Skip to main content

in reply to Nate

If BlueSky is so good, why do their users spend so much time trying to make Mastodon users accept them via Bridgey? It's weird.
in reply to sabreW4K3

The way I see it is that AT/BlueSky has a lot of potential as a finished ecosystem, but it's far from completed and even if it's completed well it won't be as decentralized as the other big protocols. It's still got 25x the people as something like ActivityPub or Nostr though, so I'm coming at this from the perspective that I don't necessarily want to make BlueSky my home base of decentralized protocols, but interconnectivity still would let me communicate with anybody on the bigger platforms.

Fediverse memes reshared this.

in reply to Nate

The same could be done right now with Lemmy and Reddit. But it would be a hack that's gonna be broken every time the site updates in a backward incompatible manner. Which will happen.

If the interoperability is not part of the core product, all you get is 3rd-party hacks.

in reply to sabreW4K3

Because Bridgy is opt-in, and I can't interact with Mastodon users on Bluesky unless they opt-in to Bridgy.
in reply to Nate

Another protocol is infact not good. Standardization can often be a good thing actually. Imagine if every company sold things made with their own custom screw head.
in reply to Themadbeagle

Imagine if every company had a different DVI version that looks almost the same but is incompatible with all of the others

Nima doesn't like this.

in reply to Themadbeagle

While you're right, screws are probably a bad example. There are dozens of different screw heads. Hex, torq, phillips, on and on.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Themadbeagle

This entry was edited (1 month ago)

Fediverse memes reshared this.

in reply to Nate

For biggest protocol it's also important to consider the number of instances. In that regard Activitypub is far ahead of everything else (Bluesky only consists of a single instance).

Rikudou_Sage doesn't like this.

in reply to Nate

softwares


\facepalm

don't like this

in reply to Nate

I mean, sure. In theory. But I can't really interact with people between platforms very well. If someone and I are both bridged, and I boost something on mastodon, they're not gonna see it

I'm not actually even sure if I can reply to their bridged account from my mastodon account and have their bluesky account see my reply.

Its a jank and hacky workaround for the fact that bluesky wasn't designed for interoperability with the Fediverse. I love that accounts can be bridged! But like, that's not the same as literally any other inter-platform interaction within the Fediverse. Its a tack on half-solution.

I'm happy we have it, but it's not fair to act like it's the same thing, and I can understand why people would find it frustrating.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)