And for what it's worth, stuff that glows under a black light is fluorescent.
I don't think phosphorus has ever been used for glowing tattoos, and if it was I'm pretty sure no one is still using it. We're well outside of my realm of expertise, but it should also be considered that how a chemical enters your body can make a difference in how toxic it is too, there's a whole lot of chemistry at work in your body, and ingesting something and absorbing it through digestion isn't necessarily going to have the same effect as absorbing it through your skin, there's a reason different medications have to be taken oral, allowed
... show moreSome glow in the dark chemicals are called phosphors, and while they're named after phosphorus, they usually do not contain any phosphorus, zinc sulfide for example. These are the kinds of things you might find on a watch face or stickers or whatever that need to absorb light from some other source first.
To make it even more confusing, phosphorus isn't actually phosphorescent, its glow is from chemiluminescence, the result of a chemical reaction.
And for what it's worth, stuff that glows under a black light is fluorescent.
I don't think phosphorus has ever been used for glowing tattoos, and if it was I'm pretty sure no one is still using it. We're well outside of my realm of expertise, but it should also be considered that how a chemical enters your body can make a difference in how toxic it is too, there's a whole lot of chemistry at work in your body, and ingesting something and absorbing it through digestion isn't necessarily going to have the same effect as absorbing it through your skin, there's a reason different medications have to be taken oral, allowed to dissolve under your tongue, given as a suppository, intravenously, intramuscularly, subdermally, etc. that said, I'm pretty sure phosphorus is bad no matter how you put it into someone's body.
TheLowestStone
in reply to EldritchFemininity • • •synae[he/him]
in reply to trolololol • • •MonkderVierte
in reply to grue • • •Smoogs
in reply to Chozo • • •eating Doritos with dorito dust all over fingers
Well….uh, ok?
it_depends_man
in reply to Chozo • • •Zier
in reply to Wilshire • • •Release the ghost mice!!!
restingboredface
in reply to Wilshire • • •So, I skimmed the article and may have missed it. Why is this anything more that tinkering with and (maybe torturing) mice? What's the actual scientific value here? (Assuming invisibility potion wasn't an actual goal)
Perhaps medical dyes for imaging?
Jimmycakes
in reply to restingboredface • • •Avicenna
in reply to restingboredface • • •Transparent mice with multiple butts
TheLowestStone
in reply to restingboredface • • •NatakuNox
in reply to Wilshire • • •JadenSmith
in reply to NatakuNox • • •Some of us can't be trusted with such power. I would personally use invisibility to switch items in people's coat pockets. Keys always in the left? Well now they're in the right pocket!
Total anarchy.
Buddahriffic
in reply to JadenSmith • • •JadenSmith
in reply to Buddahriffic • • •NatakuNox
in reply to JadenSmith • • •TheReturnOfPEB
in reply to NatakuNox • • •wait till you find out what redbull offers
the ultimate question: Flight or Invisibility ?
skulblaka
in reply to TheReturnOfPEB • • •Why not both?
I'll just pound redbulls and doritos until I become a ghost. Shouldn't take long, I'd expect.
njm1314
in reply to Wilshire • • •Aussiemandeus
in reply to njm1314 • • •njm1314
in reply to Aussiemandeus • • •bdot
in reply to njm1314 • • •perhaps it’s worded that way for legal reasons? maybe if they flat out said it was non-toxic, and then it turned out that they were wrong, someone could sue them.
i am sure it’s the same sort of idea behind posting a video of someone committing a crime on camera, they use the word “allegedly”
dunno; not a lawyer
tacosplease
in reply to njm1314 • • •Yellow 5 is super common (in the US) for things that go inside our bodies. Doritos, Mt Dew, probably Red Bull. When we were kids there was a rumor that it would shrink your dick haha.
Read the ingredients on stuff the next few days and take note of how often you see it. It's probably why they chose it as one of the test substances. It's relatively safe to eat.
What is unknown is how dangerous it is to absorb large amounts into someone's skin.
It's like the illegal weed vape pen issue years ago. People would cut the product with vitamin e to thicken it and also make more money. Vitamin E is safe for human consumption. Turns out its vapor is terrible for lungs. It's quite unsafe for that kind of consumption.
Pilterlisky
in reply to tacosplease • • •NoFuckingWaynado
in reply to Wilshire • • •sik0fewl
in reply to NoFuckingWaynado • • •Etterra
in reply to sik0fewl • • •WhatYouNeed
in reply to NoFuckingWaynado • • •leanleft
in reply to Wilshire • • •CombatWombat1212
in reply to Wilshire • • •