Skip to main content


#MovieThread VI: The Past Is An Undiscovered Country, Chapter Six — June Edition

From 2020 to 2024 I watched 1962 movies.
In 2025 so far I've watched another 172, for a total of 2134 movies.

* I'm kinda burning through Best Picture nominees, but the podcast I listen along to is about to severely slow down, so.

:beepboopone: Previous thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/114434267…


#MovieThread VI: The Past Is An Undiscovered Country, Chapter Five — May Edition

From 2020 to 2024 I watched 1962 movies.
In 2025 so far I've watched another 139, for a total of 2101 movies.

* My watchlist is a lie, podcast watches continue to rule.

:beepboopone: Previous thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/114262746…


in reply to Alex Daily!

As I understand it, in this one John Wayne goes on a trip to what Americans /think/ Ireland is like, it's --

#173, or #2135, 1952 Best Picture nominee "The Quiet Man."

#173 #2135
in reply to Alex Daily!

wait, no, not black and white again, VLC is just still set to black and white from watching The Savages on Saturday
in reply to Alex Daily!

☘️ #173: "The Quiet Man" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

☘️ #173: "The Quiet Man" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

☘️ #173: "The Quiet Man" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

☘️ #173: "The Quiet Man" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

☘️ #173: "The Quiet Man" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

☘️ #173: "The Quiet Man" (1952), fictional violence against women in the context of a marriage

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

re: ☘️ #173: "The Quiet Man" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to 🇹 Ti

re: ☘️ #173: "The Quiet Man" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

re: ☘️ #173: "The Quiet Man" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

☘️ #173: "The Quiet Man" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Everyone said the "Succession" guy's AI tech bro movie was mid, so I watched it like I watched "Succession," which is to say, while doing something else, it was --

#174, or #2136, 2025's "Mountainhead."

#174 #2136
in reply to Alex Daily!

I think this does capture very well how these types of guy /feel/ to us, looking at them from the outside, but I wish death upon these kinds of people even when I'm not in the room with them, so putting me in the room with just them for almost two hours really stretched my patience.

It's just exhausting, just relentless, even after the turn.

in reply to Alex Daily!

It really needed some kind of /relief/, I think, so it's not just two hours of guys you wish the life would drain out of while you look them in the eyes talking like they're better than everyone else.

But that's what it is, and what it is miserable.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Mountainhead? Like Fountainhead? What kind of Eragon nonsense is this?
in reply to pending handle 🎏

@kurt It's the name of the villa they're in. I don't think they say, but I think about these dickheads you can fairly assume it /is/ an Ayn Rand reference.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Starting Jane Campion with her TV movie debut, the movie that dares to ask, what if there were --

#175, or #2137, 1986's "2 Friends."

#175 #2137
in reply to Alex Daily!

Campion is essentially a complete blindspot for me -- I saw "Power of the Dog" and can't say I really connected with it -- so I hope going in order while listening to the Blank Check miniseries on her work opens me up to her a little.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Not that I ever expect the world from famous directors' early TV work besides "hey, pretty good for a TV movie."
in reply to Alex Daily!

👭 #175: "2 Friends" (1986)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👭 #175: "2 Friends" (1986)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👭 #175: "2 Friends" (1986)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👭 #175: "2 Friends" (1986)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👭 #175: "2 Friends" (1986)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👭 #175: "2 Friends" (1986)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👭 #175: "2 Friends" (1986)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👭 #175: "2 Friends" (1986)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👭 #175: "2 Friends" (1986)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Uhhh, I dunno, could be, uhhhh, "Life of Chuck," that's out this week.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I was right, it was 2025's "The Life of Chuck," a picture I thought was: Very charming.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Could easily have been very saccharine, and it does go there a bit, but it ends up finding the line at a very pleasant life-affirming sweetness that had my eyes wet for much of the picture. That first act did kind of have us all going "oof" at just how much it was throwing the apocalypse on our plates, though.

When we weren't laughing at every Charles ad!

in reply to Alex Daily!

The structure keeps you on your toes, but it's not a big mystery or nothin', we pieced it together pretty quickly. It's a neat little flick that I really connected with. :)
in reply to Alex Daily!

(Those act title cards are some free movie editing software-ass trash, though, Flanagan, get your shit together.)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Rewatched --

#177, or #2139, 2017's "Downsizing."

Still fuckin' weird, still fuckin' slaps.

#177 #2139
in reply to Alex Daily!

It's the movie that dares to ask, what if there was a Phoenician Scheme, leaving now to go see --

#178, or #2140, 2025 West Anderson picture "The Phoenician Scheme."

#178 #2140
in reply to Alex Daily!

Wes Anderson-ass Wes Anderson movie. Comes in, Wes Andersons along pleasantly for approx. 102 minutes, then rolls the credits.

Hard, really, to assess a Wes Anderson at this point, when nobody else is doing anything like it. Is this one better or worse than "Asteroid City"? "The French Dispatch"? Is it better or worse than "The Quiet Man"? "Citizen Kane"?

I may be approaching something existential, let's not do that. Anyway, I liked it. A good time at the movies.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Given its simultaneous production with "Predator: Badlands," this one feels like Dan Trachtenberg maybe wasn't initially planning a direct followup in the "Prey" formula, but then everyone went "ooh, ooh, do a ninja one, do a viking one," and so Trachtenberg and Disney went "sure," it's --

#179, or #2141, 2025 animated anthology picture "Predator: Killer of Killers."

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🛡️ #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🛡️ #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🛡️ #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🛡️ #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🛡️ #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

⚔️ #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

⚔️ #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👨‍✈️ #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👨‍✈️ #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👨‍✈️ #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👽 #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👽 #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👽 #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👽 #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👽 #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👽 #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Leaving now to go see the picture I understand is legally known by the unwieldy title --

#180, or #2142, 2025's "From the World of John Wick: Ballerina."

#180 #2142
in reply to Alex Daily!

Comparing any movie to the "Wick" films is, of course, like comparing a flashlight to the sun -- a terrific flashlight that does everything you need it to is still not gonna be a "John Wick" movie.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🩰 #180: "From the World of John Wick: Ballerina" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🩰 #180: "From the World of John Wick: Ballerina" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🩰 #180: "From the World of John Wick: Ballerina" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Basically every Western that's been nominated for Best Picture has been sincerely one of the best to ever do it, and I'm sure this one's no different, it's --

#181, or #2143, 1952 Best Picture nominee "High Noon."

#181 #2143
in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #181: "High Noon" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #181: "High Noon" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #181: "High Noon" (1952), American politics

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #181: "High Noon" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #181: "High Noon" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

The only thing I know about this one is I've seen multiple people compare this to "Babe: Pig in the City," it's --

#182, or #2144, Jane Campion's 1989 feature debut, "Sweetie."

#182 #2144
in reply to Alex Daily!

"There's a question mark on his face, dear."

you're going to meet a dark, handsome stranger who's also a fucked up live action adaptation of the Riddler

in reply to Alex Daily!

❓ #182: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

❓ #182: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

❓ #182: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

❓ #182: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

❓ #182: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

❓ #182: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

❓ #182: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

❓ #182: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

❓ #182: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Found myself so annoyed at how much I failed to connect with this yesterday that I've rewatched it with the commentary track, so, again, it's --

#183, or #2145, Jane Campion's 1989 feature debut, "Sweetie."

#183 #2145
in reply to Alex Daily!

⁉️ #183: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

⁉️ #183: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

⁉️ #183: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

⁉️ #183: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

⁉️ #183: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

⁉️ #183: "Sweetie" (1989)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

I know nothing about this, except I think it might be based on, I wanna say, Robin Hood self-insert OC fanfic? It's --

#184, or #2146, 1952's "Ivanhoe."

#184 #2146
in reply to Alex Daily!

What's chucking a bag with King Richard's emblem on it at him supposed to prove, except that you happen to have a bag with King Richard's emblem on it. Could've nicked it off him. Could've had it made.
This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

you can tell which man with a ye olde goatee is the protagonist because he's the one with a handsome haircut instead of curls, a helmet, or some other kind of hat
in reply to Alex Daily!

🏹 #184: "Ivanhoe" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏹 #184: "Ivanhoe" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏹 #184: "Ivanhoe" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏹 #184: "Ivanhoe" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏹 #184: "Ivanhoe" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏹 #184: "Ivanhoe" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏹 #184: "Ivanhoe" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Anke

🏹 #184: "Ivanhoe" (1952)

Sensitive content

@Anke
in reply to Alex Daily!

Let's see if Celine Song can make Dakota Johnson watchable, leaving now to go see --

#185, or #2147, 2025's "Materialists."

#185 #2147
in reply to Alex Daily!

Impressively subtle satire, by which I mean it took me a while to realise the picture was making me laugh on purpose.

A lot here to like -- it's gorgeously shot, it feels really solid. The picture overall is as controlled as its well-cast lead actor, and in that way can come across as cold, but I think that reflects the matchmaking world depicted.

in reply to Alex Daily!

💐 #185: "Materialists" (2025), spoilers but it's stuff I could've guessed after the trailer

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

💐 #185: "Materialists" (2025), third act

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Let's just get this over with, it's --

#186, or #2148, 1990 Jane Campion-directed Janet Frame biopic "An Angel at My Table."

Related post from fifteen minutes ago: beepboop.one/@Alexis/114688183…

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🦰 #186: "An Angel at My Table" (1990)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

One of those that's definitely not the culturally definitive take on the subject, it's --

#187, or #2149, 1952 Best Picture nominee "Moulin Rouge."

#187 #2149
in reply to Alex Daily!

The movie that dares to ask, what if there was a Moulin Rouge, the entertainment venue that dared to ask, what if there was the can-can.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Anyway, I think this one is mostly about Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, the artist who looked at the Moulin Rouge and saw a figure drawing classroom.
This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

This is clearly going for Technicolour spectacle in much the same way as "Greatest Show on Earth" -- though the palette is a little more muted, no harsh blacks here, suggesting, perhaps, a smoke-filled room -- but just by focusing on Lautrec, there's much more going on than just the raw spectacle. We're at Moulin Rouge /with/ him.
This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #187: "Moulin Rouge" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #187: "Moulin Rouge" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #187: "Moulin Rouge" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #187: "Moulin Rouge" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💃 #187: "Moulin Rouge" (1952)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

You're just mad as a Dutchie that the French cornered the red windmill market.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Against our better judgment and values, by which I mean, because there's nothing else playing this week, leaving now to go see --

#188, or #2150, 2025's "How to Train Your Dragon."

#188 #2150
in reply to Alex Daily!

A lot here works. It's often charming, funny, pleasant, exciting. The kids are consistently pretty fun, the flying scenes are joyously exciting, and all things considered, that's a pretty good "Shadow of the Colossus" fight.

As live-action remakes go, it beat my very low expectations.

But if this existed on its own, would we forgive it its sins as easily?

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

I've definitely seen the animated films, and even though I don't remotely have them front of mind, the whole time watching this one, I was really struck by how much of this seemed, well, tailor-made not for live-action but for a 2010-ish DreamWorks animated flick.

And that's because: It fucking was!

in reply to Alex Daily!

And I'm not even really talking about the aesthetic, though it's included, I'm talking on a character-emotional level -- in animation you can paint with a pretty broad brush that just... doesn't really work for a realistic, not particularly stylised or tone-controlled live-action feature.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Astrid, here, is Girl Rival Turned Teammate, and absolutely nothing more. In animation, Stoick can be kind of an abusive jackass and you understand that he's an Obstacle For Hiccup To Overcome, but that /doesn't work/ when he has a real man's real face and eyes, when you can look at him and see a Person, because then all he is is Odin, What An Asshole.

And this point extends to essentially the entire film's emotional layer.

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

In the end, I'm critiquing something that I didn't think should've been made in the first place, so maybe I'm the fool here.

But whatever this needed to be to convince me it /should/ exist, having the original film's director do it was never going to make it that.

in reply to Alex Daily!

... silly me only saw enough that the new movie existed to just assume it was animated and not, sigh, live action thingy. Siiigh.
in reply to Tom Rini

@trini Yuuup, it's an in places shot-for-shot remake of the 2010 animated film. And the sequel, a remake of the sequel, is already in production!
in reply to Tom Rini

@trini Yeah, I truly think at the core of it it's the same mindset in the executive suite -- if we can make a crap ton of money without investing expensive time and energy into coming up with something new, why wouldn't we?

(Though, look, next to LLM crap, I don't mind /this/ so much, because at least it employed hundreds of real artists and actors and such, while the ultimate goal of generative models in art will almost always be to replace as many people as possible.)

in reply to Alex Daily!

The movie that dares to ask, what if there was a piano, it's --

#189, or #2151, 1993 Jane Campion picture "The Piano."

#189 #2151
in reply to Alex Daily!

Based on how I've felt about Campion's work so far -- very passive, a lot of it about women stoically accepting the awful things that are happening to or around them, I've been calling them "inaction movies" -- I suspect I may struggle with her breakout film as well.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎹 #189: "The Piano" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

The movie that dares to ask, what if the Maze Runner also had to do some Scorch Trials, it's --

#190, or #2152, 2015's "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials."

#190 #2152
in reply to Alex Daily!

The power of a good title is that I thought the first one was very stupid, and wasn't gonna watch the other two, but I keep thinking about the third one's subtitle "The Death Cure." I gotta know, I gotta discover the Death Cure.
in reply to Alex Daily!

It's a lot of moving pieces into place after the ending of the first one choppered the pieces out of the old place. No maze in sight as yet.
in reply to Alex Daily!

The Youths have already breached containment, which makes sense, because Breaching Containment is like the one thing they gotta be good at to get to this point, but I'm sure the Containers'll be Aghast.

*I remember the ending of the first one* Or at least pretend to be Aghast.

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🔥 #190: "Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials" (2015)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

I personally find 'The Scorch Trials' a more ridiculous title than 'The Death Cure.'
in reply to pending handle 🎏

@kurt The Scorch Trials: Yeah, sure, Hot, that sounds like a real challenge for the Maze Youths.

The Death Cure: The stakes of this have been raised from Maze and Some Trials to *a cure for all death*??? That's the level we're operating at now??? They CURED DEATH???

in reply to Alex Daily!

The zombie movie that dares to ask, what if it were twenty-eight zombie years later, leaving now to go see --

#191, or #2153, 2025's "28 Years Later."

#191 #2153
in reply to Alex Daily!

The whole time I'm sat there going, this is top stuff. As zombie movies go, though it does, ultimately rest on a classic single Idiot Decision, it feels really fresh, and the memento mori section is something really beautiful and thoughtful, really the kind of thing you can only do coming back to a world like this after this much time, great stuff.

And then it clicks what the final scene is doing, and it's got me full sickos dot jpeg hahaha fuck yes. Just me fully Jimming at the camera. 👍👍

in reply to Alex Daily!

The movie that dares to ask, what if there was a Shane, it's --

#192, or #2154, 1953 Best Picture nominee "Shane."

#192 #2154
in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #192: "Shane" (1953)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #192: "Shane" (1953)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #192: "Shane" (1953)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #192: "Shane" (1953)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #192: "Shane" (1953)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #192: "Shane" (1953)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #192: "Shane" (1953)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #192: "Shane" (1953)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #192: "Shane" (1953)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🤠 #192: "Shane" (1953)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

I have such a genuinely bad time with Jane Campion's films, a reaction I'm fucking fascinated by, it's --

#193, or #2155, 1996's "The Portrait of a Lady."

#193 #2155
in reply to Alex Daily!

Often if I don't like something that is generally well-respected, I still go, oh, well, this isn't for me, I'm not into it, but I can see what people get out of-- No, not these, I think all of the ones I've seen so far are well made films that are also just a miserable, awful time, and the culture at large widely misreads them.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎨👩 #193: "The Portrait of a Lady" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

I just read some interesting (and positive) meta about MegaMind, and I'm kinda sad the movie just doesn't work for me. "alien escape pod with a baby inside crashes in a prison, and the baby is just left and raised in the prison so it grown up to be criminal" breaks my suspension of disbelief.
in reply to Anke

@anke You don't buy that people would leave the baby behind in the prison? Interesting, isn't it, how sometimes something just completely breaks down for you on a premise level. (I have this with commercials more often than I have it with movies.)
@Anke
in reply to Anke

@anke The one I'm thinking of is this Amazon commercial, which plays in the cinema all the time at the moment: youtube.com/watch?v=1U3DJpwNLo…

It's the teenager's attempt to skateboard on the beach that gets me. Are there-- Are there no paved roads on this island? Why would you even try to skateboard on sand??

@Anke
in reply to Alex Daily!

@Anke Sometime between the '40s and when that commercial came out people went from "if the waves are flat why don't we put wheels on our surf boards," to "why don't we ride our skateboards in the sand."

Which means that either:

1. California no longer has roads
2. People are much less inventive

@Anke
in reply to pending handle 🎏

@kurt @anke I'm leaning towards 2 but the way things are going these days, I wouldn't be surprised by 1, either.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Well, they live near the beach, and the beach is where he can see other people his age hanging out.. and maybe he didn't know for sure it wouldn't work, because he over-estimated how solid damp sand is.
in reply to Anke

@anke It's possible this one only breaks down for me because I've seen it 30+ times.
@Anke
in reply to Alex Daily!

I'm just gonna burn through the rest of these, it's --

#194, or #2156, 1999 Jane Campion picture "Holy Smoke!"

#2156 #194
in reply to Alex Daily!

I wasn't having a bad time when I had things to say about why I wasn't connecting with Campion's work, but there's only so many ways I can say "the protagonist never does anything, it's just two hours of awful shit happening to her."
in reply to Alex Daily!

Anyway, Kate Winslet is in India, having what would for me be a bad time but is presented to us here as a good one.
in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:holycow: #194: "Holy Smoke!" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to :beecat:

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

okay, yeah that's fair

It's just, I looked up her movies and every single one of them sounds absolutely miserable??

in reply to :beecat:

@B They /are/, and I do not understand why people read them as comedies, or, like, sweeping romances.
in reply to Alex Daily!

It's the last Tuesday of the month, which means it's time for the Mystery Classic at the cinema -- we don't know what the movie is, just that it's a "classic."

Except I guess we do, because the hints this time were:
* "Three parts."
* "After sunset."

That has to be 1995's "Before Sunrise," right?

Let's find out, leaving now.

#195, or #2157.

#195 #2157
in reply to Alex Daily!

Fell hook, line, and sinker for the hint misdirect -- you know how when you get stuck on something, it becomes impossible to think of something else -- because the Mystery Classic was 2016's "Moonlight."

Beautiful picture!

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌕 #195: "Moonlight" (2016)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌕 #195: "Moonlight" (2016)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌕 #195: "Moonlight" (2016)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

(Even if I'd thought of this one I would've rejected it as a Mystery Classic option because it feels too recent. 2016? The-- The Xbox One is retro now? Okay.)
in reply to pending handle 🎏

@kurt To be fair, "three parts" = "trilogy," the other two movies are really outside of the Mystery Classic itself.
in reply to Alex Daily!

This one's, I wanna say, a serial killer thing with Meg Ryan and Mark Ruffalo?
in reply to Alex Daily!

At least "New York serial killer thriller" presents something for me to hold on to.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to :beecat:

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to :beecat:

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to :beecat:

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to :beecat:

🔪 #196: "In the Cut" (2003)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Let's just do this, it's --

#197, or #2159, 2009 Jane Campion picture "Bright Star."

#197 #2159
in reply to Alex Daily!

A Keats biopic, this one at least opens with a woman starting an argument.
in reply to Alex Daily!

When I started Campion, I figured, well, at the end I'll rewatch "Power of the Dog," the one I'd already seen and didn't like at the time, maybe I'll like it better with the added context of her whole career.

But that seems unlikely, doesn't it.

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

✍️ #197: "Bright Star" (2009)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

✍️ #197: "Bright Star" (2009)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

✍️ #197: "Bright Star" (2009)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

✍️ #197: "Bright Star" (2009)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

✍️ #197: "Bright Star" (2009)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

✍️ #197: "Bright Star" (2009)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

✍️ #197: "Bright Star" (2009)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

✍️ #197: "Bright Star" (2009)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Time for the utter opposite of that, leaving now to go see --

#198, or #2160, 2025's "M3GAN 2.0."

#198 #2160
in reply to Alex Daily!

It looks very stupid, but also probably a lot of fun.

I suspect we're on a vector to eventually wind up with a Jason vs Freddy situation with M3GAN battling Chucky should the film gods allow

in reply to The VHS Wizard 🦝📼🧙

@DrakkenZero She does seem ready-made for a crossover, doesn't she. Just throw her at literally any other franchise and I'm good. Mthreegan meets Jurassic World.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Dumb, goofy, extremely not one to take very seriously, but a perfectly serviceable Mthreegan nonsense delivery vehicle. Not a bad time at the movies at all.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I do think a third one should, ideally, take a much bigger swing than this.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Will I like this one more than I did the first time (I did not like it very much the first time) with the full context of Jane Campion's work now filled in for myself? Let's be honest, I probably won't. It's --

#199, or #2161, 2021's "The Power of the Dog."

#199 #2161
in reply to Alex Daily!

What's this one about, again? Benny Cumberbatch performs the most toxic masculinity you ever saw because his boyfriend is dead and he has no emotional guard rails whatsoever inside of which to deal with that?
in reply to Alex Daily!

I really do wish Campion's work had, like, gelled together for me, you know? I wish I'd clicked with it.

But I barely recognise the films people describe in the ones, all of them now, this one a rewatch, I've watched. I don't see the sweeping romances, I don't see the thoughtful character study.

And when so many people do see it, do I just not get it?

No. It is the people who are wrong.

This sucks, time to move on.

in reply to Alex Daily!

(i'm free, i'm free, thanks be to oizys for she hath set me free)
in reply to Alex Daily!

The polar opposite to all those Campion movies, the movie about a Maze Runner that dares to ask, what if there was a Death Cure, it's --

#200, or #2162, 2018's "Maze Runner: The Death Cure."

#200 #2162
in reply to Alex Daily!

I will also not think this is Kino, but at least it'll be stupid. (2h24m long, though, yeesh, by Selene.)
in reply to Alex Daily!

The Maze Runner has done Highway Driving and is now Train Walking. On the roof, at least.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏃🏃🏃 #200: "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" (2018)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

I'm putting this on way too late, but I've been told to watch --

#201, or #2163, 2022 Indian queer sham marriage comedy "Badhaai Do."

#201 #2163
in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🇮🇳🏳️‍🌈 #201: "Badhaai Do" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Let's just watch literally anything that isn't two and a half hours long, (and also, the modern run of Sony animation is usually pretty solid,) it's --

#202, or #2164, 2025's "KPop Demon Hunters."

#202 #2164
in reply to Alex Daily!

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🎤👹🏹 #202: "KPop Demon Hunters" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🎤👹🏹 #202: "KPop Demon Hunters" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🎤👹🏹 #202: "KPop Demon Hunters" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🎤👹🏹 #202: "KPop Demon Hunters" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🎤👹🏹 #202: "KPop Demon Hunters" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

👩‍🎤👹🏹 #202: "KPop Demon Hunters" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

(a real shame to quietly drop this on netflix instead of giving it its theatrical due etcetera)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Finally, a movie about the button on your keyboard that takes you to the help menu, leaving now, despite miserable heat, to go see --

#203, or #2165, 2025's "F1."

#203 #2165
in reply to Alex Daily!

The visual language of cinema is so much better at making me care about sports than any actual sports broadcast, and racing especially really, really works for me on the big screen, and so I kind of just always like the big racing movies. Liked this one! Made me care!
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

It /is/ still a big glossy commercial for F1 and its associated brands -- I think you'd be hard pressed to find more than two or three percent of the picture's individual frames without any brand logos in it -- but that did mean I was pleasantly surprised to see how much of a Loose Cannon the Sonny Hayes character is.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Way too long, though. The romance adds absolutely nothing except it makes her dumber than she should be for one scene and it gives him somebody to say a meaningful goodbye to at the end.
in reply to Alex Daily!

This concludes the June 2025 #MovieThread.

:beepboopone: Next thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/114779352…


#MovieThread VI: The Past Is An Undiscovered Country, Chapter Seven — July Edition

From 2020 to 2024 I watched 1962 movies.
In 2025 so far I've watched another 203, for a total of 2165 movies.

* I really gotta double back down on the Best Picture nominees.
* Probably start Sam Raimi soon, though I dunno if I'll rewatch what I've already seen.

:beepboopone: Previous thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/114609030…


This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Alex Daily!
@naga I would-a watched it yesterday, but I was at the Forum playing a card game!
@Naga
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Alex Daily!
👽 #179: "Predator: Killer of Killers" (2025)

Sensitive content

@Naga