@publicvoit Well, I did flirt around with Vi and Pico, but settled for Emacs pretty fast. Also, Emacs was "strongly" encouraged on my first job (1999), those key-bindings have been a second nature since.
From the Pine FAQ: "Pine's message composition editor is also available as a separate stand-alone program, called PICO. PICO is a very simple and easy-to-use text editor offering paragraph justification, cut/paste, and a spelling checker..."
@tartley @finner @ike I previously posted an analysis of my Neovim plugins. I had 34 and all but about 4 were replaced by the out of the box #HelixEditor functionality.
Itās not that I want extreme or exotic configuration, but that expectations have been raised for whatās considered basic functionality. Fuzzy finders, LSP language enabled, git integration all seem like things that shouldnāt require plugins now.
@ike I've been using #NeoVim for a while now. And honestly the learning curve to configure all the plugins really is a bit much. While I have a nice config I've been using for a while now, I've been tempted by some newer simpler editors like #HelixEditor. I've been peeking at that one lately. Looks like it might be a bit similar to Amp that you mention. I'll have to give that a look.
Marius Bogdan Ursan
in reply to It's FOSS • • •It's FOSS
in reply to Marius Bogdan Ursan • • •Stefan
in reply to It's FOSS • • •0xKaishakunin
in reply to It's FOSS • • •The current editor war is #vim vs #nvi
Ivo Limmen
in reply to It's FOSS • • •miquerinus.
in reply to It's FOSS • • •jordan
in reply to It's FOSS • • •It's FOSS
Unknown parent • • •Pat āØ
in reply to It's FOSS • • •wolfytuga
in reply to It's FOSS • • •pico/nano, vi/vim at command line.
Geany, Gedit, Kwrite/Kate, Leafpad, Mousepad when in graphical mode!
I mostly work with the tools I've at that moment.
Zabuxx
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Karl Voit
in reply to Zabuxx • • •Zabuxx
in reply to Karl Voit • • •Karl Voit
in reply to Zabuxx • • •My Personal Emacs History
public voit - Web-page of Karl VoitZabuxx
in reply to Karl Voit • • •Karl Voit
in reply to Zabuxx • • •@Zabuzzman š¤ Hm, possible.
From en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_%28ā¦ and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe%27s_ā¦ I can not tell.
The first mentions:
"its message editor inspired the text editor Pico." ... which would indicate that Pico is not the editor of Pine.
console screen editor
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Zabuxx
in reply to Karl Voit • • •@publicvoit en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pico_(teā¦
From the Pine FAQ: "Pine's message composition editor is also available as a separate stand-alone program, called PICO. PICO is a very simple and easy-to-use text editor offering paragraph justification, cut/paste, and a spelling checker..."
text editor for Unix and Unix-based computer systems
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Joachim Wiberg
in reply to Karl Voit • • •Dusty Dean
in reply to It's FOSS • • •eot
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Lance Borden
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Inaction Figure
in reply to It's FOSS • • •nfilipes
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Frottier
in reply to It's FOSS • • •edison23
in reply to It's FOSS • • •If I need to edit in terminal, like writing emails or something, then vim.
MikiStrange
in reply to It's FOSS • • •NE definitely needs more love round here. šš
Facundo Sanguinetti
in reply to It's FOSS • • •not a martian, honest
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Joachim Wiberg
in reply to It's FOSS • • •#Emacs since almost 30 yearās now. I even maintain my own fork of Mg #MicroEmacs š¤
github.com/troglobit/mg
GitHub - troglobit/mg: Micro (GNU) Emacs-like text editor ā¤ļø public-domain
GitHubelgregor
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Achmadi
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Melker Ulander
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Engliz
in reply to It's FOSS • • •wwarner
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Jonathan Hartley's old account
Unknown parent • • •Mark Stosberg
in reply to Jonathan Hartley's old account • • •@tartley @finner @ike I previously posted an analysis of my Neovim plugins. I had 34 and all but about 4 were replaced by the out of the box #HelixEditor functionality.
Itās not that I want extreme or exotic configuration, but that expectations have been raised for whatās considered basic functionality. Fuzzy finders, LSP language enabled, git integration all seem like things that shouldnāt require plugins now.
SPāCED GOāT
Unknown parent • • •I've been using #NeoVim for a while now. And honestly the learning curve to configure all the plugins really is a bit much. While I have a nice config I've been using for a while now, I've been tempted by some newer simpler editors like #HelixEditor. I've been peeking at that one lately. Looks like it might be a bit similar to Amp that you mention. I'll have to give that a look.
Mark Stosberg
in reply to SPāCED GOāT • • •