The IRS has 👍collected $1.3 billion from high-wealth tax dodgers since last fall,
the agency announced Friday, crediting ❇️spending that has ramped up collection enforcement through President Joe Biden’s signature climate, health care and tax package signed into law in 2022.

Treasury Secretary #Janet #Yellen and IRS Commissioner #Danny #Werfel traveled to Austin, Texas, to tour an IRS campus and
announce the latest milestone in tax collections as 🆘Republicans warn of big future budget cuts for the tax agency if they take over the White House and Congress.

Yellen said in a speech in Austin that in 2019, 🔥the top one percent of wealthy Americans owed more than one-fifth of all unpaid taxes, “leaving ordinary Americans to shoulder the burden.”

⭐️“To fix this, we’ve channeled IRS funding toward significant investments to combat tax evasion,” she said.
apnews.com/article/irs-treasur…

DATE: September 06, 2024 at 02:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------

TITLE: Republicans slower to adopt solar panels, but respond more strongly to financial benefits

URL: psypost.org/republicans-slower…

A new study has revealed that homeowners’ political affiliations are associated with their decision to install solar panels, but this effect tends to weaken when solar energy becomes more cost-effective. Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the research found that Democratic homeowners are about 1.45 times more likely to adopt solar energy than Republicans. However, Republicans appeared more sensitive to the financial benefits of solar energy as its economics improved.

Climate risk mitigation relies heavily on transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources, such as solar power. Yet political divisions in the country, particularly regarding environmental issues, have raised questions about whether political affiliations affect household energy choices. While surveys show that people across the political spectrum support clean energy, research suggests differences in how conservatives and liberals prioritize the economic versus environmental benefits of renewable energy.

This study set out to directly examine the connection between homeowners’ political affiliations and their decisions to install residential solar panels, addressing the need for more comprehensive data on how political identity influences real-world energy choices.

To conduct the study, researchers analyzed a decade’s worth of data on solar panel installations in New York State, from 2010 to 2020. They linked three large datasets: records of solar incentive program participation, county property assessment data, and the New York State voter registration file. This allowed them to track solar installations at the household level while also considering the political affiliations of homeowners. The final dataset included information on 62,972 solar installations out of more than 5.5 million households.

The researchers compared households that adopted solar panels with neighboring homes that did not, creating a control group. This approach allowed them to examine the role of political affiliation in solar adoption while controlling for variables like property size, market value, and other household characteristics. They also analyzed how economic factors, such as electricity rates and the availability of financing options like solar leases, influenced adoption decisions.

The study found a clear partisan gap in solar adoption. Democratic homeowners were the most likely to install solar panels, followed by independents and unaffiliated voters. Republican homeowners had the lowest rate of solar adoption. Despite this, Republicans showed a greater responsiveness to economic factors, such as rising electricity costs and the availability of financing options. When electricity rates increased, Republicans were more likely than Democrats to adopt solar panels, suggesting that the financial appeal of solar can reduce the partisan gap.

The research also revealed that while Democrats were more likely to install solar panels overall, Republicans tended to adopt more cost-effective systems. Republican homeowners were more likely to take advantage of third-party ownership models, such as leases or power purchase agreements, which require less upfront investment. These financing options seemed particularly attractive to Republicans when solar system costs were high.

Interestingly, while Democrats appeared motivated by the environmental benefits of solar energy, Republicans seemed to prioritize its financial advantages. This was reflected in the fact that solar installations by Republican homeowners tended to have higher long-term economic value, or net present value (NPV), compared to those installed by Democrats.

While the study offers insights into how political identity influences solar adoption, it has some limitations. The research was conducted in a single state, New York, which may not represent the national context. New York has relatively high electricity rates and generous solar incentives, factors that may not apply equally across other states. The study also relied on observational data, meaning that the researchers could not definitively establish causal relationships between political affiliation and solar adoption.

Despite these limitations, the study provides a strong foundation for understanding how political identity interacts with economic factors to shape energy behavior. It also underscores the importance of making solar energy more financially accessible, as improving the economics of solar could help close the partisan gap and increase overall adoption.

“The study carries important implications for strategies aimed at accelerating residential [solar] deployment. Bridging the partisan gap in [solar power] adoption is important for at least two reasons. First, underadoption by Republican homeowners would significantly limit residential [solar]’s potential to mitigate [greenhouse gas] emissions. Republicans own homes at higher rates than Democrats,” the researchers wrote. “In New York, despite being outnumbered by Democrats in the voter file by a factor of 2.1 to 1, Republicans own nearly as many homes (0.9 for constitute a potentially important political constituency that has an interest in policies and regulations that favor distributed solar and electrification and could therefore help to ‘lock-in’ a decarbonization policy trajectory.”

The study, “Party affiliation predicts homeowners’ decisions to install solar PV, but partisan gap wanes with improved economics of solar,” was authored by Fedor A. Dokshin and Mircea Gherghina.

URL: psypost.org/republicans-slower…

-------------------------------------------------

Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot

Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: nationalpsychologist.com

EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: subscribe-article-digests.clin…

READ ONLINE: read-the-rss-mega-archive.clin…

It's primitive... but it works... mostly...

-------------------------------------------------

#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist