Does anyone actually use Enlightenment?
One of the first wow-moments when I first installed linux (2003ish) was Enlightenment. I though it was very pretty, and quite different from the mainstream WMs. It was presented as a feature, not a bug, that development was slow: the people behind it wanted to take the time it took to get it right.
So I waited. I always installed it on new computers, but it never seemed quite ready to use.
I did the same today, and the feeling is the same as in 2003: it's not quite there yet.
Hence the question: does anyone actually use it as their everyday WM?
like this
don't like this
shu
in reply to eyolf • • •Album: e16-themes-gallery
ps.ucw.czbootyberrypancakes likes this.
eyolf
in reply to shu • • •duncesplayed likes this.
Crunkle_Foreskin
in reply to eyolf • • •Enlightenment has a fantastic feature set and some very interesting ways of using a Linux desktop.
But...the themes are just so 2005. It's hard to look past that, or at least make it a little bit 2015 at the least.
like this
metalcoder, someacnt and ZenFriedRice like this.
Dominojack doesn't like this.
eyolf
in reply to Crunkle_Foreskin • • •Crunkle_Foreskin
in reply to eyolf • • •like this
eshep, OsrsNeedsF2P and m0stlyharmless like this.
Dominojack doesn't like this.
HarriPotero
in reply to eyolf • • •My Linux journey started on fvwm2, but after that I ran enlightenment for a good few years. Probably from 1999 to 2005, when I switched to blackbox/fluxbox.
Today I expect a DE to have great integration for managing wifi/bluetooth. It wasn't needed 20 years ago, because computers didn't have these fancy things. I haven't really tried enlightenment recently, but it feels like that's where it's lacking today.
like this
XPost3000, everett and augustus672 like this.
Dohnakun
in reply to HarriPotero • • •eshep
in reply to eyolf • •like this
eyolf, everett, OsrsNeedsF2P, duncesplayed, m0stlyharmless and augustus672 like this.
Linux reshared this.
eyolf
in reply to eshep • • •Linux reshared this.
eshep
in reply to eyolf • •Linux reshared this.
gfom
in reply to eyolf • • •ike
in reply to gfom • • •Wild theory, but I wouldn't be surprised if they change to iced-rs when they realize they can't do the work needed to get elf to do exactly what they want, and instead can ride off of system76's insane development accomplishments in their new rust based ecosystem of desktop components.
Reasons it might happen: the blog post specifically mentioned wanting a new ui-toolkit that worked well with rust or go, but at that time s76 hasn't announced or dived into developing iced-rs more. I think it even mentioned hoping that s76 would build an alternative.
System doesn't like this.
neuromante
in reply to eyolf • • •eyolf likes this.