Official vs FOSS software?
Sorry if this isn't the right place to ask this, I couldn't find a linux-no-stupid-questions community lol.
I'm migrating again to linux, and working on Linux Mint for now to avoid a huge change due to my upcoming program for school soon where I won't have extra time to fiddle with things. So I'm trying to get everything set up, and download my most used applications, but I'm trying to figure out - should I be downloading the official software if it's available, or is it better to find a FOSS alternative instead? I plan to go with the apps that come with it like the libre office instead of Microsoft, obviously, but I was looking at Discord and there is what appears to be an official looking option in the software manager app, and below it a FOSS WebCord option. Or, if this one isn't the official, I could always go to the discord site and get it from them if they have it available.
Does it matter which option I go with? Is it better to go with official software if possible? Or is it better to go with FOSS for more control/privacy?
I'm migrating again to linux, and working on Linux Mint for now to avoid a huge change due to my upcoming program for school soon where I won't have extra time to fiddle with things. So I'm trying to get everything set up, and download my most used applications, but I'm trying to figure out - should I be downloading the official software if it's available, or is it better to find a FOSS alternative instead? I plan to go with the apps that come with it like the libre office instead of Microsoft, obviously, but I was looking at Discord and there is what appears to be an official looking option in the software manager app, and below it a FOSS WebCord option. Or, if this one isn't the official, I could always go to the discord site and get it from them if they have it available.
Does it matter which option I go with? Is it better to go with official software if possible? Or is it better to go with FOSS for more control/privacy?
like this
don't like this
nous
in reply to remotedev • • •You are going to need to go on a case by case bases and decide each time.
like this
remotedev, Yote.zip, Bankenstein, under2x, Odo, yiliu, AbidanYre, baseless_discourse, mnemonicmonkeys, forked_bytes, Scrubber0777, everett, dhruv, demystify, mim, bsolos, T Jedi, GameWarrior, Cryystalized, OverfedRaccoon 🦝, Tristano, slaeg, Fantasy, Nukular, Zork, cmnybo, kraxyk, atlasraven31, alfobo, Arkhrer, BitSound, Daniel Phan, croobat, joey, hfcjxey, rdschouw, samn, miss_brainfart, count_duckula, 12510198, dafungusamongus, rafaelrsanches, pinchcramp, frayans, CalcProgrammer1, Avid Amoeba, CannonGoBoom, MayoDuckPie, avapa, Cass.Forest, Züri, exu, Tippon, Ricky, banazir, WagnasT, Binette, doguinho123, shapis and Sonori like this.
mholiv
in reply to remotedev • • •This being said I think for you installing “official” apps via flatpak might be the best compromise. You gets apps that don’t need tinkering with and “just work” while those apps are isolated from the rest of your system via flatpak isolation.
If you are going into a period low fiddle time this might be your best bet ^
like this
remotedev, Yote.zip, yiliu, mnemonicmonkeys, dhruv, GameWarrior, slaeg, hygieia, Daniel Phan, croobat, samn, 12510198, leviathan, entropicdrift, mexicancartel and ChunkMcHorkle like this.
remotedev
in reply to mholiv • • •like this
Yote.zip, yiliu, atlasraven31, mnemonicmonkeys and CannonGoBoom like this.
abrasiveteapot
in reply to remotedev • • •You'll have less grief with store apps, and they're usually foss anyway. Flatpak apps are fine but can collectively get a bit disk and ram hungry. Either version will work fine though
like this
remotedev, hygieia, mnemonicmonkeys and mexicancartel like this.
Daeraxa
in reply to abrasiveteapot • • •Basically we don't yet support flatpak for a number of reasons and the 'community' flatpak option shown in the store comes with a bunch of broken features (if you dont want to get into flatseal etc) as well as a less then obvious way for users to upgrade versions.
For a particular application i would go what they actually support and have as an installation option.
don't like this
mexicancartel doesn't like this.
Cryystalized
in reply to remotedev • • •Be careful with custom Discord clients as I’ve heard they are against TOS. I don’t think people get banned very often for it but it is something to keep in mind.
WebCord is based on the browser version so it MIGHT be fine, but I don’t know enough about it.
like this
remotedev, slaeg, cmnybo and exu like this.
sibloure
in reply to remotedev • • •like this
remotedev and NegentropicBoy like this.
jaykstah
in reply to remotedev • • •However in some cases it just might not be practical to do so, especially if the alternative isn't mature enough to rely on. I'd say at least take a look at the alternatives and give em a fair shot.
I will mention in the case of projects like WebCord you're essentially getting a cut down version of Discord, with some extra features added in some cases. Basically custom clients like WebCord have to be based on the web version of Discord (essentially what you get when you open it in a browser) and because of that will be missing features like Krisp noise reduction and hardware encoding for video which can be dealbreakers for some people. Those features and some others are only available with the native Discord app which alternative clients cannot be built on top of. So there's a h... show more
However in some cases it just might not be practical to do so, especially if the alternative isn't mature enough to rely on. I'd say at least take a look at the alternatives and give em a fair shot.
I will mention in the case of projects like WebCord you're essentially getting a cut down version of Discord, with some extra features added in some cases. Basically custom clients like WebCord have to be based on the web version of Discord (essentially what you get when you open it in a browser) and because of that will be missing features like Krisp noise reduction and hardware encoding for video which can be dealbreakers for some people. Those features and some others are only available with the native Discord app which alternative clients cannot be built on top of. So there's a hard limitation there as to how much these alternatives can accomplish.
There are others like Ripcord which are entirely custom clients, not just loading web Discord and modding it. But something like Ripcord will be missing a lot of features that even the web version of Discord has, so not really an option unless you just need basic voice and text chat stuff.
like this
remotedev and Daniel Phan like this.
platysalty
in reply to remotedev • • •I know it's probably MS's fault, but at the end of the day I'm just trying to send this boring document to this boring colleague and get on with my day. Last thing I want is for them to come back with boring complaints cause something went a bit wrong with conversion.
like this
remotedev, pipe01, atlasraven31, JorgimDoKuruma, Arkhrer, Daniel Phan, croobat, StarkillerX42, leviathan and pinchcramp like this.
someguy3
in reply to platysalty • • •like this
pinchcramp and mnemonicmonkeys like this.
Synthead
in reply to platysalty • • •like this
count_duckula, racc, zShxck, MazonnaCara89, crunchpaste, mnemonicmonkeys, exu and doguinho123 like this.
eshep
in reply to Synthead • •Don't forget about that awesome MSCRLFBS feature. 😆
VexCatalyst
in reply to remotedev • • •First, I don’t like calling proprietary software “official”. Proprietary software is just software with closed source code. What makes something official is someone deciding “OK, this is what we are going to use” or that it definitely came from a particular source. Getting Docker directly from Docker repositories rather from a distributions repository for example.
My general take is if FOSS can do the job, I use FOSS. If FOSS can’t do the job I need, then I will go with the best proprietary solution to my problem. If I go with FOSS, I tend to prefer using the repository of the project in question rather than my distributions repository. The projects repository tends to be more up to date and there are fewer opportunities for ba actors to play with the code. Downside is that these repositories may introduce changes that may bork your OS when/if you upgrade to a newer major version. FlatPacks and AppImages help to mitigate this.
Hope that helps.... show more
First, I don’t like calling proprietary software “official”. Proprietary software is just software with closed source code. What makes something official is someone deciding “OK, this is what we are going to use” or that it definitely came from a particular source. Getting Docker directly from Docker repositories rather from a distributions repository for example.
My general take is if FOSS can do the job, I use FOSS. If FOSS can’t do the job I need, then I will go with the best proprietary solution to my problem. If I go with FOSS, I tend to prefer using the repository of the project in question rather than my distributions repository. The projects repository tends to be more up to date and there are fewer opportunities for ba actors to play with the code. Downside is that these repositories may introduce changes that may bork your OS when/if you upgrade to a newer major version. FlatPacks and AppImages help to mitigate this.
Hope that helps.
like this
hitagi, Daniel Phan, croobat, Vertelleus, steal_your_face, Matt, RiverGhost, StarkillerX42, dethleffs, remotedev, X3I, ultranaut, 30p87, Lrobie, khannie, count_duckula, racc, 12510198, dafungusamongus, fireshell, Kelho, SomeBoyo, rafaelrsanches, Chrobin, darcy, zShxck, waitmarks, Aiden, kam, moreeni, CalcProgrammer1, mnemonicmonkeys, CannonGoBoom, augustus672, SummerIsTooWarm, mexicancartel, banazir, Ricky, urso, Binette, Heavybell, doguinho123, Sonori, BlueSquid0741 and deadlyremote like this.
arghya_333
in reply to VexCatalyst • • •like this
darcy, ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆, MazonnaCara89, thorn_staff, moreeni, mnemonicmonkeys and augustus672 like this.
ozoned
in reply to remotedev • • •If someone else acts like it's a stupid question, then it's their issue and not yours. NOTHING is easy until you understand it. The only way to understand it is to ask questions.
I've told numerous folks at work that before they do something if they have a question then let me know, because I'd rather answer a question then spend an hour or more fixing something broken.
I ask a LOT of questions. So many questions that when I first started in IT I had a lead that got used to me being in the office 2 hours before him so he knew I'd have a million questions and before he'd even go to his desk he'd stop by mine and ask if I had questions, which I always did.
Please please please please please ASK QUESTIONS.
I have been in IT for 12 years now, I have been on Linux for 16. Before this post I literally was in another thread and asked about BTRFS. I looked it up and it wasn't making sense to me, so I asked a question. You can NEVER know EVERYTHING. And when you sta... show more
If someone else acts like it's a stupid question, then it's their issue and not yours. NOTHING is easy until you understand it. The only way to understand it is to ask questions.
I've told numerous folks at work that before they do something if they have a question then let me know, because I'd rather answer a question then spend an hour or more fixing something broken.
I ask a LOT of questions. So many questions that when I first started in IT I had a lead that got used to me being in the office 2 hours before him so he knew I'd have a million questions and before he'd even go to his desk he'd stop by mine and ask if I had questions, which I always did.
Please please please please please ASK QUESTIONS.
I have been in IT for 12 years now, I have been on Linux for 16. Before this post I literally was in another thread and asked about BTRFS. I looked it up and it wasn't making sense to me, so I asked a question. You can NEVER know EVERYTHING. And when you start to get comfortable that's when something new comes out or you start digging deeper and have more.
like this
Kiloee, MazonnaCara89, Aiden, remotedev, T3M4, crunchpaste, moreeni, snap, Run Roh, sounddrill, mexicancartel, Ricky, banazir, Binette, doguinho123, bzbb and neytjs like this.
dinckel
in reply to remotedev • • •like this
remotedev and mnemonicmonkeys like this.
MazonnaCara89
in reply to remotedev • • •like this
remotedev, moreeni, mnemonicmonkeys and exu like this.
exu
in reply to MazonnaCara89 • • •Discord - ArchWiki
wiki.archlinux.orgMazonnaCara89
in reply to exu • • •KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ
in reply to remotedev • • •You can try out WebCord on the side too if you want, you have the freedom to install both.
like this
Kristof12, mexicancartel and doguinho123 like this.