Skip to main content


We are celebrating our 31st anniversary today! We have adopted a new logo to signal positive changes. We have refreshed our logo to reflect the new type of organization we have become — one that wants to re-engage with our community, and reach new audiences.

See more at:
w3.org/press-releases/2025/new…

in reply to World Wide Web Consortium

… and the "3" shape is … not the digit three? Your official description is that:

> It depicts a symbol made of three flowing lines that resemble the links of a chain. The words ā€˜The World Wide Web Consortium’ circle around it.

So it was meant, like, `⛓³` or `šŸ”—Ā³`? Chains cubed? Box of chains? Or is the `³` bit meant to be somewhat broken part of the "chains"? Like attached handcuffs or something? āDarlingāž?

w3.org/about/press-media/#tran…

@mariejulien

in reply to World Wide Web Consortium

Well, that's quite a •bold• choice of new logo. It reminds me of something…
in reply to World Wide Web Consortium

Sorry the previous one was better. This one you don't understand what it is.
in reply to World Wide Web Consortium

I’m sorry, but that is not a good logo. It has poor legibility. What does it convey?
in reply to World Wide Web Consortium

I really don't understand why including a phallic symbol in the logo, which every developer I know called out as as their first response. This is really problematic if wanting to be inclusive and understanding broad perspectives across developer communities. #w3c
#w3c
⇧