Skip to main content


Name ONE #Linux distro you’d never use, no matter how much other recommended it
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

Probably gentoo. Compiling everything would get old real quick. Maybe for a very specialized purpose, but I think something else would probably be better.
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

I know it’s more technically a collection of bash scripts and not a distro, but Omarchy. 🤮
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

Ubuntu. I don't like what they've done to Gnome, but I really don't like how Canonical appears to be trying to capture the Linux market.
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

probably Manjaro, every time I hear about it, it's because something is wrong.
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

MX Linux: the thing just didn't work on my machine, as opposed to the reviews I found.

Also Ubuntu gets a dishonorable mention, as a low-hanging suspect😁

in reply to nixCraft 🐧

Caldera. Ironically, it was my 1st intro to Linux, but then that whole SCO thing.
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

Ubuntu. Every few years I fall for it and try to use it for something that it seems perfect for, but the last couple attempts they shipped a release that was so buggy I couldn't actually get it installed. I've *tried* to use it plenty, but never actually have because the installer has never actually left me with a functional system so I always end up spending 2-3 days trying before I give up and spend the next thirty minutes getting Arch/Fedora/Debian working just fine...

I can get Arch setup without an installer doing the whole chroot setup thing, but Ubuntu? That shit is too hard, can't figure it out xD

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

arch-based distros. I tried cachyOS and regret it now, because in the end I made it a arch distro with cachyOS repos and some software.

And gentoo. Because if you want to compile, just use LFS. Takes a bit more time, but the result is kind of the same? You can turn it into gentoo later if you want.

in reply to nixCraft 🐧

hate to say it but Ubuntu. I started out with it. Now it seems entirely to bloated for my needs. Yes I know the net install iso exist (I think). But I prefer to use what I call its root distribution, Debian. The one distro with I swear at least a thousand derivitives. ( sarcasm at the end)
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

Manjaro. it's horrendous. you're telling me this is somehow considered a go-to Arch-based distro when its developers are more well known for breaking upstream than they are for working on Manjaro?
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

#Makulu #Linux

makulu.online/upgrade.html

makululinux.com

in reply to nixCraft 🐧

Crostini, though partly it's bad due to being in a container on ChromeOS.
Partly bad due to using Wayland and Chrome Browser / ChromeOS for desktop
I hated it so much I risked bricking the Chromebook. I soldered link on main board and replaced the BIOS to have a native Mint install.

I've used Redhat, CentOS, Suse, DSL, Debian and Ubuntu. Looked at a few others since 1998.
I used Cromix and MS Xenix in 1980s

in reply to nixCraft 🐧

ubuntu

Despite everyone saying the opposite it's not easier to setup than Debian or Fedora, and all this snap nonsense and other weird design choices, ...

Of course also some distros with weird ideology like omarchy. But luckily no-one recommended me any of those so far.

in reply to nixCraft 🐧

I had dearly loved Gentoo but a little bit of a heavy lifting building for updates.
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

Usually i went with Manjaro, but Omarchy (well is this even a distro?) will surely keep thw throne of shit for some time.

#Linux

in reply to nixCraft 🐧

basically everything because while switching to Linux was worth the learning curve, switching to an unfamiliar linux wouldn't be worth another learning curve
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

None (that does not violate free software rules).

This all depends on the use-case. I do not currently have a use case for what Gentoo, Arch or NixOS specialize in.

Also, I would usually not install another Ubuntu nowadays, but if it would get that Pinephone brave heart edition in working shape without hardware fixes now, I still would give it a 3rd try.

in reply to nixCraft 🐧

ubuntu, it was among the first and it was pretty bad already then with the UI, 2016 that was.
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

Pretty much whichever one my very annoying brother-in-law Steve recommends. He can be a real prig about Linux purity. So, out of spite, I have installed Ubuntu and bragged about how much disk space it took up, just to see him tremble with impotent rage…
in reply to nixCraft 🐧

Ubuntu lol even thought it was my first distro and it's suitable for other people, I don't like GNOME. But I do like Ubuntu-based distros tho.