PartLint is now released on git.sr.ht/~martijnbraam/partli…
Also added a small utility for calculating LCSC basic part resistors :)
eshep likes this.
PartLint is now released on git.sr.ht/~martijnbraam/partli…
Also added a small utility for calculating LCSC basic part resistors :)
eshep likes this.
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
in reply to Martijn Braam • • •Found a bug!
I have two part numbers for the same value & footprint:
C5, C2 1µF 1206 C1966364, C24497
The first one matches, the second one does not (it's 100nF) - but partlint doesn't report a problem with the second one until I remove the first one.
Nice tool and timing, you pushed it just in time for when I needed it 😁
Martijn Braam
in reply to Sebastian Krzyszkowiak • • •Martijn Braam
in reply to Martijn Braam • • •eshep
in reply to Martijn Braam • •Martijn Braam
in reply to Martijn Braam • • •Karl Schultheisz
in reply to Martijn Braam • • •term for unnecessary visual elements in charts
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Martijn Braam
in reply to Karl Schultheisz • • •Karl Schultheisz
in reply to Martijn Braam • • •Martijn Braam
in reply to Karl Schultheisz • • •flpvsk
in reply to Martijn Braam • • •Fantastic project, thank you!
I've noticed quite a few parts are not in the spreadsheet provided by JLC. Would it make sense to do a "community library" of those? Or maybe support for having an additional list locally?
Happy to put together a PR if that's something you would be open to.
Here are some of the parts missing:
C91702
C305350
C91702
Martijn Braam
in reply to flpvsk • • •@flpvsk A community library would be amazing, that's also the only option I think for having non-jlc parts in this system so it works for other suppliers. I'm not sure how it would work though.
There's a lot of parts so doing a database in git is probably painful. The other option would be running a webservice for a centralized parts database.
flpvsk
in reply to Martijn Braam • • •Oh my, git would be so cool, if it can handle the job. Folder per manufacturer, file per part number, contents with part properties including marketplace part numbers. That'd be super easy to contribute to.
I have no idea how bad would it get performance-wise though. Maybe we could ask git experts here about handling tons of small files that change rarely?
Alternatively there must be a good open database solution for crowdsourcing. I don't know much about that space.