Most uncomplicated Printer that just works™?


Hey, sorry if this isn't the right place to ask this (feel free to show me the way). I want to get myself a printer that can also scan. Main purpose is to not have endless sheets of paper laying around, but to scan Documents I recieve and then throwing them away so that I only have them digitally and can print stuff out only when I need them.
Now I know that printers are the worst piece of hardware known to man and my needs not office-level.It doesn't have to have any more buttons or features than are needed to scan a doublesided document and print them, without clogging/eating paper, and print black and white text without complaining about being low on yellow ink.

So my question generally is: what is the most minimalist, non-bullshit printer/scanner that I could get?
But since all my devices run Linux I figured I'd just ask this here. Are there any big issues I have to look out for? Brands to avoid? (i.e nvidia being a no go for a lot of linux users) Preferably

in reply to Cinnamon3431

I've had fantastic luck with a Brother MFC b&w laser. Aftermarket toner cartridges are $20 and last a ridiculously long time. The wifi is jank so I'd recommend keeping it connected to your computer via USB, but I was able to get it running on a CUPS server via a Pi easily enough, and brother does make Linux drivers available.
in reply to empireOfLove

I have a Brother MFC Color Laser and everything here is true for the color version as well. I haven't had too many issues with wifi jank after I set a static ip both on the router side and the printer side, and then map the printer by ip port on the computer. However, it still acts up every now and then. I plan on fishing some ethernet to that corner of the office, but haven't gotten around to it yet.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

Personally I'd keep them separate unless space is an issue.

For a scanner I like my Cannon LiDE 110 It just works with simplescan. For printers, any laser that supports PCL or Postscript should be fine. I'd recommend Lexmark or Brother. For black-only, I like my Lexmark B3340. I have a couple of older HP color lasers but honestly don't really use them except for printing trail maps every now and then. For color pictures (and the maps) I now use a Canon Selphy CP1300.

This entry was edited (2 years ago)
in reply to Cinnamon3431

As others have said, Brother laser printers are great. I've had mine for ~10 years, it works better on Linux than it does on Windows, and the toner cartridges last an absurdly long time. I don't print heavily but I think I'm only on my third toner cartridge since I bought the thing.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

I just have a simple Brother laser printer: It has never failed me. Not even sure what model it is but I imagine their scanners/MFPs are pretty similar.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

If you want a simple colour printer and scanner, go for a Canon Megatank or Epson Ecotank. Unless you're only printing black and white, a Brother laser printer is good, but expensive. The toner isn't cheap either, in theory tho, they can last much longer without needing to print. The tank printers have far cheaper ink. Only downside is that it requires printing once a week to ensure that nothing clogs up

Cinnamon3431 doesn't like this.

in reply to Cinnamon3431

This entry was edited (2 years ago)
in reply to Cinnamon3431

All-time classic Verge article on this subject:

theverge.com/23642073/best-pri…

in reply to Ertebolle

I have a slightly different version of this printer (HL-L2350DW) and can confirm that it just does what it is supposed to do without any issues. It pretty much worked out of the box with all devices in my household and after about two years I am still on the toner cartridge it came with.
in reply to Ertebolle

And here’s 275 words about printers I asked ChatGPT to write so this post ranks in search because Google thinks you have to pad out articles in order to demonstrate “authority,” but I am telling you to just buy whatever Brother laser printer is on sale and never think about printers again.


Lmfao

in reply to Cinnamon3431

I got two Brother laser AIOs (MFC1910W) for my folks and myself.
All I had to do on Arch was install brother-mfc-1910w for printing, brscan4 for scanning and oh-brother for (occasionally) upgrading the firmware, all over WiFi.
I think more user-friendly distros come with these packages preinstalled, so it should just be a matter of opening the printer manager and waiting for it to show up.
Don't think they make the specific model anymore, but any Brother laser AIO should do.
in reply to ikidd

Absolutely!

Not a multi function device, but a plain printer, but I have a Borther HL-2365DW connected via 2.4 GHz WiFi and that is detected as HL-L2360D. The printer works absolutely fine. It still has the original toner cartridge and it is used 3-5 times a year without any issues.

Before that I had a HL-2030 that died after ~14 years.

in reply to Cinnamon3431

I'm happy with my Epson ET-2820. It is a wireless inkjet printer, but it uses ink from bottles what is not that expensive. The printer hasn't dried up, yet.

The device works with the generic CUPS "driverless" printer driver, so no configuration on Linux computers to print. Scanning worked out of the box, too with sane.

tl;dr: most flawless working printer I ever owned.

in reply to Cinnamon3431

Our Samsung color laser AIO was getting flaky, especially for net access. I replaced it with an Epson EcoTank AIO and it's been absolutely hassle-free.

I was apprehensive at first, because using inkjet printers back in the 90s was just painful. But so far, never had clogging and hardly ever had a paper jam. I'd say the running costs are comparable or lower than laser.

Color laser printers always run out of yellow because they inline a yellow fingerprint. AFAIK this isn't the case with inkjets. So savings and additional privacy there.

in reply to Cinnamon3431

A Brother laser. If buying today, I would get a document feeder, duplexing, and wireless. The $150ish version is fine for home use. Mine lacks wireless so we use special software to add it that adds a step. But it just works and only needs a new toner ever couple years at our printing pace.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

Everyone is saying Brother, and I'll echo that. I want to add that I'm fond of their EcoTank line; there're all-in-one scanner/printers, but also they refill with liquid ink (as opposed to cartridges) and are super cost-effective as a result. I really like our's, and we've had it for two years; the next time I run out of ink on the Canon inkjet we (also) have, I'm just going to replace it with another EcoTank instead of buying more cartidges.

SirQuacksALot doesn't like this.