Time Light Attachment

Here's some #irc chat for you. I hope you're day is full of passion, craft, and/or long-term discovery!

Ahoy!
phew, what a #meditation…typing less since #sleeper waiting in perfect circles in the same room.
just meditated–phor a long time!
and as i rose my energy to the heart #chakra, some things became clear to me…
first, i had to let go of attachments–which is easier done than left…
well 0th i had to get my whole efforts going, which have become golden flower and om.
on the topic of #mantra, i believe one mechanism of healing became clear…
the frequency will resonate the body, and the overhang will activate harmonics…
and as long as this keeps going, the harmonics will fill in the gaps of inflamed or cellular-expressions of inflamation.
so that was 0, and after 1 (heart) i moved up and tried to bring awareness to the throat chakra…
here comes another big one…
the big attachment was to a person, and upon revoking the energy-line to her channel (which just means I stopped calling her psychic (in ‘my’ #psyche--‘my’ for the (impossible) individual instance of a timelight energy body) form.
(timelight replacing spacetime–in my current attempt :) #kozyrev
…readers–if you haven’t noticed, GR failed, maybe it’s the spacetime ;))
back to the Work!
so having left calling the big #attachment--which doesn’t mean the attachment is gone, just that I left it in this span of time…
having done that, and reaching the #throat, others welled up in my #heart!
And the great thing was to see how these drew my voice in–
often i’ve noticed how desires draw my head and neck forward–and there’s also some movement there in distaste, disgust, ill-will etc…
but here the interesting thing to note was how all attachments saught their immediate translation in neck-space…
the chakras describe waterwheels flowing energy on a river, except the flow of the wheels in one direction also effects the rest of the flow–extremely dynamic!
Actually, the most beneficial thing to do for me is to focus on #anahata chakra–the unstruck-tone chakra at the level of the heart.
because that which is unstruck can still resonate!
so this is maybe the half of the iceberg, and then i’m doing k-yog!
now I did some other secret secret chakra energy motion–however what i want to focus on are 2 parts of the detachment process.
ok before that, I might want to talk about 2 contexts: localized and decentral. If I have a tobacco addiction, then there’s the platforms for entanglement which I should avoid…local instances of attachment.
Then there’s clusters of activity which cause me to want, desire, and return to attachments in general and/or contingent upon a psychological category like the attainment)samskara(self-hate–here the two sides of the hyperbol pull it wider to fit more attachments.
The Ur-attachments (as an example) as attainment and self-hate, where the right follows from the left…and yet self-generates now that the program is up and running.
so this is a working definition for samskara.
he writes–falling back into social media!
so now that we have local and general contexts to isolate attachments…
we can talk about 2 helpful parts, not neglecting the ever-present 3rd case, where the parting itself is causing the parts-paradigm…
and the alternative of non-action decauses the parts-paradigm…
how much decausing we experience in quantum physics…as an aside…
is not necessarily a localized truth about all parts or things!
causation happening one way and along that way part-paradigming itself into existence–parts for causes and for sensation thereof…
however there is antimatter, and backwards causation–and we need to look for paradigms to localize instances of them.
So I recommend seeing the quantum paradigm as a relation of force between the past and present, and the future and contempus–the contemplative, resonant, non-parts paradigm stretching from everywhere all at once to this now…
to the degree that the space its forming is “timeless”, non-doing, wu-wei, or in causation language “non-attached”!
it’s :)
ok gotta finish up!
so part 1 of a 3 part model, where the 3rd is #partlessness (and won’t be further discussed!)…
the practical!
here we could just list things that cause suffering, and things that cause attachment, hinderance, or inertia, and let them go one by one…
easier if you have a Being-Cause…as I hope you do!
and the 2nd part are the afflictions…
God has none of these, and that’s why we pray to Him!
The empty set are to sets as #God is to pure forms–necessary completion…in the latter I would go so far as to label the #Theologism “necessary completion”
And alternative theologism would be “logical necessity.”
in any case, attachments are another word for thought–especially in the 1st sense.
Thoughtlessness is a great state for resonating the meta-level knowledge into existence, but to return to part 1…
attachments and thoughts are quite inseparable–unless we’re talking about actively thinking (which will be influenced by attachments anyway), every attachment implies a range of thoughts…and every thought a range of attachments.
So now we’re talking about a relation on TxT thoughtspace–where the integer partitions are thoughts we know, and the integer indexed logion (as an djective “reasonal”) are the component parts of our thinking “attachments”.
We can follow our thoughts and re-assess our whole soul in terms of what we know, painting each step so that markers remind us of the reasons.
It’s obviously a little different, because the painting process itself can become a step–but I intentionally don’t paint this, or I use a different color…because a pitfall of control is to not acknowledge its detriments.
And that brings us to samskara as an experience (see above for the context).
If we know we are in a pattern of activity that is an exclusive disjunction of our harmonious #values and those which lead us astray.
The space in-between is either where our virtues go to die, or the spot to paint…
the place to build a staircase using your own best qualities…
one step after another, until the disjunction is a labeled samskara context, the first step lies on the disjunction and the stimulating factors which caused it are contained in a subset and tucked away…
we can differentiate a finite curve precisely because it exists with a beginning and an end–this method proposes feeling the trajectory of improvement and recalling, by name and by need only, the pitfall of failure.
To get there, from the outset, the attainment)(self-hate samskara must be addressed.
It fails itself by setting too high standards or expectations…
My proposed antidote is accepting small gains and refusing expectations: we connect with the future via the present, and that means using their presents now and leaving their waters undisturbed.
Now finally I see A benefit of the masculine generalization #gender, and why I had to put so much work into a construction of the feminine gender paradigm as a #systems-theory marker (the female “person”, the male “man”)…not that my approach is necessarily right…
but one might ask, why not just do it like the Turkish and Persians do?
and so many others without gender, where one is one?
And my answer, as someone who invents language, is so that we can refer to time in the plural.
another aside passed…yes, we don’t want to muddy their waters!
with thoughts and expectations…but rather receive the best knowledge by doing the least wrong now.
so while sitting, I was imagining all the joints that await my place of business…
And kept sitting :)
I saw all the people I would be talking with…and saw myself sitting.
My mirror is clearing, God willing I will clear up my life with it.
./temple_bow

PS: I do not mean to say my way of gender is right and another's is wrong. I just adapted language to fit existing structures Those are the hiding feminine gender behind "persona," and the pretty commonly (ab-)used masculine abstract. Both seemed ergonomic for my deeper language purposes,
Feminine: to locally organize society quickly by way of known persons referred to as "she"
Masculine: to add a masculine unknown (not "he or she", but "he"). The insight here is to understand the concept of a mind in the abstract. I refer you to the known doublet of "mind" and (man. Thus I have made it an honor to be referred to as a "she", unless your person is criminal for the referee; and I have made it an honorable sacrifice for all men to have the abstract reference--our little offering for a lifetime ex utero!

They being they, I add time now and sense what it brings later--#language must be spokes.