Skip to main content


Trump pardons Silk Road dark web market creator Ross Ulbricht


in reply to mount_snowden

Don't be fooled - Trump cut a deal with the Libertarian Party promising he would do this if he won the election. It seems that yet again, he can conceive of no morality greater than transactionalism.
in reply to mount_snowden

How does that fool people? It sounds like you're scared that some people may consider his pardon to be semi-good & it bothers you that he might be capable of some good too?
in reply to John Richard

They can't think like that. Trump has to be hated so he can only do bad things.
in reply to mount_snowden

But he won the election, why does he have to keep his word to the libertarian party? What are they gonna do if he doesn’t follow through?
in reply to mount_snowden

Compromising with voters? What a violation of politician ethics. Democrats would never to that
in reply to geneva_convenience

Democrats: My way or the highway! Fall in line and support what we tell you to. This is how you're supposed to feel about these issues.

Trump: Lets make a deal. You vote for me and I'll do XYZ for you.

in reply to mount_snowden

I have to say… even with the Elon influence, I didn’t see that one coming. Ulbricht stole capital from the rich and enabled stuff including human trafficking considered evil by the religious right. But I guess he also stuck it to The Man, for which he is being rewarded.
in reply to Em Adespoton

Human trafficking is considered evil by everyone unless you're a pedo/psychopath
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to John Richard

now we know why he was pardoned
in reply to Em Adespoton

Did he human traffic? From what I read years ago he didn't allow CP, fake passports, or other things he deemed "unethical", broad statement I know
in reply to stink

He did not. This is misinformation. He also didn't sell drugs, other than maybe some mushrooms in the very first days
in reply to Em Adespoton

He's also partially responsible for why cryptocurrency has any worth at all.
in reply to Em Adespoton

Human trafficking was not allowed. Not even CCs were allowed. Silk road didn't let you sell anything that harmed others.

Also, how did Ulbricht steal from the rich?!?

in reply to jagged_circle

If anything he made it easier for the rich to wash their money and buy ketamine
in reply to ghost_of_faso3

The site operated on bitcoin. How did it help people wash money?!? Bitcoin is more easily traced than cash. Its a public ledger
in reply to jagged_circle

And it was still quite literally used by 10,000's of vendors to sell illegal drugs?

I dont think it would have even been a thing if it was as easy as you suggest to catch people selling drugs on it. Sure, with enough resources, a dedicated law enforcement team can likely bust a drug dealer using BTC; but like with most things involving drugs and Neo-liberalism, the prisons are all full, the police are underfunded and can only occasionally make token arrests and the people who arent low hanging fruit get in and out without any interaction with the police.

in reply to ghost_of_faso3

the prisons are all full, the police are underfunded


No way you actually think this is reality. No way enforcement could just be a deeply inefficient way of dealing with crime and the low hanging fruit along with making a show of token arrests is really all they care about.

No lol the country with the largest prison population, that generates private profit by holding its people captive and hands out billions of dollars to police, the DEA and the FBI to capture them, well it just needs to hand out even more billions of dollars of "resources" to these agencies so they can lock up the real criminals and then crime will be properly dealt with!

in reply to meowMix2525

in reply to Em Adespoton

Human trafficking? Stealing from the rich?
He pioneered an online marketplace for drugs and also tried to have people assassinated (allegedly)
in reply to mount_snowden

Have any other good pardons come through?
in reply to jagged_circle

Probably one of the best pardons to come out of Biden, TBH.
in reply to jagged_circle

Yes, I was also very happily surprised to hear that. There's just so much more coverage about all the cynical pardons. I'm hoping there were more truly deserving pardons than just these two. I know Biden did something for non-violent drug offenders, but I think I heard that a bunch of those people were already out.
in reply to mount_snowden

Fuck it. I’m gonna rob a bank, give Trump half, and get pardoned.
in reply to mount_snowden

Keep in mind that a big part of why Ulbricht was in jail was paying to have multiple people murdered
in reply to RegalPotoo

Was it? It wasn't mentioned in the article and I don't think I've ever heard that before.

"Ulbricht was found guilty of charges including conspiracy to commit drug trafficking, money laundering and computer hacking."

in reply to azl

in reply to RegalPotoo

I've never heard about this.

Can you provide a source?

in reply to john89

Google dude. It was all over the news back when it was new news.
in reply to borari

Google didn't turn up anything conclusive.

Are you sure you're not misremembering this or making it up? It should be pretty easy for you to provide a source if it's true.

in reply to john89

krebsonsecurity.com/2013/10/fe…
in reply to john89

justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/silk-…
in reply to RegalPotoo

Correct me if I'm wrong: IIRC the feds sent back mock pictures to 'confirm' the victims were killed, so I don't know if anyone was assassinated in reality but, as you said, Ulbricht payed to have them murdered.
in reply to comfy

Did you just restate exactly what the person above you already said?
in reply to borari

I was clarifying and adding more details, and also restating to make it clear I wasn't disagreeing at all or trivializing it.
in reply to comfy

You're correct. They were all scams, including one by the US government
in reply to jagged_circle

That doesn't mean they're scams. Ross really did earnestly pay to get people killed, he just got caught in a honey trap trying to do so and that's a good thing
in reply to db0

I have seen this repeated multiple times on Lemmy. When I look this up, I find:

So, the charges are dismissed with prejudice, the DEA agent imprisoned for corruption, the alleged victim testifies in his favor. What makes the other narrative compelling? I see people citing the court document in which the claims were made..... But what is the value of that document if the result was a dismissal with prejudice? Shouldn't that support the innocence narrative?

I am genuinely curious. I'm not necessarily advocating his innocence, I want to understand what other people know that makes them so convinced that he is guilty of this.

in reply to SpicyAnt

Just to note, charges dismissed with prejudice means that the prosecution can't correct the errors and re-file the case. It's usually done when the judge has pretty compelling evidence that the charges are garbage, or there's really egregious prosecutorial misconduct.
in reply to db0

when the government puts a gun in the hands of someone under pressure and whispers in their ear "do it. Kill them. Pull the trigger" I'd say they're innocent 100% of the time

If you manipulate someone into doing a violent crime, the person who did the manipulation is the criminal

in reply to RegalPotoo

False. Those charges were all dismissed. Dont spread misinformation.
in reply to jagged_circle

He paid money to have people killed in order to protect his profits

justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/silk-…

The fact that he wasn't convicted of it doesn't mean it didn't happen

in reply to RegalPotoo

Speaking of convicted, pretty sure at least two of the FBI agents assigned to investigate him WERE convicted and sent to jail for personally stealing funds from silk road during the investigation. The whole thing was mishandled from the beginning and the people he 'ordered to kill' weren't even real people, they were fake identities created by the same FBI agents that were posing as the hitmen and mishandling evidence. Reeks of entrapment.
in reply to Glitterbomb

As always violence is a result of fed involvement, remove them from the picture and everything is fine.
in reply to RegalPotoo

Allegedly*

Fact: nobody was actually killed.

Fact: He wasn't convicted, so this is just the government claiming someone they dont like did something without proving it (again the proof lacking is the payments, because nobody died)

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to jagged_circle

Ok, you've got me on the wording. He wasn't in jail because he paid for hits, but my point being no matter your thoughts on drug policy, Ross should be in prison
in reply to mount_snowden

now normally a german surname running a dark web website would be a massive red flag, but do the Ulbricht's get a pass because of Walter?
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to mount_snowden

Legend. Huge congrats to Ross and his family for this outcome. Here's to many more DNMs coming up in the future!
in reply to mount_snowden

So what you're saying is, Trump loves child exploitation and drug trafficking.
in reply to mount_snowden

my brother is free thanks for giving us a platform that allowed a safer way of acquiring and consuming drugs
in reply to mount_snowden

in reply to HelixDab2

Or just decrimilize them and dont let a guy who tried to order assaninations out of prison.
in reply to mount_snowden

Now, no one can say anymore that Trump has never done anything positive.