Framework says it's selling more Linux laptops than Windows as new Laptop 13 Pro sells out first 7 batches


in reply to giacomo

The chassis is the only real difference. The boards are all compatible. ~~The core 300 series Intel board might be exclusive to it for now, but they said it's compatible with the old chassis so it's just that they just don't offer the board separately yet.~~ No wait they have a listing for it so I'm just blind. frame.work/products/laptop13pr…

Did they ever post sales figures for no OS vs Windows? You can't assume no OS = Linux, but considering the target demographic I bet 80% of them planned on using Linux on it.

This entry was edited (Friday, April 24, 2026, 11:22 PM)
in reply to inari

A lot of people who are aware of Framework are linux users, and the average non-techie user probably doesn't even know they exist.

Also:

Framework calls the Laptop 13 Pro “A laptop for Linux” in its official marketing, adding that it “is designed and tested for Linux compatibility from the ground up”.


If you market your product to linux users, surely you will attract a lot of linux users.

in reply to scytale

i had a whinge in the comment section of a recent ArsTechnica article where they reviewed a bunch of Laptops and not one from Framework or Tuxedo haha

I have my eye on a Framework Pro 13 but really don't need it, i mostly desktop. I don't Laptop much and just use an old MS Surgace Pro7+ with LMDE installed.

This entry was edited (Saturday, April 25, 2026, 12:45 AM)
in reply to fuckwit_mcbumcrumble

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Not anymore. Ubuntu replaced the no OS option.


It's only Windows and None, they've replaced the pre-installed Ubuntu with an installation guide.

From FAQ:

You can choose the operating system that best fits your needs, Windows 11 and Linux are both supported. For Linux, Ubuntu and Fedora are officially supported with installation guides, and the Framework Community offers additional setup guides for many other distributions; other operating systems like OpenBSD may also work but are community-supported.
in reply to FauxLiving

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Not quite, no. Their DIY edition displays the options as you show, but if you select prebuilt then the options include Ubuntu.

I assume with DIY they offer Windows only as a quick way to acquire a license, it may not even be installed. Not sure if anyone can confirm if they just throw in a Windows USB.

This entry was edited (Saturday, April 25, 2026, 2:21 AM)
in reply to phonics

in reply to Liz

I installed Cinnamon the other day, because I remembered it to be easy to use. It is.

But. It looks dated to me. Could really use a facelift. Maybe it's just me, but in light of modern user interfaces Cinnamon is functional, but not a looker anymore. Zorin OS and Gnome in general, for example, show how it can be done.

Maybe just me...

This entry was edited (Saturday, April 25, 2026, 6:22 PM)
in reply to commander

The grapuh of Linux suitability as a function of user skill is a U. At the bottom of user skill, you've got your aunt who needs a Chrome bootloader. Linux is perfect for them, maybe better than Windows.

As you get into the middle, you get into "I just need to use Photoshop" or "I just want to play Valorant". It's gotten to where software that doesn't run on Linux is a deliberate choice, but they're still out there. Gaming has been easing up in large part due to Valve, so the middle of the U has been rising, but it's still a big dip.

At the top end you've got the computer science types developing all these internet and AI based systems almost all of which run on Linux servers in the back end. Linux dominates literally every computing platform except desktops.

in reply to Ada

Because... of the paper trail? Rails World 2026 sponsorships are up and they are not in; they haven't retweeted Omarchy rices since October; and... I admit, I can't be sure they haven't sent him another computer. Which — as you know — concludes the exhaustive trifecta of clear, loud and unambiguous support for bigots.

But you, I, and everyone else knows it's not about what they do materially. As someone in a related thread actually put in writing, they ought to "denounce, when questioned".

Meh.

in reply to Ada

If we agree the issue is about denouncing alone, and not any material activity, maybe the intellectually honest thing would be to update

tech company funding racists and transphobes

They support and fund DHH


to say what you actually mean — a tech company that refused to take a stance outside of their purview. (As a company). Which, I agree, is not exactly a badge of honour.

(Not to mention they never, once, funded DHH directly. But sure, retweets win at the exchange rate.)

(Oh and please look up Mette Frederiksen at some point.)

in reply to houjou

One of several open source projects they're helping fund happens to be run by a person like that. They're funding is because of the open source project, but some people are very vocal that they'd rather the project not exist at all, and post about it every chance they get.

It's like how some vegans can't help but tell you loudly and at every opportunity that they're vegan. Or some of the more insufferable Linux users in general. Venn diagram is probably a near circle with that linux group actually.

FOSS is a pretty small community in the grand scheme, if you avoided any project run by an objectionable individual, you couldn't run much of anything.

There's been plenty of posts about this particular issue all over if you go looking for it. I'd recommend doing your own research on whether you have a problem with it, and not rely on just a couple random commenters here, myself included.

in reply to eleijeep

I would add links to some of the conclusions in that same gargantuan thread:

community.frame.work/t/framewo…

community.frame.work/t/framewo…

in reply to houjou

Read this blog post:
- crimier.github.io/posts/Framew…

Framework does not sponsor Omarchy. They sponsor Hyprland, which is mentioned in the blog post and Rails World, a conference that DHH is part of.

List of projects sponsored by Framework:
- frame.work/dk/en/blog/framewor…

in reply to houjou

They sent money to DHH, creator of Ruby and gave some lip service to his Omarchy OS. They were defending it with some big tent statements which didn't go super well with the ones that had a bad opinion of him. DHH has great replacement theory views which is concerning and blogs about it.

Their Arch based Hyprland stuff was overblown though since it was just one weird mod and didn't reflect the project's leadership opinions.

in reply to houjou

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Gardiner Bryant did a video on this: video.4d2.org/w/rPMMDnLBA4kVmS…


The Framework/Omarchy thing


00:00 Why I'm making this video
01:17 (This isn't really about) Omarchy
02:44 (This is really about) DHH
04:35 Framework made their bed, now they've gotta lay in it.
08:45 Speaking directly to Framework's CEO Nirav Patel


in reply to Ada

i dislike how those of us who aren't okay with this are just supposed to get on board because "big tent." nazis operate by getting their foot in the door and acting respectable. then after a little bit, suddenly they've taken the whole place over. it's what they do with bars, it's what they do with music scenes, it's what they've done with past open source projects, it's what they did with the Reform Party in the united states. i need people to stop making room for nazis as long as they behave themselves
in reply to 𝖕𝖘𝖊𝖚𝖉

Care to support the transphobes angle with evidence? Or does it work like an honorary title?


Interesting that you chose to be passive aggressive and get your back up at the the idea that he's transphobic, rather than simply asking for evidence...

In any case, he did an article on his blog celebrating Abigail Shrier and her transphobic Irreversible Damage book. I'm not going to link to his blog, but if you want to find it, it was posted in March 2024

in reply to Ada

As I remembered, he positively reviewed a different book by her (Bad Therapy), which deals with parenting, and not with trans issues. Looking again (not happily), he does mention Irreversible Damage — but in passing, in an ambivalent way.

I think he never broached that particular topic, but I don't have the stomach to go over DHH's writing and check in detail. So you might be right.

in reply to Holytimes

They've always designed around ensuring good Linux support with their component choices and support of fwupd, but their marketing focused on being repairable and upgradable, unlike companies like System76, who explicitly sell their laptops as Linux laptops. It seems they've recently started advertising their Linux support more, possibly due to their partnership to have Ubuntu pre-installed, possibly due to seeing just how many Linux users they already had or possibly due to the number of people switching from Windows to Linux.
in reply to Holytimes

They always were Linux-friendly. Some hardware choices like the fingerprint reader were directly related to Linux compatibility. Firmware and UEFI updates have always been available on Linux. They sponsor a lot of FOSS projects (some of them unfortunately linked to nazi dipshits, stirring a lot of controversy, but 99% of them are clean).

They may not have explicitely advertised Linux before, but they dropped a lot of hints.

in reply to Felix

I’d like to also point out that MacOS has a hypervisor support framework built in so it can virtualize Linux built for ARM (aarch64 or arm64) very well on the Apple Silicon variants and also x86 on the Intel ones.

You can set that up yourself or use something like utm, which makes it easier. UTM also lets you set up hypervisors that can run Linux built for different architectures. Of course you can also rock Asahi on Apple Silicon hardware and blah blah blah.

But also for the non-DIYers or those who cannot abide Apple anything but want Linux there are alternatives (feel free to add to this of course):

nova custom

MNT Research

Star Labs

Tux

System76

This entry was edited (Saturday, April 25, 2026, 1:59 PM)
in reply to GamingChairModel

Yeah. This is something I've been trying to explain for a while. Between the Steam Deck and the declining overall market share of PCs, there's a huge jump in Linux as far as percentage of users goes, but it isn't actually making significant waves in general usage. Regular users are sticking with Windows and Mac, but now there's 1 Windows or Mac laptop in a household shared by everyone now versus multiple laptops and a desktop a few hardware cycles back.
in reply to Wispy2891

Who knows. Their target group is usually perfectly capable of installing an OS themselves. But Framework is also a popular hardware brand among Linux users, because their hardware is already built with Linux in mind. If you look at their forum, it does not feel like everyone is just installing Windows on their hardware.
This entry was edited (Saturday, April 25, 2026, 3:56 PM)
in reply to Aceticon

Though one would expect such technically inclined users to install the OS themselves. When I bought my 16 I bought "no OS" because while Fedora (which I knew would be installed) was an option I wanted FDE and so I chose to install it myself. It's possible many of these were first time linux users who wanted the savings but also the ease of buying with a pre-installed OS.
in reply to CriticalMiss

Quite well aware, as in, more aware than I want to be lol - but why would these be buying Framework tho? Overlap of folks wanting a Framework laptop at orgs forced to use (only) Windows, at orgs willing to then buy Framework laptops seems real small. And I mean, buying it with Windows installed does suggest what you're saying.

So hey, I'm wrong about a lot, such is life lol, maybe it makes sense.

in reply to chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]

Yet many people do pay the 145 EUR for Win 11 home in other PC products, not reading the fine print in the few alternative cases where one actually get the option to not get Windows pre-installed. Yes, I know that large producers can get much cheaper licenses, but that doesn't mean that they don't charge you big for it anyway, either openly or just hidden in the final price.
This entry was edited (Saturday, April 25, 2026, 4:03 PM)