!Friendica Support inspired by the post forum.friendi.ca/display/97d67… I had a look at the servers out there that are using OStatus. There aren't many and most of them aren't in use anymore. See the list of the servers and their last post date:
- u.qdnx.org - 17.03.2024
- status.blaise.ca - 20.01.2020
- sn.1w6.org - 05.01.2023
- status.hackerposse.com - 17.03.2024
- wherethedogsare.com 01.07.2022
- nhcrossing.com - 01.07.2022
- eduposse.org - 16.07.2021
- social.pzn.lgbt - 16.05.2024
- social.arkwoodpond.info - 19.04.2022
- gs.jonkman.ca - 20.01.2024
- social.giorgiocomai.eu - 20.08.2019
- so.mctek.tk - 18.02.2024
- ost.alglab.net - 18.02.2024
- globaltech-hub.com - 12.03.2023
- gs.powerlot.net - 18.12.2019
- gnusocial.onlinetrainer.es - 20.09.2020
The ones with recent posts had no interaction at all for a long time.
Do you know any other GNU Social/Statusnet server out there that is still active? If not, then I really would appreciate to remote OStatus from Friendica. It will clean up the code by removing a lot of endpoints also we then can remove some tasks that will then be unneeded.
Salmon fields in webfinger response
You might have seen that FediTest has begun publishing test results. As a first step they're only testing webfinger. For Friendica there are lots of failures due to Salmon fields in the webfinger response. According to the spec, link relations must be either an IANA type or a URI. Friendica returns "salmon" and "magic-public-key" link relations, which are neither.From what I've read, the Salmon protocol is supposed to use URIs for these link relations. I'm guessing that the current approach is designed for compatibility with some other service that doesn't quite follow the spec either. Does anyone know if this is true, and what would break if URIs were used instead?
Should the technical violation of the webfinger spec be considered a bug?
FediTest: FediTest | FediTest first draft WebFinger results (for FediDevs meetup today)
Tio
in reply to Michael Vogel • •Friendica Support reshared this.
Michael Vogel
in reply to Tio • • •Michael Vogel
in reply to Tio • • •Tio
in reply to Michael Vogel • •Friendica Support reshared this.
Hypolite Petovan
in reply to Tio • • •Tobias
in reply to Michael Vogel • • •Michael Vogel
in reply to Tobias • • •Michael Vogel
in reply to Tobias • • •