Skip to main content


This entry was edited (1 month ago)
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Dave Rahardja
@laughingmaus Yes! Being nihilistic not only benefits no one, it *gets in the way* of other people actually doing something positive.
in reply to KielKontrovers Blog

You’re right; the definition of “nihilism” is complex and ambiguous, and the term has been applied to mean different things at different times.

I’m using it here to describe the particular case where one perceives the conditions of life as fundamentally meaningless *therefore one might as well go all the way down the slippery slope*. It‘s a low-effort reductio ad absurdum, accelerated by a perception that there is no point in exerting energy in any particular direction.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Dave Rahardja

nihilism is courted by those who want us to check out. So much better to keep busy and ignore the manipulation
in reply to Johannes Hentschel

@johentsch I think “cynicism” may be a better word than “nihilism” actually. It’s a statement of the meaninglessness of life, plus an attitude that you can’t do anything about it to add any meaning.
in reply to Dave Rahardja

@johentsch I’m going to change the post to use “cynicism” because it’s a much better word!
in reply to Dave Rahardja

Thank you to @johentsch for bringing up the word #cynicism instead of #nihilism—that is a _much_ more accurate descriptor of the symptom I’m describing! I’ve edited the post to use that term.

hostux.social/@johentsch/11387…


Yes and another attitude you see quite a lot in disillusioned middle-aged Germans is #Cynicism which has a similar effect.

#cynicisminpolitics #cynicismandhopelessness #cynicismandmistrust


in reply to Dave Rahardja

@johentsch What I am struggling to find are ways to cope with cynicism and ultimately reverse and/or redirect it. We’re two days in and I already feel exhausted.
in reply to Jose

@j_s_j
This is a very, very old question and the best answer (to everything, life, and the universe) seems to be #stoicism
@drahardja
in reply to Johannes Hentschel

@johentsch Any thought as to how these oligarchs virtually all claim to have studied Seneca and so on and preach to follow said learnings?
in reply to Dave Rahardja

Fair enough, I suppose: I think the nihilism you are describing though mostly comes from desperation. Not sure I see much smugness there. And the desire to disassociate from the enshitification - ie by not voting because there is no one to vote for - is understandable. And to accuse those who disagree with you as being too lazy to think the problem through, is really quite lazy in itself. Maybe they've thought it thru very well - and know we're fucked?
in reply to JimmyB (he/him)

@JimmyB The smugness comes from the presumption that they are entitled to belittle someone else’s effort to improve the situation.

From my experience, people who have decided that things are fucked—and proudly tell others about it—offer no help to improve anything, even when there is room for improvement. The best they can do is stay out of the way and stop discouraging those who are actually working to better the world.

I often say: “Things could always be worse; we could be standing in shit.” The corollary to that is that things could always be BETTER, in ways small and large. People who extinguish the flame in others that work to improve the situation are nihilistic assholes.

in reply to Dave Rahardja

Ok - well we have very different experiences of nihilism. I've not seen that at all.

Anyway,

in reply to JimmyB (he/him)

@JimmyB I changed the post to use “cynicism” instead of “nihilism” because I think that’s more accurate!
in reply to Dave Rahardja

Suicide

Sensitive content

in reply to Dave Rahardja

Suicide

Sensitive content

in reply to JimmyB (he/him)

Suicide

Sensitive content

in reply to Dave Rahardja

thank you; I'm guilty of falling into the #nihilism / #cynicism trap and will do better.

I also like the #tipJar idea I saw earlier. Have a jar of ideas to improve things and post one of those instead of a cleaver snarky thing.

in reply to Dave Rahardja

Long ago I heard an orchestra leader and motivational speaker say on BBC Radio 4 that he has found cynics are idealists who don't ever want to be disappointed again.

They haven't really given up. They're simply 'keeping their intellectual powder dry' and waiting for a good opportunity to fight back. Under fascism, you don't want to look like a threat to The Leader until you strike.
"Bishop to Trump's blind-side". She used her one chance well.

in reply to Andy Wootton

@woo There’s picking one’s battles, and there’s discouraging others. Keeping your powder dry until you find a fight you can win is perfectly fine, and admirable even; telling others not to even bother is not.

You know the type: the reply guy who gives you a one-line quip about why you shouldn’t do anything because we’re all fucked in the end, or why your plan won’t be enough to solve the systemic problem so why bother, “there’s always another one ready to take their place” and blah blah blah any number of a hundred wisecracks that discourage others who try to make things better.

in reply to Dave Rahardja

You appear to have generalised the particular type of cynics you don't like to all cynics. I'm not even sure all Those People are even people.
in reply to Dave Rahardja

I'm a cynic, but I don't see it as fatalist, nihilist, defeatist - just generally being wary of putting faith in unknown people or known liars. For me it means working for good *and having a hair trigger for bullshit.
in reply to Dave Rahardja

I agree with most everything you say, but to get pedantic, I don't think cynicism is the right word. I would call if "defeatist," giving up while hope is not lost. Cynicism can lead to defeatist behavior though, because a cynic (and not a Cynic like Diogenes) is pessimistic as a defense mechanism against the injustice and disappointment of the world. It must be acknowledged that hope can be quite painful and fortitude and bravery are necessary to be hopeful when one grasps reality.
in reply to Dave Rahardja

The three modern sins are Ignorance, Arrogance, and APATHY. Any 1 can be forgiven and worked through, but any two lock together, and protect the EGO from change. Change is necessary for growth and problem solving.

Ignorance and apathy is bad.
Arrogance and apathy is malignant.

When they can't turn you evil, they want you apathetic. Apathy let's it happen, and if they can add a little ignorance, eventually a little arrogance, you'll never change.

in reply to Dave Rahardja

Cynisism is (also) a coping mechanism, a way to allow yourself to pick your battles while not beating yourself up over other battles unpicked. Not always the best way, but many people need it to protect their mental health. That's not faux-intellectualism, that's survival.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Dave Rahardja

Thank you for this.

We live in a world of nuance; I despair that is lost on too many.

"It's hard to be grey in a black and white world."

in reply to Dave Rahardja

A great post on #Cynicism!

“Zynismus ist nicht smart. So gewöhnst du ihn dir ab” (Cynicism is not smart. That's how you get used to it)

perspective-daily.de/article/3…

Dave Rahardja reshared this.

in reply to Dave Rahardja

I use "cynicism" to mean "making the effort to see society as it is, and talking about it" - the original meaning.

I would use another word, if there was one. The concept is good. It has been discredited by people who don't want to hear what cynics say - that everyone in a society is responsible for the worst abuses of that society, for example.

Diogenes meant to wake people up, to initiate change. I can't hope to do more.

in reply to Dave Rahardja

it may sometimes be an ideological hangover from too much false optimism, but I agree: it's about finding the contingencies and not losing regard for acting ("eyes on the ball")