What modern (gaming) laptops should be avoided for proprietary firmware or whitelists/gate keeping? Also posted Linux GPU telemetry data from Stable Diffusion
I'm looking for a machine to run OpenGPT, Stable Diffusion, and Blender. I'm on the precipice of buying an Alienware w/ Ryzen 9 with a Radeon RX6850m. I've never needed anything near this level on Linux and I'm scared TBH. I'd much rather get a System76, but the equivalent hw has Nvidia and costs more than twice as much. While skimming for issues with current hardware, I saw something about a Legion laptop that could only use Intel RAID for the file system, and that this was a nightmare with generic distro kernels. What other stuff like this is happening with current laptop hardware?
I can barely manage a Gentoo install by following the handbook, understanding a third of it, and taking a few weeks to get sorted.
I spent all of yesterday afternoon sorting though all of the Linux hardware data in this stable diffusion telemetry: vladmandic.github.io/sd-extensβ¦
That total dataset has just over 5k total entries/699 valid Linux entries not including LSFW. It contains no entries for a Radeon RX6850m. I'm super nervous to buy a laptop that costs as much as my first car. I never want to run Windows again. What resources can I check to boost my confidence that this is going to work on Fedora WS?
If anyone is interested, the SD github dataset has the following numb entries/AMD card model:
- _3 RX 5700 XT /8GB
- _2 RX _580 __ /4GB
- _3 RX _580 __ /8GB
- 15 RX 6600 XT /8GB
- _1 RX 6650 XT /8GB
- 31 RX 6700 XT /12GB
- 10 RX 6750 XT /12GB
- 10 RX 6800 __ /16GB
- 19 RX 6800 XT /16GB
- 15 RX 6900 XT /16GB
- _9 RX 6950 XT /16GB
- _7 RX 7900 XT /20GB
- 39 RX 7900XTX /24GB
- _6 RX VEGA __ /8GB
Other common cards used in Linux and in this dataset are:
NVIDIA
- 39 A100-SXM4 /79GB
- 20 GTX-1070 /8GB
- 11 GTX-1080Ti /11GB
- 13 H100-PCIe /79GB
- 12 RTX-2070 /8GB
- 12 RTX-2080 Ti /22GB
- 31 RTX-3060 /12GB
- 16 RTX-3070 /8GB
- 10 RTX-3080 /10GB
- 39 RTX-3090 /24GB
- 11 RTX-3090 Ti /24GB
- 10 RTX-4070 Ti /12GB
- 87 RTX-4090 /24GB
- 27 RTX-A4000 /16GB
- 15 RTX-A5000 /24GB
TESLA
- 26 T4 /15GB
- 11 V100S-PCIE /32GBlike this
shiroininja, fruitywelsh, tubbadu, ReK2, kaiserZak, sixapples, hnnng, specialneedz, Garzak, Noodles, Audrius, Fox, tentphone, Dessalines, AncientBlueDragon, Mattchenzo, outtieTV, P_A_R_T_S, chirospasm, Carlos Solís, alphapro784, OvercastSunburn, sawdustprophet, Canux, RozaΕtuno, eldrichhydralisk, InverseParallax, Jummit, linucs, ScareEm, cincinmasukmangkok, Dreadful6644, Richardisaguy, Dalde, squidzorz, mrh, alaliliiso and newbeni like this.
Canux doesn't like this.
poVoq
in reply to π΄πππ • • •Uhm, I don't think you will have much luck with an AMD laptop GPU and stable diffusion. Their support for desktop consumer GPUs is already atrocious in ROCm.
Maybe get a cheaper laptop that allows connecting a eGPU case? No idea if that works better, but I think the chances are a lot better.
like this
simple, π΄πππ, SomeBoyo, lightstream and zeroblood like this.
π΄πππ
in reply to poVoq • • •lightstream likes this.
poVoq
in reply to π΄πππ • • •π΄πππ
in reply to poVoq • • •This guy is windows centric but has a list of ram minimum requirements:
Stable Diffusion: The Ultimate GPU Guide
or just the cropped screenshot:
... Show more...I'm mostly concerned with what potential proprietary garbage is locked in the firmware of a laptop. Current PC motherboards are even worse for this, like even System76's firmware for their desktops is proprietary. The work on HIPS to bridge CUDA and ROCm is active and open source. I'll deal with some limitations to avoid nvidia treating me like garbage as a customer. There is a good bit of banter about how AMD is currently operating at around half its potential and that this is about to change. With OpenSIL and the effort AMD is putting into open source it seems like the better option. I want to do some more kernel hacking experiments with the CPU scheduler and process isolation. This is far easier when I don't have to deal with asymmetrical c
This guy is windows centric but has a list of ram minimum requirements:
Stable Diffusion: The Ultimate GPU Guide
or just the cropped screenshot:
I'm mostly concerned with what potential proprietary garbage is locked in the firmware of a laptop. Current PC motherboards are even worse for this, like even System76's firmware for their desktops is proprietary. The work on HIPS to bridge CUDA and ROCm is active and open source. I'll deal with some limitations to avoid nvidia treating me like garbage as a customer. There is a good bit of banter about how AMD is currently operating at around half its potential and that this is about to change. With OpenSIL and the effort AMD is putting into open source it seems like the better option. I want to do some more kernel hacking experiments with the CPU scheduler and process isolation. This is far easier when I don't have to deal with asymmetrical cores and complicated management.
Regardless, the linked data telemetry shows plenty of people are running AMD GPUs just fine. I was expecting to see custom kernels used with the Radeon stuff and mostly people running mainline, but that is not the case. There are a few on the bleeding edge, but most are on old generic LTS kernels. It looks like it just works. The dataset includes the parameters and iteration time for each user running SD. It is a little slower than nvidia, but it still works fine. There are a lot of people running 8GB and smaller GPUs on SD.
Stable Diffusion: The Ultimate GPU Guide
koiboi (YouTube)CMDR_Horn likes this.
poVoq
in reply to π΄πππ • • •This is for very low resolution only and AI up-scaling then takes another long time. Yes SD can work with 8gb vRAM and 12 is nicer, but the upcoming SDXL will probably require 16gb to work good enough.
I agree that Nvidia is crap and would love to recommend AMD, but their software for AI stuff is just bad right now and their business decisions to only support the newest data-center GPUs with it is even worse.
I have an all AMD Linux system, and it works great for gaming and VR, but I have given up on trying to get SD to work on it despite spending a lot of time on that already. Maybe with a newer card it would be better, but I think the risk is just too high to spend a lot of money on an officially unsupported card that AMD can break any minute and has done so in the past.
π΄πππ likes this.
π΄πππ
in reply to poVoq • • •This is the talking-sense that got to me. Thanks. It is why I made the post before pulling the trigger.
I really hate shopping and now I'm back to zero. I probably need to focus on an external graphics card solution, but that looks like a messy space to navigate too. There seems to be a good bit of negative feedback from the ASUS ROC external GPU laptop setup. I have no idea what is or is not possible. I think I saw a headline in passing about USB4 just getting merged into the kernel, so that doesn't bode well for support of existing hardware. I'm not sure what kind of bandwidth is really needed for SD to the CPU.
Thanks again for the minor disappointment to avoid a major one later.
simple
in reply to π΄πππ • • •If you're going to do AI stuff you have to go with Nvidia. AMD is quite bad at it and in some cases doesn't support some technologies like Stable Diffusion at all.
I'd recommend a 3070 at least. You'll need the vram.
like this
π΄πππ, lightstream and Adhalia like this.
π΄πππ
in reply to simple • • •simple
in reply to π΄πππ • • •π΄πππ likes this.
l3mming
in reply to π΄πππ • • •like this
π΄πππ and hstde like this.
guyman doesn't like this.
π΄πππ
in reply to l3mming • • •like this
fryday, ashestosea, Mothra and hstde like this.
apatters
in reply to π΄πππ • • •π΄πππ likes this.
l3mming
in reply to π΄πππ • • •like this
π΄πππ and Mothra like this.
π΄πππ
in reply to l3mming • • •bentruck doesn't like this.
l3mming
in reply to π΄πππ • • •like this
π΄πππ likes this.
guyman
in reply to l3mming • • •Do not listen to this person. They have no idea what they're talking about.
bentruck doesn't like this.
eshep
in reply to π΄πππ • •like this
Professional_Human and π΄πππ like this.
guyman doesn't like this.
Linux reshared this.
π΄πππ
in reply to eshep • • •eshep likes this.
bentruck doesn't like this.
Linux reshared this.
eshep
in reply to π΄πππ • •π΄πππ likes this.
Linux reshared this.
guyman
in reply to eshep • • •You're usually better off just buying a Windows computer and installing Linux on it if you want the best performance for the price.
Linux reshared this.
what
in reply to guyman • • •guyman likes this.
guyman doesn't like this.
guyman
in reply to what • • •Uhh, no.
You still end up paying more for worse hardware with that brand, regardless of the windows license.
Ennon
in reply to π΄πππ • • •like this
koalatums, π΄πππ and Kimo like this.
Lx32
in reply to π΄πππ • • •π΄πππ likes this.
Dreadful6644
in reply to π΄πππ • • •like this
Richardisaguy and π΄πππ like this.