Skip to main content


#MovieThread VI: The Past Is An Undiscovered Country, Chapter Ten — October Edition

From 2020 to 2024 I watched 1962 movies.
In 2025 so far I've watched another 306, for a total of 2268 movies.

* Wrapping up Stanley Kubrick.
* Not a bad month to do Henry Selick in.
* Probably some horror.

:beepboopone: Previous thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/115135887…


#MovieThread VI: The Past Is An Undiscovered Country, Chapter Nine — September Edition

From 2020 to 2024 I watched 1962 movies.
In 2025 so far I've watched another 274, for a total of 2236 movies.

* Have started Stanley Kubrick.
* Coming up on some real long ones.

:beepboopone: Previous thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/114953310…


in reply to Alex Daily!

The government has injected me with a fresh dose of plague juice, so let's bring back my "and then all I did the rest of the day was watch a long movie" tradition, it's --

#307, or #2269, 1975 Stanley Kubrick film "Barry Lyndon."

#307 #2269
in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔫🔫 #307: "Barry Lyndon" (1975)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Long, but gorgeous, and also long, but funny as hell. In a very, very dry sense.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Maybe I should've waited another nine years to watch this? It's --

#308, or #2270, 1985's "2010: The Year We Make Contact."

#308 #2270
in reply to Alex Daily!

Everyone I've ever seen say they kinda like this has disclaimed it with "but you have to try to totally ignore that it's a sequel to 2001: A Space Odyssey."

Anyway, this opens with a recap of and stills from "2001: A Space Odyssey."

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

📡 #308: "2010: The Year We Make Contact." (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

for how boneheaded a thing this is to make at all, in the end, it's fine. wish it had more of its own thing going on, though.
in reply to Alex Daily!

The year is 1991. With the exception of "Char's Counterattack" and an 8-episode OVA, for the past half a decade, the face of new Gundam has been the largely regrettable SD shorts. Until --

#309, or #2271, "Mobile Suit Gundam F91."

#gundam

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

The preview episode of 0083 I thought was really 90s-coded, a little cartoonier, a little more radical, aesthetically it very comfortably stands next to Dragon Ball and Sailor Moon, you could easily air it on Toonami, as it were.

But for all that F91 is just as much meant to be a Gundam for the 90s, it immediately feels really stuck in 80s shoulder pads and bomber jackets.

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

I suppose that's probably part of why this is the first 13 episodes of a new planned but scrapped year-long TV show boiled down to a 2-hour film that never really goes anywhere else.
in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:gundam: #309: "Mobile Suit Gundam F91" (1991)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

It's paced like a compilation film and doesn't really do anything new in a major way, but you know, Tomino on his usual bullshit is still very watchable, so as a kick-off to 90s Gundam goes, not a bad start.

(But as a road not taken by the franchise, I'm also glad it's not a longer road, and am ready for something fresher.) #gundam

in reply to Alex Daily!

It’s the movie my brother keeps calling “not Paddington, I know it’s not called Paddington,” leaving now to go see —

#310, or #2272, 2025’s “Eddington.”

#310 #2272
in reply to Alex Daily!

Please find attached my review of the first half of Ari Aster’s 2025 film “Eddington”:

I think this does a terrific job depicting something very specific about the world of early 2020. Even if I probably disagree with Mr Aster about how annoying we each think some of the types of character from that time are, I think he does a terrific job accurately capturing a heightened version of a time we all lived through.

in reply to Alex Daily!

I’d like to draw specific attention to how the picture frames and scores simple things like conversations on the street or walking into supermarkets as tense confrontations of the kind we all know from westerns, daily life made scary by the pandemic. I think Mr Aster might have something here.

Once I tuned in to the picture’s wavelength, I found a lot of it really funny. Great performances anchor pathetic behaviour that might be unwatchably sad from real people.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Now, please find attached my followup review, of the second half of Ari Aster’s 2025 film “Eddington":

We enter now into the demilitarised zone between “what the fuck was that” and “hahaha fuck yes.”

in reply to Alex Daily!

😷 #310: "Eddington" (2025), the second half

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

😷 #310: "Eddington" (2025), the second half, one big spoiler

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

All of this adds up to a rough, often frustrating watch that it /is/ hard to deny is incredibly well made.

I guess it’s only fitting that a movie that so relentlessly refuses to pick a clean side comes so clearly in two halves.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Will half metal apparel do? No? Well, alright then, it's --

#311, or #2273, 1987 Stanley Kubrick film "Full Metal Jacket."

#311 #2273
in reply to Alex Daily!

Not actually entirely sure what this is about, besides army.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987), racist old dialogue

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

Alex Daily! reshared this.

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

well made but just miserable to sit in for two hours

war is hell etcetera etcetera

in reply to Alex Daily!

🥾 #311: "Full Metal Jacket" (1987)

Sensitive content

in reply to 🇹 Ti

@The_T If I so much as see a dog and a little girl in this, I swear.
in reply to Alex Daily!

It's about two brothers who can turn matter into other matter, no? Ooh and then join the army.
in reply to Alex Daily!

It's the members only screening, which means free snack and drink, which makes the question of whether to bother seeing this very easy, leaving now to go see --

#312, or #2274, 2025's "Roofman."

(Of the New England Roofmans?)

#312 #2274
in reply to pending handle 🎏

@kurt Yes, if Sinterklaas was kind of an idiot criminal whose modus operandi was breaking into a series of identical American McDonald'ses through the roof, and who, after breaking out of prison, lived in a Toys R Us for a while.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Pleasantly charming, lightly comic true story crime drama about a guy who broke into a series of McDonald’ses, got caught, broke out of prison, then lived in a Toys R Us for a while.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Objectively, on paper, the guy is an asshole — yeah, he’s nice to the people he robs, tells them to put their coats on before he makes them get in the walk-in freezer, but that’s still armed robbery and involuntary restriction of free movement, and neither of his two families are actually better off for living in his wake — but the Channing Tatum performance does a lot of work to make that guy a watchable, likeable goofball.

(I probably wouldn’t wanna hang out with the real guy.)

in reply to Alex Daily!

Interesting structural thing of spending two hours getting to know him, and most of that time getting to know the employees of the Toys R Us — and then when he finally interacts with more than just Kirsten Dunst, to have them see him as nothing more than the asshole he is. There’s something interesting there, even if this just grazes it.

Nothing much to remark upon, nothing much to pick apart. A perfectly solid picture.

(45 years, America is such a fucking shithole.)

in reply to Alex Daily!

Time now to take a short walk to go see --

#313, or #2275, 2025's "The Long Walk."

#313 #2275
in reply to Alex Daily!

My brother did not believe me when I told him this was 110 minutes of boys walking. Dear reader, it was 110 minutes of boys walking. Pretty good!

Or, at least, as good, I think, as an adaptation of the Bachman novel in 2025 is gonna get. I understand, respect, and think I might like the changed ending, though ultimately I do think it means I prefer the book over the film.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Not a single bad performance in this, and several really great ones. David Jonsson is gonna win Best Actor this decade for /something/.
in reply to Alex Daily!

(Finally I can listen to the 96 Greers that's been glaring at me in my podcast feed for 9 days.)
in reply to pending handle 🎏

@kurt Every step they take is one step further away than they've ever been from the start of the movie.
in reply to Alex Daily!

The vibe is not that I'll enjoy the new Kathryn Bigelow picture, but I gotta see it eventually anyway and who knows how long it'll play, so alright, leaving now to go see --

#314, or #2276, 2025's "A House of Dynamite."

#314 #2276
in reply to Alex Daily!

🧨 #314: "A House of Dynamite" (2025), no spoilers beyond the premise level but my wording here might be quite worrying out of the context that it's about a movie

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧨 #314: "A House of Dynamite" (2025), no spoilers beyond the premise level but my wording here might be quite worrying out of the context that it's about a movie

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧨 #314: "A House of Dynamite" (2025), no spoilers beyond the premise level but my wording here might be quite worrying out of the context that it's about a movie

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Do you see the problem here?

It’s tense, it’s well-made, but each section is just… already pretty complete, and the second and third never really escalate or provide meaningful additional information, while doubling up on quite a lot. Every act has a guy who’s scared, somebody who makes a call to somebody who they’re worried about, etcetera.

If you watch this and there’s a power cut right after the first act, I’d honestly say you’re good.

A polite three stars.

in reply to Alex Daily!

All day I've been trying to get my eyes into this configuration, and I don't think it's happening, so let's find out how Tom Cruise and/or Nicole Kidman get their --

#315, or #2277, 1999 Stanley Kubrick picture "Eyes Wide Shut."

#315 #2277
in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

👀 #315: "Eyes Wide Shut" (1999)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

You're telling me there's a guy hiding in the shadows of Gotham who punches crime... while dressed like a bat? Preposterous. Leaving now to go see --

#316, or #2278, 2005's "Batman Begins."

#316 #2278
in reply to Alex Daily!

”I’m Batman.”

I was never that big on these. Some of that is that I was an idiot — this one wants you to take it seriously, but it’s also pretty silly when it wants to be and nowhere near as dark and/or gritty as I might once have told you with confidence that I thought it was — but it’s also just that it doesn’t quite emphasise the elements I like about the Bat-Man.

(His detective work here is limited to yelling at people and using one nightvision periscope gadget to scope out the Narrows.)

in reply to Alex Daily!

With time and shifting context, living in a world where this is no longer the dominant view of the Bat-Man, I suppose I’ve come to appreciate these. This one has some issues — the white man appropriating an Orientalist cliché identity sure trains the other white man in the way of the ninja, the Narrows never feel like a real place — but overall, I think it’s a pretty succesful boiling down of the Bat-Man idea to something audiences in 2005 would connect with, even if it took me a little longer.
in reply to Alex Daily!

(Where’s Wayne Manor supposed to be, exactly? Somewhere between the one intersection of New York they ever show in "Eyes Wide Shut" and rural England?)

(Given how often he falls off and into things, are we sure his fear is of bats and not of heights, canyons, pits? Maybe he should dress like a well and call himself the Pitmaster.)

in reply to David 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️NB they/them

@SailorDisco 2022's "The Batman" gets a lot closer, but it's still, you know, a modern superhero movie, and yeah, I'd love for it to be stripped all the way back down to what exists in 1939/1940.
in reply to Alex Daily!

This is one of those movies people are always surprised to learn I've never seen, it's --

#317, or #2279, 1993 Henry Selick film "The Nightmare Before Christmas."

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

I've obviously picked up on a lot of it through cultural osmosis, I've seen my brother play the "Nightmare Before Christmas" bit of "Kingdom Hearts 2," I might've caught bits of it on TV, but I've never sat down to watch it before.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I'm also definitely watching it too early in the year, but c'est la mort.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

re: 🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to 🇹 Ti

re: 🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

re: 🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to 🇹 Ti

re: 🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

re: 🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

re: 🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to 🇹 Ti

re: 🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

Alex Daily! reshared this.

in reply to Alex Daily!

re: 🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎄💀 #317: "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (1993)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

What if there was a Sneak Preview, would that be fucked up or what, leaving now, #318, or #2280.

Guesses: “The Smashing Machine” or “After the Hunt,” both of which are from companies that do Sneak Preview and both of which are out in America already.

#318 #2280
in reply to Alex Daily!

Sneak Preview was 2025 French picture "Le Répondeur," or "Guess Who's Calling!"

A famous but distracted writer hires a talented but unsuccessful impressionist to pretend to be him on the phone.

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

It ends up at “light dramedy” more than you’d maybe expect from that premise, and never really goes that broad or that outrageous, when it easily could have and probably should have. Instead of falling into big, silly misunderstandings, everyone is largely pretty agreeable and reasonable, and everything works out fine.
This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

I never knew if the peach was giant or the James simply remarkably small. Anyway, it's --

#319, or #2281, 1996 Henry Selick film "James and the Giant Peach."

#319 #2281
in reply to Alex Daily!

Oh, live-action segment. I guess the James gets shrunk down.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Obviously the animation is as good as it gets, and I appreciate how bugnuts goofy big the ending goes, but I dislike Roald Dahl even more than I'm kind of over early Burton, so, eh.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

🍑👦 #319: "James and the Giant Peach" (1996)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Haven't seen "The Commandment" through "The Nine Commandments," but I understand Mr B. DeMille crammed all ten into this one, it's --

#320, or #2282, 1956 Best Picture nominee "The Ten Commandments."

#320 #2282
in reply to Alex Daily!

Love when directors walk on screen to talk to you for a sec before the movie. I don't necessarily need to hear any of this, but, like, hi Cecil.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Some things up front:
* I'm not a big religion person, it all just doesn't really have that much to do with me.
* The actual ten commandments could maybe stand to be edited down a little.
* I understand this is an American Easter TV classic, please understand that I do not and can not share your nostalgia.

So far it does seem very earnest, which is a thing I like.

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Intermission.

(I'm gonna go do some groceries real quick, be right back.)

in reply to Alex Daily!

I return now to the second half of 1956's "The Ten Commandments," or, "Moses II: This Time It's Personal."
in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🏜️ #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Eliot Lash

🔥🌳 #320: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

George Carlin had a good bit where he edited the Ten Commandments down to Two.
youtube.com/watch?v=jTb6YGciI2…

Alex Daily! reshared this.

in reply to Alex Daily!

The word “straf” means “punishment,” but in this case specifically the kind a kid gets, say, in school, so, writing lines, detention, that kind of thing. Leaving now to go see —

#321, or #2283, 2025 Dutch comedy “Straf.”

#321 #2283
in reply to Alex Daily!

Beset-upon high school music teacher Edwin has no control over his life, his students, or anything at all. After a string of humiliations, the new kid putting a lock on his bike is his breaking point, and Ed hits him in the head. With a sausage. Armed with footage of the assault, the new kid starts to blackmail him, so Ed turns to alpha male dingaling gym teacher Peter (and his intern, breakout character Melchior) to help him fight back.

Things escalate. There’s a dognapping.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Funny! Less crude and rude than some of the other Dutch comedies I’ve seen, and a lot more comfortable just relying on the strength of strong performers in an outrageous situation.
in reply to Alex Daily!

And, speaking as somebody who’s taught Dutch high school, every type of personality running around in this is extremely real and recognisable. Obviously I’ve not had to deal with blackmail or drug dealers, and I have far more control over my classroom than Ed does, but I’ve known that principal, I’ve worked with people who were just like that, I’ve taught those kids. Very real, in a very funny way.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I know nothing about this except that it's notorious and that Justin McElroy has seen it at least seven times, it's --

#322, or #2284, 2001 Henry Selick picture "Monkeybone."

#322 #2284
in reply to Alex Daily!

Oh, the Brendan Fraser character is a cartoonist. ...He's alright as a specific kind of very late-90s artist, but it's not really the kind of thing I read.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Look, I don't want this to sound like I'm defending 2001's "Monkeybone," a bad movie that's a genuine mess, and ill-advised on most levels.

But it's a work of art, gloriously obscene, and will probably end up being my favourite Henry Selick flick.

in reply to Alex Daily!

I think it's trying too hard to be edgy and adult and if it focused on being weird and wacky (let's say in the vein of beetlejuice) that would make it like 20% more watchable in my estimation
in reply to brendan (#39C3に行こう)

@bnys Yeah, "Beetlejuice" is the comparison here, "Beetlejuice" is the version of "Monkeybone" that works, in that it commits to actual character arcs, in that the other world makes some sense, and that it eases you into its big ideas far smoother.

I wonder what a director's cut could do for "Monkeybone."

in reply to Alex Daily!

🐵🦴 #322: "Monkeybone" (2001)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

My argument is that the fundamental problem with this one is the insistence on doing the Dark Phoenix Saga at all, it's --

#323, or #2285, 2006's "X-Men: The Last Stand."

#323 #2285
in reply to Alex Daily!

Mandatory de-aging acknowledgment post:
* Looks better on Stewart than on McKellen.
* Looks, frankly, better than a lot of modern de-aging.
* Still looks weird, though.
in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

2006's "X-Men: The Last Stand" is really not as bad as people make it out to be, by which I mean, yeah, it’s an absolutely catastrophic emotional core implosion, thousands dead in its wake, but many of the individual bits are quite watchable.
in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

:xmen: #323: "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

It’s the movie that gave the most boring person you know a Halloween costume for at least five consecutive years, leaving now to go see —

#324, or #2286, 2008’s “The Dark Knight.”

#324 #2286
in reply to Alex Daily!

Some of what’s hokey here has aged a little sillily, and the Bat-Man’s detective work approaches something closer to a baseball game where his body is the, well, you know, but coming at this, again, so far removed from its immediate impact, it’s hard to deny this is: Pretty good.
in reply to Alex Daily!

The Ledger performance is just electric, exerting a gravitational pull on the rest of the film that there’s just nothing else like in the superhero sphere. Every Joker performance after this has to define itself in relation to this one, almost universally to the later films’ detriment.
in reply to Alex Daily!

An underappreciated element here is that whenever this Joker is off-screen, he just doesn’t exist, I think. Joaquin Phoenix tries to play a Joker with a full interiority, an inner life, like he’s a guy who might a year ago have gone to work somewhere, but this guy, this Joker, is so completely separate from all that. There’s no interiority. There’s no off-screen life. There’s just the chaos he exerts.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I remember trying to watch that movie, and giving up partly because Joker's mouth noises grated so much on my nerves...
in reply to Anke

@anke Oh, yeah, it's a very... mouth-based performance. It's a lot of mouth.
@Anke
in reply to Sky, Cozy Goth Prince of Cats

@Anke (I mean, it's an intentional part of the sound design/acting performance, but... that'd be an interesting thing to do. Though I suspect automation would bunge everything up and I'm not sure if anyone feels up to doing a full manual mouth noise removal.)
@Anke
in reply to Sky, Cozy Goth Prince of Cats

@skysailor @anke I mean, intentionality be damned, I fiddle with the brightness settings in VLC for maybe 6 out of 10 movies I watch at home?

(Not an option in the cinema, though, obviously.)

in reply to Alex Daily!

@Anke I mean, home viewing you're probably expected to adjust somewhat anyway because everyone's screen is different...

...is what I'd say if I didn't intuit that you're probably referring to the habit of many movies of making the damn movie impossible to see by making everything too damn dark.

@Anke
in reply to Sky, Cozy Goth Prince of Cats

@skysailor @anke My screen /is/ set slightly too dark, because I prioritised in my setting choices the readability of browser text (hard to adjust settings on the fly) over how dark VLC comes out (very easy to adjust settings on the fly.)

But also the movies are too dark thing, one hundred percent. What am I, a bat?

in reply to Alex Daily!

@skysailor
I don't think being a bat would help? At least I thought they couldn't see particularly well in the dark, but used echolocation, which doesn'T help with screen content...
in reply to Sky, Cozy Goth Prince of Cats

@Anke Peripheral, some movies work better artistically on mute, or with all the speaking muted. I'm trying to remember which ones, but there's some fan cuts of a couple famous films that do that.
@Anke
in reply to Sky, Cozy Goth Prince of Cats

@skysailor @anke A similar thing is, I think it's Soderbergh who suggests to study how a good movie is put together by watching it in black-and-white without the original sound, so all you get is the pacing, the editing.

*checks* It is, he's had a version of "Raiders of the Lost Ark" that's edited that way for a decade. extension765.com/blogs/soderbl…

in reply to Alex Daily!

While working, at @Lady_Noremon ’s suggestion, watched —

#325, or #2287, 1936’s “Murder at Glen Athol.”

:youtube: 🔗 youtube.com/watch?v=AFPcpIeRYA…

in reply to Alex Daily!

Though Glen Athol appears to be a South African suburb, this could be set just about anywhere but down the road from me. And though the characters and titular murder mystery are, really, similarly thin, surface-level stuff, the dynamic between the bothered detective and the people at the party — and with his retired boxer housekeeper — is watchable enough that, though this is clearly on the low, low, cheaper end of 1936 cinema, I wouldn’t say I had a bad time.
in reply to Alex Daily!

There obviously aren’t, but if you told me there were ten movies about this detective and his retired boxer housekeeper, I’d want to believe you.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Pretty much! I had to look up during the first seen that this wasn't a sequel or such because it seemed like there was more history between them than just the set-up
in reply to Alex Daily!

The movie that dares to ask, what if there was a night of the living dead, the living dead went away for a while, and then there was --

#326, or #2288, 1985's "The Return of the Living Dead."

#326 #2288
in reply to Alex Daily!

"The events portrayed in this film are all true. The names are real names of real people and real organisations."

alright calm down

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Big and gnarly and gross and a lot of fun.

Noting that I'm saying this in the context of having seen all the Romeros, one of the better followups to "Night."

in reply to Alex Daily!

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

in reply to pending handle 🎏

🧟 #326: "The Return of the Living Dead" (1985)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

Wait I was wrong, there aren't three sequels to Night of the Living Dead, I got confused by Zombi 2 the *other* sequel to Dawn of the Dead.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Isn't it like the '''official''' sequel to the Italian version of Dawn of the Dead, though? I thought like whoever had the distribution rights in Italy made Zombi 2 or some nonsense like that.
in reply to pending handle 🎏

@kurt I think that's the situation, yeah, but that doesn't make it an official sequel to "Dawn."
in reply to Alex Daily!

@kurt "Zombi 2" is a sequel to "Zombi," which is to "Dawn" what "Power Rangers" is to "Super Sentai."

A season of "Power Rangers" structurally can't, I think, be a sequel to a season of "Super Sentai."

in reply to Alex Daily!

Sneak Preview? Sneak Preview.

Leaving now. #327, or #2289.

Filing one (1) guess: Hoping for "Bugonia," because that's one that would be: Funny to spring on the Sneak Preview crowd.

#327 #2289
in reply to Alex Daily!

Sneak Preview was 2025’s "The Occupant," a movie that came out in other places a few months ago, but still only has 324 reviews on Letterboxd.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Abby (Ella Balinska, who really nails it here) takes a job in the Georgian wilderness (the country of Georgia) to fund her sister’s expensive cancer treatments, but when she has to go home quite suddenly and her helicopter crashes, she finds the Georgian wilderness to be the wrong amount of hiking away from her sister.
in reply to Alex Daily!

A voice on her radio (Rob Delaney) is her only company for the first hour or so — it’s a lot of hiking through the Georgian wilderness — after which the picture takes the kind of turn that, if I did it, people would tell me was “inaccessible” and “makes sense in your head but not out of it.” And maybe that is, or once was, true about my own work, but this does it gorgeously. Fully saw it coming and still really dug the execution.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I could nitpick this to death, I could file a thousand notes, but in the end, gorgeously shot, gorgeous twist, great actor at the core to drag you along, I enjoyed this one.
in reply to Alex Daily!

For a few years now my contrarian hot take has been that this is the best of these three movies, let’s walk through a storm to find out if that take holds up, leaving now to go see —

#328, or #2290, 2012’s “The Dark Knight Rises.”

#328 #2290
in reply to Alex Daily!

I used to say this was my favourite one of these because it did more of the things I want from a Bat-Man movie. Revisiting it now, 2200+ movies since I last saw it, that take doesn’t hold up. It’s actually "Batman Begins" that gets closest to all that.

But this one is still my favourite of the three, because it’s where the Christopher Nolan who made "Memento" hands the series over to the Christopher Nolan who made "Inception", and who is about to make "Interstellar."

in reply to Alex Daily!

Obviously this one doesn’t go into anyone’s dreamscape or save humanity with the power of love through bookcases, but in the sense of, this is a tremendously well-constructed, beautiful, handmade metal box that enjoys showing you how it’s put together.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Opening sequence obviously slaps, but it also never stops giving you cool sequences that rule.

I kind of think a dozen actors could’ve done a great Bane here, but Tom Hardy is a /really great Bane/.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Gotham and Wayne Manor look totally different, and the Occupy stuff has aged a little weirdly, especially with how it intersects with the cop stuff, but I’d much rather these things be so passionately of their time than have them stuck married to an irrelevant past, or, worse, unmoored in a timeless void.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I no longer think Detective Blake being called Robin is stupid, I now think it’s a little silly but in a way that makes me smile.
in reply to Alex Daily!

I think it is underrated, and Tom Hardy had huge boots to fill after Heath's Joker and he did admirably.

Also the opening sequence is incredible.

in reply to Santa Sponge Has Moved🏳️‍🌈⛄⛄

@retrosponge The thing about the Heath Ledger Joker is only Heath Ledger could've done that, and the film might fall apart entirely without a performance that strong to hold it up, while probably a dozen actors could've done a great Bane that really worked in this.

But the Tom Hardy Bane we got /rules/.

in reply to Alex Daily!

It's the movie that dares to ask, what if Emma Stone bald, leaving now to go see --

#329, or #2291, 2025's "Bugonia."

#329 #2291
in reply to Alex Daily!

Hm, grim! Funny, though. But in that Yorgos Lanthimos way.

Think this might be one I need to sit with for a few days to let my thoughts settle, but regardless of where I land on it exactly, good movie, well made, great central performances.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Remember “The Black Phone,” a movie about a haunted landline that also wanted to be about the Grabber, a kidnapper who wears a mask, but didn’t really do anything to really connect those two ideas besides the landline being in the Grabber’s basement? Yeah, I know.

Anyway, leaving now to go see —

#330, or #2292, 2025’s “Black Phone 2.”

#330 #2292
in reply to Alex Daily!

Went to see this knowing very little about it and, frankly, somewhat begrudgingly, because I found the first one messy, overcrowded, and, frankly, a little stupid. What could they possibly do with it to make me care?
in reply to Alex Daily!

Dear reader, they made the Grabber into Camp Crystal Lake's Frederick Krueger On Ice!, and it rules.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Every now and then it gets a little eyeroll-y, and it fully screeches to a halt when they have to catch the dad up in the third act, but then the climax absolutely honks and slaps, so, yeah, a good time at the movies.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Let's wrap up Selick so next month I can start Danny Boyle fairly cleanly, it's --

#331, or #2293, 2022's "Wendell & Wild."

#331 #2293
in reply to Alex Daily!

So far, not really clicked with Henry Selick. Part of that is that with the exception of "Monkeybone," which rules, the films are pretty child-aimed, and I'm 34, but a /bigger/ part of it, I guess, is.

Every Selick film except "Monkeybone" sort of surrenders itself to a source material or influential producer's aesthetic. "Nightmare" is a Tim Burton thing, "Peach" is Dahl, "Coraline" is a Gaiman confession, and all three of those are aesthetics I'm not necessarily... that interested in.

in reply to Alex Daily!

But this one was very much promoted as Selick by way of Peele, which I'm a lot more interested in.
in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #331: "Wendell & Wild" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #331: "Wendell & Wild" (2022)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

I guess I should get a little more horror in before Halloween, it's --

#332, or #2294, 1936's "The Walking Dead."

#332 #2294
in reply to Alex Daily!

I don't know what this one's about but I don't think it's about zombies.
in reply to Alex Daily!

So far it's mostly about mobsters upset about a judge sentencing one of their buddies to ten years for misappropriation of funds.
in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💀 #332: "The Walking Dead" (1936)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Pretty simple mobster sci-fi -- Karloff gets framed for murder, Karloff gets executed and resurrected, Karloff takes his thematically relevant revenge -- but Karloff and his beautiful face, lovely eyes absolutely nail it, obviously.
in reply to pending handle 🎏

@kurt He's going to make you an offer of a plate of brains you can't refuse, because you're a zombie and all you want is to eat brains.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Time to figure out how in Hades I'm gonna Post my way through --

#333, or #2295, 1982's "Koyaanisqatsi."

#333 #2295
in reply to Alex Daily!

Here's my understanding of 1982's "Koyaanisqatsi."

* 86-minute video poem. No dialogue, just images and a Philip Glass score.
* Title means "life out of balance," a theme it tries to sell you on by juxtaposing footage of nature with footage of life in cities etc.
* Title fun to say.

in reply to Alex Daily!

It is, I understand, well-liked, and sort of iconic as an 80s experimental documentary, but people have yet to describe the premise of 1982's "Koyaanisqatsi" to me in a way that doesn't sound like 2020 humanity is a virus dingaling shit to me.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Really, I'm only watching this because Blank Check have done it.
in reply to Alex Daily!

> if blank check jumped off a bridge etc

well they're not likely to cover the experience of jumping off a bridge in a way I can log on letterboxd are they

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

one my teachers in high school showed this to one of my classes, and the students hated it. he then asked us to write a 4-page paper with very little guidance so most of the students just ripped into the film. this was a class that struggled to participate in discussions so the teacher was relieved that everyone finally had something to say lmao
in reply to Advent of Clod

@wallhackio lmao, yeah, you gotta know your audience, if you don't click with it this is just meaningless collage
in reply to Alex Daily!

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Targea Caramar 🇨🇴

🎥 #333: "Koyaanisqatsi" (1982)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

I mean...

- letterboxd.com/film/the-bridge…
- letterboxd.com/film/its-a-wond…
- letterboxd.com/film/better-off…
- letterboxd.com/film/the-girl-o…

And we're not even counting all the movies where someone jumps off a bridge onto a truck that happens to be carrying a load of pillows, particularly soft trash, mattresses, or all sorts.

in reply to pending handle 🎏

@kurt alright, true

I was gonna say, they're rarely from the POV of the jumper, but no, I did watch that happen somewhere recently, though I forget where.

in reply to Alex Daily!

The hints for the October 2025 Mystery Classic are:
* Dit hebben we vorig jaar dubbel gedraaid... (We played this double last year...)
* Met driedubbel kijken we wel uit... (We'll watch out for a third time...)

So I’m as sure as I’ve ever been what the Mystery Classic is, which is to say, leaving now to probably go see 1988’s “Beetlejuice.”

#334, or #2296.

#334 #2296
in reply to Alex Daily!

Obviously it was "Beetlejuice."

I said the other day I was kind of over Tim Burton, that he was never really my jam to begin with, and that I was in no hurry to revisit his aesthetic sensibilities, but here I did again enjoy his usual bullshit.

in reply to Alex Daily!

But I guess it's because it's /not/ his usual bullshit -- here the Hot Topic Strange And Unusual Corpsefucker thing is /meant/ to be an attack on the senses, it's meant to overwhelm first this normal couple who something awful happens to, and then the people who buy their house. It's tactically deployed.

Aged a little unpleasantly, but still, fun, enjoyed it.

in reply to Alex Daily!

The election means I can't focus on shit, so let's just watch --

#335, or #2297, 1988's "Powaqqatsi."

#335 #2297
in reply to Alex Daily!

wild to add George Lucas to the "Francis Ford Coppola presents" card.
in reply to Alex Daily!

The theme of a "parasitic way of life" may be a little easier to swallow than "Koyaanisqatsi"'s "life out of balance" just because, like, yeah, the bodies of human beings being considered a burnable resource by capitalism, that feels truer than "microchips are like cities and for life to be a microchip that's bad."

(I liked "Koyaanisqatsi" a lot but disagreed with its theme.)

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌐 #335: "Powaqqatsi" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌐 #335: "Powaqqatsi" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌐 #335: "Powaqqatsi" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌐 #335: "Powaqqatsi" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌐 #335: "Powaqqatsi" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌐 #335: "Powaqqatsi" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🌐 #335: "Powaqqatsi" (1988)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Hard to pull off the same basic thing twice, but the Glass score here rules.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Average American has to drive 6 to 48 hours, but the average European (me, Alex Daily) only has to walk 15 minutes, to see —

#336, or #2298, 2025 Guillermo del Toro picture “Frankenstein.”

#336 #2298
in reply to Alex Daily!

Hey, that's a pretty good "Frankenstein"!

Doesn't beat out my fondness for the Cumberbatch/Miller play as my favourite "Frankenstein" -- though I confess I've not seen that many -- because ultimately this one is just a little messier and more cluttered than it really ought-a be, but still, does a damn good job at it.

Isaac good, Elordi unbelievably good. And looks gorgeous.

in reply to Alex Daily!

Afterwards my brother went "that really seems like a Christoph Waltz role, but it's not him, so who was that" so I guess Christoph Waltz really disappears into his role, too.
in reply to Alex Daily!

Chiming in to say that the Miller/Cumberbatch one is really good and probably my favorite too!
in reply to kev

@kev Just a great production that'll loom large for me for a long time!

(I only saw the Cumberbatch as the Creature version, but I scrolled through enough of the Miller Creature version that, like, I don't think I /could/ have a clear favourite of the two.)

@kev
in reply to Alex Daily!

I don't know how much I'll have to say about a third one of these in such short succession, but okay, it's --

#337, or #2299, 2002's "Naqoyqatsi."

#337 #2299
in reply to Alex Daily!

I'm already getting the feeling letting Godfrey touch the 2002 3D modeling software may have been a mistake on this one.
in reply to Alex Daily!

i'm not logging all these 1-second early shorts he's chucked in here separately on letterboxd
in reply to Alex Daily!

there's stuff here that might've worked if left untouched by 2002 filters and graphics, but the artificiality of those effects is what ties all of this together, and it drags it all down straight to the basement

this must've seemed novel at the time

in reply to Alex Daily!

💥 #337: "Naqoyqatsi" (2002)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💥 #337: "Naqoyqatsi" (2002)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💥 #337: "Naqoyqatsi" (2002)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💥 #337: "Naqoyqatsi" (2002)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💥 #337: "Naqoyqatsi" (2002)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💥 #337: "Naqoyqatsi" (2002)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💥 #337: "Naqoyqatsi" (2002)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💥 #337: "Naqoyqatsi" (2002)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💥 #337: "Naqoyqatsi" (2002)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💥 #337: "Naqoyqatsi" (2002)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

💥 #337: "Naqoyqatsi" (2002)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

after I really connected with "Koyaanisqatsi," a real shame to end so frustratingly on one that really doesn't do it for me.
in reply to Alex Daily!

yeah I've seen all three of these movies, I really love koyaanisqatsi. It feels like a lot of the techniques they're using in that movie like timelapse photography, etc. become pretty commonplace and mundane, like you see on the tv news report or whatever. I'm not actually sure when this sort of thing was pioneered, but it does seem like these sorts of effects would have been a lot more unique at the time the movie first came out. Banger glass soundtrack too.
in reply to Alex Daily!

The director of this sent me a screener, which I'm pretty sure officially makes me an influencer of some kind, even though an identical email almost certainly went to literally any ol' fucker, it's --

#338, or #2300, 2025's "Don't Trip."

#338 #2300
in reply to Alex Daily!

I know nothing about this, but here's the description of it on Letterboxd: "After getting fired from his assistant job, a young struggling screenwriter hatches a plan to befriend a powerful producer’s troubled nepo-baby son in order to sell his screenplay. But when the nepo-baby learns of his plan things go awry."
in reply to Alex Daily!

If anyone else wants to hit me up with a screener of their real movie they made, my email is on my website.
in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

🎬🔪 #338: "Don't Trip" (2025)

Sensitive content

in reply to Alex Daily!

Wobbly, and leaves a lot to be desired in places. But I've seen far worse debut features, I've seen far worse straight-to-Tubi flicks.
in reply to Alex Daily!

This concludes the October 2025 #MovieThread.

:beepboopone: Next thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/115475262…


#MovieThread VI: The Past Is An Undiscovered Country, Chapter Eleven — November Edition

From 2020 to 2024 I watched 1962 movies.
In 2025 so far I've watched another 338, for a total of 2300 movies.

This month:
* Danny Boyle.
* Men in Black.
* Probably some Planet of the Apes.

:beepboopone: Previous thread: beepboop.one/@Alexis/115310169…


This entry was edited (1 month ago)