in reply to Unruffled [they/them]

For a long time the claim was that it's only terrorism when non-state actors do it. If a state does it, it's not terrorism by definition.

Then the loyal dogs in the EU declared in January that an official branch of Iran's own military is a terrorist organization, so I guess the old definition is defunct. It basically just means "outlaw" or "designated bad guy" rather than having a real definition.

in reply to Tja

western libs are smarter than global consensus, bear in mind. really, what it is, is they'll say anything so long as the money keeps moving.

the reality is of course that terrorism is any act that is intended to modify public behavior through widespread fear. here's some examples of terror states:

  • America
  • Russa
  • Israel
  • India
  • Iran

i'm POSITIVE there's more, and i'd even be willing to hear arguments that every nation today is either a terror state or subservient to a terror state.