What is your go-to Linux distro and why?
I'd like to settle on a distro, but none of them seem to click for me. I want stability more than anything, but I also value having the latest updates (I know, kind of incompatible).
I have tested Pop!_Os, Arch Linux, Fedora, Mint and Ubuntu. Arch and Pop being the two that I enjoyed the most and seemed the most stable all along... I am somewhat interested in testing NixOS although the learning curve seems a bit steep and it's holding me back a bit.
What are you using as your daily drive? Would you recommend it to another user? Why? Why not?
like this
don't like this
Meow.tar.gz
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja, Wizard, DuncanTDP, Paralda, Daklon and mrh like this.
Krafting
in reply to pluja • • •like this
Accursed_Volition, rzlatic, Wizard, linuxdaemon, 908musdf, pluja, Ullebe1, gnumdk, diffaldo, swordfish and timbuck2themoon like this.
TheFuzz
in reply to pluja • • •like this
supervent, Accursed_Volition, crusa187, pluja, Libertus, srock, DuncanTDP, Jestzer, IRQBreaker, aport, TiTeY` and mrh like this.
L3ft_F13ld!
in reply to pluja • • •like this
chaddy, pluja, snoopa, Matt, MisterDigital, DuncanTDP, forgotten_xennial, rainier, banazir, CrypticCoffee, JoeneckSpoeneck, 5i5phyu5, emhl, zemon, gadgetzombie and cuicuit like this.
RangerHere doesn't like this.
Spunky Monkey
in reply to L3ft_F13ld! • • •This is the way.
I changed GPU recently and felt like doing a fresh install and tried openSUSE Tumbleweed (was using EndeavourOS before). Very stable and fast.
like this
L3ft_F13ld!, DuncanTDP, anteaters, ElectricMachman and CrypticCoffee like this.
ElectricMachman doesn't like this.
Revan343
in reply to L3ft_F13ld! • • •I'm actually in the middle of deciding on a new distro, I'm trying to get away from Ubuntu/snap, but Debian 12 with LxQt or Xfce isn't playing nice with my laptop. I just finished writing out Mint and Tumbleweed flash drives, gonna give them both a shot, but I've never really used openSUSE before.
Any tips? Particular things you like about it
anteaters likes this.
L3ft_F13ld!
in reply to Revan343 • • •like this
Spunky Monkey and anteaters like this.
5i5phyu5
in reply to L3ft_F13ld! • • •gadgetzombie likes this.
unknowing8343
in reply to pluja • • •You tried most of them. You found Arch enjoyable, so I'd stick to that for the Wiki, the community, and flexibility.
NixOS looks interesting too, but nothing beats Arch in terms of having so much software at one-click distance with the almighty AUR.
like this
pluja and kam like this.
Jo Miran
in reply to pluja • • •I have been a Linux user since the Red Hat Halloween release (back in the twentieth century) and have run SUSE, Slackware, Red Hat, Arch, Debian and countless of their forks. Currently I'm settled on Pop!_OS 22.04 NVIDIA for my daily driver laptop with a built-in Nvidia GPU. It is rock solid and can run my three displays, each with a different resolution and refresh rate, without ever missing a beat. For everything else I use Debian and most of my clients run either RHEL or Oracle SEL on their production servers.
TL;DR: Pop!_OS daily driver and Debian for everything else.
like this
pluja and Turtle like this.
Cora
in reply to pluja • • •I’ve hopped around to a bunch of different distros, but I always return to Debian Stable. I don’t really need the most bleeding-edge packages for my system, due to my use case.
Most of my actual apps are installed via Flatpak, so they’re all pretty recent, while still being on a rock-solid stable distribution.
like this
pluja, banazir and LogarithmicCamel like this.
effingjoe
in reply to pluja • • •VanillaOS is pretty neat. It has an immutable (kind of) OS, lets you choose which package formats you want to use (flatpak, snap, appimage, etc) and leverages containers (a la Distrobox) and their package manager Apx to give you seamless access to packages on other distros. It's Ubuntu-based right now but the next release is switching to debian.
To be fair, I don't have much time on it. My daily drivers are a chromebook and a steamdeck, but I did dust off an old laptop just to check it out for a little bit.
Vanilla OS
vanillaos.orglike this
pluja and daw like this.
vitrial
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja and daw like this.
SinJab0n
in reply to pluja • • •U want stability stick to debian, bleeding egde apps? NixOs.
Middle ground? Ubuntu Rolling, u get reasonable up to day updates, and reasonable stability.
And remember, the perfect distro is the one u configure, and personalize for u. The distro is only gonna make ur life easier in making it urs, but that's all, I wasted a lot of time understanding this.
like this
pluja and tangled_cable like this.
Offlein doesn't like this.
👍Maximum Derek👍
in reply to pluja • • •pluja likes this.
CerineArkweaver
in reply to pluja • • •like this
rzlatic and 908musdf like this.
vermyndax
in reply to CerineArkweaver • • •kam likes this.
CerineArkweaver
in reply to vermyndax • • •DerRackletTänzer
in reply to pluja • • •pluja likes this.
saplyng
in reply to pluja • • •I've been using Garuda (arch derivative) for my home and work PC. It works how I want it to, I like that it has BTRFS as default for the file system, and the AUR is such an amazing resource I miss it whenever I use a different distro.
I have a production server that's using Alma at the moment, but with the RHEL news I'm thinking of switching it over to something else, but I'm not sure what yet. I've been using Ubuntu server for some test servers/projects and I like it better than Alma but it still hasn't given me that "wow" factor I feel with Arch so I'm not sure what I'm going to do there...
like this
pluja, surrendertogravity and HarriPotero like this.
xan1242
in reply to pluja • • •I'm using Arch simply because of familiarity and comfort in using it. That and pacman being fast usually helps me make up my mind whenever I try something else. I really hadn't experienced any major breakage in any of the packages in the standard repos, especially if everything is configured correctly. So I don't really have anything to say against Arch's stability.
I also hear good things about Tumbleweed, so that could be an alternative and more complete out-of-box package, but that also highly depends on how comfortable you'll be with openSUSE's way of doing things.
It all boils down to how you prefer to configure and manage your system and its packages, really. Nothing much more than that. As long it does the job, it's usually fine.
like this
pluja, wanghis_khan and nasa1531 like this.
wanghis_khan
in reply to xan1242 • • •AWizard_ATrueStar
in reply to pluja • • •pluja likes this.
brainfreeze
in reply to AWizard_ATrueStar • • •NumbersCanBeFun
in reply to pluja • • •Linux mint because it works out of the box and I’ve never had an issue installing it on any device I’ve needed.
Most of my office apps are cloud based so all I need is Firefox to get to work. I can also use the live USB to just do work out of that if push really comes to shove.
like this
anteaters, pluja, SmokeInFog, Shoresy, Tristano, Turtle, SOB_Van_Owen, CausticRain, frippa and JonTheKnight like this.
broben2of3
in reply to pluja • • •pluja likes this.
Kerb
in reply to pluja • • •i settled on fedora kde a few years ago(altho i recently switched to fedora silverblue kde)
imo a nice middleground.
if you are intrested in immutable distros, i can recommend silverblue (not as drastic of a change compared to nixos)
if you are intrested in nixos package management, you might want to try out the nix package manager on your current distro.
an intresting way to get the fresh but stable system you want is to,
install some rock solid distro like debian,
and then use the nix package manager and/or flatpacks to get the fresh software you want.
like this
anteaters, pluja, nasa1531, znx3p0, Ullebe1, LogarithmicCamel and Kerb like this.
Kerb doesn't like this.
Doll_Tow_Jet-ski
in reply to pluja • • •MX Linux – Midweight Simple Stable Desktop OS
mxlinux.orglike this
pluja, Turtle and bour like this.
anteaters
in reply to pluja • • •openSuse. After my years of distro hopping ended over a decade ago I settled on openSuse Leap and never switched to something else again. It's reliable and gives me the least bullshit. And by now it's the one I have the most experience in.
//edit
Leap on my server and tumbleweed on my work laptop but Leap would be sufficient there, too.
pluja likes this.
Linux reshared this.
joaom
in reply to pluja • • •like this
Leviathan, Bri Guy, pluja, HarriPotero, nasa1531 and Daklon like this.
cincinmasukmangkok
in reply to pluja • • •like this
FirstWizardZorander, flimsyberry, louis_sch, Bri Guy, pluja, Hibby, Daklon and forks like this.
SamsonSeinfelder
in reply to cincinmasukmangkok • • •I have it running as my Desktop (x86) and on my RPi (Arm)
Manjaro - FREE OPERATING SYSTEM FOR EVERYONE
ManjaroBri Guy likes this.
don't like this
orion, Wizard, HarriPotero, Jestzer, Holzkohlen, Ullebe1, zemon and Chaewon don't like this.
wanghis_khan
in reply to SamsonSeinfelder • • •like this
surrendertogravity, HarriPotero, Jestzer, znx3p0, Holzkohlen, LedoKun, Ullebe1, Hibby and emhl like this.
SamsonSeinfelder doesn't like this.
marlowe221
in reply to wanghis_khan • • •like this
znx3p0, LedoKun, aksdb and zemon like this.
SamsonSeinfelder doesn't like this.
Sentient Loom
in reply to SamsonSeinfelder • • •Name-Not-Applicable
in reply to pluja • • •In general, Ubuntu is my go-to when I just want something that works and is reasonably stable. Just pick the spin with the Desktop Environment that you like. I'm using KDE Neon (I realize Neon isn't an Ubuntu flavor or spin) on my daily driver laptop, and Ubuntu MATE on my desktop. I also have an old netbook that usually gets Xubuntu, but currently has Fedora 37 XFCE as an experiment.
It sure is nice that we have to option to distro-hop, either on bare metal or in a VM.
like this
crusa187 and pluja like this.
RoboRay
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja and rzlatic like this.
shrugal
in reply to pluja • • •like this
Nitrousoxide, pluja, rzlatic, farmer_bobathan, wanghis_khan, linuxdaemon, 908musdf, Matt, DuncanTDP, Tristano, birdie, Ullebe1, MoreCoffee, diffaldo and ItsPlasmaSir like this.
0xtero
in reply to pluja • • •Changing now would be major undertaking with no apparent upside, so I won't.
like this
pluja, Libertus, Matt, cheeseball, IRQBreaker, LedoKun and TiTeY` like this.
Nitrousoxide
in reply to pluja • • •Fedora Workstation is what I use for my desktop. If I were to have to reinstall now I'd do Silverblue.
For my home lab I do Proxmox with a couple of VM's for Ubuntu server for pihole DNS servers and an OpenMediaVault VM for my docker workloads. I'd probably do CoreOS or IoT if I was starting over there though.
like this
pluja, rzlatic, wanghis_khan, 908musdf, Matt, DuncanTDP, ilych, Ullebe1 and shrugal like this.
ProfessorCrunch
in reply to pluja • • •mint
it "just works" and I dont have to update it constantly
but my daily driver is endeavourOS
like this
pluja, SmokeInFog, Shoresy, abrasiveteapot, entropicdrift, Holzkohlen, GetAwayWithThis, Paralda, lemba, AusatKeyboardPremi, Mak40, CausticRain, AstroLightz_, mrh, frippa and JonTheKnight like this.
lemba
in reply to ProfessorCrunch • • •Mak40 likes this.
cyberpunk007
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja, erezac, GadgeteerZA and Slide like this.
Kallioapina doesn't like this.
Wr4ith
in reply to pluja • • •Gentoo and Debian. Debian will let you get back to what you really want to be doing whereas gentoo gives you excellent granularity over everything, but can be overwhelming and time consuming.
Really should ask yourself what you'll be mostly doing and pick a tool (distro) that let's you accomplish that.
like this
Libertus, cheeseball, pluja, Tristano, TiTeY` and krissen like this.
ehrenschwan
in reply to pluja • • •pluja likes this.
AsinineMonkey
in reply to pluja • • •like this
2xsaiko, 908musdf, DataDreadnought, nicomem, snek_boi, sneakyninjapants, di5ciple, Corngood, netvor, mrh and Klaymore like this.
DudeWithaTwist
in reply to AsinineMonkey • • •Corngood likes this.
aurtzy
in reply to DudeWithaTwist • • •Nix & NixOS | Reproducible builds and deployments
nixos.orgznx3p0 likes this.
nyan
in reply to pluja • • •Gentoo, for its user choice and lack of bloat. I've been using it for a long time, and can create my own packages for personal use if I don't mind them looking like Frankenstein bodges, so that's another plus. It's stable enough if you stick with actual stable-marked packages and don't go out of your way to shoot yourself in the foot, and if something does go wrong at the distro's end, 1. they usually fix it pretty fast and 2. rolling packages back is easy if the older version is still in the tree (and usually still possible if it isn't, although it can get kind of involved).
Would I recommend Gentoo to another user? That depends on which user. You kind of have to be either knowledgeable or willing to learn—it isn't a "just works" distro, although some things have been streamlined in recent years. You do have to put a little time into maintenance, but it's usually on the order of less than half an hour a week.
like this
gkpy, pluja, krissen and Hatch like this.
krissen
in reply to nyan • • •wanghis_khan
in reply to pluja • • •I used to be config tweaker master but now appreciate things just working for the most part without me touching it.
like this
Matt and pluja like this.
Sivaru
in reply to pluja • • •If you want to try Nixos (my current distro), watch this video .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGVXJ-TIv3Y
like this
pluja, pnutzh4x0r, ZenFriedRice, daw, sneakyninjapants, Paralda, Jdeez and DangerBird like this.
netvor
in reply to Sivaru • • •I've checked voidlinux.org/, looks nice but there is no screenshot! How can I decide without screenshot?
/s
Enter the void
Void Linuxlike this
Sivaru likes this.
Sivaru doesn't like this.
gkpy
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja and alternateved like this.
alternateved
in reply to gkpy • • •banazir likes this.
DniMam
in reply to pluja • • •Immutable OS with flatpak, snap or appimage.
While there is still lot limitation using only flatpak, snap or appimage, i believe that in the next decade they will slowly grow and end up that packaging nightmare.
So we can have an OS up to date, latest app without worrying any breakage. But i'm not well versed and dunno if people and dev will follow that road.
I think it's time to ditch apt, dnf, rpm, aur. I imagine it would ease dev work but i'm not sure.
like this
pluja, nasa1531 and aport like this.
don't like this
Unimps and zemon don't like this.
owatnext
Unknown parent • • •I agree, but ever since systemD, well...
like this
Tristano, TiTeY`, netvor and Dieal like this.
echo doesn't like this.
non_feistel
in reply to pluja • • •pluja likes this.
DarkThoughts
in reply to pluja • • •like this
Turtle and forgotten_xennial like this.
nasa1531 doesn't like this.
Fantasy
in reply to DarkThoughts • • •nasa1531 likes this.
Trent
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja and DynamicBits like this.
ffhein
in reply to Trent • • •Xubuntu has been my go-to so I installed 23.04 on both my wife's new computer, her netbook and our htpc recently. Turns out it ships with a broken xfce4-screensaver that crashes when you try to unlock the computer and you get stuck (unless you switch to a virtual console and kill the process). A xubuntu dev was helpful and directed me to a ppa that had a patched version, but I was still surprised that such a central feature wasn't working.
In addition there appears to be some kind of screen blanking that I haven't been able to disable. At first I just turned off the screen saver and all power saving features in the control panel, but the htpc would still turn off the monitor if left alone for some time, and then refuse to turn it back on unless I switched back and forth between virtual terminals while the TV was turned off. It got a little bit better after uninstalling xfce4-power-manager, and now the screen can be woken by moving the mouse, but it shouldn't turn off at all since it's supposed to be disabled.
I hope they manage to sort all those things out. I used Xubu
... show moreXubuntu has been my go-to so I installed 23.04 on both my wife's new computer, her netbook and our htpc recently. Turns out it ships with a broken xfce4-screensaver that crashes when you try to unlock the computer and you get stuck (unless you switch to a virtual console and kill the process). A xubuntu dev was helpful and directed me to a ppa that had a patched version, but I was still surprised that such a central feature wasn't working.
In addition there appears to be some kind of screen blanking that I haven't been able to disable. At first I just turned off the screen saver and all power saving features in the control panel, but the htpc would still turn off the monitor if left alone for some time, and then refuse to turn it back on unless I switched back and forth between virtual terminals while the TV was turned off. It got a little bit better after uninstalling xfce4-power-manager, and now the screen can be woken by moving the mouse, but it shouldn't turn off at all since it's supposed to be disabled.
I hope they manage to sort all those things out. I used Xubuntu for 5+ years with almost no issues.
Trent
in reply to ffhein • • •lemminer
in reply to pluja • • •If you are looking for stability with latest updates, then Gentoo. But I won't recommend it to a distro hopper.
Besides than Arch and Mint are my general recommendation.
like this
pluja, XPost3000, ZenFriedRice, dcat and krissen like this.
fallenone81 doesn't like this.
HegemonSushi
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja, XPost3000, Tristano, ZenFriedRice, GadgeteerZA, Hibby and Daklon like this.
Lemmchen
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja, 𝓢𝓮𝓮𝓙𝓪𝔂𝓔𝓶𝓶, RedShadowWizard, IRQBreaker, average650, XPost3000, marble, keanu0396, Tristano, ZenFriedRice, Holzkohlen, LedoKun, Paralda, andruid, lionkoy5555, BlueDragon28, Guilty Tangent, diffaldo, cuicuit and mrh like this.
average650
in reply to Lemmchen • • •Tristano likes this.
Holzkohlen
in reply to Lemmchen • • •like this
banazir and kanzalibrary like this.
under2x
in reply to Lemmchen • • •HubertManne
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja, XPost3000, keanu0396 and andruid like this.
mrmanager
in reply to pluja • • •Arch because I like simple.
Other distros are an exercise in patience I think. Each Ubuntu version has different names and versions of stuff like docker, mysql and everything else. It's really annoying to work with. I assume all six month distros are like that. And you have to add extra repos, keys and whatnot for it to even find things.
With arch, since it's rolling, I just install the latest version and I already know the command. It's always the same. Always.
There are many reasons I like arch but the simplicity of the installations is one of my favorite reasons to use it.
like this
muhyb, blue_struct, isbiltur, XPost3000, thisisbutaname, Rambler, Allene, ZenFriedRice, madthumbs, nasa1531, PAPPP, x2XS2L0U, Holzkohlen, Paralda, BlueDragon28, Laura, kat, echo, Daklon, kryllic, Dieal, riffy, mrh, Aodh and newIdentity like this.
Mak40 doesn't like this.
non_feistel
in reply to owatnext • • •sneakyninjapants likes this.
owatnext
in reply to non_feistel • • •like this
non_feistel and mrh like this.
9488fcea02a9
in reply to pluja • • •like this
IRQBreaker, average650, TCB13, adriator, ZenFriedRice, fireflash38, PAPPP, Sunny, aport, TiTeY`, arthurpizza, bober5, blayde, zemon, oblique_strategies, Optophonic 🚀, AstroLightz_, mrh, quat, 𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙚 and davidog23 like this.
TiTeY`
in reply to 9488fcea02a9 • • •like this
arthurpizza, 9488fcea02a9, zemon and oblique_strategies like this.
TCB13
in reply to pluja • • •Debian -- The Universal Operating System
Because it's universal, runs on everything rock solid and stable.
like this
adriator, ZenFriedRice, fireflash38, TiTeY`, arthurpizza, pluja, drier2423, blayde, netvor and AstroLightz_ like this.
kanzalibrary
in reply to pluja • • •1. It's Debian
2. Very lightweight (100mb on RAM)
3. Live to RAM
4. Frugal installation
5. Small size ISO (1gb) with full function utility
6. Flexibel recovery, from old to modern system
7. Responsive (no systemd)
8. Retro-kind WM (icebox-wm), perfectly match on retro system
like this
ZenFriedRice, GadgeteerZA, Hatch, sLLiK, fly_paper_love_maker and bour like this.
don't like this
fireflash38 and sLLiK don't like this.
Seperis
in reply to pluja • • •I semi-regularly distro-hop, but Xubuntu is the distro I keep coming back to between hops to take a break or when one goes (temporarily) dormant. It's currently running on my primary server/linux machine.
Reasons:
1.) It's light on resources
2.) It's very simple and clean.
3.) It works with all the programs I use regularly; only one needs to be hand-compiled (but that one has to be compiled for literally any Linux machine).
4.) I know it. Scrub/partition/install/configure in under an hour. I can pick up any of my projects again immediately where I left off.
DynamicBits likes this.
Ignacio
in reply to pluja • • •like this
Tech With Jake, klad0815, Daklon, sLLiK and 2001herne like this.
senslayer
in reply to pluja • • •like this
Gatsby, andruid, pluja, Slide and Daklon like this.
Gatsby
in reply to senslayer • • •Charlatan
in reply to pluja • • •like this
NeroToro, kim (she/her), pluja, naptera and masochismworld like this.
lemmy_n doesn't like this.
CarlCook
in reply to pluja • • •like this
DynamicBits and grean like this.
Holzkohlen
in reply to pluja • • •I'm on Fedora KDE now. Solid distro for now at least.
If I need to return to monkee: EndeavourOS
NeroToro likes this.
lemba
in reply to Holzkohlen • • •It's my daily driver, coming from Linux Mint.
ClaretNBlue
in reply to pluja • • •like this
Hatch, ramius345 and smpl like this.
ramius345
in reply to ClaretNBlue • • •Digester
in reply to pluja • • •Digester
in reply to pluja • • •like this
sabriy01, bl4in, 1henno1, PurpleGreen and Hibby like this.
1henno1 doesn't like this.
gunslingerfry
in reply to pluja • • •like this
sabriy01, Guilty Tangent and lemba like this.
arthurpizza
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja, smithjoe1, WarlordTeias, zemon and DaPorkchop_ like this.
bearfootbees
in reply to pluja • • •I searched for years. Nothing really clicked...
I've finally settled on ParrotOS. Their flagship is a pen testing distro like Kali, but they have a home distro as well, I've been using it for quite some time.
Stability is huge for me, and regular updates. Privacy focused, based on Debian.
Hope this helps your search :)
like this
WarlordTeias, pluja and amanneedsamaid like this.
Liam Mayfair
in reply to pluja • • •Fedora because it's robust, stable, mature and has a fairly up-to-date package repository. Plus, it has spins (ISO flavours) with different DEs/WMs installed, including i3 and even Sway!
If you want a Linux distro that just works and gets out of the way, Fedora is for you. I've been using it for years now and see no reason to switch.
like this
Ullebe1, shrugal, darkufo and pluja like this.
fireshell doesn't like this.
darkufo
in reply to Liam Mayfair • • •Same here, Tried about 10 distros and always end back with Fedora.
Been using it full time on my 2 desktops, and 2 laptops for 2 years now without ever thinking about trying another distro.
Liam Mayfair likes this.
phar
in reply to Liam Mayfair • • •Liam Mayfair likes this.
GadgeteerZA
in reply to pluja • • •like this
Guilty Tangent, Slide, hiroyt and giacomo like this.
don't like this
kedarkhand, Ullebe1, Hibby and TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him) don't like this.
Radin
in reply to GadgeteerZA • • •Manjaro Controversies
rentry.colike this
Ullebe1, Hibby, falcon2r, traches, emhl and TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him) like this.
GadgeteerZA
in reply to Radin • • •like this
smpl, isil, hiroyt, giacomo and utopianrevolt like this.
don't like this
witx, fen, traches, Hibby and TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him) don't like this.
giacomo
in reply to GadgeteerZA • • •I use Manjaro only because it makes others upset.
Also, I installed it a few years back and it just keeps working fine for me.
like this
utopianrevolt and GadgeteerZA like this.
TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him) doesn't like this.
kedarkhand
in reply to pluja • • •like this
Ullebe1, gnumdk and pluja like this.
anteaters doesn't like this.
Hibby
in reply to pluja • • •For desktop Linux, I use Arch. It's a community driven base distribution, so the needs of the community are what drives development and there are no financial decisions of a company that get priority, which is refreshing. It also has access to the latest and greatest that Linux has to offer.
They have a philosophy of expecting basic effort from users and to have a tinkering mindset. Historically, Arch devs and users have a reputation of being grumpy greybeards, but many of the rough edges have been rounded off in the last few years. If you are willing to do a bit of reading or watching some YouTube videos, it's not really that hard.
You can really build a lean and powerful machine that has just the software you want on the system with Arch. All it takes is a little effort and willingness to ask for help from the community after you have tried and failed to solve problems yourself. It's really not the badge of elitism to use Arch in 2023. It's never been easier to use and doesn't blow up on you nearly as often as the reputation implies. Just use good hygiene and
... show moreFor desktop Linux, I use Arch. It's a community driven base distribution, so the needs of the community are what drives development and there are no financial decisions of a company that get priority, which is refreshing. It also has access to the latest and greatest that Linux has to offer.
They have a philosophy of expecting basic effort from users and to have a tinkering mindset. Historically, Arch devs and users have a reputation of being grumpy greybeards, but many of the rough edges have been rounded off in the last few years. If you are willing to do a bit of reading or watching some YouTube videos, it's not really that hard.
You can really build a lean and powerful machine that has just the software you want on the system with Arch. All it takes is a little effort and willingness to ask for help from the community after you have tried and failed to solve problems yourself. It's really not the badge of elitism to use Arch in 2023. It's never been easier to use and doesn't blow up on you nearly as often as the reputation implies. Just use good hygiene and make snapshots so if you blow it up, it's only a 5 minute recovery.
like this
Sethayy, traches, kev, matchbox, pluja, sLLiK, Thomas, pkru and kam like this.
AsRedAsMonkeysAss
in reply to pluja • • •like this
traches, Someonelol, lemminer, Daklon, diffaldo and Thomas like this.
iamonabike doesn't like this.
phrogpilot73
in reply to pluja • • •I use Pop!_OS on my desktop and laptop. Prior to that, I would distro-hop like it was my job. I bought a system76 laptop and figured, why not. So, I had Pop preloaded on it instead of Ubuntu. Here's the reason I ended up settling on Pop as my one-and-only distro.
- Based off Ubuntu/Debian, which I am most familiar/comfortable with
- No Snaps
- Flatpak supported out of the box
- Relatively rapid deployment of updated kernels (currently on 6.2.6), so no need to worry about hardware support
- Tiling windows that are well implemented
- Backed by a company, but one that shares the same values as me
- Stable, even with semi-rolling release nature of it
The downsides are that their choice of colors are god-awful. I get it, it's their company's colors, but I don't think it looks really all that good on an operating system. I've gotten used to it, and don't care as much anymore.
like this
pluja, diffaldo, mbryson, ReadingStrawberry, xohshoo and 书行 [he / comrade] like this.
xohshoo
in reply to phrogpilot73 • • •PurpleGreen
in reply to pluja • • •Simple, stable, efficient.
like this
Cyberpro123, noordsestern, whoareu, mbryson, ReadingStrawberry and poquito_cabeza like this.
Steamymoomilk
in reply to pluja • • •and if i break something i can just rollback.
like this
Corngood and Klaymore like this.
di5ciple
in reply to Steamymoomilk • • •like this
Corngood, Steamymoomilk and Klaymore like this.
FaeDrifter
Unknown parent • • •I've slowly over the last 16 years come all the way around to Fedora. I started with Ubuntu Feisty Fawn, explored Mint and then Debian, then played around with Arch, moved to Opensuse Tumbleweed when it began, and now all Fedora and Fedora derivatives.
I think the most interesting Fedora projects rn are the immutable desktops, Silverblue and Kinoite. I might consider testing out Opensuse MicroOS when the desktop versions are more stable.
like this
MrDetermination and timbuck2themoon like this.
noordsestern
in reply to pluja • • •like this
Mugmoor, whoareu, LaughingM0n, ReadingStrawberry and poquito_cabeza like this.
mrmanager
Unknown parent • • •I wouldn't call it rock solid... It was running old versions of kde with lots of bugs. Bugs that had been fixed months ago.
So I don't know. It's good we have choice but I don't personally see Debian as more stable than arch. I see it as having older bugs than arch.
aport
in reply to mrmanager • • •like this
diffaldo, mrh and davidog23 like this.
Biti
in reply to pluja • • •like this
waytogoskills, pluja, sLLiK and ReadingStrawberry like this.
Flaky
in reply to pluja • • •It depends on how you want your update cycle.
If you don't mind the rolling release type of updates where you get updates ASAP, EndeavourOS does the job nicely. It's based on Arch Linux like Manjaro, but unlike Manjaro it only uses its own repository for its own, distro-specific extra software, everything else is from Arch's repos. If you remember Antergos, it's basically the spiritual successor.
For those who want a stable update cycle, I would recommend either Linux Mint or Fedora. I've had a solid experience with Fedora, but my friends really like Mint as well.
For those who want to be able to mix and match stable and unstable packages, Gentoo is the way to go. The nature of its package management allows you to mix and match stable and unstable versions at your own leisure, at the cost of long compilation times. It depends on whether that's worth it for you, but it's worth mentioning.
like this
pluja, ReadingStrawberry and TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him) like this.
smpl
in reply to owatnext • • •eshep
in reply to pluja • •You'll be happiest using whatever you're comfortable maintaining/troubleshooting. I've spent ~20 years playing with many different distros for one reason or another and the only one I can't stay away from is #gentoo. As with most things, everyone's got different tastes, that's the great thing about having so much choice.
Nobody's reason for "the best" distro is gonna be the right one for you. You'll know what's right for you because it's the one you always want to use more than any other.
like this
alternateved, Jdeez, ReadingStrawberry, lemba, Ew0, pkru and notfromhere like this.
James O'Malley reshared this.
notfromhere
in reply to eshep • • •eshep likes this.
Linux reshared this.
eshep
in reply to notfromhere • •Linux reshared this.
crystal
in reply to pluja • • •I use NixOS on my main PC.
If you want to use NixOS, you have to be willing to read.
Two things are especially difficult:
Coding: You will have to learn the Nix-specific way for everything you do. How does Nodejs work in NixOS? How does GCC work in NixOS? How does my IDE work in NixOS?
Using unofficial packages: The nix repos are very large and you'll most likely find everything you need there (or on flatpak/flathub). But if something isn't there, the easiest way tends to be packaging it as a nix package yourself. And that's something many people probably don't want to do.
The coding thing is annoying enough that I may switch away from NixOS at some point.
Other than that, NixOS is great.
like this
ReadingStrawberry, fly_paper_love_maker and Klaymore like this.
nightingalem
in reply to crystal • • •aksdb
in reply to pluja • • •like this
ReadingStrawberry, Thomas and pkru like this.
Rikudou_Sage
in reply to pluja • • •Linux Mint is my go-to. It's stable and if I want the latest update of anything, I use one of these:
I think people underestimate how useful docker can be for running various stuff, I have few semi-permanent containers for some software and it works great.
like this
ReadingStrawberry, round_circle and averyfalken like this.
utopianrevolt
in reply to Rikudou_Sage • • •Rikudou_Sage
in reply to utopianrevolt • • •docker run -it --name mysql -p 3306:3306 mysql:8. This will run an interactive container (-it) called mysql (--name mysql) which will run the version 8 of mysql (the image name and version,mysql:8) which will forward the port 3306 from container to the port 3306 on your host PC (-p 3306:3306). You can have multiple containers, so for example multiple mysql versions (they can't have the same host port if they're running at the same time).mrmanager
in reply to aport • • •sLLiK
in reply to pluja • • •like this
nathanjent, shapis, Thomas, round_circle and jelloeater - Ops Mgr like this.
chockblock
in reply to sLLiK • • •Does Arch have built in disk encryption?
I'm on Manjaro but I'm sick of having to unlock the LUKS drive encryption every time I start the computer
don't like this
giacomo and vodka don't like this.
yourdogsnipples
in reply to chockblock • • •like this
round_circle and giacomo like this.
chockblock
in reply to yourdogsnipples • • •bellsDoSing likes this.
bellsDoSing
in reply to chockblock • • •AFAIK, if you want disk encryption on Arch, you gotta set it up yourself (i.e. follow the wiki).
And last time I installed manjaro (couple years ago), the installer would let you decide whether you want disk encryption or not. So nobody is being forced to use it.
Then again, if you are tired of it, there likely is a way to effectively disable it for your current install. But most likely that will be quite a bit more involved that just unchecking it during install.
like this
chockblock and Hibby like this.
chockblock
in reply to bellsDoSing • • •chockblock
in reply to bellsDoSing • • •fly_paper_love_maker
in reply to pluja • • •like this
jelloeater - Ops Mgr, pluja and Klaymore like this.
Jerry
in reply to fly_paper_love_maker • • •like this
jelloeater - Ops Mgr and Klaymore like this.
fly_paper_love_maker
in reply to Jerry • • •Klaymore
in reply to fly_paper_love_maker • • •s20
in reply to pluja • • •It used to be Fedora, and I still want it to be Fedora. It was solid, stable, cutting edge, and easy to work with both on the command line and in the super-up-to-date Gnome desktop. DNF is great once you make a few tweaks, I don't care about systemd, and it supports all of my hardware with basically no tweaking right out of the box. And the Anaconda Installer isn't all that bad once you get used to its idiosyncrasies. I've been a distrohopper for like 15 years now, but I always end up hopping back to Fedora. Or I did, anyway, but with IBM-RedHat's shenanigans as of late, I'm looking for a new home. Current thoughts:
- I used to run Arch (btw), and could go back to it, but I'd prefer something more brainless to maintain (Arch isn't hard to maintain - check updates before you install, be careful with the AUR, it's golden - but I just don't have the spoons anymore). It's actually what I'm running on the laptop I'm using to post this.
- I'm not going to use Ubuntu or anything else involving Snap because I
... show moreIt used to be Fedora, and I still want it to be Fedora. It was solid, stable, cutting edge, and easy to work with both on the command line and in the super-up-to-date Gnome desktop. DNF is great once you make a few tweaks, I don't care about systemd, and it supports all of my hardware with basically no tweaking right out of the box. And the Anaconda Installer isn't all that bad once you get used to its idiosyncrasies. I've been a distrohopper for like 15 years now, but I always end up hopping back to Fedora. Or I did, anyway, but with IBM-RedHat's shenanigans as of late, I'm looking for a new home. Current thoughts:
But seriously, RHEL - just re-open the source code, thanks, you asshats.
Edit: I really need to learn how to proofread before I post.
like this
PasserOfTheBuck, cutotopo, a Kendrick fan, MonkeyLord, pikl and 𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙚 like this.
PasserOfTheBuck doesn't like this.
Professorozone
in reply to s20 • • •It is running Mint. Getting YouTube to come up takes an eternity. I'm wondering if a different distro would fix this. If so, which one would be best? I need it to run Firefox well because I want to use the ad blocker. Ideas?
amanneedsamaid
in reply to Professorozone • • •Professorozone
in reply to amanneedsamaid • • •amanneedsamaid likes this.
amanneedsamaid
in reply to s20 • • •As a Fedora user, I don't understand why you care this much about RHEL? I agree the decision is very bad, but Fedora is downstream from RHEL and
If you really prefer using Fedora, I think the paywalling of RHEL's sourcr code has little to no affect on you.
s20 likes this.
s20
in reply to amanneedsamaid • • •You make good points. My jumping off the Fedora ship was a knee-jerk reaction to the RHEL doofusry, and not one based completely on rational thought, sadly. And now I've been hopping around spending more time researching stuff and trying things out than getting things done lol.
So yeah. I might just go back to Fedora...
amanneedsamaid
in reply to s20 • • •Yeah, I almost distrohopped for the same reason!
Even if you do go back to Fedora, you're a more experienced user than you were before.
s20 likes this.
cow
in reply to pluja • • •alternateved likes this.
DaPorkchop_
in reply to pluja • • •like this
xohshoo, reflex_aliens and factorialsexciteme like this.
NerdyOldGeek
in reply to pluja • • •like this
jelloeater - Ops Mgr, xohshoo and factorialsexciteme like this.
U de Recife
in reply to pluja • • •denny
in reply to pluja • • •I tried quite a few of distros and I keep on going back to Fedora. A lot of things come out of the box such as Flatpak, it won't pester you about the password when you just want to install a app and i barely find myself solving issues with command line.
My other two favorites are Mint and Pop, i can recommend these to beginners and I really just like a good out of the box experience, avoiding command line where possible. Are there others that tick these boxes?
like this
a Kendrick fan, amanneedsamaid and iter_facio like this.
a Kendrick fan
in reply to denny • • •like this
denny and amanneedsamaid like this.
EamonnMR
in reply to pluja • • •𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙚 likes this.
Cosmonaut_Collin
in reply to pluja • • •dadarobot
in reply to pluja • • •like this
jelloeater - Ops Mgr, bellsDoSing and wawowiwe like this.
don't like this
dinckel, vodka and puhaah don't like this.
Ew0
in reply to dadarobot • • •GitHub - arindas/manjarno: Reasons for which I don't use Manjaro anymore
GitHublike this
SyndicateClu and Hibby like this.
wawowiwe doesn't like this.
health437682
in reply to pluja • • •pluja likes this.
Red Army Dog Cooper
in reply to health437682 • • •like this
asparagus9001, VirtualBriefcase and health437682 like this.
SapienSRC
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja, banazir and flyos like this.
dinckel
in reply to pluja • • •I've tried basically every reasonably maintained distribution, and keep coming back to Arch. It just feels right. And it just works right too. The package manager is excellent, and that is one of the things that makes or breaks any distribution for me. I also love that it comes with nothing, so you know what you get, and it'll be setup how you want it. With other major distributions, I spend a considerable amount of time removing things first, which is something I just don't want to do.
I've been trying out NixOS recently. I really appreciate what it is trying to do, but the complexity of nix-command is quite overwhelming
like this
pluja, Agareth, Sh3Rm4n, pkru and binarious like this.
bloodfart
in reply to pluja • • •Debian stable, the os for 50 year old nudists.
It’s the stable branch of one of the oldest distributions around.
like this
reflex_aliens, bour, banazir, pluja, Krik, factorialsexciteme, sebsch, 𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙚 and frippa like this.
thinkyfish
in reply to pluja • • •like this
harpuia, ronflex, blastofffox, Gleddified, clementineholic, dudebro, Zozano, Tomkoid and tubbadu like this.
ronflex
in reply to thinkyfish • • •like this
clementineholic and xpsking like this.
Resolved3874
in reply to ronflex • • •Red Army Dog Cooper
in reply to pluja • • •like this
TheButtonJustSpins and amanneedsamaid like this.
plasticbaginthes3a
in reply to pluja • • •like this
Omniformative, LewsTheremin, LibertyBeta, Double_A, banazir, BubblyMango, themarty27 and pluja like this.
TheFrirish
in reply to pluja • • •like this
mlfh, Kristof12, Hibby and banazir like this.
amanneedsamaid doesn't like this.
TheV2
in reply to pluja • • •I've been using Arch Linux as a daily driver for about two years I believe. As with any other distribution, it depends on the user's preferences, experience and needs, whether or not I'll recommend them Arch.
What I like the most about Arch is the customization from the ground up, the rich, detailed and yet user-friendly Arch Wiki, the AUR (although one shouldn't depend on it too much) and that after the installation everything seems more trouble-free than the distributions I've tried before. Arch almost never broke for me and even then fixing the issues weren't a big problem. It's not as difficult as it is often portrayed.
Nor is it as easy as it is often portrayed. A new user could be comfortable starting with Arch Linux, but it doesn't hurt to have experienced another distribution that is intended to be user-friendly.
like this
pluja, notfromhere, dudebro and monotrox like this.
notfromhere
in reply to TheV2 • • •like this
TheV2 and JustARegularNerd like this.
Ew0
in reply to notfromhere • • •This is how I feel about Gentoo too but I use Void as a daily instead, no systemd and it feels more like what Arch used to be (e.g. Runit is like 5k SLOC whereas systemd is 100s of k's).
Not bashing but everything seems well engineered with less cruft/bitrot than Gentoo. Of course there's less customisability xbps-src is pretty decent at doing the job, or just write your own templates :)
notfromhere likes this.
AstroLightz_
in reply to pluja • • •factorialsexciteme likes this.
marmalade
in reply to pluja • • •like this
pluja, factorialsexciteme, quat and 𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙚 like this.
notfromhere
in reply to marmalade • • •marmalade
in reply to notfromhere • • •Nothing really. Arch is still great, I just kept having stuff happen where I’d suddenly find out there was a new bug in something at inopportune times. Just the nature of being bleeding edge. Nothing broke severely, but like if you want to join a Zoom call or play a game with friends or something, having something break randomly that you have to fix, even if it just takes a quick search or 5 minutes of troubleshooting can get tiresome.
Also, all of the customization stuff that Arch allows is not as appealing to me anymore since my skill level with Linux has reached a point where I can get super granular with pretty much any distro. Add to that flatpak reducing my need to depend on the AUR, and there you have it.
notfromhere likes this.
Ew0
in reply to pluja • • •pluja likes this.
katy ✨
in reply to pluja • • •pluja likes this.