Skip to main content


in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

Volunteer Japanese firefighters, elite trained firefighters, fighting Canadian Wildfire Catastrophe, say the fire destruction is UNLIKE any fire they've fought.

"We always walk forward fighting fire, a steady kiliometer after kilometre" but constant deep climate heat has made roots kindling dry, "we are going a tenth as fast putting out roots"

Canada has burned, is burning, more than 30 million hectares in 30 months.
Bigger than Scotland, and Ireland combined.

#warning #climate

in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

The framing of the problem is sub-optimal, at least for effect, also.

A variety of people are running companies doing things which will, stochastically, kill a few of you, more of your children, many of your grandchildren, perhaps all of their children, and doing so for money.
Others are paid to distract you from saving your descendants.

Tends to make people think there are relatively small corrections available earlier in the process.

in reply to Mike Weston

@mweston unfortunately not in its current iteration. My experience, sadly, is that this is a judgy and often hostile echo chamber. I feel regulation is needed to change social media.
in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

I'm sorry that is your experience, and am grateful that it is not mine (well, sometimes judgy, but mostly in the direction I prefer, so harder to notice).

Is it not at least better than the Facebooks, etc. of the world?

in reply to Mike Weston

@mweston unfortunately this is the worst platform for friendly fire, much of it mansplaining (i.e. men who are not experts in either climate or scicomm wanting to lecture me on the science and/or communication of climate). Facebook has more trolls for sure, but it's emotionally easier to deal with that type of hate than attacks from people who agree with you about climate science but want to fight about other things like "how you said it" and "why you didn't say X instead" 😢
in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

@mweston

That’s so bad 😢

Thank you for hanging in there and still being around for the rest of us 💛

in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

@mweston How exactly would regulation change social media? Right now regulation is either trying to ban kids from social media, or ban opinions the people in power do not like.

The only regulation that could improve social media would be a guarantee of free speech there, but who in power would do that?

in reply to mike805

@mike805 @mweston I'm also curious about this. The problems with the Fediverse described in this thread are real, but I'm at a loss to imagine how they could be solved with regulation.
in reply to mike805

@mike805 Ban advertising, collection of data about users, algorithms, etc., none of which will ever happen for corporate social media, unless I guess it wasn't free.

Maybe I should get around to actually reading @pluralistic 's book, since there might be more ideas there. #enshittification

in reply to Mike Weston

@mweston @mike805 @pluralistic
RE
Ban #advertising, collection of data about users, #algorithms....

Well, that would be nice, but we just gotta find the good in the #enshitification and the #PlatformDecay

Oct 31 2025
#CoryDoctorow joins #StephanieRuhle to discuss his new book, "Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It"

⭕see next post for the 7min VIDEO

in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

Yes, there is always hope!
I'm amazed that any survey (except maybe those funded by the oil, gas, and plastics industries) would show decreased concern, even as the evidence is swallowing us. I wonder if maybe people are confusing climate change with one of its symptoms - volatile weather - and think "I don't live on a low-laying coastline, what do I have to worry about?"
in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

The fossil industry has known since the 70's of the past century that burning carbon based fuels will heat up our atmosphere. They spent billions - not fighting global warming - but fighting information.
Privately owned media outlets are a problem when they end up concentrated in just a few hands - as it's happening in the US.

As long as politicians and media can be bought, that will not change. When elections are won by the wealthiest candidates, democracy is lost!

in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

The algorithms were polarizing people before 2022, too. We're "just" "distracted" by war. No need to pathologize this.
in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

In Australia the Labor Party, our union based party, is in power &
- supporting renewable electricity transition
- supporting coal & gas extraction
- in favor of mining etc far more than the environment
So no major party wants to argue for actual climate action & the Labor Party work very hard to marginalise & discredit the Greens. Greens get 12% primary vote, in our fully preferential/instant running off system & are a substantial Senate bloc.
So there are widespread big forces working to make people not worry about climate.
Of course the kids are worried about it, but that's considered a mental health issue☹️
in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

I feel so ashamed about my country.

And so frightened for the world.

N.B. Brazil is really outstanding.

in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

I find it surprising at least regarding EU countries, because those numbers are not in line with the last Eurobarometer survey about climate change, showing that the concern has increased compared with two years ago: europa.eu/eurobarometer/survey…
in reply to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe

this is such an important point! Concern alone does not result in action.

caring + confidence = action

in reply to Bri - for people & planet 💖

@brichapman And also recognition that individual actions *do* have an impact.

Perhaps not a large one, mind; but non-zero! And even small non-zero values start adding up when you get a lot of them.

Small personal steps might not get us all the way, but they are something that it is in almost anyone's personal power to do without waiting for anyone else to do anything. That alone makes them worthwhile IMO.

michael.kjorling.se/blog/2025/…

@kathhayhoe

in reply to mkj

@mkj 100%. I would also say that people sometimes think about individual choices being only something that happens “outside of work” but our work-related choices can have huge climate impact. While some of us don’t have a lot of say at work, some of us DO have a lot of say at work. So for some people they can make a massive impact by making climate friendly choices at work.
@mkj
in reply to Bri - for people & planet 💖

@brichapman Exactly! Or like I note in the blog post: just because we have to go along with *some* doesn't mean we have to go all in with the worst. Even when the choice isn't *all* our own, it's exceedingly rare for one to be in a position where individual choices and actions have *no* impact whatsoever.

Alone, it might not get us all the way. It probably won't, actually. But it's something which is in our individual power to do something with and about.

(I refuse to give up.)

@kathhayhoe