Skip to main content


#MovieThread VI: The Past Is An Undiscovered Country, Chapter Four — April Edition

From 2020 to 2024 I watched 1962 movies.
In 2025 so far I've watched another 98, for a total of 2060 movies.

* I've hit a part of Blank Check where I've seen most of what they're covering, so I really should get back to the watchlist.

:beepboopone: Previous thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/114087786…


#MovieThread VI: The Past Is An Undiscovered Country, Chapter Three — March Edition

From 2020 to 2024 I watched 1962 movies.
In 2025 so far I've watched another 60, for a total of 2022 movies.

* 30 per month feels neat, but I also feel like I gotta pick up Da Pace.
* Have been mostly focused on podcast movies.

:beepboopone: Previous thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/113929817…


in reply to Alex Daily!

While working, I took the opportunity to engage in some seasonal viewing and watched --

#99, or #2061, 1986 slasher "April Fool's Day."

Ultimately I just need something more -- more interesting characters, for one thing -- but as cheapie 80s slashers go, this one's honestly not half bad.

Less about how pranks and misinformation will kill you and more about how you should never, ever trust the rich, but I mean, I'll take it.

#99 #2061
in reply to Alex Daily!

Leaving now for Sneak Preview.

Movie #100 of 2025, or #2062 since I started counting.

I do not know which as yet unreleased movie I'll be seeing, but I like to guess: A24's "Death of a Unicorn" is out later this week.

#100 #2062
in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #100: "The Last Showgirl" (2025), on cities

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #100: "The Last Showgirl" (2025), on Shelly

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #100: "The Last Showgirl" (2025), on time

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #100: "The Last Showgirl" (2025), on sidewalks

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #100: "The Last Showgirl" (2025), on glory

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #100: "The Last Showgirl" (2025), on legends

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #100: "The Last Showgirl" (2025), in conclusion

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #100: "The Last Showgirl" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

While working on the first AVI & AQUILA collection, I watched --

#101, or #2063, 1948 Best Picture nominee "Johnny Belinda."

EDIT: #2063, not #2062.

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🧏‍♀️ #101: "Johnny Belinda" (1948), reference to fictional sexual abuse

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

The movie that dares to ask, what if it was pretty dark somewhere, it's --

#102, or #2064, 2000's "Pitch Black."

EDIT: #2064, not #2063.

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Vin Diesel is one of those actors who I think is honestly very enjoyable when doing the, like, one thing he does, but as soon as he so much as lingers outside of that very narrow zone, it gets very, very dicey.

I suspect diceyness will not get involved in this one.

in reply to Alex Daily!

The thing about all the many dangers in outer space is I would simply not go to outer space. Outer space? Couldn't be me. Inner space only for this gal.
in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

█ #102: "Pitch Black" (2000)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

The picture that dares to ask, what if there were shoes, and what if they were red, it's --

#103, or #2065, 1948 Best Picture nominee "The Red Shoes."

EDIT: #2065, not #2064.

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Funny, it's 1948, and colour film has been around for years, but at this point it's not the default yet, it's still a filmmaking choice, an exception, colour as a feature a movie can have, like how most movies aren't musicals.
This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

I gather this is based on a Hans Christian Andersen tale, which I'm not familiar with.
in reply to Alex Daily!

👠 #103: "The Red Shoes" (1948)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👠 #103: "The Red Shoes" (1948)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👠 #103: "The Red Shoes" (1948)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👠 #103: "The Red Shoes" (1948)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👠 #103: "The Red Shoes" (1948)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👠 #103: "The Red Shoes" (1948)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👠 #103: "The Red Shoes" (1948)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👠 #103: "The Red Shoes" (1948)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👠 #103: "The Red Shoes" (1948)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👠 #103: "The Red Shoes" (1948)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

I'm of sound mind and fully aware I'm doing this to myself, leaving now to go see --

#104, or #2066, 2025's "A Minecraft Movie."

EDIT: #2066, not #2065.

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

And you wonder why people don't pity you when you put yourself through Talking Dutch, Getting Dutch, Going Dutch? Whatever it's called.

Alex Daily! reshared this.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Oof.

Many of the individual elements, or building blocks, if you will, of 2025's "A Minecraft Movie" are, really, fine. But they somehow add up to a block house that is much, much less than the sum of its parts.

For a film so determined to communicate you that it's about the power of creativity, an absolute void of story, art, meaning, anything of value.

But the 50 young people sat behind us, and I swear to gog this is true, gave it a standing ovation. So I guess it works for the target demo?

in reply to Alex Daily!

Genuinely one of the worst things I've ever seen.

But if you're my age or just a little older and have kids, they'll love it.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Everyone always says this is great, so every now and then I line it up to watch, and then promptly don't, it's --

#105, or #2067, 1998's "The Prince of Egypt."

EDIT: #2067, not #2066.

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

the movie that dares to ask, what if there was some manner of... exodus
in reply to Alex Daily!

literally a few days ago I remembered about a DOS software compilation some hackers put together called eXoDOS and I googled it and google suggested "exodus" and I was like "ohhhhh... that's why it's called eXoDOS..."
in reply to Alex Daily!

🤴 #105: "The Prince of Egypt" (1998)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤴 #105: "The Prince of Egypt" (1998)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤴 #105: "The Prince of Egypt" (1998)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤴 #105: "The Prince of Egypt" (1998)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

ultimately I just struggle to connect with the religious aspect of it, but as an achievement of animation and filmmaking, it's completely and utterly un-fucking-deniable
in reply to Alex Daily!

Live musical adaption anecdote

Sensitive content

in reply to Zatty

Live musical adaption anecdote

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

You had me at "Paul Rudd and Jenna Ortega run over a unicorn," leaving now to go see --

#106, or #2068, 2025's "Death of a Unicorn."

(Doing lunch first.)

EDIT: #2068, not #2067.

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

That was alright, enjoyed it. Everyone understands the assignment and turns material in that gets them a good grade.

56-year old Paul Rudd finally old enough to be cast as a dad of a teenager.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Just from existing in the world at the time, I heard a lot about this show and its central performance, so while working, I finally watched —

#107, or #2069, 2012's "Marina Abramović: The Artist is Present."

EDIT: #2069, not #2068.

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🪑🪑 #107: "Marina Abramović: The Artist is Present" (2012)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🪑🪑 #107: "Marina Abramović: The Artist is Present" (2012)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🪑🪑 #107: "Marina Abramović: The Artist is Present" (2012)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🪑🪑 #107: "Marina Abramović: The Artist is Present" (2012)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🪑🪑 #107: "Marina Abramović: The Artist is Present" (2012)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🪑🪑 #107: "Marina Abramović: The Artist is Present" (2012)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

While working, watched —

#108, or #2070, 1948 Best Picture nominee "The Snake Pit."

EDIT: #2070, not #2069.

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Sneak Preview. Leaving now. (Could be "Drop.")

#109, or #2071.

EDIT: #2071, not #2070.

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

before it started, I said, "nightmare scenario is it's White Bird."

dear reader, it was "White Bird."

in reply to Alex Daily!

Much in 2025's "White Bird" to explicitly not care for --

the totally unnecessary framing device connecting it to another inspirational drama about how courageous a child with a disability is,

the reduction of the Holocaust to shallow inspirational one-liners and teachable moments for a privileged bully (in the framing device) to learn something from,

the whole thing is dreck to the core.

in reply to Alex Daily!

🕊️ #109: "White Bird" (2025), one particularly awful moment re: what this has to say about a disabled character

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🕊️ #109: "White Bird" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

I did appreciate that the main Nazi got gored to death by wolves.
in reply to Alex Daily!

While working, watched —

#110, or #2072, 2020 Biosphere 2 doc "Spaceship Earth."

EDIT: #2072, not #2071.

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Look, this probably says something about me that I'm not entirely ready to fully interrogate at this time, but for all the clear and valid criticisms of the Biosphere 2 project, if you came to me today and said, Biosphere 3, you want in? I'd want in. Sign me up, lock me in, and throw away the key.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I honestly think the primary failure of the project, at least as told here, is that it was allowed to live in the culture around it as a serious scientific experiment, that the idea of a fail state was allowed to exist in mainstream coverage, when what it was was a theatre troupe looking for an adventure. None of that failed. Huge success.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I counted these last season, so I'm counting them this season, I watched --

#111, or #2073, 2025 Black Mirror episode "Common People."

#111 #2073
in reply to Alex Daily!

👨👩📱 #111: Black Mirror: "Common People" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👨👩📱 #111: Black Mirror: "Common People" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👨👩📱 #111: Black Mirror: "Common People" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Another one, watched while eating dinner --

#112, or #2074, 2025 Black Mirror episode "Bête Noire."

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🍫 #112: Black Mirror: "Bête Noire" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🍫 #112: Black Mirror: "Bête Noire" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🍫 #112: Black Mirror: "Bête Noire" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

The movie that dares to ask, remember Riddick? From "Pitch Black"? Well what if there were Chronicles of him. Wouldn't that be something? It's --

#113, or #2075, 2004's "The Chronicles of Riddick"

#113 #2075
in reply to Alex Daily!

Not gonna lie, this is an "I've got a headache, gonna make some tea, put on an easy watch" choice.
in reply to Alex Daily!

The thing about Riddick is, as well-developed characters go, he is not one of them. If the character has any appeal at all in "Pitch Black," it's in that he enables the the titular total darkness sequence happening, and it's in Vin Diesel kinda operating on a level above the incredibly generic cheap sci-fi movie he's in.
in reply to Alex Daily!

"You made three mistakes. First, you took the job. Second, you came light. A four-man crew for me? Fucking insulting. But the worst mistake you made... Empty gun rack."

see, this is why you make three more of these

in reply to Alex Daily!

anyway, it's kind of his breakout role, it's the first real "Vin Diesel character" who isn't just "a gangster," "a soldier," so Vin gets /really/ attached to it all, to the point of acquiring the rights
This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

"Some of us still remember the true crime that happened here on Furya."

bad line read, she says it like it's the true crime genre, not like it's something truly heinous

in reply to Alex Daily!

and these don't honestly do /huge/ numbers at the box office? but they have a long tail on DVD, and so it's never /that/ hard to talk a board room into making another one

which I guess is why last year they filmed a fourth one

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #113: "The Chronicles of Riddick" (2004)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

@kurt This is the wrong amount of hair for Vin. He looks like regular old bald Vin Diesel standing in front of a wig.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I actually quite liked this one, I watched —

#114, or #2076, 2025 Black Mirror episode "Hotel Reverie."

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

☎️ #114: Black Mirror: "Hotel Reverie" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

☎️ #114: Black Mirror: "Hotel Reverie" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

☎️ #114: Black Mirror: "Hotel Reverie" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

☎️ #114: Black Mirror: "Hotel Reverie" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

☎️ #114: Black Mirror: "Hotel Reverie" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

☎️ #114: Black Mirror: "Hotel Reverie" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Before heading out, watched --

#115, or #2077, 2025 Black Mirror episode "Plaything."

#115 #2077
in reply to Alex Daily!

👾 #115: Black Mirror: "Plaything" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👾 #115: Black Mirror: "Plaything" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

With lunch, watched --

#116, or #2078, 2025 Black Mirror episode "Eulogy."

#116 #2078
in reply to Alex Daily!

📷 #116: Black Mirror: "Eulogy" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

As I understand it, in this one, there is a letter, and it goes to three wives, it's --

#117, or #2079, 1949 Best Picture nominee "A Letter to Three Wives."

#117 #2079
in reply to Alex Daily!

Hollywood could not afford all five wives of the original novel.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Existence of "A Letter to Three Wives" and "A Letter to Five Wives" implies existence of A Letter to any number of Wives.
in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949), the titular letter (1/2)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949), the titular letter (2/2)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to :beecat:

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to :beecat:

📨 #117: "A Letter to Three Wives" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Wrapping up the season, I watched --

#118, or #2080, 2025 Black Mirror episode "USS Callister: Into Infinity."

what if they made a sequel to one we were all pretty hot on when it came out nearly a decade ago that we now barely remember would that be fucked up or what

#118 #2080
in reply to Alex Daily!

💻 #118: Black Mirror: "USS Callister: Into Infinity" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💻 #118: Black Mirror: "USS Callister: Into Infinity" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

I like to think this one is called "Riddick" less like how "Oppenheimer" is called that and more like how "Chernobyl" is called that, it's --

#119, or #2081, 2013's "Riddick."

#119 #2081
in reply to Alex Daily!

With nearly a decade between them, this one has to be an overcorrection in some way, surely. Less, ideally, with the necromonging.
in reply to Alex Daily!

So far, notably less with the Chronicles, a lot more with the Riddick stranded in a Situation.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #119: "Riddick" (2013)

"So what's the best way to a man's heart."
"Between the fourth and fifth rib. That's where I usually go."

he's a practical man, that Richard B. Riddick

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #119: "Riddick" (2013)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #119: "Riddick" (2013)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #119: "Riddick" (2013)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #119: "Riddick" (2013)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #119: "Riddick" (2013)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #119: "Riddick" (2013)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #119: "Riddick" (2013)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #119: "Riddick" (2013)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🥽 #119: "Riddick" (2013)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:vin: #119: "Riddick" (2013)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:vin: #119: "Riddick" (2013)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

what if you went to the movies and didn't know what movie you were going in for, would that be fucked up or what, leaving now for this week's sneak preview.

#120, or #2082.

(Guess: "Black Bag." Universal/Focus, came and went in the US already, out here soon, could use the buzz.)

#120 #2082
in reply to Alex Daily!

Ooh, I've seen this Black Mirror episode, when you get there they play a movie all about your life where you are played by Salma Hayek, but then at the end you die because your mom, who you've been avoiding, calls you on your phone.
in reply to Alex Daily!

After about half an hour of technical difficulties, Sneak Preview was 2025's "Warfare," a movie I knew I would hate, and did.

A fucking /rough/ time at the movies!

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), on neutrality

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), on neutrality

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), on neutrality

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), on depictions

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), on depictions

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), on depictions

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), on depictions

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), on America

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), on America

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), in conclusion

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Good to get my angriest review of the year out in April, I guess.
in reply to Alex Daily!

re: 🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), on neutrality

Sensitive content

in reply to 🇹 Ti

re: 🇺🇸 #120: "Warfare" (2025), on neutrality

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

A genuine coincidence that I watched this mostly animated documentary featuring Alan Cumming only a few days before Alan Cumming voices an animated character on Doctor Who, I watched --

#121, or #2083, 2022's "My Old School."

#121 #2083
in reply to Alex Daily!

A 32-year old man pretends to be a 16-year old high schooler so he can get another shot at going to medical school.

Speaking as somebody who's been in their late twenties/early thirties going to school alongside 18-24-year olds, can not imagine having to pretend not to be older and smarter than most of the people around me.

in reply to Alex Daily!

In the end, the story itself is quite thin -- nothing that big really happens, at its worst it gets a little uncomfortable, morally icky -- and it's really just about, like, what if there was a weird guy in your school who made some big choices.
in reply to Alex Daily!

But it's still a pretty watchable doc, the story given weight by the talking heads mostly being his classmates and such, all telling it like we all would tell the story of the wildest thing that happened to us in school.
in reply to Alex Daily!

The lovely Alan Cumming a really solid lip-synching stand-in for the subject of the film, who agreed to be interviewed but not filmed.
in reply to Alex Daily!

oh I had no idea he was going to be in Doctor Who. He was the best bit of season 11
in reply to Furby

@furby Just as a voice role this season, I think, but yeah. Always happy to see him in things, really.
in reply to Alex Daily!

might be a bit confusing if King James came out of a cinema screen
in reply to Alex Daily!

you've heard of the horror of being perceived, now get ready for the horror of being perceived as rude in a restaurant, leaving now to go see --

#122, or #2084, 2025's "Drop."

#122 #2084
in reply to Alex Daily!

Solid, contained little thriller! Knows when to escalate, never drags anything out too long, and always smart and ridiculous exactly when you want it to be.

Enjoyed it!

in reply to Alex Daily!

the movie that dares to ask, what if there was an heiress, it's --

#123, or #2085, 1949 Best Picture nominee "The Heiress."

#123 #2085
in reply to Alex Daily!

we've established that there is indeed an heiress

and that she should really be getting on the scene and look for a husband to grant her 30k a year (in 1849 money!!) to, though her father doesn't think she's much of a catch, and has called her "mediocre" (just say it's a skill issue)

by which he of course means she seems like a fairly normal person

in reply to Alex Daily!

Olivia de Havilland has been cast a little too young here -- I don't quite buy quite how naive and un-hip to the world around her she's supposed to be, no matter how big she makes her eyes.
in reply to Alex Daily!

She's met a pleasant, charming young man called Morris, whose low financial status has led to her father accusing him of being a gold digger.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Unfortunately, she has, [I look at her doubtful face] I wanna say, fallen for him? She can't quite believe that's what she's telling him, either.
in reply to Alex Daily!

💍 #123: "The Heiress" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💍 #123: "The Heiress" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💍 #123: "The Heiress" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💍 #123: "The Heiress" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💍 #123: "The Heiress" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💍 #123: "The Heiress" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💍 #123: "The Heiress" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💍 #123: "The Heiress" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

An Easter Saturday with nothing to do until Doctor Who, let's check in on what this Jesus guy is up to, it's --

#124, or #2086, 1988 Martin Scorsese picture "The Last Temptation of Christ."

#124 #2086
in reply to Alex Daily!

Religion has always been to me an answer to a question my heart has never asked and will never ask.

I always say the closest thing I have is that I consider stories, the act of telling a story and making people care about it, to be the closest thing we have to magic.

And, of course, what is religion if not people telling stories?

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Not sure how much attention I'll pay to it, but I have it on, so it counts, on BBC One ahead of Doctor Who, it's --

#125, or #2087, 2022 Pixar film "Lightyear."

#125 #2087
in reply to Alex Daily!

I stand by it: The idea that 2022's "Lightyear" is 1995's "Lightyear" in the "Toy Story" universe is fun on paper, but *this* movie makes absolutely no sense as that movie.
in reply to Alex Daily!

It's way too "Interstellar" to be from 1995, has really too complex a plot and emotional journey to be a kids movie from 1995 -- if it's not a kids' movie, why is it so toyetic and why does nobody say any swears -- and also, we never see a Sox toy in the "Toy Story" movies, do we.
in reply to Alex Daily!

As the gritty remake of 1995's "Buzz Lightyear," 2022's "Lightyear" is ultimately resoundingly Fine, though.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Sox the robot cat in 1995 would be a lot more like one of those useless yappy toy dog robots, many of the other funny robots are Threepio-style deadpan, which was not in fashion in 90s kids animation, most of the humour is that post-Marvel snarky deadpan generally, while nothing and nobody at all is *zany*.
in reply to Alex Daily!

On a more meta level, the entire voice cast is celebrity actors, while in 1995 this thing would be voiced by reliable voice actors whose faces you might never have seen. (Post-Aladdin, you might get one famous actor in it.)
in reply to Alex Daily!

(You could argue Chris Evans is playing Reliable Voice Actor From 1995 playing Buzz, but obviously that's not in the film at all.)
in reply to Alex Daily!

If this is meant to be live-action, being in generally speaking the same style as the Toy Story movies, that would mean Toy Story Hollywood is in a totally different place than our Hollywood in 1995, because let me assure you, the industry that's about to make "Contact," the industry in which the advances George makes on Phantom Menace have not been made yet, is not making this movie.
in reply to Alex Daily!

An Aggressively Fine Motion Picture, the meta layer of which makes not an ass hair's amount of sense.
in reply to Alex Daily!

does it make any more sense if you consider it a film within the realm of The Pixar Theory being canon
in reply to 🇹 Ti

@The_T I would need to have that laid out for me to have any kind of answer to this question.
in reply to 🇹 Ti

@The_T Hmm, nah, even with "Incredibles" in there, the 90s feels fundamentally too much like our 90s for me to buy that movies are /this/ far ahead of their time -- Buzz, in Toy Story, is clearly from a cartoon property in the style of the 90s we share with it, not from /this/.
in reply to 🇹 Ti

@The_T Yeah, either Buzz is from "Star Command," or "Star Command" is the Saturday morning cartoon based on whatever bigger movie Buzz is from.
in reply to Alex Daily!

it actually makes more sense for the movie to be the Disney live action remake of Star Command
in reply to 🇹 Ti

@The_T Yeah, exactly, there are absolutely framings that work for what this actually is! But "This is that movie." absolutely is not it.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Wait until they make an animated biopic about the guy Evans is playing is playing Buzz.
in reply to Alex Daily!

hearing there's a cat named Sox reminds me of the Super Nintendo video game based on Bill Clinton's cat that never got released and then eventually leaked and then released through a Kickstarter in 2018 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socks_th…
in reply to Alex Daily!

entirely read that as "we never see a sex toy in Toy Story" and there's no way I'm the only one
in reply to Andrew

@andrewt This, too, raises its share of entirely reasonable if significantly more existentially horrifying questions.
in reply to Alex Daily!

the dog toys have a pretty bad time in the Toy Story universe, too
in reply to Alex Daily!

I thought 2022's "Lightyear" was supposed to be the ACTUAL adventures of Buzz Lightyear that 1995's "Lightyear" was based on. No?
in reply to Sean Kleefeld

@SKleefeld Nope, it explicitly says in the opening captions, "In 1995, Andy got a toy from his favorite movie. This is that movie."

(Everyone was confused about this at the time, too.)

Alex Daily! reshared this.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Like half the poster for this one is yelling about how the book it's based on won a Pulitzer, and is now "a vital, very great motion picture," which is usually: A terrible sign, it's --

#126, or #2088, 1949 Best Picture winner "All the King's Men."

#126 #2088
in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949), modern American politics

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:fedora: #126: "All the King's Men" (1949)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Already about a third of the way through --

#127, or #2089, 1949 Best Picture nominee "Battleground."

#127 #2089
in reply to Alex Daily!

Stands out for the same reason it doesn't -- after an era of Hollywood figuring out how to even depict the war, and an era of war films all essentially being propaganda for the folks at home, this is an early attempt at trying to show the war as it was.

But that's every war film now.

in reply to Alex Daily!

All of these soldiers complain and whine and get frustrated -- they all even get their moments where they want nothing more than to run away. That humanisation is compelling, and makes the picture somewhat respectable for the time, if not, to be honest, particularly interesting from my perspective here in the Year of Luigi 2025.

(It doesn't help that I can't tell any of these soldiers apart for the fucking life of me.)

in reply to Alex Daily!

While working, watched --

#128, or #2090, 1949 Best Picture nominee "Twelve O'Clock High."

I get what this is trying to say about the war -- that so much of it is about morale, and so much of it is about command -- but the practical effect of applying this take to yet another boring war movie is that *this* boring war movie is about how the *most* boring guy in the war is *also* very important to something something patriotism bring 'em home boys yankee doodle yeehaw.

#128 #2090
in reply to Alex Daily!

What if there was a Sneak Preview and I went to it like I did every single Sneak Preview for the past several years, leaving now.

#129, or #2091.

Still fully expect to see "Black Bag" at Sneak Preview.

#129 #2091
in reply to Alex Daily!

Sometimes it takes me a few minutes to figure out what movie Sneak Preview is -- today all I needed was the first frame, because even though I can never tell any of two to seven blonde classmates apart, I know what Michael Fassbender looks like from behind.

It was 2025's "Black Bag."

in reply to Alex Daily!

Fassbender learns his wife, Cate Blanchett, may or may not have done a treason, and so may or may not do some treason to do what's best. (Is it really treason if they don't catch you?)

One of those where you've seen all the individual parts a thousand times before, but they come together here totally fresh, totally cool, in a great, compelling way. So strong on every level, so in control of itself that it makes it look effortless, when you know it's not.

Great little flick.

in reply to Alex Daily!

While finishing my pages for the week, watched --

#130, or #2092, 2016's "The Accountant."

As a depiction of a grown adult autistic man, borders on being a hate crime. But as a piece of modern over-the-top bordering-on-silly action cinema, just about gets away with it by being very, very watchable.

#130 #2092
in reply to Alex Daily!

Existence of Michael B. Jordan implies existence of Michael A. Jordan, leaving now to go see --

#131, or #2093, 2025's "Sinners."

#131 #2093
in reply to Alex Daily!

My expectations were both high and absolutely blown out of the water. Every time they ask to be let in is tenser than it's ever been. Incredible picture.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Is "The Mummy" front of mind, no, and yet --

#132, or #2094, 2001's "The Mummy Returns."

#132 #2094
in reply to Alex Daily!

The movie that dares to ask, is the Rock an actor? Answers remain elusive.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I would simply not perish under the scorching sun. Frankly, put me close enough to a desert, I might perish in the shade.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Pronouns in BIOS

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Pronouns in BIOS

🦂 #132: "The Mummy Returns" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

To distract myself from an increasingly spoiler-riddled internet, it's --

#133, or #2095, 2008's "Tropic Thunder."

#133 #2095
in reply to Alex Daily!

You couldn't make this today, because Tugg Speedman, Jeff Portnoy, and Kirk Lazarus have all for sure been mega-cancelled. None of these men would be in the news for good reasons.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🌴⚡ #133: "Tropic Thunder" (2008)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌴⚡ #133: "Tropic Thunder" (2008)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌴⚡ #133: "Tropic Thunder" (2008)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌴⚡ #133: "Tropic Thunder" (2008)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌴⚡ #133: "Tropic Thunder" (2008)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌴⚡ #133: "Tropic Thunder" (2008)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌴⚡ #133: "Tropic Thunder" (2008)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌴⚡ #133: "Tropic Thunder" (2008)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌴⚡ #133: "Tropic Thunder" (2008)

Sensitive content

in reply to kev

🌴⚡ #133: "Tropic Thunder" (2008)

Sensitive content

@kev
in reply to Alex Daily!

Rewatched --

#134, or #2096, 2008's "Tropic Thunder,"

-- with the commentary track where RDJ stays in character as Kirk Lazarus staying in character as Staff Sergeant Lincoln Osiris the whole time. Pretty good, pretty funny.

Say, how the hell do you win Best Actor for a documentary.

#134 #2096
in reply to Alex Daily!

What if there was a Star War in the cinema, would that be fucked up or what, leaving now to go see the 20th anniversary rerelease of --

#135, or #2097, 2005's "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith."

#135 #2097
in reply to Alex Daily!

Loved it, obviously. Big goofy smile on my face the whole time. Star Wars, bay-bee.
in reply to Alex Daily!

:lightsabers: #135: "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith," valid criticisms

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:lightsabers: #135: "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith"

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:lightsabers: #135: "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith," and yet

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:lightsabers: #135: "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith," and yet

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:lightsabers: #135: "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith," and yet

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:lightsabers: #135: "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith," in the end

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:lightsabers: #135: "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith," in the end

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:lightsabers: #135: "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith," in the end

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

As I understand it, there is a Bride, and there is a Father thereof, it's --

#136, or #2098, 1950 Best Picture nominee "Father of the Bride."

#136 #2098
in reply to Alex Daily!

That's really all you needed in the 50s. What if there was a father of the bride.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I see this is going for more of a "light folly from the perspective of a beset-upon dad" thing than the more outright comedy I imagine the 1991 film is like. (Haven't seen it.)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Boy, this is really far too gentle to be anything at all. Jokes is not in the room with us on this one.
in reply to Alex Daily!

christ this is dull

do you know how many weddings i've seen fathers be overly protective of their daughters in the context of

it must be millions

in reply to Alex Daily!

Leaving now for the Mystery Classic.

@kev probably nailed it, I fully expect it to be "Top Gun."

#137, or #2099.

@kev
in reply to Alex Daily!

Great news for fans of the first 60 seconds of Kenny Loggins' "Danger Zone," the Mystery Classic was indeed — 1986's "Top Gun."

I don't think I have much to say about 1986's "Top Gun," though I guess coming back to it after having seen "Top Gun: Maverick," it's really not that evil compared to the later film.

The dudes being guys stuff is pretty watchable, but the action is honestly impossible to follow.

I dunno, I think the review from last time covers the rest of it: letterboxd.com/alexdaily/film/…

in reply to Alex Daily!

While trying and failing to work through my hay fever, I watched —

#138, or #2100, 2008's "The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor."

#138 #2100
in reply to Alex Daily!

Broadly speaking, everyone kinda agrees this one sucks, but honestly, as a bargain bin Indiana Jones-like, pretty watchable.

Obviously doesn't hold a candle to the 1999 film, though.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Has big issues -- Rachel Weisz should not have been considered recastable, the large adult son is more annoying than the small child son was in the last one, and an American blockbuster in 2008 was never gonna depict anything Chinese particularly thoughtfully, was it — but I dunno, I thought this did a better job at delivering watchable Brendan Fraser action nonsense than the last one.

(A little too long, mind.)

in reply to Alex Daily!

I did like the mother and daughter characters though; but it's been so long
in reply to Alex Daily!

Topical rerelease of my favourite movie of 2024, you say, let's gooo, leaving now to go see --

#139, or #2101, 2024's "Conclave."

(Oh, oops, I forgot to do the new thread again. Later.)

#139 #2101
in reply to Alex Daily!

Obviously still slaps. Pretty sure the Tedesco vape hit gets a big laugh every time this plays to a crowd. (Which, this time, was mostly on the older end.)

Nothing else to really add. Still just think it's a tremendously constructed airport novel-ass little picture.

in reply to Alex Daily!

This concludes the April 2025 #MovieThread.

:beepboopone: Next thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/114434267…


#MovieThread VI: The Past Is An Undiscovered Country, Chapter Five — May Edition

From 2020 to 2024 I watched 1962 movies.
In 2025 so far I've watched another 139, for a total of 2101 movies.

* My watchlist is a lie, podcast watches continue to rule.

:beepboopone: Previous thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/114262746…


This entry was edited (7 months ago)
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Alex Daily!
🔨 #124: "The Last Temptation of Christ" (1988)

Sensitive content

@Naga
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Alex Daily!
@naga You will want to avoid this one at all costs.
@Naga