Wow. @emilymbender, University of Washington computational linguist, deconstructs algorithmic tools, aka automation.
“#AI” is a marketing term dating to the 1950s, when it was employed to secure research dollars.
What is being automated?
By whom and why?
Who benefits?
Who is being harmed?
How well does it work?
Who is accountable?
What laws/regulations apply to what is being automated?
Well worth the ~5 minute investment
youtube.com/watch?v=eK0md9tQ1K…
h/t:
@futureisfoss @alex
How should regulators think about "AI"?
On Thursday 9/28, I had the opportunity to speak at a virtual roundtable convened by Congressman Bobby Scott on "AI in the Workplace: New Crisis or Longstand...YouTube
This entry was edited (11 months ago)
Stephen Godwin
in reply to Kathy E. Gill 🇺🇦 • • •Dave Rahardja
in reply to Kathy E. Gill 🇺🇦 • • •A land fit for all our futures
in reply to Kathy E. Gill 🇺🇦 • • •This is fantastic, thank you. I'm currently writing a paper for uni considering the UK AI Safety Summit in respect to several theories about policy and intend to discuss the use of patterns of discourse and creation of ``storylines''.
Sticking this related link here as I'm a firm believer in saving search effort medium.com/@emilymenonbender/o…